Greetings! | |
Eductor
User ID: 76367158 United States 08/27/2018 12:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.qmetaphysics.com] Quoting: Stephen S. Is the woman whose image is being displayed on this site the one called ‘Shoule’? Marker AKA: U3 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74533487 United States 08/27/2018 12:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.qmetaphysics.com] Quoting: Stephen S. Is the woman whose image is being displayed on this site the one called ‘Shoule’? Marker Poler |
Eductor
User ID: 76367158 United States 08/27/2018 11:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.qmetaphysics.com] Quoting: Stephen S. Is the woman whose image is being displayed on this site the one called ‘Shoule’? Marker Poler We could play this a long time Marker AKA: U3 |
Wayfaring Stranger
User ID: 76285781 Canada 08/27/2018 11:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44941411 United States 08/27/2018 05:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.qmetaphysics.com] Quoting: Stephen S. Is the woman whose image is being displayed on this site the one called ‘Shoule’? Marker Poler We could play this a long time Marker Bueller... Bueller... Bueller... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44941411 United States 08/27/2018 05:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Andra54
User ID: 76746342 France 08/27/2018 05:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Galaxy500
User ID: 16505326 United States 08/27/2018 05:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76764840 United States 08/27/2018 08:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Cat Carel
User ID: 68726729 United States 08/28/2018 01:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So interpreting something differently than before indicates a shift in perspective. Quoting: Cat Carel Earth E is one perspective, Earth A is another. Each has its own timeline and universe, each is its own world. Sounds like the Mandela Effect is Ecsys. And how could you know if you interpret something differently than before? hmmm.... From John Titor: 05 November 2000 03:29 (about time travel) Pamela: 3.what would happen if you would meet yourself on another world line' Timetravel_0: It has always surprised me why that concept is so hard for people to imagine and accept. Nothing would happen. The universe would not end and there are no paradox problems that threaten existence. Temporal space-time is made up of every possible quantum state. The Everett Wheeler model is correct. I have met and/or seen myself twice on different world lines. The first was a training mission and the second is now. I was born in 1998 so the other "me" is 2 on this world line. There is a saying where I come from....Every possible thing that can happen or will happen has already happened somewhere. 05 November 2000 03:29 (about time travel) Pamela: 4.How is this world line different from your own' Timetravel_0: For starters....the fact that I'm here makes it different. I've also noticed little things like news events that happen at different times, football games won by other teams...things like that. I would guess the temporal divergence between this world line and my original is about 1 or 2 percent. Of course, the longer I am here, the larger that divergence becomes from my point of view. |
Kore
(OP) User ID: 76649486 Italy 08/29/2018 09:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.qmetaphysics.com] Quoting: Stephen S. Is the woman whose image is being displayed on this site the one called ‘Shoule’? More like "Chaol" video 6: <<Beyond the Red Pill: Top 10 Black Pills About America>> [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
Kore
(OP) User ID: 76649486 Italy 08/29/2018 09:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Chaol, Chaom, Chaon, etc., are all typed by the same fingers, of course. That also means the same mind is interpreting whatever is there to interpret, same/similar expressions used, etc. video 6: <<Beyond the Red Pill: Top 10 Black Pills About America>> [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
Kore
(OP) User ID: 76649486 Italy 08/29/2018 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was once believed that a human individual only uses 10% the capacity of his/ her brain. To be honest for some that’s a short circuit that’s gonna leave a mark. Quoting: Galaxy500 We don't use a brain at all. It's just a convenient way to explain a process that is more difficult to understand because we don't have the terms. No brain is needed. video 6: <<Beyond the Red Pill: Top 10 Black Pills About America>> [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
Kore
(OP) User ID: 76649486 Italy 08/29/2018 09:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So interpreting something differently than before indicates a shift in perspective. Quoting: Cat Carel Earth E is one perspective, Earth A is another. Each has its own timeline and universe, each is its own world. Sounds like the Mandela Effect is Ecsys. And how could you know if you interpret something differently than before? hmmm.... From John Titor: 05 November 2000 03:29 (about time travel) Pamela: 3.what would happen if you would meet yourself on another world line' Timetravel_0: It has always surprised me why that concept is so hard for people to imagine and accept. Nothing would happen. The universe would not end and there are no paradox problems that threaten existence. Temporal space-time is made up of every possible quantum state. The Everett Wheeler model is correct. I have met and/or seen myself twice on different world lines. The first was a training mission and the second is now. I was born in 1998 so the other "me" is 2 on this world line. There is a saying where I come from....Every possible thing that can happen or will happen has already happened somewhere. 05 November 2000 03:29 (about time travel) Pamela: 4.How is this world line different from your own' Timetravel_0: For starters....the fact that I'm here makes it different. I've also noticed little things like news events that happen at different times, football games won by other teams...things like that. I would guess the temporal divergence between this world line and my original is about 1 or 2 percent. Of course, the longer I am here, the larger that divergence becomes from my point of view. Ahhh.. John Titor. Same Company as the President. It's good to have intelligent family and friends, I suppose. video 6: <<Beyond the Red Pill: Top 10 Black Pills About America>> [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74533487 United States 08/30/2018 02:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was once believed that a human individual only uses 10% the capacity of his/ her brain. To be honest for some that’s a short circuit that’s gonna leave a mark. Quoting: Galaxy500 We don't use a brain at all. It's just a convenient way to explain a process that is more difficult to understand because we don't have the terms. No brain is needed. What would be more useful? Neuronics, perhaps? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74533487 United States 08/30/2018 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.qmetaphysics.com] Quoting: Stephen S. Is the woman whose image is being displayed on this site the one called ‘Shoule’? More like "Chaol" Alphen and Shoule, both Chaol? Two expressions of Chaol, organized for ‘ease of reference’? Would be interesting if they were actually not figments of Levi’s mind, because that makes it easier to imagine interactions. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76532689 Canada 09/02/2018 02:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Kore
(OP) User ID: 76649486 Italy 09/02/2018 05:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was once believed that a human individual only uses 10% the capacity of his/ her brain. To be honest for some that’s a short circuit that’s gonna leave a mark. Quoting: Galaxy500 We don't use a brain at all. It's just a convenient way to explain a process that is more difficult to understand because we don't have the terms. No brain is needed. What would be more useful? Neuronics, perhaps? It depends on what you're interacting with. If you're interacting with biology then proteins would be more useful expressions. With this brand of physicality, a natural language like English or Mandarin. With the world 'beyond' this one, a constructed language like neuronics that would allow you to 'jump orbit' from the current physicality. video 6: <<Beyond the Red Pill: Top 10 Black Pills About America>> [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
Kore
(OP) User ID: 76649486 Italy 09/02/2018 05:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.qmetaphysics.com] Quoting: Stephen S. Is the woman whose image is being displayed on this site the one called ‘Shoule’? More like "Chaol" Alphen and Shoule, both Chaol? Two expressions of Chaol, organized for ‘ease of reference’? Would be interesting if they were actually not figments of Levi’s mind, because that makes it easier to imagine interactions. They are all different expressions of the same being. But imagining our reality as distinct beings, events, processes, etc., allows us to exist (through interaction). 'ease of existence' I think would be more like it. video 6: <<Beyond the Red Pill: Top 10 Black Pills About America>> [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
Kore
(OP) User ID: 76649486 Italy 09/02/2018 05:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Because it doesn't need to exist ;) video 6: <<Beyond the Red Pill: Top 10 Black Pills About America>> [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
Puri Ketsi
User ID: 76815369 Estonia 09/02/2018 07:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45493085 United States 09/03/2018 06:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was once believed that a human individual only uses 10% the capacity of his/ her brain. To be honest for some that’s a short circuit that’s gonna leave a mark. Quoting: Galaxy500 We don't use a brain at all. It's just a convenient way to explain a process that is more difficult to understand because we don't have the terms. No brain is needed. What would be more useful? Neuronics, perhaps? It depends on what you're interacting with. If you're interacting with biology then proteins would be more useful expressions. With this brand of physicality, a natural language like English or Mandarin. With the world 'beyond' this one, a constructed language like neuronics that would allow you to 'jump orbit' from the current physicality. But it can be anything, right? Neuronics is just a convenient way to explain a process that is more difficult to understand because we don’t have the terms. Kind of like the brain instructs us on central processing units and hierarchies of engagement (scripts, standard operating procedures, aka conditioning and habituation) as well a self-coding program (misnamed “consciousness”) - an order that mysteriously [randomly:chaotically] seems to arise from nothing, but actually from the core relationships that make up its code). And like DNA instructs us on an organism-building matrix of interaction, fancy code for a self-designing bio-body blueprint, which seems to be a mysterious [random:chaotic] life arising from inanimate matter (but is actually part of an evolutionary process called ‘artificial selection’ that some call “God made men in his image”). Neuronics instructs us on mental coding of reality (perception, the resistance between two illusions: Order and Chaos, the archetypes that fold into The Archetype: Perspective). It is the ultimate creative process that creates creative processes (Language of the Gods). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45493085 United States 09/03/2018 06:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.qmetaphysics.com] Quoting: Stephen S. Is the woman whose image is being displayed on this site the one called ‘Shoule’? More like "Chaol" Alphen and Shoule, both Chaol? Two expressions of Chaol, organized for ‘ease of reference’? Would be interesting if they were actually not figments of Levi’s mind, because that makes it easier to imagine interactions. They are all different expressions of the same being. But imagining our reality as distinct beings, events, processes, etc., allows us to exist (through interaction). 'ease of existence' I think would be more like it. How does it make existence a matter of ease? I can see how it has been useful in making the Ecsys material sensible to me. I notice how I have been working on what may be called Logia, and how QuMe is basically a shortcut in “getting there”. So that is pretty generous, I’d say. But it still hypothetical, of course. Though would it be too crazy to hypothesize that it will always be hypothetical? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45493085 United States 09/03/2018 06:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MissCleo
User ID: 76541118 United States 09/03/2018 07:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74533487 United States 09/03/2018 07:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Artemis7
User ID: 75476321 United States 09/03/2018 09:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19367385 United States 09/03/2018 09:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74533487 United States 09/17/2018 02:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Kore
(OP) User ID: 76649486 Italy 09/18/2018 11:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP, share something mindblowing here, without the need to scroll the general thoughts of yours through the 15 pages of this thread ? Quoting: Puri Ketsi Curious. What would be the benefit? video 6: <<Beyond the Red Pill: Top 10 Black Pills About America>> [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |