Jesus never went to India

Or migrant worker! And what did Jesus and his merry band of Disciples do but wander from town to town preaching their doctrines? In fact, they earned no actual living but existed soley on the kidness of strangers - and the reputation they built like a modern-day Evangelist with his own satellite. Further -and despite the faithful's claim to the contrary- there is still precious little archeological evidence to support the bulk of the Gospels... and what does exist has been perverted by religion to support their own versions.

I recall the much-hyped "dicovery" of the tomb of Jesus' family and how quickly that was revealed as a fake... and how many times has the real-genuine-authentic-one-and-only-here-it-is Noah's Ark been found? Sunn Classic Pictures made a whole string of so-called Christian documentaries back in the 1970's promoting finds such as these. Films that were -BTW- frequently shown in churches nationwide once their limited theatrical runs were over.

As far as the scriptures are concerned, it always amazes me that the faithful seem to forget they were mostly only set down decades after Jesus walked the Earth -primarily becauwe the majority of peolple oculd neither read/write [which is another reason it was so easy to perform those "miracles"] with the bulk of the original texts being purely anecdotal. That is until much later when the first of many "official" versions sprang into being.

And that's the true eternal problem with religion: as it was in the beginning so shall it be in the end... it is based entirely upon faith.

Last Edited by GSB/LTD on 12/29/2018 12:05 PM

The majority of edits have to do with the "trinity" doctrine.

Got a link to show edits in Paul's letters?

The errors of the Pharisees were how they decided various "transgressions of the law" amongst themselves and eventually wrote in the Talmud etc...instead of inquiring to God about each "transgression".

Buddha is supposed to have lived around 500 AD, so he definitely came after the Jesus story and yeah, more likely that Eastern religions were influenced by the events in the Levant than vice versa.

No ancient scripture supports any claim that Jesus went to India.

None.

Your griping about "walls of text" betray the fact that you and others simply don't want to READ.

I'm a writer, Sweetie! Words are my profession. HINT: if you require lengthy paragraphs to present your concept, you need to rethink it before presenting it to the public.... because they -unlike I- will not waste their time reading what you consider so precious.

Last Edited by GSB/LTD on 12/29/2018 12:09 PM

No the majority of edits center around the cross and notion of sacrifice. Jesus never spoke dogmatically only Paul's letters did that. Christianity is Paul's doing regarding Jesus dying for our sins which is an error. Jesus never intended to be a bloody body on a wood stick. He won't be returning with a smile for He knows not the ones who act like they know him. Jesus isn't even his name. But for the sake of misunderstanding it's being used here..

It's something about spiritualist photo fakery.

Back then, Indo meant Persia, and it's perfectly reasonable to think that he could have gone through that area.

Incorrect, your post is incorrect, here is a quote about Buddha

Siddhartha Gautama, who would one day become known as Buddha ("enlightened one" or "the awakened"), lived in Nepal during the 6th to 4th century B.C.

So as you can see, your post isnt true, it is incorrect. Buddha in fact lived four to six hundred years before Christ.

Jesus' very first teaching was to "repent". Repent for what? Sin.

Matthew 4:17 (KJV) From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.

Mark 1:15 And saying*, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe* the gospel.

Thread: Repentance - A Deeper Look - Definition of "Repent" & The Importance of Repentance
-------------------------------------------------
"Jesus never intended to be a bloody body on a wood stick."?

Really?

Jesus tells the Apostles SEVERAL times what will happen...including this...

John 10

15 As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep.

16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.

17 Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again.

18 No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.

Prophecy even speaks of it.

[link to bibleprobe.com]

You obviously have done no research on this topic, and yet accuse others of not wanting to READ

NO proof.

Ive seen this photo before and cant remember where. I was wondering if it was being claimed underneath if its Jesus returned.
The first person ever photographed was in Paris, and I think the date of that photo ( The Paris one )was circa turn of the twentieth century.
What date is claimed to be of the photo in the earlier post?

No PROOF.

Based on what...a "story" by Notovitch that's been questioned since day 1?

The text is
The Great Decision

This remarkable “Time Photo” was taken by a woman, who wishes to remain anonymous, in 1967 during a contact with a race of extraterrestrial beings called The Pleidians. She was visiting the Holy Land and contact took place near the Sea of Galilee. The Pleidians told her to take a picture with her black and white Kodak instamatic of the surrounding hillside, and that they would give her a gift of a great event which occurred on the spot.
When the film was later developed this is what appeared. It shows (from left to right) Joseph of Arimithea (Jesus’ maternal uncle ), Immanuel Ben-Joseph (Jesus Christ), his younger brother James, and Simon Peter.
It was at this moment that Immanuel had made his decision to return to Jerusalem, which explains the concern and sorrow of Joseph and James.
It was this One Man’s Great Decision which forever changed the course of history.

Whether or not Buddha or Christ existed is irrelevant.

Buddha represents enlightenment

Christ represents either deception (salvationism/idolatry) or enlightenment...

If Christ represents enlightenment you might symbolically say Christ met Buddha, or went to India, or acquired the knowledge of the divine feminine, or w/e...

Thank you very much for your information, I appreciate it. And it is fascinating. I shall make myself a cup of Coffe and let that sink in.

These `Pleidians`, it says that she went to meet a race of extraterristrials called the Pleidians. It says this as though it is a perfectly normal thing to do. `Oh yes, I went to meet a race of extraterrestrail beings in Galilee` a perfectly usual, mundane thing to do, and she didnt tell anyone about this contect she somehow got, and she also wishes to remain anonymous. And so it goes on.

Those that do not believe what is plainly written about Jesus Christ

make use of the opportunity to speculate speculate speculate about whatever else they want about Jesus.

Did God need to learn anything from men in India?

Of course not, so this speculation is an admission of ignorance and rejection of Jesus Christ to begin with...

Last Edited by shoeshy on 12/29/2018 01:06 PM

Christ doesn't "represent."

Christ IS.

Those silent years were simply Jesus working for His father...

before the specific hour defined appointed time arrived for His Mission on earth for all mankind.

You are Free to believe whatever else you want so as not to believe His Truth.

As You Will.

Last Edited by shoeshy on 12/29/2018 01:11 PM

If he knew of his sacrifical dogmatic death he would never of asked God on the cross why he had forsaken him. Your scriptural quotes say nothing about the cross though and that is the point. The edits of Paul brought about the dogma. Jesus despises the lies of Christianity and will use his multitude to correct the errors not continue preaching the false news

that would be odd considering how the Jews were severely punished at times for being sun worshippers--a cult still with us today…

how about :"all things are made through Christ" and what that might mean about the sun and all things created… worship the Creator not the created

Oh ye of little faith...

The messianic aspects are all through the old testament, you can find it there too. The new testament is an elaboration on the old, but there is nothing 'new' or 'reformed' about it.

The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ by Levi H. Dowling is fascinating to read. Tells of Jesus experiences while in Egypt and all the things he learned before starting his ministry, and many more details about his life.

Really?

The only reason Jesus stated "Why have you forsaken me" on the cross is because the Father was terribly saddened that this had to happen, and that the Father isn't a God of the dead, especially since Jesus had taken the "burden" of sin upon Himself.

Jesus spoke of the "cross" beforehand.

Matthew 10:38 And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.

Matthew 16:24 Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.

Mark 8

34 And when he had called the people unto him with his disciples also, he said unto them, Whosoever will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
35 For whosoever will save his life shall lose it; but whosoever shall lose his life for my sake and the gospel's, the same shall save it.
36 For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?


Mark 10:21 Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me.

Luke 9:23 And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me.

Little faith?

I believe AND trust in the Father - the Living God, and His Son FULLY.

Faith has nothing to do as to whether Jesus went to India or not.

The ancients were well versed with lifeforce energy and chakras. Someone in the hierarchy is very upset because the teachings of Jesus align with that of ancient religions from across the world and they destroyed the ancient cultures only to be exposed as Jesus's original teachings. Jesus might have traveled to South America for all you know because the teachings are identical.

Both the known old world and the recently discovered 'new' world like South Americas.

[link to ibb.co (secure)]