Cannabis declared a Public Health Crisis

Hardly anyone smokes it anymore here where it's quite potent, and legal.

Nonsensical non-issue, another waste-of-space thread from the *Reefer Madness!!* dude that we all ignore. lol.

This study debunks all of the OP's post.


There's Very Good News for the Lungs of Marijuana Smokers

According to data recently published in the journal Annals of the American Thoracic Society, inhaling one marijuana cigarette a day over 20 years is not associated with adverse changes in lung health.

In other words, unlike tobacco cigarettes and their well-documented highly negative effects on smokers' lungs, marijuana cigarettes cannot be said to have the same correlation. On top of that, the researchers concluded marijuana smoke exposure could be "associated with some protective lung effects among long-term smokers of tobacco," reports NORML. 50%<

[link to mic.com (secure)]





.

Hardly anyone smokes it anymore here where it's quite potent, and legal.

Nonsensical non-issue, another waste-of-space thread from the *Reefer Madness!!* dude that we all ignore. lol.

This study debunks all of the OP's post.


There's Very Good News for the Lungs of Marijuana Smokers

According to data recently published in the journal Annals of the American Thoracic Society, inhaling one marijuana cigarette a day over 20 years is not associated with adverse changes in lung health.

In other words, unlike tobacco cigarettes and their well-documented highly negative effects on smokers' lungs, marijuana cigarettes cannot be said to have the same correlation. On top of that, the researchers concluded marijuana smoke exposure could be "associated with some protective lung effects among long-term smokers of tobacco," reports NORML. 50%<

[link to mic.com (secure)]




.

Smoking is bad for your lungs, no shit sherlock..

I wonder is there other ways to ingest weed? oh yeah lots!!!

1 star and 5 bs flags, your on a roll today op

But what if you don’t smoke it?

OP seriously... I understand where you're coming from I'll give you that. Some people won't give you the time of day I'm sure.

To hold such a strong, negative stance on cannabis must have been caused by something, ie abuse, transitioning into harder drugs, financial instability...

But to wholeheartedly believe cannabis KILLS people is very naive. Most if not all of your studies are linked to corporate interests that have something to lose with people consuming cannabis over other drugs, even harder ones like heroin, Meth and alcohol.

Do you know Harry J. Anslinger? Reefer Madness?

These were the first big opponents to the plant that's been around forever, longer than any other drug except for psilocybin.

The reason?

Cannabis and hemp could start industrial revolution/medical revolution 2.0 and when you're invested in companies like DuPont and big pharma you simply cannot afford the competition.

I've consumed cannabis since I was 7 years old one way or another. Edibles have been the best option because you don't have to smoke to get an even better effect. In fact, I've always had a low blood pressure issue and it's only helped.

It's no long shot saying I'm one of the most healthy people in my direct family, if not the most, and I also excelled in academia, to the point I understood I was wasting my time and life by being somebodies perfect puppet.

Finished school with a 5.0 and went to a state college on scholarship. I wish I would have awoken earlier because then I wouldn't owe on loans I don't even agree to.

How do you feel about hemp?

Is it just thc you are worried about?

Have you looked into cbd?

Do you think regulating it like alcohol could actually diminish usage?

Thank you CKP.

But what if you don’t smoke it?