Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 930 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 306,098
Pageviews Today: 464,668Threads Today: 183Posts Today: 2,350
05:23 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345

 
NawtyBits  (OP)

User ID: 78033304
United States
01/26/2020 12:43 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
h/t crofsblog

[link to crofsblogs.typepad.com (secure)]

California case

a traveler from Wuhan, China, has been in contact with the HCA and was provided guidance in order to reduce exposure to the public while awaiting laboratory confirmation from the CDC. The individual has now been transported to a local hospital and is in isolation in good condition.
WWJBD-What Would Jimmy Buffett Do

"If it's wet and not yours, don't touch it." Oregon H1N1 Summit speaker
solarbliss

User ID: 76560363
United States
01/26/2020 12:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
If what I'm reading is true, in 3-4 months 34% of the people currently posting on this site will be dead.

Does that sound right?
 Quoting: Billy Ringo


No.
Not everyone gets sick, not everyone gets seriously sick, and it's highly unlikely that 1/3 of the world will be dead in a few months. Like this has the potential to get pretty bad, but not like that.
 Quoting: Feistylorax


Agreed. It may kill millions, or 10's of millions, but I can't believe that it would kill 3 billion.

Now, infrastructure and societal collapse....who knows.

If this continues the way it appears to be continuing, a lot of people who never even got nCoV will have died.

Now, before I start my daily news dump, I'm going to relax with a soak in my hot tub.

Life goes on.
 Quoting: NawtyBits


Yeah, I’m much more concerned about the economic and social fallout than the virus. The world economy has been on the brink for 12 years, and any decent-sized breakout in one of our cities will be big trouble.
 Quoting: Deplorable Revbo™


Yes. Pharmacy, all health svcs could be real bad I can't even go there. It will impact us, but how bad
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75458309
United States
01/26/2020 12:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
Since the virus started in central China and there’s a two-week incubation period, it stands to reason that the only cases would be Chinese currently. If, as you said, in another 8-10 days, all the cases are still ethnically Chinese, we could start to be suspicious that it discriminates, but I very much doubt that will be the case.
 Quoting: Deplorable Revbo™


Where did that train of thought even begin (that the virus only targets Chinese)? I agree with you, another week and we'll know for sure, but it doesn't seem likely that it would target only one ethnic group. That statement keeps popping up all over GLP but no one ever posts anything to support it other than "only Chinese people have died". To me, that's like saying that because there was a car crash in China, only Chinese people crash cars. Bad logic. Fact is, right now, we don't have enough information to make any kind of real assessment of the situation.
NawtyBits  (OP)

User ID: 78033304
United States
01/26/2020 12:52 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
[link to www.cnn.com (secure)]

China warns that coronavirus can spread before symptoms show, as death toll rises

The United States’ top infectious disease doctor wants a team of disease detectives from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to go to China and check on crucial questions about how the Wuhan coronavirus is spreading.

But there’s one problem: China first has to invite the CDC.

“Up to now, to my knowledge, we have not been invited,” said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the US National Institutes of Health.


[snip]

Ma did not explain how Chinese authorities arrived at this conclusion.

“The implications for this are so important that in my mind it’s absolutely critical that we ourselves see the data, because what goes on over there has implications for what happens here,” Fauci said.

Fauci said that CDC disease detectives would need to see precisely how Chinese health authorities have gathered their data.

“To my knowledge, we have not seen the precise minute, granular data and how they collected it,” he said. “We need to get to the real bottom line of how they collected their data and see if it’s valid.”


[snip]

He added that to his knowledge, the Chinese did not tell US health authorities that the virus could spread before someone is symptomatic, a crucial aspect of any disease investigation. He said he learned about it after reading a CNN reporter’s email.


Comment: So, the US didn't know it could be asymptomatic, it's claiming. And won't act on the info until "we see the data."

Last Edited by NawtyBits on 01/26/2020 12:53 PM
WWJBD-What Would Jimmy Buffett Do

"If it's wet and not yours, don't touch it." Oregon H1N1 Summit speaker
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78222212
United States
01/26/2020 12:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
Well, shit. There goes Plan B.

"Rumor 5: drinking can kill the virus

锡 Xin Yanxin, the leader of the pneumonia expert group for the treatment of new coronavirus infection in Hebei Province, said that the new coronavirus is indeed intolerant to alcohol, and alcohol has a good disinfection effect. However, after a person drinks alcohol, alcohol enters the bloodstream through the gastrointestinal tract and is eliminated by liver metabolism. The new type of coronavirus infection is that the virus enters the respiratory tract and causes airway and lung lesions. "After a person drinks alcohol, the content of alcohol in the airways is far from enough to kill the virus, so there is no possibility of drinking to prevent or treat new coronavirus infections. On the contrary, excessive drinking reduces the body's resistance and easily leads to more serious Infection. "Yan Xixin said."

[link to news.workercn.cn]
 Quoting: NawtyBits


Alcohol spray bottles. Use on nose neck and chest nightly. Soaks in before hitting the liver
MissCleo

User ID: 77082640
United States
01/26/2020 01:01 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
3 cases of MERS in Saudi.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78179084
United States
01/26/2020 01:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
This whole thing is worrysome. I have followed the Sars, ebola and mers outbreaks. This has a different feel to it and I'm not a panicer.
 Quoting: Deplorable Mary


I've been following Chinese-originated pandemic possibilities since the early 2000's.

Of course the numbers are way understated. Chinese hubris.

This is different. Way different. 10+ cities, 30-40 million people "quarantined". This is unprecedented in modern times. Even NOT considering the virus, the social and economic implications boggle the mind. I think China is done as a perceived superpower for quite a while. They are done as a world economic powerhouse for a long time. Just the social and economic recovery will take years. Foreign companies and countries are pulling their people out of China. It will be months or years before they can go back.

Now, add this stupid virus in to the mix, and other countries unwillingness to do the smart thing. Monitoring airports and expecting people to self-report or self-quarantine are just stupid. People suck. They will not comply. They will medicate just to get past airport checks. But, more importantly...ASYMPTOMATIC CARRIERS. FFS, how many "Mary Mallons" are coming in to the US every day. 5? 10? All it takes is ONE. FYI, Mary Mallon is better known as Typhoid Mary.

So, it feels different, because it is different. Way different. Personally, I don't see things getting better for China, the US, or the world, any time soon. Do I think this is it? The big one? The thing some people prepare for for years or decades but hope it never happens? I just don't know. Currently, for me, it's a struggle between seeing all this horrifying information, and normalcy bias- it can't happen, because it doesn't happen. (But, pandemics do happen, do kill millions. I just can't convince myself we are headed to a worse-case scenario.)

Damn. Sorry to carry on like this. As you can see, I, too, am trying to work through some shit. Putting it in writing certainly helped.

Good luck.
 Quoting: NawtyBits


Which makes this quite possibly a bioweapon. What a great way to end the trade war, huh?
NawtyBits  (OP)

User ID: 78033304
United States
01/26/2020 01:05 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
I don't want to see any anti-vax BS. This is for info only, not pro or con. This is not a debate, nor is this thread a democracy.

[link to news.bloomberglaw.com (secure)]

Coronavirus Vaccine Candidate Eyed for Human Trials by April (1)

A potential vaccine to prevent the spreading coronavirus could move into early-stage human testing in the next three months, the NIH’s infectious disease chief said.

[snip]

“The bad news is that it happened. The good news is that we have considerable experience with coronaviruses,” Anthony S. Fauci, director of the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said in an interview. “Everything we’ve learned with working with coronaviruses, with SARS and MERS, are helping us very rapidly get a jump on things with regard to this new virus.”

{snip}

Fauci said the vaccine work is the most concrete effort to date among the several countermeasures the agency is pursuing. The NIAID is collaborating with Moderna Inc., a Cambridge, Mass. biotechnology company, to use its RNA-based vaccine technology to develop a new vaccine.

“We’re already working on it. And hopefully in a period of about three months, we’ll be able to start a phase I trial in humans,” Fauci said.



Comment: weasel words to placate. Phase 1 trials in maybe 3 months. That means very little to us.
WWJBD-What Would Jimmy Buffett Do

"If it's wet and not yours, don't touch it." Oregon H1N1 Summit speaker
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78069906
Germany
01/26/2020 01:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
it’s a confirmed voice message

Voice message from a medical staff in #Wuhan. "There are more than 100,000 infected. The government provides no medical supplies... People are dying right in front of our eyes...Don't EVER trust the government. We are on our own."

[link to twitter.com (secure)]
Prayandprepare000

User ID: 74637812
United States
01/26/2020 01:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
h/t Treyfish at FT

[link to www.china-briefing.com (secure)]

Coronavirus: Latest Emergency Measures Announced by the PRC Government




China’s central government has made an announcement concerning measures designed to combat the spread of the coronavirus, which has already been identified across many Chinese cities. The key points are as follows:

*The Chinese New Year holiday period will be extended “as appropriate”. This is designed to reduce the motivation for people to travel back from their home towns to where they work during this critical period.
*The start of the upcoming semester at schools and colleges around the country will also be delayed.

[snip]

*Suzhou residents currently outside of the city – are not to return to Suzhou. Those residents currently in Suzhou shall only move around when required. For companies operating within the administrative district, staff may not come back to work before February 8. Schools may not re-open before February 17. Exceptions exist for organizations involved in providing basic services for residents (provision of water, gas, electricity etc.) and those involved in combating the spread of the virus.

*For any Suzhou residents in transit (returning to Suzhou), inspections shall be carried out on every individual at stations, ports, roads, and highway exits. All such persons shall be restricted to their homes or sent to specialist facilities for a minimum period of 14 days after their return.

*Any resident who has traveled to Hubei in the past two weeks, or those who have had physical contact with people from Hubei, or those who have had physical contact with anyone already infected with the coronavirus – are required to report to a medical center to report their health condition and have their temperature taken. They should then be restricted to their homes or go to specialist facilities for observation.

*All meetings and gatherings are to be cancelled. Group social meals of all types, whether organized by companies or individuals, are prohibited. Any pre-planned events must be cancelled or delayed. All cinemas, leisure facilities, internet cafes, saunas, etc. are to be closed. Retirement homes and rehabilitation facilities are to be locked-down.

*
 Quoting: NawtyBits


I know it is really happening and expect it to come to the USA, I just can hardly process it emotionally.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76935617
United States
01/26/2020 01:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
What concerns me is that I'm sure China is not putting out real numbers. One reason is because of the medical personel we've seen or heard breaking down over this. Medical workers are used to working long hours and they are used to seeing death and sickness. If there were only 56 deaths at this point, I don't think they would be reacting like they have been. In reality 50 something in a city of millions doesn't seem like a lot. Also they are going to great measures to block the city off.

There are confirmed cases here in the states and other places. Hopefully if others have caught it from confirmed cases in places besides China, we are given actual numbers. I'm feeling though it will be a week or so before we start hearing about it given incubation times.

This whole thing is worrysome. I have followed the Sars, ebola and mers outbreaks. This has a different feel to it and I'm not a panicer.
 Quoting: Deplorable Mary


I’m with you on this. I will also say that I know somebody who works with somebody whose mother is a physician in China not in Wuhan. the mother implored the daughter to take preparations because she really believes that it’s coming to New York where she is and it’s FAR, FAR worse than what people are being told.
Ohio chic

User ID: 78368631
United States
01/26/2020 01:10 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
If what I'm reading is true, in 3-4 months 34% of the people currently posting on this site will be dead.

Does that sound right?
 Quoting: Billy Ringo


No.
Not everyone gets sick, not everyone gets seriously sick, and it's highly unlikely that 1/3 of the world will be dead in a few months. Like this has the potential to get pretty bad, but not like that.
 Quoting: Feistylorax


Agreed. It may kill millions, or 10's of millions, but I can't believe that it would kill 3 billion.

Now, infrastructure and societal collapse....who knows.

If this continues the way it appears to be continuing, a lot of people who never even got nCoV will have died.

Now, before I start my daily news dump, I'm going to relax with a soak in my hot tub.

Life goes on.
 Quoting: NawtyBits


Yeah, I’m much more concerned about the economic and social fallout than the virus. The world economy has been on the brink for 12 years, and any decent-sized breakout in one of our cities will be big trouble.
 Quoting: Deplorable Revbo™

I’m worried about the zombies that will roaming the streets.

If I’m in my house and I’m not infected then no one else will be allowed up my driveway.

Have a box with some food, but there will also be sign time not to come past a certain point.

Anyone I bring in..IF I would, will have to stay quarantined for two weeks or more in a tent to make sure they aren’t infected.
NO! My name is NOT spelled wrong. Grab a dictionary.
Peace, Love & Prayers
God bless America
And YES. I am a nurse!

SIDE NOTE- I find articles everywhere and post what I think GLP would like to know.
I do not necessarily believe or endorse some articles I find.
So do not bash the messenger
MissCleo

User ID: 77082640
United States
01/26/2020 01:11 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
...
I know it is really happening and expect it to come to the USA, I just can hardly process it emotionally.
 Quoting: Prayandprepare000


Me too.
Same steps as grieving.

Denial
Anger
Bargaining
Depression
Acceptance (get there, get ready, prep, do it now).

I just made my last store run. Will hunker down for a week and see how things play out.
MissCleo

User ID: 77082640
United States
01/26/2020 01:12 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
...


No.
Not everyone gets sick, not everyone gets seriously sick, and it's highly unlikely that 1/3 of the world will be dead in a few months. Like this has the potential to get pretty bad, but not like that.
 Quoting: Feistylorax


Agreed. It may kill millions, or 10's of millions, but I can't believe that it would kill 3 billion.

Now, infrastructure and societal collapse....who knows.

If this continues the way it appears to be continuing, a lot of people who never even got nCoV will have died.

Now, before I start my daily news dump, I'm going to relax with a soak in my hot tub.

Life goes on.
 Quoting: NawtyBits


Yeah, I’m much more concerned about the economic and social fallout than the virus. The world economy has been on the brink for 12 years, and any decent-sized breakout in one of our cities will be big trouble.
 Quoting: Deplorable Revbo™

I’m worried about the zombies that will roaming the streets.

If I’m in my house and I’m not infected then no one else will be allowed up my driveway.

Have a box with some food, but there will also be sign time not to come past a certain point.

Anyone I bring in..IF I would, will have to stay quarantined for two weeks or more in a tent to make sure they aren’t infected.
 Quoting: Ohio chic


Yep. Set the rules now.
Sanitation stations at all entrances with warning. Learn to say "no" to even friends and family.
Lady Jayne SmithModerator
Forum Administrator

01/26/2020 01:17 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
Nawty -- been so busy, have not yet had a chance to say "Thank You" for this thread.

Thank You

grouphug
Fate whispers to the warrior

"You cannot withstand the storm"

the warrior whispers back

"I am the storm"

INTJ-A

Killer Bunny
NawtyBits  (OP)

User ID: 78033304
United States
01/26/2020 01:18 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
...


No.
Not everyone gets sick, not everyone gets seriously sick, and it's highly unlikely that 1/3 of the world will be dead in a few months. Like this has the potential to get pretty bad, but not like that.
 Quoting: Feistylorax


Agreed. It may kill millions, or 10's of millions, but I can't believe that it would kill 3 billion.

Now, infrastructure and societal collapse....who knows.

If this continues the way it appears to be continuing, a lot of people who never even got nCoV will have died.

Now, before I start my daily news dump, I'm going to relax with a soak in my hot tub.

Life goes on.
 Quoting: NawtyBits


Yeah, I’m much more concerned about the economic and social fallout than the virus. The world economy has been on the brink for 12 years, and any decent-sized breakout in one of our cities will be big trouble.
 Quoting: Deplorable Revbo™

I’m worried about the zombies that will roaming the streets.

If I’m in my house and I’m not infected then no one else will be allowed up my driveway.

Have a box with some food, but there will also be sign time not to come past a certain point.

Anyone I bring in..IF I would, will have to stay quarantined for two weeks or more in a tent to make sure they aren’t infected.

 Quoting: Ohio chic


I will use 21 days of quarantine.
WWJBD-What Would Jimmy Buffett Do

"If it's wet and not yours, don't touch it." Oregon H1N1 Summit speaker
NawtyBits  (OP)

User ID: 78033304
United States
01/26/2020 01:21 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
...
I know it is really happening and expect it to come to the USA, I just can hardly process it emotionally.
 Quoting: Prayandprepare000


Me too.
Same steps as grieving.

Denial
Anger
Bargaining
Depression
Acceptance (get there, get ready, prep, do it now).

I just made my last store run. Will hunker down for a week and see how things play out.
 Quoting: MissCleo


Surprisingly (to myself), I will make a run to town this afternoon to top off my gas tank, my generator fuel tanks, and grab some more chocolate and beer. Then, I think I'm inside for the next week or so. And see what happens.

Do I need to go to town? No, it's just my denial mixing in with my acceptance. lol
WWJBD-What Would Jimmy Buffett Do

"If it's wet and not yours, don't touch it." Oregon H1N1 Summit speaker
NawtyBits  (OP)

User ID: 78033304
United States
01/26/2020 01:24 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
Nawty -- been so busy, have not yet had a chance to say "Thank You" for this thread.

Thank You

grouphug
 Quoting: Lady Jayne Smith


You're welcome.

Admittedly, it's selfish on my part. I just process info better in my mind if I manipulate it...look for it, read it,copy it somewhere else, and read it again and again. It my way of processing all this stuff.

But, I'm certainly glad others are finding it useful.
WWJBD-What Would Jimmy Buffett Do

"If it's wet and not yours, don't touch it." Oregon H1N1 Summit speaker
Penny Peppers

User ID: 45904129
United States
01/26/2020 01:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
This whole thing is worrysome. I have followed the Sars, ebola and mers outbreaks. This has a different feel to it and I'm not a panicer.
 Quoting: Deplorable Mary


I've been following Chinese-originated pandemic possibilities since the early 2000's.

Of course the numbers are way understated. Chinese hubris.

This is different. Way different. 10+ cities, 30-40 million people "quarantined". This is unprecedented in modern times. Even NOT considering the virus, the social and economic implications boggle the mind. I think China is done as a perceived superpower for quite a while. They are done as a world economic powerhouse for a long time. Just the social and economic recovery will take years. Foreign companies and countries are pulling their people out of China. It will be months or years before they can go back.

Now, add this stupid virus in to the mix, and other countries unwillingness to do the smart thing. Monitoring airports and expecting people to self-report or self-quarantine are just stupid. People suck. They will not comply. They will medicate just to get past airport checks. But, more importantly...ASYMPTOMATIC CARRIERS. FFS, how many "Mary Mallons" are coming in to the US every day. 5? 10? All it takes is ONE. FYI, Mary Mallon is better known as Typhoid Mary.

So, it feels different, because it is different. Way different. Personally, I don't see things getting better for China, the US, or the world, any time soon. Do I think this is it? The big one? The thing some people prepare for for years or decades but hope it never happens? I just don't know. Currently, for me, it's a struggle between seeing all this horrifying information, and normalcy bias- it can't happen, because it doesn't happen. (But, pandemics do happen, do kill millions. I just can't convince myself we are headed to a worse-case scenario.)

Damn. Sorry to carry on like this. As you can see, I, too, am trying to work through some shit. Putting it in writing certainly helped.

Good luck.
 Quoting: NawtyBits


bump
There's never a dull moment here on planet earth, unless GLP ceased to exist...

Oh, and Biden can't dress himself....
gnostic9

User ID: 71056695
United States
01/26/2020 01:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
I don't understand this infectability rating at all. It makes no sense.

If it were true, that would mean that an infected person on a bus with 50 other people would only infect as many people as a person in a room with five other people.

Common sense tells me that the more people an infected person is in contact with, the more they will infect.

How can it be that anyone infected will only infect 2 or 3 people?

Someone tell me how I'm being dumb about this.


[link to translate.googleusercontent.com (secure)]

Study refers to Wuhan pneumonia 1 pass 2 or 3+ Zhong Nanshan claims fast clinical trial of new drugs


After research and analysis, many infectious disease experts concluded that Wuhan pneumonia new coronavirus can be widely transmitted from person to person and the infectious power ranges from "2" to "3+", which means one patient can be infected Two to three or more close contacts. Liang Zhuowei, director of the Li Ka Shing School of Medicine at the University of Hong Kong, described that the spread of the new coronavirus in Wuhan is not weaker than SARS. Without epidemic prevention measures, the number of patients will at least double within a week.

Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding, an epidemiologist at Harvard University in the United States, quoted a preliminary estimate yesterday (25th) that the infectivity of the new virus in Wuhan is 3.8, which is described as a thermonuclear plague. He later quoted the third edition of the latest edition of the Royal College of London, UK, saying that the estimated infectivity of the virus is 2.6, that is, one person can infect 2.6 people, the situation is extremely bad, and the epidemic will be difficult to stop. He also quoted report author Neil Ferguson on Twitter on the 25th, saying that although China and other countries have worked very hard, everyone must be prepared, "it may not be possible to stop the virus."

[snip]

In terms of mortality, Liang Zhuowei quoted experts inferring that the death rate of pneumonia in Wuhan reached 14%, that is, one death per 7 to 8 people, and the death rate of SARS was 17%.
 Quoting: NawtyBits

gnostic9
CSnow

User ID: 74827762
United States
01/26/2020 01:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
“Everything we’ve learned with working with coronaviruses, with SARS and MERS, are helping us very rapidly get a jump on things with regard to this new virus.”
 Quoting: NawtyBits


I didn't realize the label of "Coronavirus" applied to a range of viruses with similar traits. I thought "Coronavirus" was its own animal and didn't have anything to do with SARS and MERS, other than all of them being microbes.

Now I understand why the word "Coronavirus" predates the current form of that virus. That it isn't necessarily a case of Dr Evil conjuring up things in his lab.

.
Toprance1

User ID: 70287640
United States
01/26/2020 01:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
From Ian M. Mackay, PhD
@MackayIM
virologist. scientist.

"Not To Soon To Be Thinking About Preparedness.
"While nCoV2019 is definitely still in the `before a pandemic' stage - and it may never get there - now is the best time to make your plans and gather your supplies"

[link to twitter.com (secure)]
Never ever, ever, ever give up!!!
NawtyBits  (OP)

User ID: 78033304
United States
01/26/2020 01:40 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
Some random thoughts on nCoV


asymptomatic carriers

1-12 day incubation, assume at least 14 days possible

it's worse that the Chinese are publicizing

~50% CFR

~2-3% mortality

3 confirmed in US at major population centers

2 suspects, college students, at U of Mn, 2 hours from me
10s of chinese nationals, students at local university, 30 minutes away. Since college was on break, many went home for the New Year, and are back for classes now.

US gov't doesn't seem to believe there are asymptomatic carriers and want the Chinese to prove it, so airport screening will continue to be useless

I suspect the early cases in the US may have a lower R0 than now, and that may be one reason we aren't seeing H2H xmission in the US yet. However, we are barely in to the incubation period for Chicago and Cali cases

watch for power outages and blackouts in Hubei Province

Airborn...N100 or P100 respirators, gloves, droplet goggles, and tyvek overalls.

unprecedented city "closures"

areas of china "extending the holiday" so people dont have to go to work, school

watch for bank holidays in China

disturbing info leaking out of China...take with a grain of salt because it's rumors

extreme social distancing in China/ forced quarantines for some

ugh
WWJBD-What Would Jimmy Buffett Do

"If it's wet and not yours, don't touch it." Oregon H1N1 Summit speaker
Toprance1

User ID: 70287640
United States
01/26/2020 01:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
Nawty -- been so busy, have not yet had a chance to say "Thank You" for this thread.

Thank You

grouphug
 Quoting: Lady Jayne Smith


bump...Excellent job reporting accurate info...hf
Never ever, ever, ever give up!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75458309
United States
01/26/2020 01:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
Nothing will happen in the US
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76791014


Interesting, the prevalence of these types of posts in the last few days. Almost all of the "nothingburger" posts are 1-2 sentences at most, and all use much of the same basic wording, without any critical addition to the dialogue taking place.

Take note, as this poster can't possibly make that assessment with the information we currently have. None of us can. So ask yourself, why is this poster on this website? Isn't this a conspiracy theory forum? Why do we suddenly have a bunch of random posters who parrot the official line on everything? I think that answer is pretty obvious.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78372681
United States
01/26/2020 01:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
Ozone fumigation, get a ozone generator they are less than $100. It will sterilize the air and permeate porous materials defusing through clothing and even N95 masks. Ozone destroys viruses and bacteria.

Source - [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76870401
United States
01/26/2020 01:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
Since the virus started in central China and there’s a two-week incubation period, it stands to reason that the only cases would be Chinese currently. If, as you said, in another 8-10 days, all the cases are still ethnically Chinese, we could start to be suspicious that it discriminates, but I very much doubt that will be the case.
 Quoting: Deplorable Revbo™


Where did that train of thought even begin (that the virus only targets Chinese)? I agree with you, another week and we'll know for sure, but it doesn't seem likely that it would target only one ethnic group. That statement keeps popping up all over GLP but no one ever posts anything to support it other than "only Chinese people have died". To me, that's like saying that because there was a car crash in China, only Chinese people crash cars. Bad logic. Fact is, right now, we don't have enough information to make any kind of real assessment of the situation.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75458309


True, but if it is a bio-weapon, it could have been engineered to be race specific. I'm hoping that is the case.
NawtyBits  (OP)

User ID: 78033304
United States
01/26/2020 01:43 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
I don't understand this infectability rating at all. It makes no sense.

If it were true, that would mean that an infected person on a bus with 50 other people would only infect as many people as a person in a room with five other people.

Common sense tells me that the more people an infected person is in contact with, the more they will infect.

How can it be that anyone infected will only infect 2 or 3 people?

Someone tell me how I'm being dumb about this.


[link to translate.googleusercontent.com (secure)]

Study refers to Wuhan pneumonia 1 pass 2 or 3+ Zhong Nanshan claims fast clinical trial of new drugs


After research and analysis, many infectious disease experts concluded that Wuhan pneumonia new coronavirus can be widely transmitted from person to person and the infectious power ranges from "2" to "3+", which means one patient can be infected Two to three or more close contacts. Liang Zhuowei, director of the Li Ka Shing School of Medicine at the University of Hong Kong, described that the spread of the new coronavirus in Wuhan is not weaker than SARS. Without epidemic prevention measures, the number of patients will at least double within a week.

Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding, an epidemiologist at Harvard University in the United States, quoted a preliminary estimate yesterday (25th) that the infectivity of the new virus in Wuhan is 3.8, which is described as a thermonuclear plague. He later quoted the third edition of the latest edition of the Royal College of London, UK, saying that the estimated infectivity of the virus is 2.6, that is, one person can infect 2.6 people, the situation is extremely bad, and the epidemic will be difficult to stop. He also quoted report author Neil Ferguson on Twitter on the 25th, saying that although China and other countries have worked very hard, everyone must be prepared, "it may not be possible to stop the virus."

[snip]

In terms of mortality, Liang Zhuowei quoted experts inferring that the death rate of pneumonia in Wuhan reached 14%, that is, one death per 7 to 8 people, and the death rate of SARS was 17%.
 Quoting: NawtyBits

 Quoting: gnostic9


R0- n epidemiology, the basic reproduction number of an infection can be thought of as the number of cases one case generates on average over the course of its infectious period, in an otherwise uninfected population.

You will have people who don't spread the disease, and you will have super-spreaders. Also, viral load makes a difference. If you, for example, breathe in 10 viruses, that might not be enough to infect you. Each person has a viral threshold that basically has to be exceeded to actually get sick.
WWJBD-What Would Jimmy Buffett Do

"If it's wet and not yours, don't touch it." Oregon H1N1 Summit speaker
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77831020
United States
01/26/2020 01:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
Well, shit. There goes Plan B.

"Rumor 5: drinking can kill the virus

锡 Xin Yanxin, the leader of the pneumonia expert group for the treatment of new coronavirus infection in Hebei Province, said that the new coronavirus is indeed intolerant to alcohol, and alcohol has a good disinfection effect. However, after a person drinks alcohol, alcohol enters the bloodstream through the gastrointestinal tract and is eliminated by liver metabolism. The new type of coronavirus infection is that the virus enters the respiratory tract and causes airway and lung lesions. "After a person drinks alcohol, the content of alcohol in the airways is far from enough to kill the virus, so there is no possibility of drinking to prevent or treat new coronavirus infections. On the contrary, excessive drinking reduces the body's resistance and easily leads to more serious Infection. "Yan Xixin said."

[link to news.workercn.cn]
 Quoting: NawtyBits


I'll try some Jack Daniels in a Vicks humidifier.
NawtyBits  (OP)

User ID: 78033304
United States
01/26/2020 01:45 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
“Everything we’ve learned with working with coronaviruses, with SARS and MERS, are helping us very rapidly get a jump on things with regard to this new virus.”
 Quoting: NawtyBits


I didn't realize the label of "Coronavirus" applied to a range of viruses with similar traits. I thought "Coronavirus" was its own animal and didn't have anything to do with SARS and MERS, other than all of them being microbes.

Now I understand why the word "Coronavirus" predates the current form of that virus. That it isn't necessarily a case of Dr Evil conjuring up things in his lab.

.
 Quoting: CSnow


MERS and SARS are coronaviruses

Coronaviruses are a group of viruses that cause diseases in mammals, including humans, and birds. In humans, the virus causes respiratory infections which are typically mild, but may rarely be lethal. In cows and pigs they may cause diarrhea, while in chickens it can cause an upper respiratory disease. S and SARS are both coronaviruses.

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Last Edited by NawtyBits on 01/26/2020 01:45 PM
WWJBD-What Would Jimmy Buffett Do

"If it's wet and not yours, don't touch it." Oregon H1N1 Summit speaker





GLP