Texas Democrat Threatens To Kill Republican On Legislative Floor After He Called ICE On Protesting Illegal Immigrants

Oh those gentle, sweet, kind democrats who push the propaganda of the ruffian aggressive republicans seem to have gone a bit far in stepping out of their media stereotypes. I wonder if this will be on MSNBC.

That's easy. They have no rights.

This was posted here yesterday so you might not get much response

Racial profiling? The protesters were proudly claiming to be illegal! At least ONE representative follows the law ffs.
What's up is down........

Triggered.

Crazy : [link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)] *

Thread: WTF?? check out this tweet from a Texas congressman

Last Edited by Flameworker on 05/30/2017 12:36 PM

The DNC is using MS13 for their killings, so don't be surprised by anything.

accuse Rinaldi of threatening to “put a bullet in the head”

The "article" says its the other way around.. so which is it?

Poncho Nevarez and Ramon Romero should be arrested for terrorist threats.

Fucking ass wipe commie traitors.

Didn't see it yesterday so thanks for letting me know.

We've been invaded, and the Democrats opened the doors. And threaten those who would protect you and me from them.

When will this madness end?

The really bizarre thing in this entire scenario is that the illegals who were protesting were encouraged to break the law in their efforts. What the hell is that all about?

They're here illegally so they're breaking the law already.

Their only rights are the ones they have in their home countries when they are residing there, not here.

Thread: George Webb: Names Who He Believes Assassinated Seth Rich

Pakistani-Mexican assassination connection

I think it should be pinned every dayvuntil we remove all libtards from positions of power at all levels.

Not shocking at all, but then you probably meant that sarcastically. Democrats and their progressive socialist useful idiots love to accuse conservatives, especially gun owners, of being dangerous and potentially violent, but they are they ones that do all the dangerous violent stuff.

I did mean it sarcastically. Their entire media projection is aimed at presenting democrats as peace-loving and republicans or anyone on the right as dangerous and violent. At this juncture the dems' claim of having the moral high ground is laughable.

Their enforcers, MS 13 have free reign. The DNC have introduced an invading army into the US....and defy us to disobey.

who started it....
the Dem's threatened the Rep...a CC gun owner that he would follow him outside.

never threaten a CC gun owner unless you want a gun fight.


all that aside....

really WTF....are they elected officials or high school kids?

how much more in your face does it have to be ...

We Live in a Country with a LAWLESS government.

floor fights common though the world....we have the least of them

Tic tock
Tic tock

Oh the wait is endless...

You are so very right.

This is nothing compared to the fist fights and all out brawls in the government operations in the Ukraine but I'm not sure the US government as well as state governments should be using them as an ideal.

double post

Last Edited by -Haun- on 05/30/2017 01:18 PM

Has the MS13 hit been submitted?

Our brothers and sisters in Texas need to step up and support their reps who at least try to follow the Constitution.

The libtards and the violent criminals they prefer to associate with are too confident. They need to be shown they are the minority opinion. Being loud, obnoxious and ignorant doesn't equal being right.

If the tards want to escalate that's on them. I'm just calling for a presence to show support for the Constitution and rule of law.

Yep.

I'm a conservative white male, carry permit holding, gun owner living in a thoroughly red state. This weekend my wife (only one I've ever had for over 20 years) took our "dangerous" guns to the range and put some holes in paper targets for fun. Neither I nor anyone else here where I live shot anyone.

Meanwhile in one of the bluest left leaning cities in the country where they love to tell me how horribly dangerous I am, "Six people were killed, including a 15-year-old boy, and at least 44 other people were wounded in Chicago shootings throughout the Memorial Day weekend." [link to chicago.cbslocal.com]

Seriously, threatening to shoot someone is a good way to get a hollow-point in the gut. Having a heated argument is one thing, but threatening to shoot me in any manner that comes across as a legit threat has and always will yield such a reaction. Most of my time has been spent in lawless areas of the world though. Having just read through the basics of Texas law on such scenarios around self defense all I can say is we're in a shitty situation. Everything is stacked against the good folk. Even the law is written in a way that guarantees the bad guy (attacker) has the advantage.

Technically, you can't even raise self defense if you have to fire if you're experienced enough to not be completely shaken by having to shoot someone. So, regardless of the facts ahead of time it seems that unless you're completely pussified and are barely lucky to be alive that you're considered the bad guy. To me it looks like it's high time to stop giving a fuck about laws. I'll take the jury of 12 over being carried by 6.

The below snip from a defense lawyer's page is less than 50% and is fucking terrifying to me. As someone who has grown up around firearms and been trained in so many different aspects of their use this all seems to make me the bad guy if I ever have to shoot in Texas. Being a law abiding citizen is becoming very disadvantageous.

---------

Let’s take the example of Jeff and Bob.

Example 1: Jeff is walking down the road. Bob is walking towards Jeff. Bob takes out a knife and points it at Jeff while he runs at him aggressively. Jeff did not provoke Bob to do this, but he thinks Bob is going to stab him, or cut him. Jeff is permitted to take out a knife in his own defense because he is not the aggressor. It is also possible, depending the specific facts, that Jeff could take out a gun as well since, Bob has displayed a deadly weapon (the knife).

Example 2: Bob is running toward Jeff. Jeff does not know Bob. Jeff takes out a gun, and shoots Bob, killng him. This scenario would not enable Jeff to successfully use self defense during his murder trial. It was not reasonable for Jeff to believe he needed to shoot Bob. The measure of force was not reasonable. It is not clear given this example whether any force was necessary at all. A person can only use force against another when there is a clear imminent threat of bodily harm or death.

Example 3: On July 28th, 2012, Jeff tells Bob he is going to kill Bob. Bob sees Jeff with a loaded gun on the same day. Jeff enters the premises, and Bob thinks Jeff still has the loaded gun. Bob can shoot Jeff and raise Self Defense during his case.

Example 4: Bob is driving Jeff home. Jeff threatens to kill Bob and tells him that he has a gun under the car floorboard. Jeff then begins grabbing at Bob. Bob pulls car over and shoots Jeff. Self defense can be raised in this situation.

Example 5: Medical examiner testifies that Bob was stabbed 52 times all over his body. Jeff raises self defense at his trial. Self defense law will not protect Jeff in this circumstance because 52 stabbings are not “reasonably necessary” to protect oneself. The only force permitted is the minimum amount of force necessary to prevent the imminent bodily harm or death.

It should be noted that Baker’s Texas Penal Code Handbook from 2008 clearly indicates that more often than not in Texas, a defendant fails to succeed in using the self defense law to get out of the criminal charges. Self defense it extremely fact dependent. All of the surrounding circumstances will be assessed by the jury when they are deciding whether the use of force was permissible under the self defense law. For instance, killing someone and then afterwards acting casually about it, can lead to a jury finding that you were not a victim employing self defense, but rather an aggressor trying to hide behind the self defense law. How a person acts before, during and after the assaultive event will be looked at with a microscope by an able jury.

--------

[link to lawyerdefend.me (secure)]

he threatens the guy who reported the law breakers ,that's racketeering