Need a CLEAR, non-CGI, non-photoshoped picture of Earth from space

Woo-Woo "Logic":

"Everyone is pointing at me and laughing...I MUST BE ON TO SOMETHING!!!"

Do you have a data viewer on your machine? Some satellite data is free. I don't think you'll find ONE image of the entire planet because spatial and radiometric resolutions are fixed, plus what would be the point?

He's trying to see where he left his keys...

Still crickets....

All I hear is the wind through OPie's ears...

You aint gonna get one.

Lets assume, for simplicity, that the earth is a globe and space is real. Highest humans have ever been must be around 400 miles high, on a ball of 24000 miles circumfrence. Thats feck all, you'd have to be 1000's of miles up to get a decent view and no person ever been anywhere near that far away.

No photos from the moons landings, as they a laughable fakes, just silly really.

Or the earth is flat, though i doubt this and yes i have spent the time to investigate it.

Call NASA or JPL. Have a few honest conversations with some techies there about your ideas.

You're obviously not going to get a satisfactory answer from sites like GLP. If you REALLY want to know, do ACTUAL research. That does not include watching YouTube videos produced by Nazi yoga instructors.

Last Edited by Buck Fiden on 05/01/2017 04:36 PM

Have you seen the photos of Saturn that were broadcast this weekend? Round Saturn? With round rings?

Images transmitted from one of our satellite probes?

Or is that what you consider CGI or "Photoshop"?

It's no blue/maroon/white globe hanging in non-existent outer space at any rate.

^ how do you explain satellite imagery? Trigonometry would suggest they are taken from higher than 400 miles and, depending on the satellites resolution, you can actually visually verify the photo.
For instance, you can perhaps make out the location of your car, but also one several hundred miles away.

And here is the TRUTH.


Only a selected few have access to the hidden secrets.



Did you just just asked me to call NASA or JPL?


Are you for fucking real?


What makes you think they will actually answer me?


It's fucking easier to have an answer from Putin or Trump, than NASA or JPL.

Last Edited by Recollector on 05/01/2017 04:47 PM

You mean this pictures?

[link to www.space.com]


These black and white pictures?


Sorry, these black and white CGI?



If you would been around computers as much as I have been, you would instantly see what is cgi and what is not.

So we have not been far enough from earth to capture a real photo? How do scientists know how far the sun is or what it is made of if we never been there? Not even close! Shit, we don't even know what the earth is made up of. Only been down 7 miles. I could go on about numerous other things but there is no point. I believe in what is actually provable, not theory.

Man, we need better science education in the USA.

We can sense energy travel through the planet.

that's because there is such a massive cloud cover over the majority of the earth at all times that a real picture looks like a grayish ball. The real earth from space is not the vivid blue/green that we think it is.

...about 70ish percent of the planet is covered by clouds, on average at any given time.

Here's the best one to date.
[link to www.nasa.gov (secure)]

Pretty cool. Flat Earth-tards will say it's fake tho.

Then prove it.
[link to epic.gsfc.nasa.gov (secure)]

Prove it.
[link to www.metabunk.org (secure)]
[link to www.metabunk.org (secure)]
I sure would like to know how it is that the famous blue marble photo from Apollo 17 matches up so perfectly with the expected perspective of the planet along with weather satellite photos and weather reports from that day.

Because it is.

Globe tard will say it's real.

See what I did here?

This is really funny man.


You just presented me a CGI and a Globe.Both are fake.


2 fakes don't make one right.


I could do EXACTLY the same with a CGI flat earth and a flat earth model.

You have not proven that accusation.

How do you know they are cgi or photoshopped? Can you prove it?

It doesn't get much clearer than this.


[link to www.theverge.com (secure)]

Any reasonable person would expect in this day an age to have many hundreds if not thousands of real images of Earth that are not composites or CGI. Those should be the first ones to come up in searches. To deny there is a problem with that just makes those calling others retarded for wanting to see one shills and agents for dis info and not for truth. If the dis info agents wish to shut up the retards then they should demanding also better images of the REAL earth not composites for which they ALL are to date. Sections out a window of a craft dont count. We mean the WHOLE earth from one perspective even would be nice. Doesnt even need to be all every side.

[link to epic.gsfc.nasa.gov (secure)]

I dont trust you fella... sorry


but Kudos on the cute avatar and the way cool signature art
those are cool :)

Oh and yeah that Nasa Earth ya linked to is also cool art (composite)