BIG update Top Pg.3: "What About BOB?" meets "What About Carl?" Psychology Today Suggestion Carl Jung May have been "disturbe

Also Jung did not refer to them as "art".

This distinction never made sense to me until we connect
it with OP's hypothesis that it is predictive of natural
future events and not merely aesthetic attempts.

(of course we can bundle the disciplines of art, science, religion etc. in a holistic sense - individuation implies this)

Your thoughts as to why the was published(judging their intentions) could be off by a mile....
Would you rather this never be seen...
Is you felt there was significant information, say about the electric universe in the red book that was being g suppressed in the world, might you allow the book and images to be published... In whatever fashion necessary....
Now you have this in your hands... And you are doing a great job deciphering what COULD be available info buried within... Thank you... But also be less critical until you walk a mile in their shoes

EDITED: 11-15-2019

Go ahead...google it yourself...Articles are coming
out now that Freud's creative genius protoge, creator of the concept
"The collective unconscious" and artist Carl Jung...
may have been NUTS! (Hey! I'm just the messenger here,
and of course, I DISAGREE mightily!) Here is the latest
I can find on a quick search (do one yourself!) Here's a
link:
[link to psychcentral.com (secure)]

:WAT CRAB:


[link to youtu.be (secure)]
:FairUSE:
OFFICIAL TRAILER the movie "What About Bob?" There are
all kinds of movies out there about psychiatrists...but
this one sticks out as my favorite with BOTH the patient
(Bill Murray) and the doctor being slightly "on-the-fritz!"

Richard Dryfus and Bill Murray are a hilarious team
for this movie where we see Dryfus (Dr. Marvin) worried
about his standing among the psychiatric community when
a truly dedicated "patient" (Bill Murray as Bob) follows
him on vacation in an effort to continue his therapy
--uninterrupted even by Dr. Marvin's vacation--and begins
to stalk him. There were MOMENTS when the "shrink" was
more crazy than his patient--but I don't think it lasted
too long!

While it is a great topic for a comedy...preserving one's reputation
(even if challenged by a nutty client) at ANY of the higher
levels of science is a real worry for many professionals
called-on-the-carpet for any new theories which fly in the face of the existing
"status quo." We saw this in the thread on Douglas Vogt's new revelation
about our sun having a 12,000 year cycle at which point it has either a
minor or a major solar micro-nova. This is being challenged right now in
the science circles as we have heard from Ben Davidson at Suspicious Observers.
Thread: Greatest Secret of the United States, Causes of the Ice Age and Nova,

Vogt and Davidson have even been accused of having REAL LIFE
"Cassandra Complexes!" (Where have we head this before?)
Well...if you are a Carl Jung fan--it appears that Carl Jung
is currently being scrutinized for the same reason!

So now...Carl Jung "coined" "THE CASSANDRA COMPLEX"
...because he HAD ONE HIMSELF?

:TrippyPillowHug:

A MAJOR "soft disclosure" (12-2018 ON GLP HOSTED with "ADRAGON")
by researcher Dr. Douglas Vogt has brought to our attention NEW
INFORMATION about the "secret history of Earth" (which Velikovsky
and others after him attempted to bring forward to a stoic mainstream
science community in the 60's) Now..."Armed" with this new theory,
we can see how it gives a NEW BREATH to the remarkable symbolism
contained in Dr. Jung's "Catastrophe Art" (my own term for Jung's
bizaar painting) in Jung's "RED BOOK" published after his death.
(*I've coined the phrase, "Catastrophe Art" as given this new info
uncovered as an exclusive for the GLP Community will prove Immanuel
Velikovsky most certainly conveyed "end of the world scenarios"
to his friend Dr. Jung which inspired some of his artwork) and
also inspired a new thread.:
Thread: Dr. Carl Jung's "Catastrophe-Art" Meets Velikovski, Vogt, Davidson and the Solar Micro-Nova--Did Jung KNOW?
AND ALSO:
Thread: Greatest Secret of the United States, Causes of the Ice Age and Nova,

MUST WATCH FOR THIS THREAD'S TOPIC:

Part 1:

[link to youtu.be (secure)]
:FairUSE:

and Part 2:

[link to youtu.be (secure)]
:FairUSE:


KEEP IN YOUR MIND'S-EYE INFO/IMAGES FROM THE 2 VIDEOS
POSTED ABOVE...THEN LOOK "WITH NEW EYES" AT CARL JUNG'S ART!
A SHORT TOUR THROUGH "THE RED BOOK" (JUNG'S PAINTINGS)
THESE ARE THE "SMOKING GUN PAINTINGS" BY CARL JUNG SHOWING
THAT...HE KNEW WHAT VELIKOVSKY KNEW!




:2carlJungzCatypi:

END OF EDITS SECTION
--------------------------------------------


"Hey! Did you guys feel THAT?" What was that...Another
8 pt. quake in Indonesia...A huge gamma ray burst? What the heck?"
ANSWER:
No...Not a quake! It's a few 1,000 Carl Jung fans running to
their local bookstores for a REFUND (some are $300-500+) for
the misinterpretation of his original artwork in "The Red Book!"

So...just like the movie "What About Bob?"...we can ask: "What About Carl (Jung?)"


[link to youtu.be (secure)]
:FairUSE:
OFFICIAL TRAILER FOR "WHAT ABOUT BOB?"

The movie (above) is what most people's exposure to psychiatry (who have not
had the personal joy of actually working with one personally) with their ideas
shaped by "shrinks in movies" (and their nutty patients) from mainstream Hollywood.
Richard Dryfus plays the classic Freudian Psychiatrist (Dr. Marvin)--a spin off
of Kelsey Grammar's "Frasier" series from 1993-2004 which came first--while
Bill Murray plays the wacko "Bob" who is so keen on having a resolution to his "phobias"
he can't wait for the good doctor to finish his trip and stalks the him creating
a hilarious vacation farce. It's a great flick...even if a little misleading about
doctor/patient relationships.

But let's look at a REAL "shrink"...Carl Jung who has had some run-ins
lately with mainstream psychiatry (the chemical straight-jacket providers)
in what I believe is an "agenda" by Big Pharma to change our view of
traditional "talking cures" like Analytical Psychology inspired by Jung in favor of their "A.B.C. named chemical
"fixes."

January 1, 2015 I hosted this thread for the GLP family:
Thread: Big UPDATE pg 7!!Part 2. The "Father of Modern Psychology," Carl Jung Kept Planetary "Doom" Secret for 80 years! Update/Warning se

In the thread above I came across an amazing video--a Tour of Carl Jung's RED BOOK
--to see very personal and private artwork created (but NOT explained)
by the genius of Carl Jung during his life. This book, The Red Book
--an effort to profit by revealing personal diaries and artwork by Jung's
heirs and certain art dealers who compiled the book (it was never an actual
creation by Carl Jung himself--hence explains the reason the artwork was
MISUNDERSTOOD and misinterpreted.)

Look at the video presenation of Jung's artwork and tell me
(keeping in mind the theories in the EDITS section as you look)
if you don't see very accurate symbolic presentations in the
paintings of things that look like space weather disasters!

For an example, doesn't this painting (found in The RED BOOK)
seem to be depicting the day of a solar micro-nova as Vogt/Davidson
describe it? I don't think this is just a "sunny day...I'm ready for
a picnic theme!" Jung didn't just paint "pretty pictures"--these were
done as "personal and private therapy" to attempt to integrate into
his own subconscious mind images Velikovsky would have shared that
were too scary for him reconcile in his waking thoughts.
(Even his own heirs--who we can't actually be sure knew
what it was the Velikovsky shared with their relative before
he died--probably didn't realize Jung wouldn't have wanted
those paintings compiled into a commercial book.)


:JungzKPindex4:


[link to youtu.be (secure)]
:FairUSE:
A "Virtual Tour of Carl Jung's The RED BOOK.

Shortly after this video, I stumbled across a very unflattering article
on Carl Jung in Psychology Today suggesting that Jung, himself, might
be mentally ill. Psychology Today called Carl Jung "Disturbed" and
haunted by "Demons" for his Red Book (catastrophe) Art!
[link to www.psychologytoday.com (secure)]

Here is a very recent quote from the first link in the Edits (above)
that is actually hard to believe MADE IT INTO PRINT and
wasn't scratched out in red ink by the magazine's editor!
How on earth do they come up with this stuff? (No...I do
NOT believe this to be the truth about Jung--it is classic
"yellow journalism!")
[link to psychcentral.com (secure)]

[Less than 50%]
Over the course of 16 years, Jung recorded everything he experienced in these unconscious journeys. Some of the material ended up filling 205 large pages in the red book. The book consists of intricate, colorful, wildly detailed drawings and writings. “The Red Book,” as it was later called, stayed locked up in a vault after Jung’s death. It was finally published in 2009 as The Red Book and is now available for sale.

The New York Times describes the story told by the Red Book:

The book tells the story of Jung trying to face down his own demons as they emerged from the shadows. The results are humiliating, sometimes unsavory. In it, Jung travels the land of the dead, falls in love with a woman he later realizes is his sister, gets squeezed by a giant serpent and, in one terrifying moment, eats the liver of a little child.
[End Quote]

Continued on Post #2

Freud may have represented Kronos/Saturn; the old one who
ate his children. (Jung) Even Jung's name suggests the child,
while Freud's name suggests joy, but not love; more like a
Saturnian Santa with a dark side. His Krampus side.

Freud hated the way Jung usurped his high position as the foremost Western psychologist and feared that Jung wanted to
kill him, which was a massive projection.

The major philosophical difference between the two was the
Freudian atheism/reductionism vs. the Jungian metaphysics and holism.

All of the world's God affirming theologies hold an
Aristotelian concept of the four causes. The atheists reduce
this to three causes by eliminating the 4th cause; the telos,
or reason for a thing to exist. [link to www.etymonline.com (secure)]

Read Carl Jung's Red Book. It is obvious he was nuts and he told his family not to publish it or reveal what was in it until after his death because he knew everyone would think he was nuts after reading it.

All the psych people have profound mental illness they tried to cover up. So obvious when you research them and their field.

Nice thread here, O's C!! Will have to come back to it later since I'm just playing catch-up from being unplugged most of the day.

Right off the bat, YES, that movie is epic! And yeah, I can actually see how Jung kept something written/recorded as a private journal to work thru' all this personal shit.

The Cassandra complex can eat someone inside out. Knowing.

Hey, just like Nick Cage's movie called Knowing.

5 s for you, madam!!

nothing new, whoever red them had the impression they were mental

I made that happen
I actually somehow made Bill live next to Bob in real life
Jeez
Am I god?

Damn. Now we know why shamans and those type of folks dropped Peyote tea or did their Ayahuasca trips. That was all before there ever was big pharma and all that.

Heavy thread, O's C.

Funny enough but today I went to art galleries. Walked into an artist's studio who was not there but his art was
real interesting. Made me think of this particular thread, 'oh wow! I've walked up into someone using his art to slay his dragons just like Jung did!'

I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest. A lot of these guys strike me as being bat shit crazy!

BOB + Carl = COB ???

I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest. A lot of these guys strike me as being bat shit crazy!

Tribe hates jung.

bang! in a nutshell

Um...You realize, don't you, that the premise of my thread
is that the "crazy or disturbed label" on Carl Jung is
EXACTLY the opposite of what I believe to be true. The title
isn't to let you know he WAS NUTS...it is to give you an
"ah ha!" moment where you would think the accusation was
over-the-top!

Did I goof with the title?

The suggestion in the science magazines suggesting Jung
may have been "mad" are a blatant "smear campaign" (in my
mind from BIG PHARMA AND BIG MEDICINE) due to the battle
between the non-drug approach to emotional illness (Jung's
and Freud's "talking-cure" having NO MEDS) as apposed to
BIG PHARMA who are pushing for more and more drug therapy
(which only "masks" mental disorders and never cures them.)

Hope more folks will read the introduction and not go
by the title...maybe I need to make a new thread called:
"...The AMAZING "Therapy/catastrophic Art" of the strictly
SANE Carl Jung." (I guess I could do that...)

Thanks for the post!


O'sCookie

NOPE, Louis! It's even MORE STRANGE THAN THAT!

Sorry I missed this thread in October...better late than
never! lol!

Here is a video from a Bell Lab "genius" Eric Dollard who explains
to you that what we know about the sun and stars (as of 2013 at the filming
of Dollard in his car!)--but they keep this fact a secret even in 2019--will
blow your mind! (Most of Dollard's Youtube videos have been scrubbed thanks
to Google censoring--HINT: use duck duck Go to search for them.)

[link to ericpdollard.com]


[link to youtu.be (secure)]

2 Minute duration
Eric Dollard talking about the sun.

His last sentence in that video is chilling:
"...ALL THEORIES COLLAPSE once you realize you can't
see the sun and stars in space!"

Dollard explains briefly (video is only 2 minutes)
that--just like the current videos from Douglas Vogt
circulating on GLP now about THE REAL STUFF ABOUT
SOLAR LIGHT and the Solar Micro-Nova Theory--you
do NOT see sun or starlight in space. There needs to
be what Dollard calls "Gross matter" interacting with
the energy from these bodies to be able to see them.
Therefore, the atmosphere of the Earth allows us to
see the sun's and the star's light patterns...but the
VOID of space does not allow this "trick" of energy.

Why this isn't generally known is hard to understand
except that according to Dollard it is part of the
whole cabal of Nuclear Energy (who wants the public to
believe the sun is "on fire" and is a nuclear oven...
which it isn't!)

Wow! The things we learn on GLP! LONG LIVE GLP "CITIZEN
SCIENTISTS!!"


O'sCookie

Pointless redeux of Planet X bullshit!!!

Another 2012 psyop.


All from a book the cia released. Ben D. has lost his way.