Ford Polygraph Results Released. Did They Just Blow a Huge Hole in Her Story?

Good point

I think the DNC is paying her attys. What was in the envelope that Sheila Jackson Lee slipped Fords Atty?

The money is being laundered through the fund me

The note was to correct some of her lies and what they needed to hear from her

She might look & sound stupid but still, any affirmative action California phd in her field knows how to easily pass (or skew) a polygraph.

Why is it that things that are so obvious that SHOULD happen never will? What a convoluted world we live in.

She said the lie detector test was done the day after her grandmother died. So convenient when you're grieving. Great timing!

Last Edited by nutmeg on 09/28/2018 10:24 AM

Yep. Controlling the polygraph is a matter of visualization. If you can focus your minds visual imagery, on something technical, such as, screwing a nut onto a bolt slowly, and only hearing enough of the question, to answer yes, or no, while keeping your mind focused on the bolt, you will not give an emotional response. While on the irrelevant questions, such as "Your name", or "your age", you visualize someone trying to punch you violently in the face, you will show an emotional response where there should be none. The test will be "inconclusive".

This is not meant to show people how to pass tests to cover up their illegal or immoral activity, but to point out the fallacy that polygraphs are totally accurate. In most states they are no longer admissible as evidence.

I think they researched all 3 Supreme Court nominees.

Found the book written by Mark Judge gave it to the accuser to
Read, and memorize. Fill in her story to go along with what was written.

No addresses or real names were put in the book
That is why she doesn't know where party was

He even said he was at a gathering, that is what she said

She is a lying bitch so is Hillary who is behind all of this

This!

They sought her out and it started in 2012, when Romney named his as a potential

They have been sitting on this since 2012

Last Edited by ~kpm~ on 09/28/2018 11:05 AM

Exactly, that's why it took so long for her to come to DC, so she could get prep!!

I want to say this AGAIN, in real life...

She said under oath that she CRIED throughout her poly....... not doubt that skewed all answer results.... NO legitimate poly examiner would have conducted a poly on anyone in that emotional state.

Not only that, she looks like a man pretending to be a woman.

I dont think you are allowed to do that during a polygraph

They say what the script tells them to say, it's that simple.

her story is an exact description of a scene I have seen in a Law and Order SVU episode on TV

[link to m.youtube.com (secure)]

Lock her up for lying to Congress!

On the statement that she wrote for the guy doing the polygraph, why did she sign it as Christine Blasey, instead of Christine Blasey Ford as has been shown everywhere else?

We have to ask ourselves..... How many test did she take until she passed? Maybe that is why they removed the Brett Kavanaugh questions. She failed when they mentioned his name so they kept trying different questions until she passed.

Someone will be arkancided soon.

Hillary style

There are rare cases in which Hillary does us all a favor.

It says "Brett". Look again.

I talked to someone who studies these and he said this polygraph is once removed and is not credible because the test was given in reference to the letter she wrote, not her first hand account.

Thread: Here's a timeline: + epic fired-up speech. enjoy my friends

most people dont watch the whole thing, they just read the headline and go with whatever msm tell them to.


case in point, today i was talking with a co-worker that happy because "ford cameout strong and very believable" "the judge was all scared and crying"

after listening to him spewing his non-sense, i said "seem like you and i were watching complety different hearings" and then he said he didnt watch the thing, he read some stuff on the newspaper and watched nbc

so yeah

In a Criminal Court, she would not have been "babied". A good defense Atty would have tore her a new one (so to speak).

All the Dems kept saying "she is credible", and she is "telling the truth", and "she is 100% sure that it is was Kavenaugh". There was very little done to either establish her credibility, or challenge it. It was just accepted as fact.

There are plenty of cases where the "victim", is either mentally disturbed, wanting revenge on some perceived wrong doing by the accused, jealously, financial reward....etc....

A good defense Atty will find an ulterior motivation for prosecution if there is one.

The polygraph was presented as something showing that she is credible, but no one challenged the way the polygraph was conducted.

2 questions for a profiteering liar are long and difficult.

I think it is the most important part of this as well. She testified as too how difficult and long the polygraph process was. The examiner said she arrived and was introduced. He left the room while she hand wrote a statement. He returned and the test proceeded. He asked TWO questions both about the statement she just wrote down. He never asked about the events she described, that is not how it is done

That's not true. I have been through several polygraph and you can establish a baseline with less than 10 questions. No way a polygraph would ever go for 2 hours, no one hooked up that long would be able to pass, 45 minutes would be long.

The examiner may ask additional questions but no one would be hooked up longer than 20 minutes to the machine. A baseline can be established quickly

Last Edited by Emoj on 09/28/2018 04:43 PM