Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

What do you mean, my post was put up four hours ago.

No, I don’t get tired dealing with the likes of you, I find it fascinating that you try so hard to convince others of some lame ass bullshit that never happened, can’t happen now, and will never happen in the future.

Rebuttal? To what? Your bullshit?

Lol.

Yeah, film "found on the floor of an editing-room" is going to outweigh the tonnes and tonnes of hard physical evidence that proves beyond any reasonable doubt that men walked on the Moon.

As I said, CTers have very asymptotical scepticism.
Anything that confirms their preconceived notion is believed without question or thought, no matter how obviously faked or stupid it is, while tonnes and tonnes of hard physical evidence that proves that they are wrong are simply ignored.

Just sheeple of a different colour.


Also, the opinion on what is very much a technical subject of someone who has trouble using a simple forum interface will be taken with a mountain-sized grain of salt.

Thread: Live Now- Investigative Research into Attack or Virus depends?

Gee, you’re a real brainiac, eh?

Lol

moon hoax tards, still rocking tard...

It’s just that you can’t provide any of it...

A meme? Okay, two can play at that game...

I am honored you did a thread search. Phuck off you twisted bastard.

Now, now, there’s no need to get mad...

Thanks for the red though, I like it.

Funniest part is that the Chinese and Russian fake probe images are remarkably similar to the old fake NASA images...

Can’t make this shit up...

Can’t go changing the landscape of the fake moon surface now can we...

Found this little gem in my karma box

A red thumbs down - You are a fucking child with the mentality of an infant

Thanks Victor Vector...

Your claim thus is that I spotted your post immediately after posting and did nothing else since other than compose a response.

Even the hard-of-thinking would realise they could never prove that.


You fail to realise that the discussion is for the benefit of the peanut gallery, not you.
You are clearly beyond hope.

My only purpose is to make you demonstrate that you don't know what you are talking about and are rather irrational about the whole thing.
People will than know what your opinion is worth.
Les than we paid for it.


A clown laughing at their own jokes is rather pathetic.


You didn't even ask.

Not that it would make any difference.
It always gets ignored.
Either it is all handwaved away as faked, without any support or justification, or it gets no comments at all.

Guess most of it goes over the average hoaxies head any way.
I find it telling that hoaxies often have to ask what the evidence for Men On The Moon is in the first place
I mean, didn't you need to know it first? It's after all the stuff that you need to prove was faked.


Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 06/29/2020 03:31 AM

Okay, you win, the moon landings were real and happened consecutively 6 times.

Happy now?

the china moon probe photos looked totally different, no terrain, just a drab, blue-gray coloured flat powder land.

it looked nothing like apollo

very strange, as I recall

Looks pretty grey and rocky to me, what are you looking at?

[link to techcrunch.com (secure)]

Okay, you win, the moon landings were real and happened consecutively 6 times.

Happy now?





And the winner isss....This guy!!

As I previously stated opinions are irrelevant.
And the opinion of someone as stupendously ill-informed as you even less so.

The only thing that matters is the evidence.
In over half a century hoaxies have presented none that was either relevant or stood up to scrutiny.

Meanwhile the historical record is overwhelmingly one-sided.


There are man-made retro-reflectors are on the Moon.
Every observatory in the world with a big enough laser can proof that.

We have a chain of evidence of how they got there.

We know the hardware, how and where, and by whom it was designed and build.
Certified as the real deal by any aerospace engineer who looked at them.
We know when it was launched, in front of literally millions of witnesses.
We tracked it to the Moon.
We know the men who placed them.
There is photographic documentation of the whole process.
Video, DAC, telemetry, dosimeters, voice recordings, live broadcasts, independent observations, including by the Soviets.
Thousands of autobiographical books, articles, and interviews, by some of the 400,000 people involved in the process. None of whom EVER voiced ANY doubt that what they did was not for real.

The telemetry from the science stations.
Tens of thousands of scientific publications and engineering reports based on the results from Apollo.

The science itself.

Much of it a complete surprise, and COMPLETELY CONSISTENT with anything that has been learned about the Moon since.

We have (or rather the Japanese do) conformation that the topological layout of the landing site documented by Apollo 15 DOES EXIST on the Moon.

This is information nobody could possibly have had at the time.

And there are the rocks.

Moon rocks. Hundreds of kilos.
Documented to been retrieved in-situ.
Often on live television with the geologists who got first dibs watching.
These geologist sometimes saying: No, that one, bring us that one!

Rocks verified by thousands of geologists the world over.
Matching the few ounces of Soviet samples.

And core samples. Which possibly couldn't even be robotically retrieved with today's technology.

There you have it. And I was being concise.

there's no fake backdrop of the same exact hills in multiple different event photos, like in a flintstones cartoon where they're in a car and the same backdrops flash by over and over.

BS. The space around us is 99.9% absolutely vacuum, air molecules only took 0.001% space at sea level. You are retard or uneducated.

Dude wut? Why are you preaching to the choir.

Your persistence paid off and all of us hoaxies have now been converted.

Outer space has very low density and pressure, and is the closest physical approximation of a perfect vacuum. But no vacuum is truly perfect, not even in interstellar space, where there are still a few hydrogen atoms per cubic meter.
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Wiki and textbooks are full of BS.

Gravity pulls all atoms in space into stars or planets.

Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. - Tesla

It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge of what energy is. We do not have a picture that energy comes in little blobs of a definite amount. It is not that way. -Feynman

All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, “What are light quanta?” Nowadays every Tom, Dick, and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. - Einstein

Theoretical physics has been totally messed up since Einstein's relativity became mainstream.
Science became a religion; relativity, quantum mechanics, string theory, the standard model, the big bang theory, and cosmology are all based on imaginary made up word puzzles, impossible assumptions, misinterpretations, and false mathematical equations. No theory is based on fact and logic; no theory has a precise mechanism, or cause and effect explained.

There is no such thing in reality as a photon particle, quantum state, quantum energy, quantum field, quantum gravity, energy level, electron shell, electron-hole, electron cloud, wave-particle duality, wave function collapse, uncertainty principle, black hole, dark matter, dark energy, graviton, virtual particle, space-time, time dilation, gravitational lensing, quantum entanglement, or photoelectric effect. Space cannot tell matter how to move, and matter cannot tell space how to curve. There is no fabric of space-time, no ripples of gravity wave in the vacuum of space.

For example, time dilation is a misinterpretation of the timer’s reading charged at a different speed, gravity, or temperature. Put the same clocks in the Sun, Mars, Earth, and flying on a plane, and in a freezer for 24 hours, and every clock will have a different reading, but all spent the same 24 hours simultaneously

Gravitational lensing is a misinterpretation of the hot gas on the Sun or gas clouds in deep space deflected light, not gravity.

Quantum entanglement is a misinterpretation of Coulomb's force at work. All lines of sight charged particles are connected by F=Ke x PQ/R^2, and therefore, act as entangled.

A black hole is an imaginary stuff that has a huge mass that its gravity is so strong that even light cannot escape from it so it looks black. Based on Einstein’s theory that gravity can bend light and slow down the light speed. This is impossible. If gravity can slow down the light speed, Sunlight and flashlight will have different speeds. Every star light will have a different speed.

No theory, no scientist can explain how 1 electron and 1 proton can form into a stable hydrogen atom yet. Look at all the pictures of atoms, what do you see? Why scientists cannot build a working model of an atom?

The standard model is absolutely incorrect. Fusion is impossible and imaginary, and the stars are not fusion reactors. That's why scientists wasted 80 years and lots of money to research and develop fusion without any success. If stars are fusion reactors and constantly release energy, why the temperature of the universe is stable? Why the so-called cosmic microwave background is stable and detectible?

Scientists don't know exactly what energy is yet. How could E=MC^2 be correct?

Electromagnetism is the most accepted theory, but it is not correct at all. Look at antennas, the antenna is a terminal, how can current flow back and forth in an antenna to produce so-called EM waves? A continuous, unbroken path through which electrons can flow is a closed circuit. Maxwell was wrong. There is no transverse wave moving at light speed in the vacuum due to there being no force carrier in existence.

Energy is the motive force carried by moving matter (kinetic energy) and the alternating current carried in atoms (thermal energy). Energy must coexist with the matter. Therefore, there is no light wave, and no energy traveling in space at light speed. All theories based on light propagating in the vacuum of space are mistaken.

All energy came from atom formation. Oppositely charged particles attract each other and the same charged particles repel each other to form an atom, and the atom carries charged particles’ kinetic energy and is constantly vibrating
.
The words of Tesla:
"Nature has stored up in the universe infinite energy. The eternal recipient and transmitter of this infinite energy is the ether. The recognition of the existence of ether, and of the functions it performs, is one of the most important results of modern scientific research. The mere abandoning of the idea of action at a distance, the assumption of a medium pervading all space and connecting all gross matter, has freed the minds of thinkers of an ever-present doubt, and, by opening a new horizon new and unforeseen possibilities has given fresh interest to phenomena with which we are familiar of old."

He missed the fact that universal repulsion force/levity is the eternal recipient and transmitter of this infinite energy. He misinterpreted levity as aether.

Close to 0 psi is a vacuum and rockets will not work

Rockets absolutely, 100%, unquestionably do work in a vacuum.

No one is going to “scrub” or delete this because it is fake BS.

Earth atmoshere next to a space vacuum without a strong barrier is not possible. Moon trips never happened, period.

The clip starting at 5:48 is from the movie "Capricorn One". Compare with this clip at 1:28 - [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

I have already and everyone ignored it, but let me try again:

- hundreds of pounds of carefully selected Moon rocks that have been examined by geologists around the world for decades
- 340,000 people involved in the program, not a single one has confessed it was hoaxed even though it's been fifty years
- Spacecraft independently tracked to and from the Moon
- Complete inability of hoax believers to construct a consistent theory as to how it was faked - the truth is that it would have been harder to fake than do it for real

the new Space Force is simply a reorganization of the satellite control divisions of the Air Force, Navy, and Army into their own force to better compete for funding. It is an idea that has been considered for decades.

Specifically talking about testing the electronics on the new spacecraft which are more susceptible than the electronics on Apollo. Plus they are testing for a path through the center of the belts where Apollo missions went around them. The path around is not available for interplanetary missions.