Professor under fire for saying the Holocaust and moon landing were a hoax, saying Irish were Americas first slaves

Have you figured out, how Germany could kill 2.8 million SOLDIERS (nonetheless) just like that, but somehow needed sophisticated methods, that took time and resources, like "gas chambers" and "crematoria" to kill civilians?

All defensive wars, no doubt.

What really pissed the British off, was that by the time, Germany united, despite their empire, they could no longer push us around.

As Hitler said, they all preferred the time, when Germany was split into numerous little kingdoms.


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

The large number of captives is infact proof for the war preparations of the Soviets.

Hitler in his talk with Mannerheim talks about 30000 thousand destroyed tanks.

Soviet Offensive Plans Against Germany 1939-1941

"The importance of the Soviet offensive plans lays into the ultimate explanation of the massive Soviet losses in the summer of 1941. Soviet military historians claimed that the Soviet Union was not ready for the war with Germany and had not fully prepared its defensive capabilities. During the summer of 1941, Red Army lost 900-1000 thousand men while Germans lost 25-30 thousand soldiers. Such grandiose disparity is not just explained by German technical and tactical superiority. Apparently, the Soviet government had already gathered very large force within the western Soviet region and had not prepared them for defensive action. During the initial phase of the German invasion, Soviets had to abandon whole airfields and tank detachments as well as artillery pieces. Whole divisions routed in panic and large numbers surrendered. "

[link to www.numbers-stations.com (secure)]

we can't make it a single week in NYC without hearing about the fecking holo-AT-ALL-COSTS

explain the significance of repeating 6 million for decades BEFORE ww2? Here are the newspaper articles.



[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

What needs to be figured out? Healthy young men of the Red Army were concentrated in large groups when they surrendered. There were 9 encirclements early in the war where over 100,000 young Soviet soldiers were captured. Two of them were of more than 600,000 troops. No need for sophisticated methods to kill these 2.8 million young men. The Wehrmacht simply took their coats, refused to feed them and slowly marched them toward Germany and kept them outside in the winter until they were dead.

The more sophisticated methods of murdering civilians were developed because it was found by the Einsatzgruppen that murdering civilian women and children was very difficult on the men. Heinrich Himmler even attended one of the Einsatzgruppen killing of civilians and got splashed with some blood and almost puked. (he wrote about it in his diary) He realized how hard it was on the men to murder women and children so more sophisticated methods were developed and used when Action Reinhardt exterminated about 2 million Jws from the Ghettos of Eastern Europe.

What a load of rubbish.

Oh gee, another stupid reference! LOL

Since Germany had invaded country after county in Western Europe of course the Soviets had a large number of troops in their western frontier region. How would we expect them to behave with the aggressive Third Reich to their west?

But the largest encirclements were at Kiev and Vyazma-Bryansk where at each location more than 660,000 young Red Army soldiers surrendered. Both these locations are far from the border deep in Soviet territory as the Wehrmacht headed towards Moscow.

Unfortunately for the Soviets their armies were not prepared for offensive or defensive operations. Many were new troops who still had little training and few supplies. Tanks ran out of gas before they could engage the enemy. But once it became clear that surrendering to the Germans meant almost certain death the Soviets stopped surrendering and repelled the German invaders.

[link to www.ushmm.org (secure)]

You mean the same Soviet Union, that had invaded the Baltics, Poland, Bessarabia and attacked Finland.

Already in 1939 the Soviets had plans against Germany.


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

A brilliant rebuttal!

The Irish were the first slave class in America and the West Indies.

The Irish slave trade began when James II sold 30,000 Irish prisoners as slaves to the New World. His Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies.

During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England.

Irish slaves were also far cheaper at 5 Sterling than black slaves at 50 Sterling a pop.

Radical progressives, especially those in academia, avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.

Because that looks much more easy. Nothing gruesome about that at all.




[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

This video should be seen far and wide.

The story about 6 million Jew-s is decades older than WW2.


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

:racist5:

Your main reason for posting on GLP seems to be spreading Holocaust denial material.

So why don't you explain the value of a 22 minute video that just reference 10 newspaper articles about Jws in danger?

Seriously, that video is of an idiot rambling on for 22 minutes about 10 old newspaper references. Nine of them actually use 6 million and one just talks about the European Holocaust.

Here, I made notes a while back to save people the trouble of listening to a Holocaust denying idiot ramble for 22 minutes.




8 of the 10 articles were from the New York Times and likely the same author. These articles appear to be about fundraising for European Jws due to the persecution by the Russian Empire, dangers of WWI, dangers of the Russian civil war and the many famines in Central and Eastern Europe in the interwar period.

So please explain why that 22 minute video of those 10 newspaper articles is worthy of you saying "This video should be seen far and wide."

Are you just fucking with people, duping them into wasting 22 minutes? Or what do you find worthy in those articles.

Thanks for the list1

June 6, 1915 - "Six million Jws, one-half of the Jwish people throughout the world, are being persecuted, hounded, humiliated, tortured, starved. "

October 19, 1918 - "Six million souls will need help to resume normal life when war is ended." and below that it said "6,000,000 Jws Need Help"

September 8, 1919 "Mass meeting hears that 127,000 Jws have been killed and 6,000,000 are in peril."

November 12, 1919 "The successive blows of of contending armies have all vut broken the back of European Jwry," he said, "and have reduced to tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation and disease about 6,000,000 souls, or half the Jwish population of the earth."

So the first 4 were all from the New York Times and probably the same author and were about the suffering of Jws in Eastern Europe due to the Russian Empire, WWI and the Russian civil war.

Atlanta Constitution February 23, 1920 - "He called upon the Atlanta Jws to arise to the occasion, and to contribute to the emergency fund in order that the lives of six millions of Jwish people may be saved."

New York Times May 7, 1920 "The fund for Jwish war sufferers in Central and Eastern Europe, where six millions face horrifying conditions of famine, disease and death was enriched yesterday by a contribution of $100,000 from Thatan Straus.

New York Times July 20, 1921 - "Russia's 6,000,000 Jws are facing extermination by massacre. As the famine is spreading the counter-revolutionary movement is gaining and the Soviet's control is waning."

Gazette December 29, 1931 - "Six Million Jws Face Starvation"

New York Times May 31, 1936 - This one doesn't even say anything about 6 million, it just talks abut the European holocaust.

New York Times February 23, 1938 - " A depressing picture of 6,000,000 Jws in Central Europe deprived of protection or economic opportunities, slowly dying of starvation, all hope gone, was to the teachers by Jacob Tarshis, known to his radio audience as The Lamplighter.

The lack of value you add to the discussion of this subject is amazing.

I agree with the other guy, you should be banned for constantly spreading Holocaust denier material, things that you KNOW are false just to spread your hatred of the Jws. You bump old thread and spread lies about the Holocaust and Hitler.

Is that you?


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

even if he is paid 1000 bucks per post, it doesnt change the fact his INFO crushed your lies.

Did an alarm in Tel Aviv just went off?

must be depressing to know the only people you are able to influence are ignorant people who still havent learned why ad hominem and deflections are usually a tell tale sign of someone lying

Is that why you are speculating about my motives in the other thread, because you are so appalled by ad hominems.

If you know the truth he was right on all counts.

well I can very easily relate to him... Im basically on GLP defending my nation from accusations.

I just hope that if someone counters my arguments with concrete evidence, I dont react by going into ad hominem
and deflection fit.

yeah once the adhomz come out the argument is lost... akin to showing the cards

Well Lance, families can be quite different. Your great-grandfather died in 1972 while I just lost my father 2 years ago and Mom is a healthy 89 years old. They were both 16 in 1945 when WWII ended. My grandfather who died in the 1940s registered for the draft in 1918 and my great grandfather served in the US Civil War... for the south of course.

Did you know that the last WWI veteran just died a few years ago in 2012? Florence Green was a British nurse serving at the front during WWI and died at the age of 110 in in 2012. Frank Buckles the last American WWI vet died in 2011 and John Babcock the last Canadian WWI vet died in 2010. There will still be WWII veterans and Holocaust survivors living for several more decades.

I have to say I am still puzzled by your talk about a great grandfather who was a Jw taken as a slave by the Nazis, complete with the slave labor tattoo and all. It is puzzling as you are telling us you had a Holocaust survivor in your family while you have openly denied the Holocaust. It just seems that at some point it would have dawned on you that your great grandfather was telling the story of his years as a Nazi slave and you would have had some resentment about the things the Their Reich did.

Yet you seem to be more compassionate toward the German AC troll than toward a Holocaust survivor in your own family. So.... what's up with that?

He has a Holocaust survivor in his family and he is a Holocaust denier??

WTF??

No shit!

It is not that puzzling to be honest. Why did my great-grandfather not DIE during the supposed holocaust? How can you be a 'holocaust survivor'? It is a bit confusing to be honest. Which is why I question it. War is war, look at Dresden, look at Hiroshima, look at what happened to the Japenese in their internment camps. Why are the jws so 'special?' They declared war on a country with superior fire power.
Who the frick cares fer fox lake about the hollowhoax? All wars are bankster wars, everyone loses. No one is 'special' and no one should be paying reparations fer fox lake.