Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES | |
Astromut
Senior Forum Moderator 08/17/2020 02:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Op thank you for debunking your own thread with the first post! Quoting: Louis in Richmond Have YOU actually LIDAR scanned an actual space suit and a LEM hatch to prove that a space suit will not fit through it? This man has and disproves your entire thread. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Two full green karma bars pushing the fake narrative... Nuff said. So because we have full green karma that somehow means we're not credible? Sounds like you're jealous. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78203859 Netherlands 08/17/2020 03:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78203859 Netherlands 08/17/2020 03:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut
Senior Forum Moderator 08/17/2020 03:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77070237 08/17/2020 04:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The BEST video/documentary on the subject, written & [low budget] produced by an actual scientific investigative journalist (who was later found dead, mysteriously) is this one. He interviewed the friggin DIRECTOR of the Apollo "mission", the man responsible for training the astro-NOT$ on the usage of the L.E.M. moon lander...who goes on to look into the camera and state that he 'never had to train the astro-not$ to actually GO THROUGH THE LEM HATCH,[LOL!!!] - which is measured in the documentary & proven that it was not possibly able to allow a fully packed astronaut to enter or exit from. [the film producer then says 'so i guess they just had to TRAVEL THE 250,000 MILES TO THEN JUST "WING IT"] Good stuff, great footage, ignore the poor-mid 90's VHS quality to this copy that someone uploaded: Quoting: VHS 1897079 |
anonym0us coward
User ID: 79262093 United Kingdom 08/17/2020 05:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77070237 08/17/2020 10:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Look at you all. Beating a dead horse. Quoting: JoeNobHead Making claims none of you can support, either way. There's a shit ton of data, showing we went, yet there is very little saying we didn't. But that's none of my business. I deal in facts, data. Tell me, how do you fake CGI in 1969? Was it possible? No. Computer technology would show you that for sure, but that's none of my business right? Or is it. I've been involved in computers since 1986. Visual basic was the best there was. Yet, could it fake a moon mission? NO... Deny all you want. the data is there. Let me ask you all. Have you looked at the source files? Or are you of the mind, NASA is faking it all, even data from BEFORE the moon missions? Search your ass off, and prove me or NASA wrong? The data goes back before Apollo, it was a concerted effort. Built upon many many missions before it. Do you have an open mind or not? Are you willing to look at the accumulated data or not? [link to ntrs.nasa.gov (secure)] The surface photography was created using a technique known as rear screen projection The backgrounds were BLACK AND WHITE stills taken by Pioneer probes that just conveniently happened to land feet from the Apollo "Landing sites" These images were projected on a screen made of a material called scotchlite which was always in the background. In the NASA photo records, you will see panaramas with no lander or moon buggy in them and such. The foreground was a stage set and utilized PORTLAND CEMENT to simulate "moon dust". The company that made the cameras was Hassleblad, and their best engineer said the photos were fakes , all photos had depth of field anomalies and showed multiple lighting sources,. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77008585 United States 08/17/2020 10:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77542759 France 08/17/2020 10:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78212539 United States 08/17/2020 10:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79047391 Australia 08/21/2020 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The BEST video/documentary on the subject, written & [low budget] produced by an actual scientific investigative journalist (who was later found dead, mysteriously) is this one. He interviewed the friggin DIRECTOR of the Apollo "mission", the man responsible for training the astro-NOT$ on the usage of the L.E.M. moon lander...who goes on to look into the camera and state that he 'never had to train the astro-not$ to actually GO THROUGH THE LEM HATCH,[LOL!!!] - which is measured in the documentary & proven that it was not possibly able to allow a fully packed astronaut to enter or exit from. [the film producer then says 'so i guess they just had to TRAVEL THE 250,000 MILES TO THEN JUST "WING IT"] Good stuff, great footage, ignore the poor-mid 90's VHS quality to this copy that someone uploaded: Quoting: VHS 1897079 Does anyone want to sell me a good version of this documentary so that I can upload it and we'll all have a good copy? Lookin all over the interwebs for one, can't find any. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79262845 United States 09/05/2020 04:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The BEST video/documentary on the subject, written & [low budget] produced by an actual scientific investigative journalist (who was later found dead, mysteriously) is this one. He interviewed the friggin DIRECTOR of the Apollo "mission", the man responsible for training the astro-NOT$ on the usage of the L.E.M. moon lander...who goes on to look into the camera and state that he 'never had to train the astro-not$ to actually GO THROUGH THE LEM HATCH,[LOL!!!] - which is measured in the documentary & proven that it was not possibly able to allow a fully packed astronaut to enter or exit from. [the film producer then says 'so i guess they just had to TRAVEL THE 250,000 MILES TO THEN JUST "WING IT"] Good stuff, great footage, ignore the poor-mid 90's VHS quality to this copy that someone uploaded: Quoting: VHS 1897079 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78914237 Australia 09/12/2020 01:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Clon
User ID: 76412999 United States 09/12/2020 02:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77927763 United States 09/12/2020 03:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77770577 United States 09/17/2020 04:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The BEST video/documentary on the subject, written & [low budget] produced by an actual scientific investigative journalist (who was later found dead, mysteriously) is this one. He interviewed the friggin DIRECTOR of the Apollo "mission", the man responsible for training the astro-NOT$ on the usage of the L.E.M. moon lander...who goes on to look into the camera and state that he 'never had to train the astro-not$ to actually GO THROUGH THE LEM HATCH,[LOL!!!] - which is measured in the documentary & proven that it was not possibly able to allow a fully packed astronaut to enter or exit from. [the film producer then says 'so i guess they just had to TRAVEL THE 250,000 MILES TO THEN JUST "WING IT"] Good stuff, great footage, ignore the poor-mid 90's VHS quality to this copy that someone uploaded: Quoting: VHS 1897079 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76960873 Australia 10/11/2020 12:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The BEST video/documentary on the subject, written & [low budget] produced by an actual scientific investigative journalist (who was later found dead, mysteriously) is this one. He interviewed the friggin DIRECTOR of the Apollo "mission", the man responsible for training the astro-NOT$ on the usage of the L.E.M. moon lander...who goes on to look into the camera and state that he 'never had to train the astro-not$ to actually GO THROUGH THE LEM HATCH,[LOL!!!] - which is measured in the documentary & proven that it was not possibly able to allow a fully packed astronaut to enter or exit from. [the film producer then says 'so i guess they just had to TRAVEL THE 250,000 MILES TO THEN JUST "WING IT"] Good stuff, great footage, ignore the poor-mid 90's VHS quality to this copy that someone uploaded: Quoting: VHS 1897079 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79187281 United States 12/08/2020 06:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The BEST video/documentary on the subject, written & [low budget] produced by an actual scientific investigative journalist (who was later found dead, mysteriously) is this one. He interviewed the friggin DIRECTOR of the Apollo "mission", the man responsible for training the astro-NOT$ on the usage of the L.E.M. moon lander...who goes on to look into the camera and state that he 'never had to train the astro-not$ to actually GO THROUGH THE LEM HATCH,[LOL!!!] - which is measured in the documentary & proven that it was not possibly able to allow a fully packed astronaut to enter or exit from. [the film producer then says 'so i guess they just had to TRAVEL THE 250,000 MILES TO THEN JUST "WING IT"] Good stuff, great footage, ignore the poor-mid 90's VHS quality to this copy that someone uploaded: Quoting: VHS 1897079 The Moon Hoax now has a rival: the ELECTION HOAX OF 2020. Yet another mystery the illumini$t gov't. above our gov.'t controlling all things in this world will never reveal the truth of. |
StokieJ
User ID: 77904187 United States 12/08/2020 06:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In DC there is a replica. It looked to small to me |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79556217 Australia 12/21/2020 11:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The BEST video/documentary on the subject, written & [low budget] produced by an actual scientific investigative journalist (who was later found dead, mysteriously) is this one. He interviewed the friggin DIRECTOR of the Apollo "mission", the man responsible for training the astro-NOT$ on the usage of the L.E.M. moon lander...who goes on to look into the camera and state that he 'never had to train the astro-not$ to actually GO THROUGH THE LEM HATCH,[LOL!!!] - which is measured in the documentary & proven that it was not possibly able to allow a fully packed astronaut to enter or exit from. [the film producer then says 'so i guess they just had to TRAVEL THE 250,000 MILES TO THEN JUST "WING IT"] Good stuff, great footage, ignore the poor-mid 90's VHS quality to this copy that someone uploaded: Quoting: VHS 1897079 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78829877 United States 12/22/2020 02:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Wayfaring Stranger
User ID: 79139945 Canada 12/22/2020 02:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78336645 Canada 12/26/2020 10:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ToSeek
User ID: 9653749 United States 12/26/2020 11:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's not a replica. It's an actual unflown lunar module, LM-2. It was planned for an uncrewed flight, but the first uncrewed test flight (with LM-1) was so successful, they didn't need a second one. LM-3 was used on Apollo 9, the first crewed flight with a lunar module. |
mlabors
User ID: 78224333 United States 12/26/2020 11:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny how NASA claims the Van Allen Belts were not a problem for the Apollo astronauts IN 1969-72 -- they went through them about 7 times. Yet as recently as 2012, NASA spent a millions of dollars to build & send a probe to study the Van Allen Belts. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 62070845 ...and they spend 100s of millions studying the weather and the Earth too... Yes, because every person on earth is affected by weather, and we live on the earth. What justifies spending all that money sending a probe to the Van Allen Belts? After all, the Van Allen Belts only directly affect us if we travel through them. And if we've allegedly done that successfully nine times, what's the justification for the expensive V.A.B. probe? Good question. Like a LOT of good questions posted by that first SCIENTIFIC documentary i posted at the top of this string. If anyone reading this has never watched it, i recommend you do. He interviews the director of the apollo mission. if looks could kill... watch it. Easily explained by the complicated delicate electronics in use today, compared to the relatively rudimentary electronics that existed in 1969. Remember the advice on EMP and cars built before OBD ports. Earlier cars will still work after an EMP, newer cars will be dead. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79689145 United States 12/26/2020 11:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78003884 Australia 12/27/2020 12:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The BEST video/documentary on the subject, written & [low budget] produced by an actual scientific investigative journalist (who was later found dead, mysteriously) is this one. He interviewed the friggin DIRECTOR of the Apollo "mission", the man responsible for training the astro-NOT$ on the usage of the L.E.M. moon lander...who goes on to look into the camera and state that he 'never had to train the astro-not$ to actually GO THROUGH THE LEM HATCH,[LOL!!!] - which is measured in the documentary & proven that it was not possibly able to allow a fully packed astronaut to enter or exit from. [the film producer then says 'so i guess they just had to TRAVEL THE 250,000 MILES TO THEN JUST "WING IT"] Good stuff, great footage, ignore the poor-mid 90's VHS quality to this copy that someone uploaded: Quoting: VHS 1897079 It starts to get real good at 10:29 into video |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73506716 United States 12/27/2020 12:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73506716 United States 12/27/2020 12:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Moon trips absolutely happened, period. We have photos of the landing sites including the equipment and footprints of the astronauts. China and Russia have sent probes which have photographed the landing sites. If they weren’t there why would they perpetuate the “lie”? You “moon landings are fake” types are as bad as flat-earthers. I am sorry to burst your bubble but nothing you can see on a computer screen is really rpoof of anything since anything can be faked with digital rendering. What you have is a CLAIM that the photos are real and no way in hell to ever hope to prove it. It's just that simple. Go to any GOOGLE EARTH image, see if you can see footprints in the dirt from 60 miles up. Thats a fucking RETARDED BELIEF, the resolution of the camera that took the images was supposedly two meter or one meter resolution. FOOTPRINTS OR FOOTPATHS WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE OUT, unless they were simply photoshoped, LIKE THEY WERE. If you had the original rendering you could prove it one way or another. When I asked to review the telemetry tapes to determine if the missions were real or not with certainty two days later NASA announced it had recorded over them to save money. YEP. A U L I S. Com Your welcome |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78107266 United States 12/27/2020 12:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |