Greetings!

What if this 'folding' process looked like a sphere when made obvious?

If you were orbiting the Earth and saw the Earth as a sphere, then what might your perspective be doing with the Earth?

Do we need to perceive the 'other side' of the sphere?

Is the 'flat Earth' theory a psy-op, a conspiracy theory, or a glimpse into how perspective works?

Good. It can be. But what is a number?

A basic unit of ____________, perhaps?

When orbiting the Earth it could just be a flat circle and the sense of orbit could be created by the shifting land masses and water bodies on the planet. Some would appear from one edge of the circle while others would disappear off an other edge. It would created a sense of movement “around”, especially when I am biased by words such as “orbit”.

I have never witnessed Earth as “from outer space”. There is no need for this representation to exist except as a reference to a certain kind of cosmology.

I have my own cosmology that makes Sphere/Flat Earth irrelevant.

...

With Law of Energy Perspective 5/2, when I am in my room the Earth is neither a flat disk nor a spherical globe because it doesn’t need to exist. So that shit is irrelevant.

The Earth is the minimal shape necessary for it to make sense in my perspective.

When flying in an airplane it may as well be flat.
When deciding how to go from the United States to Russia, it may as well be spherical.
When attempting to land on Earth from “outer space” it may as well be a circle.
When attempting to explore the relationships that make up Earth, it may as well be a “ring of circles” that, when orbited, exactly produces the illusion of a rotating globe. I could call each circle a “time zone” even though it would simply be “an other Earth”.

Keeping it efficient makes sense to perceive.

However, Spiral Earth has its own meaning for me. It’s personal to me and very unlikely to be of interest to anyone other than me or a few others. (Unless I find a way to make this representation useful to more people, by simplifying it.)

Right now, the Earth is folded into the walls of this room I am in. It exists in ‘Osmosis’, the imaginary space beyond my perception. The signs of Osmosis, such as cars driving around or someone mowing their lawn are all happening within my perception, those sounds exist in this room. But they represent what has been folded into this place and give a sense of expanded location, keeping Earth relative by keeping it logical with efficient representations.

For what benefit have four comments been edited out?

Probably a psy-op for glimpsing into how perspective works that spawned a group of conspiracy theories that grew relationships with other conspiracy theories to strengthen the logic of the view and make it more accessible to more people.

Measurement.

I keep thinking of “folding” as

Set A contains elements X, Y, Z.

XYZ fold into A.
A unfolds into XYZ.

Is there more to it?

I posted something I probably should not have. Instead, I will just post [link to i.imgur.com (secure)] so that it can be figured out.

Discovery is the best method of perception, perhaps.

Tell me more about this fisheye thing. Was I to focus on various light sources serving as a challenge for fisheye lens photography?

Or was the visual enough?

I'm getting images of "earth from space" as an "angle" that distorts the space to accommodate the constraints of the lens.

From this I can see how I am the Earth.

Looking at it differently, I exist at one layer of Earth-reality. The "Manifestation Threshold".

These ideas excite various nodes in my mental network.

Tell me more about this fisheye thing. Was I to focus on various light sources serving as a challenge for fisheye lens photography?

Or was the visual enough?

I'm getting images of "earth from space" as an "angle" that distorts the space to accommodate the constraints of the lens.

Yes, I mentioned that one in a way.

I suggested:

Representation
Relationship
Extension
Magnitude
Measurement

Number as a basic unit of Relationship is what I would call Harmonics/Music (based on the Quadrivium).

I'm the Point.

It's just an example of how we interpret relationships rather than perceive things directly.

This is more readily seen in the so-called 'Mandala Effect' where, for example, some people remember The Berenstein Bears book series.

Neither The Berenstain Bears books nor The Berenstein Bears book exist, only the interpretation of the relationships that 'causes' the perception.

You could 'remember' something being different than what it currently is because both interpretations are equally real, and both are equally false.

The world is flat in one interpretation.

The world is round in an other interpretation.

To a fly or a cloud, the world may be neither flat nor round but something else.