Why are most Historians such hardcore ultra Liberals?

You can't get tenure at a university without pledging allegiance to their causes. It's not limited to historians.

It's because they are indoctrinated with a worldview that denies
the true nature of spirituality, and instead of taking spirits
seriously, they sublimate the word into some kind of idiotic
happy bullshit feelings idea.

The reason they can't take reincarnation seriously is that
they are philosophical materialists and biological evolutionists.

They need to stick with the materialist ideology or be labeled
superstitious.

Notice the spiritual re-incarnation does not fit with their
ideas of biological evolution and social progress. So this is
why they can feel good attacking religions, traditions, taboos, and all the cultures of the past as "bronze age goat-herder mythologies" while they HYPE modern PROGRESS.

Because it is all staged

You can't even get a degree without remaining silent on matters you disagree with.

Because you have to be a Libtard in the first place to actually believe what we currently teach as "History" is accurate.

History is written by the victors, re-written by the propagandists, and in the end is nothing more than what most can agree on. History is far from accurate.

I call them Twistorians.

You cant change History unless you have your own "Historians" to push the new narrative

this.

historians know it's all a sham. over and over again.

I am a Historian , professor and run a museum

I am not a liberal but conservative

HISTORY IS AN EASY MAJOR

Which historians are you following?

Maybe because their mommy or daddy paid for their way through life.

I am a historian, and I have to agree with you.
I am not affiliated with any school or university because I am incapable of towing the party line.
I am now researching a book on the Elaine Race War of 1919 and have received death threats because of my research, which points to the validity of the first reports that the Blacks were going to massacre White people.

Not if you are serious.

Because modern history is basically hero worship.

The people who are considered the "good guys" of history (particularly US history) are all either liberal democrats (FDR, JFK, etc.) or other people who expanded the power of the federal government (Lincoln, Washington, etc.). Heroes with conservative ties (like MLK) have those ties ignored or whitewashed, while Villains who were liberal (Stalin, Mao) are either apologized for (for the greater good) or "aren't true (insert left wing ideology here)".

I should add that every Republican president besides Lincoln is demonized in some way by mainstream historians. They blame Hoover for crashing the economy. A president like Coolidge who actually did his job and didn't intervene in politics unnecessarily is called boring, inept, or unmemorable.