Lisa Marie Presley 's Twin Daughters taken into care by California DCFS | |
An Anonymous Cow
User ID: 73686824 United States 02/17/2017 11:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Apparently tons of pictures of children found on 80 devices belonging to her ex-husband. Quoting: Crystal Starlight [link to www.music-news.com] LOL. Presley's 250 million estate is gone and she survives by living on $100,000 a month from a trust.hahahaha. she's forced to live with an older daughter. Poor thing, only 100k a month? How can she survive on that? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53273258 United States 02/17/2017 11:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm having trouble wrapping my head around this one. How is it that she's losing custody when her ex-husband is the one who did something wrong??? Doesn't make sense to me. Maybe there's more to the story than what's being reported. Quoting: Shasta 70885965 There has to be!! She filed for divorce (ugly battle) and no longer lives with him. Google shows quite a few reporting this but they are all trash rags. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74003821 Australia 02/17/2017 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Bizarre story. Prisilla (who is all over the media now she is dating Tom Jones) and her famous actress daughter who is half sister to the twins who she is living with couldn't get temporary custody of the twins? Something really weird about it all. Lisa in and out of rehab... so obviously not in a fit place to be a full time mother.... Now Elvis' grandchildren in child protection care. Hate to think what might be happening to them there. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53273258 United States 02/17/2017 11:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4524052 United States 02/17/2017 11:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
FEARLESSone
User ID: 73623386 United States 02/17/2017 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Lisa Marie Presley divorce bombshell - Heir to Elvis' $300 million estate tells confidantes her husband Michael Lockwood was 'verbally and financially abusive' and fears ‘he's an unsafe father’ to twin girls" Read more: [link to www.dailymail.co.uk] Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook [link to www.dailymail.co.uk] It'd be nice if the flag next to my name represents the country I actually inhabit. |
MissCleo
User ID: 73977055 United States 02/17/2017 11:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah, I'll second that: [link to static1.purepeople.com] Guy might as well have a tattoo on his forehead that says "CREEPY PERV" Clockwork Orange. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72397927 United States 02/17/2017 11:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Undestroyer
Truth User ID: 74032961 United States 02/17/2017 12:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Terrible DCFS could just lead to more terrible experiences for the children. You cannot destroy my vision when you see my vision undestroyed because I am just an undestroyer. Thread: Food Combining Made Easy by Herbert Shelton a progenitor from the Natural Hygienist Movement "I am a hunter of peace, one who chases the elusive mayfly of love... errr something like that." -Vash the Stampede |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72620452 United States 02/17/2017 12:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah, I'll second that: [link to static1.purepeople.com] Guy might as well have a tattoo on his forehead that says "CREEPY PERV" ugh! That one is even worse! |
ShaddapAlready
User ID: 12384656 United States 02/17/2017 12:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm having trouble wrapping my head around this one. How is it that she's losing custody when her ex-husband is the one who did something wrong??? Doesn't make sense to me. Maybe there's more to the story than what's being reported. Quoting: Shasta 70885965 There can be only one reason she would lose custody for something her ex did, and that would be facilitating it. She probably helped with whoring her children out for money, as she has been making such a big fuss about being so broke she had to move in with her daughter. If she were truly innocent then she wouldn't be receiving the harshest possible punishment society can inflict on a mother -- the forcible removal of her children. It's hard to believe the volume (80!) of devices could exist without her knowledge. We'll see if she gets her kids back. If not we'll know CPS thinks she had something to do with it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73881074 United States 02/17/2017 12:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Apparently tons of pictures of children found on 80 devices belonging to her ex-husband. Quoting: Crystal Starlight [link to www.music-news.com] Ok, so a couple things came to mind after reading the article.. -- Snipped from your link: "She continued to reveal that police raided her former home with Lockwood and discovered 80 of his devices, but these have yet to be fully analysed." "I have no idea what else may be on those devices and fear that there are more and worse images and evidence in these un-analysed devices." -- According to the article, Presley and Lockwood filed for divorce last June. Warning bells going off with this alone. They are in a divorce battle that includes fighting over money. Interesting that HER home was raided for what MIGHT have been on HIS computer and devices. These are supposedly un-analyzed devices. So they just raided her home in case there might be something on them? I kind of doubt that's the exact truth. More than likely she KNOWS what was on those devices, either because she knows her ex and his preferences or maybe because she put them there to bring him down. Think about it. If you had 80 devices full of crap like that, would you leave it all behind for someone else to find? -- Snipped from your link: "She added in the papers that she has to pay for two nannies to accompany Lockwood as monitors when he visits his daughters." -- I'm curious to know more about the reason she was paying two nannies to be monitors for his visits. Why would she feel the need to do this? Sounds like this was 'her choice' that there be monitors instead of a court decision, otherwise the court would have been providing court-appointed (and paid for) supervision of their own. So was she making a statement before the raid, that he was bad news for her kids? And was the court ignoring that? So maybe he really was, and that's why they stepped in with the raid to see the proof on his comp and likely on thumb drives, etc? Or..... did it take all this time since June for her to gather a bunch of crap to put on 80 devices and make it look like it's his? Some things I wonder about: Why would the courts remove the kids from her? Are these Lockwood's kids? California does have laws about taking the kids if one parent has knowledge of something that the other parent is guilty of but does not take the steps to protect the children from whatever that is. The reason DCFS took the kids is not mentioned in that article. And then.. check out the money angle, he wants a shitload of money she doesn't want to pay. What better way to get out of that than to accuse him of something like this, whether he is truly guilty or not. I hope the attorneys are looking at all angles. . |
She needs to be locked away User ID: 74038086 United States 02/17/2017 12:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71047645 United States 02/17/2017 12:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Apparently tons of pictures of children found on 80 devices belonging to her ex-husband. Quoting: Crystal Starlight [link to www.music-news.com] Ok, so a couple things came to mind after reading the article.. -- Snipped from your link: "She continued to reveal that police raided her former home with Lockwood and discovered 80 of his devices, but these have yet to be fully analysed." "I have no idea what else may be on those devices and fear that there are more and worse images and evidence in these un-analysed devices." -- According to the article, Presley and Lockwood filed for divorce last June. Warning bells going off with this alone. They are in a divorce battle that includes fighting over money. Interesting that HER home was raided for what MIGHT have been on HIS computer and devices. These are supposedly un-analyzed devices. So they just raided her home in case there might be something on them? I kind of doubt that's the exact truth. More than likely she KNOWS what was on those devices, either because she knows her ex and his preferences or maybe because she put them there to bring him down. Think about it. If you had 80 devices full of crap like that, would you leave it all behind for someone else to find? -- Snipped from your link: "She added in the papers that she has to pay for two nannies to accompany Lockwood as monitors when he visits his daughters." -- I'm curious to know more about the reason she was paying two nannies to be monitors for his visits. Why would she feel the need to do this? Sounds like this was 'her choice' that there be monitors instead of a court decision, otherwise the court would have been providing court-appointed (and paid for) supervision of their own. So was she making a statement before the raid, that he was bad news for her kids? And was the court ignoring that? So maybe he really was, and that's why they stepped in with the raid to see the proof on his comp and likely on thumb drives, etc? Or..... did it take all this time since June for her to gather a bunch of crap to put on 80 devices and make it look like it's his? Some things I wonder about: Why would the courts remove the kids from her? Are these Lockwood's kids? California does have laws about taking the kids if one parent has knowledge of something that the other parent is guilty of but does not take the steps to protect the children from whatever that is. The reason DCFS took the kids is not mentioned in that article. And then.. check out the money angle, he wants a shitload of money she doesn't want to pay. What better way to get out of that than to accuse him of something like this, whether he is truly guilty or not. I hope the attorneys are looking at all angles. . The court doesn't pay for monitors the supervised parent does |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73881074 United States 02/17/2017 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | found this older article dated in June 2016. apparently she has known for quite some time that he is "unsafe" to be around the kids. Quoting: FEARLESSone "Lisa Marie Presley divorce bombshell - Heir to Elvis' $300 million estate tells confidantes her husband Michael Lockwood was 'verbally and financially abusive' and fears ‘he's an unsafe father’ to twin girls" Read more: [link to www.dailymail.co.uk] Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook [link to www.dailymail.co.uk] Even more reason to check out what she says more fully. She has lots of reasons $$$ to accuse him. On the other hand.. could be true, and she may be honestly trying to protect the kids. . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31958838 United States 02/17/2017 01:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm having trouble wrapping my head around this one. How is it that she's losing custody when her ex-husband is the one who did something wrong??? Doesn't make sense to me. Maybe there's more to the story than what's being reported. Quoting: Shasta 70885965 There can be only one reason she would lose custody for something her ex did, and that would be facilitating it. She probably helped with whoring her children out for money, as she has been making such a big fuss about being so broke she had to move in with her daughter. If she were truly innocent then she wouldn't be receiving the harshest possible punishment society can inflict on a mother -- the forcible removal of her children. NOT TRUE!!! There is ENOURMOUS profit in the child protection industry, many innocent people have been railroaded and lost their children. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73881074 United States 02/17/2017 01:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73881074 United States 02/17/2017 01:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ontheverge
User ID: 35690621 United States 02/17/2017 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73881074 United States 02/17/2017 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just because the state took custody does not mean they were removed from her home. However, it does mean the state would set the rules I.e. No communication with him (over riding previous judicial orders regarding visitation and contact). I'm not saying they didn't it's just the article doesn't really say if they were removed from her physically. There is a difference. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72610063 Some very good points, thanks! . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70384968 United States 02/17/2017 01:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
WhatsItAllAbout Alfie
User ID: 65398400 United States 02/17/2017 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rachael123
User ID: 72409878 United States 02/17/2017 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Bizarre story. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74003821 Prisilla (who is all over the media now she is dating Tom Jones) and her famous actress daughter who is half sister to the twins who she is living with couldn't get temporary custody of the twins? Something really weird about it all. Lisa in and out of rehab... so obviously not in a fit place to be a full time mother.... Now Elvis' grandchildren in child protection care. Hate to think what might be happening to them there. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74079932 United States 02/17/2017 01:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Apparently tons of pictures of children found on 80 devices belonging to her ex-husband. Quoting: Crystal Starlight [link to www.music-news.com] Uh, why would she be punished for stuff her ex husband did? Maybe that's why he's her EX!!! |
ShaddapAlready
User ID: 12384656 United States 02/17/2017 01:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69408899 United States 02/17/2017 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm having trouble wrapping my head around this one. How is it that she's losing custody when her ex-husband is the one who did something wrong??? Doesn't make sense to me. Maybe there's more to the story than what's being reported. Quoting: Shasta 70885965 She probably had no way to prevent his access to the twins the way DCFS would be able to do. This is by far the most probable reason. There may be a credible threat by the father to snatch the girls and hide them, in the US or overseas. He may be desperate at this point - thousands of child sexual abuse photos in his possession...? = Prison sentence. |
DuckSpeaker
User ID: 22289285 United States 02/17/2017 01:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DuckSpeaker
User ID: 22289285 United States 02/17/2017 01:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
snark
Forum Administrator 02/17/2017 01:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | she has a house here in Nashville (think it's up for sale though) T For Texas, T For Tennessee! The virtue of courage is a prerequisite for the practice of all other virtues, because otherwise one is virtuous only when virtue has no cost. There are times when something needs to be done, and yet we know that if we step up and do this needful thing, we will pay a heavy personal price. -C.S. Lewis |
uh User ID: 71876285 United States 02/17/2017 01:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |