CONGRESS IS BEING BLACKMAILED?

Elizabeth Moon
February 25th, 2016 on 8:46 pm

“Preventing the actions” of any senior in the chain of command is an action that will be tested in court to determine if the soldier was correct in a) judgment of the situation and b) the necessity to act against the senior. Since soldiers are not, in general, experts in Constitutional law, their opinions of any President’s actions–whether those do in fact violate the Constitution or merely do not accord with the soldier’s understanding of it–are much more likely to be flawed than accurate. So there is no defined point at which individuals can take action or might be required to take action against a Commander in Chief.

Moreover, outside sources are a fallible guide to Constitutional law; states’ attorneys-general (including mine) have in the past few years erred in interpreting the Constitution on such matters as whether one state must honor Article IV, Section 1 (“Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State.”) Political sites and media are just as bad if not worse. You can’t trust ’em.

I have lived through eleven Presidents so far. Several of them did illegal things that affected the national interests. Several of them did things that probably violated the Constitution (I think so, but their supporters did not agree, and in several of those instances, Congress was solidly in favor of the President’s actions); in none of those cases did I feel that anything more than voting the incumbent out of office was necessary.

Mutiny and sedition are deadly serious affairs. It would take something worse than any President I’ve observed or read about to be worth another one.

Good point

Burn the pedophile politicians at the stake!

If Judge Moore was blackmail-able he would allowed to run his campaign with the full support of the establishment.

Same for Trump. He must be clean enough the globalists cannot control him.

There is a meme that goes "There is no free lunch." and one that goes "If a man worketh not, let him eateth not". Neither of these thing did Jesus say. No he gave people, magically produced fish and bread. Jesus was a welfare daddy and the best one of all time really. But I ask you: "free lunch" what does that mean? Can it mean, well, you give up one child to save the other four? Sacrifice? And/or can it mean "no free lunch" in that everyone is bought and paid for? For example, if you were in Congress, and you were the one good person, how would the view out, when you close your eyes at your desk and ponder the nation, how would the view out, look? And since the plebes and electors are such dimwits controlled by weaponized media cartels, tecch producing slabfone engineer orc army, and IP shitpostings and shit domains, well, tell me, how could that one good person in government, remain good?

Veeeeeery interesting take on the matter.

"Trump must be clean enough the globalists cannot control him."

that has got to be the most stupid thing i have read on GLP in the last 15 yrs! SERIOUSLY!


how naive are you people? C'mon! here is how the NWO does things:

Trump, for the first time, walks in to his new oval office. The phone rings. Trump answers ...'hello? .

"Listen very carefully Mr. Trump. we can get to you any time of any day of any week. Just to let you know how easily, there will be a dead cat in your limo, another at your house, and another in your chair at the oval office tomorrow when you arrive.

Every president since Lincoln has been under our control, and believe me, it's for the betterment of the U.S.

We won't make you do anything that will seem out of the ordinary. In fact, you will pretty much do exactly what you told the voters that you would.

There will be a few boundaries that you cannot cross and if you don't want your family to end up like those cats, you will follow the rules we give you."