CLICK ME! In light of the recent school shooting in Florida when will the Democrats start worrying about Illegal Immigration and Crime

Does Illegal Immigration Relate to Higher Crime Incidence?
[link to immigration.procon.org (secure)]


A must view link about Illegal Immigration and crime
[link to crimeresearch.org (secure)]

9 Things You Need To Know About Illegal Immigration And Crime
[link to www.dailywire.com (secure)]



Restrictionists Are Misleading You about Immigrant Crime Rates
[link to www.cato.org (secure)]

Peter Kirsanow: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

1. He Was Appointed to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights By President Bush in 2001

2. He Served on the National Labor Relations Board

3. He Writes For National Review

4. He Lines Up With Trump On Illegal Immigration

5. He Met With Trump to Speak About Labor Issues in November 2016


One issue Kirsanow has spoken extensively on is illegal immigration. For National Review, he has written a number of articles on the subject including one titled “Americans Are Right to Worry about Illegal Aliens and Crime.”


[link to heavy.com (secure)]

In March 2016, Kirsanow testified before the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and said that undocumented immigration has a disproportionately negative impact on the wages of black Americans.

“Illegal immigration has a disparate impact on African-American men because these men are disproportionately represented in the low-skilled labor force,” he said. “…People often say, ‘Well, illegal immigrants are taking jobs that Americans do not want to do. No one wants to be a hewer of wood or a drawer of water.’ The problem is that there are thousands of Americans, and always will be thousands of Americans, who find that those jobs are the only ones for which they are qualified. How can you better yourself if you cannot even get on the first rung of the employment ladder and find yourself essentially shut out of certain industries?”

I think National Review is still banned here.


Illegal Immigration and Crime

National
Review
.com/article/455549/importing-crime

Conventional political wisdom holds that there will be some sort of amnesty for illegal immigrants who came to the United States as minors. The Obama administration’s original DACA memorandum applied to individuals who came to the United States before the age of 16, but where the line would be drawn in any permanent DACA deal remains unclear.

There are a number of familiar talking points surrounding this amnesty, which tend to give the impression that the approximately 800,000 DACA recipients are disproportionately valedictorians and Medal of Honor recipients. Amnesty proponents often extend these characterizations to illegal immigrants generally, claiming that they’re the “real Americans,” better, harder-working, and more law-abiding (with the exception of that pesky “illegal presence” thing) than native-born Americans.



DACA amnesty is merely the first of what will likely become many amnesties. The ink will not have dried on the bill before pro-amnesty organizations and politicians will begin agitating for amnesty for the parents of DACA recipients. Then we must have amnesty for illegal immigrants whose children are native-born U.S. citizens. After all, why should parents of DACA recipients receive legal status simply because their children were born in another country? If anything, the parents of U.S. citizens have a stronger claim to receive amnesty. Still more will be added through chain migration. On and on it will

5

pin requested

The DIRTY TRUTH About DACA Recipients.
Where They’re REALLY Coming From.
Their CRIMINAL Records.
And How They REALLY Got Here


Yesterday, a second U.S. judge on Tuesday blocked President Donald Trump’s decision to end a program that protects immigrants brought to the United States illegally as children from deportation.

U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis in Brooklyn ruled that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, cannot end in March as the Republican administration had planned, a victory for Democratic state attorneys general and immigrants who sued the federal government.

The decision is similar to a Jan. 9 ruling by U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco that DACA must remain in place while litigation challenging Trump’s decision continues.

The legal battle over DACA complicates a debate currently underway in Congress on whether to change the nation’s immigration laws.

The Supreme Court on Friday is due to consider whether to take up the administration’s appeal of the San Francisco ruling. The court could announce as soon as Friday afternoon whether it will hearing the case
[link to www.cnn.com (secure)]




Since when does a judge unilaterally decide that a program based on an executive order by a radical and lawless president, with an expiration date, can be extended?

Peel back the layers of lies that are being told to the American public by Democrats like Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi and Senator Chuck Schumer, and their allies in the media, and discover the shocking truth about the “Dreamers”(or voters) they’re fighting so hard to keep in America.

According to The Hill, the narrative surrounding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program holds that it was put in place to protect “kids” who were brought here through no fault of their own. DACA supporters implied that applicants were mostly Hispanic and that as citizens of distressed republics a short distance away from the wealthy United States, their violation of our immigration laws was somehow understandable. Program applicants were also portrayed as brilliant valedictorians and proud members of the military.



From the outset, that narrative rang hollow. In a column for the Washington Post, Mickey Kaus described it [link to www.chicagotribune.com] as public-relations-style “hooey.” Here’s why.

Many of the DACA “kids” were not brought here as young children. They entered the U.S. illegally as teenagers.

A large number of DACA applicants weren’t “brought” here at all. They crossed the border themselves.

Over 2,000 individuals approved for DACA had their status terminated for criminal activity ranging from alien smuggling to sexual assault. That number is still growing.
[link to www.washingtonexaminer.com]

Fewer than 900 DACA recipients – or slightly more than one-tenth of one percent of the total DACA population – joined the military.
[link to www.cbsnews.com (secure)]



New data released by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) definitively establishes that most of the DACA narrative is false. Particularly overblown are claims that deported DACA recipients would inevitably be strangers in a strange land.
[link to fairus.org (secure)]








USCIS lists 149 countries of origin for DACA applicants. English is the national language in at least 26 of those countries. Those include the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Ireland. A large number of applicants are from India, Hong Kong and the Philippines, where there are enormous English-speaking communities.

Other statistics also undermine claims that the United States must “take care of the DACAs” or condemn them to a life of isolation and poverty.

At least 36 of the nations of origin listed by USCIS are wealthy, democratic and European. They include Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Sweden.

Applicants also originate from at least nine Asian countries with fully developed or rapidly developing economies. Those include South Korea, Japan and Singapore.

A total of 360 nationals from Israel applied for DACA benefits. Israel is a developed nation with a thriving economy that accepts all returned citizens and provides free instruction in Hebrew to returnees and immigrants.

In fact, many DACA applicant’s birth countries are listed on the higher end of the common standard of living indexes. Which means that DACA advocates are arguing that the United States has a moral obligation to undermine its own laws in order to avoid returning illegal aliens to countries whose citizens are considered to have a higher standard of living than many Americans.

One wonders why it has never occurred to Congress that its primary obligation should be protecting native-born American kids from illegal aliens who compete with them for entry-level jobs and seats at colleges and universities. Curiously, our elected representatives seem remarkably unconcerned about protecting America’s standard of living.

What is most disturbing about the data released by USCIS, however, is the number of DACA applicants who come from countries associated with terrorism or overt anti-Americanism. This is cause for concern given the “lean and lite” vetting used to quickly approve DACA applications:

More than 1,000 DACA applications were accepted from Pakistani nationals [link to www.uscis.gov (secure)] despite concerns over growing anti-U.S. sentiment within the country and the Pakistani government’s overt support of jihadist terror groups.

At least 60 applicants were accepted from Iran, and more than 2,000 from Venezuela, even though both nations are overtly hostile to the United States.
[link to www.uscis.gov (secure)]

Applications were also accepted from Libyans, Syrians and Yemenis even though the Obama administration placed travel restrictions on nationals from those countries, due to terrorism concerns.






Based on the facts — rather than the myth — it seems clear the individuals who applied for, and received, DACA were not the oppressed, well-meaning, high-achievers that the media and the open-borders lobby portrayed them to be.