| Users Online Now: 2,139 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 925,884 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,728,443 | Threads Today: 846 | Posts Today: 14,959 |
| 07:14 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,139 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 925,884 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,728,443 | Threads Today: 846 | Posts Today: 14,959 |
| 07:14 PM | ||
500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution | |
| (:-DeeZe
Offer Upgrade  User ID: 75458263  Canada08/02/2018 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| It's in the Blood
User ID: 76115547  United States08/02/2018 07:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| It's in the Blood
User ID: 76115547 United States08/02/2018 07:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| It's in the Blood
User ID: 76115547 United States08/02/2018 07:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| It's in the Blood
User ID: 76115547 United States08/02/2018 07:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| (:-DeeZe
(OP) User ID: 75458263 Canada08/02/2018 09:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation |  (:-DeeZe "The love that you withhold is the pain that you carry" “To live content with small means; to seek elegance rather than luxury, and refinement rather than fashion, to be worthy, not respectable, and wealthy, not rich; to study hard, think quietly, talk gently, act frankly, to listen to stars and birds, to babes and sages, with open heart, to bear all cheerfully, to all bravely await occasions, hurry never. In a word, to let the spiritual unbidden and unconscious grow up through the common. This is to be my symphony.” .........William Henry Channing |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 41173011 United States08/02/2018 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| M.C. Escher
User ID: 76226131 United States08/02/2018 10:00 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Quoting: (:-DeeZe snip.... "As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact." [link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)] Yep. Evolution is pseudoscience based on artists' drawings and unfounded speculation. There's a reason why many molecular biologists end up rejecting the theory once they find out what goes on inside the "simple cell". The theory of evolution would be complete bunk if it hadn't been so thoroughly debunked. Last Edited by Monty Python on 08/02/2018 10:03 PM Monty Python's Flying Circus |
| Expose ALL Shills
User ID: 39886939 United States08/02/2018 10:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| G a Y t h e | sT ?/?
User ID: 75586405 United States08/02/2018 10:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| FlashBuzzkill
User ID: 75251329 United States08/02/2018 10:34 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| jake
User ID: 76807127 United States08/02/2018 10:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Darwin was a drunk and babled a lot Evil controls the ignorant... Climate change is a hoax so is the vax you have been fear-porned into compliance! Definition Satan from the bible: Satan (Rev 12:7) exercising his subtle (indirect) impact on heathen governments (powers) – i.e. accomplishing his hellish agenda from "behind the scenes." |
| Expose ALL Shills
User ID: 39886939 United States08/02/2018 10:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76678898 United States08/02/2018 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Harry The Dog
User ID: 52680061 United States08/02/2018 10:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And my largest frustration in any debate is how the subject matter gets framed. Darwin's book was titled "The Origin Of Species." He postulated that evolution within a species somehow leads to THE CREATION OF NEW SPECIES. Over time we have all accepted that EVOLUTION is real. AND IT IS! Humans in sunny, hot environments are very different from humans in cold, sun-starved environments. Evolution within species is undeniable; however, evolution as a means of explaining origins of new species is ludicrous. |
| ToSeek
User ID: 9653749 United States08/02/2018 10:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Quoting: (:-DeeZe snip.... "As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact." [link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)] Yes, they were able to get 500 scientists - most of them obscure - to sign this mealy-mouthed proclamation: "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutations and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged." Meanwhile, the National Center for Science Education asked scientists to sign up to this statement: "Evolution is a vital, well-supported, unifying principle of the biological sciences, and the scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that all living things share a common ancestry. Although there are legitimate debates about the patterns and processes of evolution, there is no serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence. It is scientifically inappropriate and pedagogically irresponsible for creationist pseudoscience, including but not limited to "intelligent design," to be introduced into the science curricula of our nation's public schools." And to make things a little harder on themselves, they only asked scientists named "Steve." They're up to 1427 signatures and counting. ( [link to ncse.com (secure)] ) Last Edited by ToSeek on 08/02/2018 10:54 PM |
| Sodbuster
User ID: 68702751 United States08/02/2018 10:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How anyone can look at the complexity of the human body and say it just happened is a fool. Even if you don't believe in God, we were definitely "constructed" Last Edited by Sodbuster on 08/02/2018 11:02 PM Coal burning stove no natural gas, if that ain't country, I'll kiss your ass - David Allan Coe |
| Ozric
User ID: 76792171 United States08/02/2018 11:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | hats of to Kent Hovind....might not agree with the man on a lot of things I do also agree with him on a lot more things... I just thought this fella presented well , didn't back down and used common sense fact to generally balance the argument back to that it is a belief system just like any kind of religion His early debates are legendary... Last Edited by Ozric on 08/02/2018 11:07 PM I do exist, I'm pretty sure :) |
| F+2.0
User ID: 76797054 United States08/02/2018 11:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| A1Janitor
User ID: 58658563 United States08/02/2018 11:04 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| TheLordsServant
User ID: 76807596 United States08/02/2018 11:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Quoting: (:-DeeZe snip.... "As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact." [link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)]  I am a humble Servant of the one True Living God. |
| TheLordsServant
User ID: 76807596 United States08/02/2018 11:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Last Edited by Servant-of-the-LORD on 08/03/2018 11:48 AM I am a humble Servant of the one True Living God. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74240439 United States08/02/2018 11:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Harry The Dog
User ID: 52680061 United States08/02/2018 11:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Quoting: (:-DeeZe snip.... "As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact." [link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)] Yes, they were able to get 500 scientists - most of them obscure - to sign this mealy-mouthed proclamation: "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutations and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged." Meanwhile, the National Center for Science Education asked scientists to sign up to this statement: "Evolution is a vital, well-supported, unifying principle of the biological sciences, and the scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that all living things share a common ancestry. Although there are legitimate debates about the patterns and processes of evolution, there is no serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence. It is scientifically inappropriate and pedagogically irresponsible for creationist pseudoscience, including but not limited to "intelligent design," to be introduced into the science curricula of our nation's public schools." And to make things a little harder on themselves, they only asked scientists named "Steve." They're up to 1427 signatures and counting. ( [link to ncse.com (secure)] ) Help me out here. What is that common ancestry? And when our common ancestor split into 2, what were the two? I have never been so excited in my life to get an answer! |
| The Patriot Mind
User ID: 72690837 United States08/02/2018 11:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well this will not be taught in high schools and universities anytime soon ... or even brought up for obvious reasons of questioning the collective Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014 Signed, The Patriot Mind |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76678898 United States08/02/2018 11:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| The Patriot Mind
User ID: 72690837 United States08/02/2018 11:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Quoting: (:-DeeZe snip.... "As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact." [link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)] Yes, they were able to get 500 scientists - most of them obscure - to sign this mealy-mouthed proclamation: "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutations and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged." Meanwhile, the National Center for Science Education asked scientists to sign up to this statement: "Evolution is a vital, well-supported, unifying principle of the biological sciences, and the scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that all living things share a common ancestry. Although there are legitimate debates about the patterns and processes of evolution, there is no serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence. It is scientifically inappropriate and pedagogically irresponsible for creationist pseudoscience, including but not limited to "intelligent design," to be introduced into the science curricula of our nation's public schools." And to make things a little harder on themselves, they only asked scientists named "Steve." They're up to 1427 signatures and counting. ( [link to ncse.com (secure)] ) Just the mere fact that you think the origin of life is settled science shows just how indoctrinated and blind you really are .... Not a human being on earth knows the origin of life and there are competing theories and understanding of the BASICS OF LIFE ... BUT ZERO UNDERSTANDING OF THE ORIGIN OF LIFE ... Claiming to know is folly and shows how faulted human beings really are ... Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014 Signed, The Patriot Mind |
| The Patriot Mind
User ID: 72690837 United States08/02/2018 11:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well this will not be taught in high schools and universities anytime soon ... or even brought up for obvious reasons of questioning the collective Quoting: The Patriot Mind oh it will Doesn't fit the narrative ... why would you think it would be Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014 Signed, The Patriot Mind |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70732847 United States08/02/2018 11:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Earth is the hardware chip. The Sun is the activating energy source. Biology is the malleable software code that expresses consciousness. The software can be manipulated through viral and retrovirus infection. Don't buy into the vaccinations. They contain viral components to change our DNA little by little. Earth is infected with some type of invasive species that is competing with Earth's creator civilization. (And that creator "civilization" is so fucking advanced, most would have a real difficult time comprehending just how advanced it is) I'm writing books on this topic. If nothing else, they will make great sci-fi reads. |
| ToSeek
User ID: 9653749 United States08/02/2018 11:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Quoting: (:-DeeZe snip.... "As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact." [link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)] Yes, they were able to get 500 scientists - most of them obscure - to sign this mealy-mouthed proclamation: "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutations and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged." Meanwhile, the National Center for Science Education asked scientists to sign up to this statement: "Evolution is a vital, well-supported, unifying principle of the biological sciences, and the scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that all living things share a common ancestry. Although there are legitimate debates about the patterns and processes of evolution, there is no serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence. It is scientifically inappropriate and pedagogically irresponsible for creationist pseudoscience, including but not limited to "intelligent design," to be introduced into the science curricula of our nation's public schools." And to make things a little harder on themselves, they only asked scientists named "Steve." They're up to 1427 signatures and counting. ( [link to ncse.com (secure)] ) Just the mere fact that you think the origin of life is settled science shows just how indoctrinated and blind you really are .... Not a human being on earth knows the origin of life and there are competing theories and understanding of the BASICS OF LIFE ... BUT ZERO UNDERSTANDING OF THE ORIGIN OF LIFE ... Claiming to know is folly and shows how faulted human beings really are ... The origin of life is a separate issue. Evolution only deals with what happened after life began. |
| Q33
User ID: 76709818 Canada08/02/2018 11:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Quoting: (:-DeeZe snip.... "As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact." [link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)] Fuck darwin fuck everything nothing not even the bible explains what the fuck we are or anything i seen a small fly the other day it was so fucking small there is no way in HELL that shit just made it self out of nothing its so deep and complicated i dunno what the hell to believe what the hell is the sun what is space what the hell is water why are we even here what is this? |
