Christians and everyone else, do you accept Paul's gospel? It is of Christ

There is only one scripture, the words and works of Jesus.
Not anyone else.

Jesus didnt choose Paul.
At all.

Always happy to see those who recognize Gnostic Paul. He was Gnostic and that is only way we can understand him.

"And consider that the long-suffering of our Lord [His slowness in avenging wrongs and judging the world] is salvation [that which is conducive to the soul’s safety], even as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the spiritual insight given him,
Speaking of this as he does in all of his letters. There are some things in those [epistles of Paul] that are difficult to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist and misconstrue to their own utter destruction, just as [they distort and misinterpret] the rest of the Scriptures." [2 Peter 3:15,16][AMPC]

We're now just 5 weeks away from when God's wrath will destroy the earth! So it's no real surprise that ignorant and unstable souls are coming out in their droves! Be warned you're all being marked for utter destruction!

Then why does Jesus constantly quote from the Old Testament?..

I guess you see what you want to see..

The Lord quoted from the Old Testament. So did all the Apostles, including Paul.
You really have to be completely ignorant not to know this. This is what happens when Christians are spoon fed by lazy Pastors that quote only from the New Testament.They don't realize that the Old Testament from Genesis to Malachi is about Jesus Christ. But without the Holy Spirit's guidance the Old Testament is a locked book. That's why many Christians don't read it. When infact they should be studying it daily in order to grow spiritually mature in Christ.

I would love a pre-masoretic version of the old testament..

I view the two parts as like rungs on a ladder.. one establishes the other and progresses the understanding of the other as well...

They have definately tampered with the old testament to make gods reasons for the purging of canaan as an act of sheer brutality so they can disconect people fromt the law of moses..

Let me first say I've wrestled with the Paul thing for quite some time and my jury is still out.

Having said that, there are some definite problems with the Paul conversion on the road to Damascus. 1st we only have Paul's word of the account and scripturally every word must be confirmed by two or more witnesses. Where is the second witness?

Next, show me one other person who did not repent of their sins and were basically forced by Jesus to accept His salvation and go on to be the great "apostle" of Christ. Wouldn't Jesus have at least given us a heads up that another apostle would come? Especially when Paul's writing constitutes two thirds of the new testament.

Paul was not a nice person. He sought out Christians in order to have them killed. He was a big time anti Christ sinner. All examples of men like that always had their hearts hardened.

When did Paul repent of his deeds?

Jesus absolutely knew Paul (Saul of Tarsus), better read Acts 9:3-9. Dumb ass!

^^id hazard a guess that being turned blind for a while might have had a serious impact on his moral compass.

And when he got to jerusalem he was scalded by the elders of he congregation there for preching against the law of moses..
To which he didnt reply and justbwent and did it...

Plus if the holy spirit hadnt testified of him to peter and james i rekon they wouldnt have given him a second chance

Acts 21:21-24

Telling a nazerene to shave off their locks is pretty serious

But i know what you mean.. i had issues with paul for a long time as well... it has a lot to do with context and re-reading what he says a couple of times.. perfect test of the doctrine and a practise run

Because he was dealing with chewis theocrats, insincere, corrupt frauds that used the o t like the weapon it was designed to be, then, and now, afraud and toxic to anyone else.

If you are so simple and deluded you are beyond hope

I dont think he did. I think he just changed from destroying one at a time to destroying them all at once?
I think he intended to derail it and weaken its principles

I might be simple and deluded... but pride cometh before a fall

Did christ ask you to go read Daniel???

In 5 weeks, when youve been proven WRONG, what then?
recalculate?

wrong is wrong as is your focus on being right about things that are not your concern

What you fail to 'get' is that the actual experts of the o t are the ones that saw none of Jesus in their own books, then or to this day.
there is no need for the o t to exist, Christian principles are unique from and OPPOSITE of those in the o t .

the o t is a fake and its believers at WAR of elimination with Christians for that reason.

You seem proud in your ignorance to me.
You live in a world were you connect the unconnected.

^^dreadfull.. truely dreadfull

I trust nothing unique sourced from Paul.
I dont believe him, and furthermore the fact that he adds his own opinion makes what he says his own.

Everything you need to know comes from Jesus.

EITHER he is the singular sole source or he is no source at all.
UNLESS he told of successors to come with amendments and updates, and he didnt, none should be expected.

Paul got love. Nothing much wrong with his writing. He was just a man though like everyone else. Not G-d, not messiah. But man, like you and me. Trying to make the best understanding of it

The fact is that there is no need for heavy, dense books of arcane scripture.
What Jesus taught could be put on a single 3x5 card.
Everything he said and did was direct and straight to the point.

Lies need to hide in thousands of words and millions of letters.
Truth does not, because truth is all around you.

True, and men make mistakes.
And apostles can be wrong, as they were from time to time, even those who actually were there with Jesus, yet they still screwed up.

their ONLY value is in relating what THEY saw Jesus do or heard Jesus say.
Their opinions, any of their opionions outside of that are their own.
OTHER than the ones Jesus said had editorial and interpretation rights.

in other words NONE.

ARCANE?... is your minister a freemason

It certainly sounds like it.

Freemasonry and Catholicism are the enemies of biblical Christianity.

Connecting the unconnectable is a prerequisite for being a judeochristianity believer

Did not Paul mentioned mysteries in his letters?

Christ Jesus preached "the Kingdom is Near" as close as "within you" . Then, know yourself.

M't:12:31:
Wherefore I say unto you,
All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men:
but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.

Paul's message to blah and Gentile was about how to prepare for being around when the time came for the conclusion of the bruise to the head from Ge:3:15. The cross was the final event associated with the bruise to the heel. The teachings should be different as they are different events. Peter would have been teaching the same material when he met with Gentiles in Acts:10.

Last Edited by Wayfaring Stranger on 08/27/2017 09:22 AM

The sad thing is that what some guy with a bad and otherwise questionable history wh , like BHO seems to refer to himself more consistently than anything else is the one being discussed.
He would be so glad.
He is not the real point.
He serves no real or good purpose.
His opinions, the right ones and the wrong one , are unimportant.

But he didnt say, "stay tuned for the Saul of Tarsus roadshow, because hes got some break7ng updates",