Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES

Look at you all. Beating a dead horse.

Making claims none of you can support, either way.

There's a shit ton of data, showing we went, yet there is very little saying we didn't. But that's none of my business.

I deal in facts, data. Tell me, how do you fake CGI in 1969? Was it possible? No. Computer technology would show you that for sure, but that's none of my business right? Or is it.

I've been involved in computers since 1986. Visual basic was the best there was. Yet, could it fake a moon mission? NO...

Deny all you want. the data is there.

Let me ask you all. Have you looked at the source files? Or are you of the mind, NASA is faking it all, even data from BEFORE the moon missions?

Search your ass off, and prove me or NASA wrong? The data goes back before Apollo, it was a concerted effort. Built upon many many missions before it.

Do you have an open mind or not? Are you willing to look at the accumulated data or not?

[link to ntrs.nasa.gov (secure)]

If you want to know for sure the missions were faked look at the biometric data for missions 7-17.

You will see the rate of exposure of the craft and the astronauts to radiation with Low Earth orbital Apollo missions that never left Low Earth orbit are essentially equal to those of "Lunar landing" missions. This is simply not possible, no matter how lucky they got.

To believe we landed 12 men on the moon in 1969-1972 without a single loss of life or serious injury is one of the most absurd and unintelligent ideas I have ever encountered. It isn't possible today, and it wasn't then either.


We are 20-30 years out from a successful manned landing.

I am convinced of one thing though, the average american is so dumbed down he will believe anything he is told.

Not a single one of the astronauts of the sixties and seventies was black.
It baffles me why since they are physically and in many cases intellectually superior to whites.

I think there has been two or three since.

I grew up on Mather AFB in Sacramento, about 2 miles away where McDonnell Douglas built and static tested the Saturn V third stage engines. I remember feeling the ground shake when they fired those engines and this was the third stage, not first stage of Saturn V rocket. Then they'd transport it across to the flight line at Mather AFB and load it into a "Super Guppy" plane for its flight to Cape Canaveral.

Another 5 miles away was Aerojet, where they manufactured the LEM and Command Module thrusters.

Afters I graduated in the mid 1980's, I worked with some Aerospace Engineers and Technicians who previously worked at both of those facilities. All of them were proud of what they achieved as a team and what we achieved as a nation.

Anyone who believes the Apollo moon landings were faked are the same type of people who believe the Earth is flat.

On a side note, I heard rumors of a secret underground facility at this same McDonnell Douglas facility. So I asked one of the Engineers who worked there about it. He told me that certain areas of the facility were off-limits to him (he had TS clearance). Him and co-worker were walking during lunchtime one day and accidentally wandered into one of the off-limits areas. He saw ventilation pipes sticking out of the ground. When he got back, he was called to his managers office, where he was verbally reprimanded him. Then his manager did something that really freaked him out. The manager told him about the conversation that him and his coworker were discussing. He said there was no one else around but him and his coworker.

Since this facility was above his TS clearance, it was rumored to have been staffed for developing black budgeted space program technologies. Ring any bells (Solar Warden)?

Edit: Watched the video. Note the astronaut aboard the ISS said, "We can't go beyond 230 miles" in PRESENT TENSE. In other words, we don't currently have the capability to place crewed flights beyond that limit. That is what ORION project will accomplish. To get crewed flights beyond low earth orbit once again. This includes the Earth's moon, asteroids or Mars.

USA is a nation of crooks and liars

I deal in facts, data. Tell me, how do you fake CGI in 1969? Was it possible? No. Computer technology would show you that for sure, but that's none of my business right? Or is it.

I've been involved in computers since 1986. Visual basic was the best there was. Yet, could it fake a moon mission? NO...

The surface photography was created using a technique known as rear screen projection

The backgrounds were BLACK AND WHITE stills taken by Pioneer probes that just conveniently happened to land feet from the Apollo "Landing sites" These images were projected on a screen made of a material called scotchlite which was always in the background. In the NASA photo records, you will see panaramas with no lander or moon buggy in them and such. The foreground was a stage set and utilized PORTLAND CEMENT to simulate "moon dust".

The company that made the cameras was Hassleblad, and their best engineer said the photos were fakes , all photos had depth of field anomalies and showed multiple lighting sources,.

They had a fixed lens facing forward as it was mounted on their suits. Did they have to disconnect the Hasselblad camera, point at the ground and arbitrarily HOPE that the photo would come out in perfect focus? Without having to focus on any footprint?

Back in the day, on here, there was a post about that camera and how one of the directors of the company saying that the film in it would have melted or froze on the lunar surface.

I can prove I exist to anyone with eyes.

What you CANNOT do is show me one piece of evidence Apollyon landed men on the moon that I cannot INSTANTLY debunk as nonsense.

TRY ME.

Ther est of what you wrote is what you do, cast doubt on obvious reality and misrepresent what I said.

I say there is no way to predict what level of radiation in any particular latitude at any time in the future, AND I AM RIGHT.

Determining the lifespan of satelites involves AVERAGE flux and energy levels. Living things are no shielded machines.

The lander didn't kick up any moon dust with its boosters.

That is not evidence, it's absolute proof the landing was faked.

There's such a thing as Field of Depth.

After practicing with these cameras for months it's not hard to figure out which presets to use for which distance.


Garbled and bullshit.

PET has a melting point above 200C.
PET is a solid, IOW is already frozen.
The film NEVER touched the lunar surface.




Not by hoaxie "standards" of evidence.


People have CLAIMED that for decades.
People have FAILED to do so for decades.

All they do is handwave, or turn hysterically blind.


ALSEP DATA.


What hoaxies consider "obvious reality" is just a collection of lies, insanities, and brainfarts.
Not a single actual fact between the lot of 'em.


Proof by assertion is just that, a claim not supported by any evidence.

And what can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
You are dismissed.


Living things can recuperate from minor damage, machines can not.




This is a lie.


No this is proof that hoaxies are gullible sheep who believe the lies told by hoaxmongers without EVER applying their brain.

The surface photography was created using a technique known as rear screen projection

The backgrounds were BLACK AND WHITE stills taken by Pioneer probes that just conveniently happened to land feet from the Apollo "Landing sites" These images were projected on a screen made of a material called scotchlite which was always in the background. In the NASA photo records, you will see panaramas with no lander or moon buggy in them and such. The foreground was a stage set and utilized PORTLAND CEMENT to simulate "moon dust".

The company that made the cameras was Hassleblad, and their best engineer said the photos were fakes

, all photos had depth of field anomalies and showed multiple lighting sources,.

If you want to know for sure the missions were faked look at the biometric data for missions 7-17.

You will see the rate of exposure of the craft and the astronauts to radiation with Low Earth orbital Apollo missions that never left Low Earth orbit are essentially equal to those of "Lunar landing" missions.

To believe we landed 12 men on the moon in 1969-1972 without a single loss of life or serious injury is one of the most absurd and unintelligent ideas I have ever encountered. It isn't possible today, and it wasn't then either.

I am convinced of one thing though, the average american is so dumbed down he will believe anything he is told.

you have it all wrong, its called front screen projection and stanley k perfected it.

Blah! Blah...blah, blah, blah, blah! Blah, blah...blah, blah, blah, so blah.

Blah! Blah...blah, blah, blah, blah! Blah, blah...blah, blah, blah, so blah.

Since it is pressure gradient force moving the gases out of the rocket, the rocket doesn’t apply force and there is no opposite force on the rocket. The gases that move out of the rocket push off the atmosphere moving the rocket forward. It is the same principal of a propellers. It simply can work with an atmosphere to push off of

If you want to know for sure the missions were faked look at the biometric data for missions 7-17.

You will see the rate of exposure of the craft and the astronauts to radiation with Low Earth orbital Apollo missions that never left Low Earth orbit are essentially equal to those of "Lunar landing" missions. This is simply not possible, no matter how lucky they got.

To believe we landed 12 men on the moon in 1969-1972 without a single loss of life or serious injury is one of the most absurd and unintelligent ideas I have ever encountered. It isn't possible today, and it wasn't then either.


We are 20-30 years out from a successful manned landing.

I am convinced of one thing though, the average american is so dumbed down he will believe anything he is told.

The BEST video/documentary on the subject, written & [low budget] produced by an actual scientific investigative journalist (who was later found dead, mysteriously) is this one. He interviewed the friggin DIRECTOR of the Apollo "mission", the man responsible for training the astro-NOT$ on the usage of the L.E.M. moon lander...who goes on to look into the camera and state that he 'never had to train the astro-not$ to actually GO THROUGH THE LEM HATCH,[LOL!!!] - which is measured in the documentary & proven that it was not possibly able to allow a fully packed astronaut to enter or exit from. [the film producer then says 'so i guess they just had to TRAVEL THE 250,000 MILES TO THEN JUST "WING IT"] Good stuff, great footage, ignore the poor-mid 90's VHS quality to this copy that someone uploaded:

The BEST video/documentary on the subject, written & [low budget] produced by an actual scientific investigative journalist (who was later found dead, mysteriously) is this one. He interviewed the friggin DIRECTOR of the Apollo "mission", the man responsible for training the astro-NOT$ on the usage of the L.E.M. moon lander...who goes on to look into the camera and state that he 'never had to train the astro-not$ to actually GO THROUGH THE LEM HATCH,[LOL!!!] - which is measured in the documentary & proven that it was not possibly able to allow a fully packed astronaut to enter or exit from. [the film producer then says 'so i guess they just had to TRAVEL THE 250,000 MILES TO THEN JUST "WING IT"] Good stuff, great footage, ignore the poor-mid 90's VHS quality to this copy that someone uploaded:

LM hatch too small?

[link to www.nasa.gov (secure)]

Wow. That took almost 9 seconds to debunk.

Op thank you for debunking your own thread with the first post!

Have YOU actually LIDAR scanned an actual space suit and a LEM hatch to prove that a space suit will not fit through it?

This man has and disproves your entire thread.


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Rockets don’t work in space