Otherworldy Influences

Greetings Friends,

Previously I mentioned the battle between light and dark and whether you choose to believe this is entirely up to you, but if you choose the path of disbelief, then can you really call yourself awake? Because by definition you should have already considered this as a huge probability.

For centuries, there have been reports of mysterious lights in the sky, of strange objects flying about, of strange people who seem otherworldly, of craft landing and their occupants coming out. The 1561 woodcut of Nuremberg, the 1989 landing in Voronezh, or even the drawings of Alexander the Great, of objects in the sky that stopped him and his troops crossing a river during wartime. History is littered with incidents like this, Christopher Columbus was buzzed by craft, during his sail to the exploration of the Americas and 5 years previous, in his home town of Genoa, a craft landed in one of the lakes and allegedly stayed for over an hour, refuelling, while its occupants got out and busied themselves.

Later, we have numerous sightings by the missions of the Space Shuttle, with all sorts of visible goings-on, with the most (in)famous capture by STS-75 of “The Tether Incident.” where a 12-mile cable was apparently cut through, although NASA denies this, the video tells an altogether different story.

These incidents do prompt the questions of why they happened, why we were allowed to witness these things and most importantly, are we in any danger?

What’s obvious to anybody with a modicum of common sense is that we really aren’t alone and irrespective of the silence or scoffing at such notions from any department of government, apart from the few rebels who have tried to get the truth to us, like Paul Hellyer, for example, we are generally with the official response that to believe in such notions is foolhardy and irresponsible. But the evidence is there for all, with eyes to see, regardless.

"The greatest trick The Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist."

That quote can also be ascribed to the way we are mockingly told non-terrestrial life doesn’t exist and can only be sustained through certain, restrictive parameters, for example, the oft used “Goldilocks zone” of solar systems, but can we believe this? While it makes sense on a practical level, there are many factors that can blow this idea out of the water. What if the species isn’t carbon-based and is instead silica-based instead, or if the entity takes on a gaseous or gelatinous form instead, wouldn’t this alter our standard views of life?

So we can see already that our standard model of life forming and evolving suddenly goes out the window. Even if we use the Drake formula to guess at the potential amount of civilizations in our galaxy and the generous figure of 4,590 civilizations is returned, that’s a lot of species roaming around space and when we further consider cross-species integration and the subsequent flourishing of each offshoot, then the number of potential galactic civilisations could double and yet we’re told that we are all one!!

Don’t know about you but I don’t believe that for one second, so let’s consider then why we’re in the midst of mushroom syndrome (kept in the dark and fed on s**t).
If we take away the obvious reasoning that to be told there are no other lifeforms in our galaxy, the monopoly on religion would crumble overnight, that’s a start. To be told that our governments have been actively shooting down and intercepting non-terrestrial vehicles leads to the questions of why, what are the motives, where’s the debris plus occupants, are they deemed a threat...and on who’s say so?

I think most of us know the answers to those questions, but it’s more the motives as to the probable acts of hostility towards potentially peaceful visitors that intrigues me and we should consider if these motives are directed by an outside influence because as a species who’s allegedly in a massive unpopulated universe, wouldn’t we be accepting of all visitors to our planet?

The more I think on this perspective, the more I’m convinced somebody - or something is pulling the strings of decision making at the highest levels.