Guccifer 2.0 Hacked Clinton Foundation Donor Information

I think the hack is legit, Wikileaks has posted a link, and they are very careful posting links to other sources. There is a lot of information to sift through and the word is mum in the media and it looks like a lot of censorship on the web. Why would they not report on it and claim it is fake if they are sure it is fake? Why avoid all mention? Why censor twitter and facebook etc? I think they were all caught with their pants down, they were still congratulating themselves that Assange didn't release anything and tuning in to the debate. If Wikileaks has posted a leak, they must have already known and had a chance to verify it as legit, or maybe Assange passed it off to be release on non Wikileaks sites first. I was a bit skeptical last night, but today, with the story haven broken 24 hours ago and still silence about it, plus wikileaks linking it, I am more inclined to believe this is real and just the tip of the iceberg.

You make some very good points.

Who are Brook and Fink?

IF YOU CANNOT SEE ANYTHING
ABOUT THIS ANYWHERE ELSE, IT IS
BECAUSE "THEY" ENGAGED THE
CENSOR BOT TO WIPE IT
EVERYWHERE I am getting a little bit worried, it looks like the censorship
really is stopping this. They are now trying to front it as a hoax. But the problem is that all the social media posts on this
topic were exploding last night, and then suddenly just froze
where they were 1 hour after this broke. There is no
explicable reason for this other than a massive ability to
shut it all down from a central location which would never
have been used if this was a hoax. Even my message window got shut off entirely, and I can't see where or how
that was done. The only thing that works is the front page.
Conclusion: NOT A HOAX, and the control over the web is
far more vast than anyone ever expected. Guccifer 2.0 is not the Guccifer that is in jail, and he was
asking for server space to host it all because it was too
much. This would be expected if it was not a hoax. Someone
else did this drop which is why it is Guccifer 2.0 and I
suspect it is the Russians or white hats that actually
provided the files, and they have to make it all look plausible (like an individual who might have problems getting enough
space for all the files online.) The coincidence with this and Assange yesterday lends
credibility to it all. It appears Assange used a front. Hillary and the rest of the elite scum are asking for bullets to fly
their direction by blocking this, and the bullets probably won't be
from the general public. They will be from a powerful entity that
does not want world war 3. Someone somewhere did the hack
and it was not "joe Guccifer". That much is obvious. And that
someone will be far more capable of taking direct physical action than "Joe guccifer" ever could be. UPDATE: It looks like Hillary's team really is using NSA
hackware against people, this time to stop this leak from
spreading. The method? To attack people's computers and
destroy them. The only reason I am still up is because you
can't write to the ROM chip my specially configured computer
runs from, but they did try to attack and kill the CPU. If I had a normal setup, the hard drive would now be gone and as it
is, they already made the laptop produce a burning smell
while the CPU fan went to max. They want this leak stopped at all costs, and have resorted to
blowing people's computers out. Thankfully I don't have CoreVpro. This is probably why practically no locations on the web have this leak despite how huge it is. -JimStone

That would be David Brock and Elliot FInk. They are comspiring to commit murder- their chat log was hacked showing they are using some software to personally identify people online and 'Seth Rich" them. It is an uncovered plan for mass murder and has been all but scrubbed as well. Everyone needs to say alert.

Its overwhelming when you think about it . Stunning .
They play by their own set of rules .

Fink might be Elliot Fink from the archived conversation involving NSA grade tracking software of trump supporters. Also have a look see for a Charles Shaw he works for google inc as a software engineer and I believe also engaged in that same conversation with david brock and elliot fink. I have yet to id ekim.. umm Charles Shaw also donated to her campaign frequently an in small amounts probably to get around donation limits though that hardly matters anymore with the DNC using a credited system so they can double dip if they like.

Ohoooh interesting.

This was posted in page 10 from another poster from the dump. I think this gives some insight into what the plan is to cover up the dump and control the media using this "Team 34". Even in the second to last redacted words if you blow up the text it clearly reads "Cover Up". I think they anticipated dump and put in preemptive measures to control "Clients Campaign"

[link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)]

Dirty dirty deeds. I can only hope a few truthful patriots come to the forefront.

Not sure where I saw it, but I think someone identified ekim as Elizabeth Kim.

Is Elizabeth Kim a journalist?

Clinton foundation they can just deny

but I heard this is a hoax

If it was a hoax, I think by now the Clinton campaign would be using it to smear Trump and Putin especially if it's fake. Whenever anything bad comes out about her, she gets indignant and turns it against Trump, right wing conspiracy, Russians. Why is this being handled by her campaign differently? That's what I would have expected her to do, but instead it is being censored in the media and on the internet. Nobody is talking about it, not even to deny it.

THE BACK STORY: Yesterday the image of Guccifer
(marketed as Guccifer 2) did the first part of a huge data
dump on the Democrats, which proves they received
kickbacks from the banker bailouts and live by "pay to play".
It was erroneously stated to be a Clinton foundation hack so
the Clinton foundation took advantage of that and issued a "truthful" response saying it was fake. PROBLEM: it was not
fake. Though it is titled a "Clinton foundation hack", the hack is
broader than just a Clinton foundation hack. YES, tons of Clinton foundation documents are there, and tons of documents
regarding other democrat crimes are there. I really don't know
how it was done, because the data rape was so complete. It had
to be the NSA that did this, and the intelligence agencies are now
in a tug of war beteen the dark side and the white hat side (my
guess, and it is only a guess.) There are no "insider contacts" or "rumors circulating" with this one as far as this web site goes. How do I know it is real, and how do I know there is a battle
between good and evil in the intelligence agencies? SIMPLE: 1. It is extremely implausible that any individual could have nailed
so much stuff. This is over a million documents in total, the type
of data cache that you won't just find on a single hacked machine.
This is a full spectrum data rape of an entire criminal infrastructure,
(and yes, it was a criminal infrastructure) And 2.It is censored where possible. The huge black intelligence juggernaut was activated yesterday to blow it off the web. Now it is available at Atlantia online with a password of Caligula36 but if you are in the U.S. (and a few other locations) it is
censored and will not come in. And it might already be censored at this location for everyone. This is going to be a big whack-a-
mole game. The open public password says it all The manner in which it was posted (requiring an open public
password) proves that it was getting censored when linked
yesterday, and the only way to get it public was to put it in a web
cache somewhere with a password that Google could not get
beyond to notify the authorities it was available somewhere and
had to be wiped out. THAT ALONE PROVES IT IS REAL, AND PROVES IT WAS CENSORED because to keep it available
anywhere, it had to be hidden behind a password. WHY WOULD A PASSWORD BE NEEDED TO KEEP IT
AVAILABLE LONGER? ANSWER: It is a primary function of Google to notify the authorities
when something they are interested in gets posted. Google
hits the entire (meaningful) web (including this web site)
once every 8 minutes or so (and I hate that, because google
does this web site no good at all, only damage.) All they have to do is tell Google to look for a string of text
that only appears in what they want banned and Google will
automatically provide practically instant feedback telling
them when something pops up somewhere. Norobots
command does not work to stop it. SO GUCCIFER(tm) HAD
TO PUT THE FILES BEHIND A PASSWORD, SO GOOGLE COULD NOT NOTIFY THE AUTHORITIES. That is why this
time around the Guccifer files were password protected, with
an open public password. All of this means, beyond all doubt, that this data drop is the real
deal. If it was fake, they'd shout it to the world and laugh at it.
They would not instantly wipe it whenever it is posted, forcing
"Guccifer" to keep it out of the watchful eye of Google. -JimStone

Well,my friend you have a few good points
however..do not underestimate the power of lazyness and stupidity:)))

1.I have made atlantia.online and all the otehr sites at 123systems.net back in january 6th
I needed to upgrade to an enterprise package of 75 GB storage when I hosted the first dump of Guccifer files from 2012 when he got in jail
and the site demanded me to setup a password for my ftp.atlantia.online site
the pass is now Caligulas36:) thanks very much for mentioning it

2.I have moved in every month the sites around the web to avoid getting caught and yes...I have anonymous access at [email protected] because that is the domain name
I have also set Apache and the FTP server to accept billions of people in the same time
I also got a very beefy virtual machine...

3.however,the domain name is in Romanian and most of you folks speak English therefore I needed to refer to atlantia.online for indexing and speaking purposes
and on the secondary websites I no longer have anon acces therefore the pass is required

Yes,I could have splitted the 7 websites on 7 virtual machines
but you know..money...time...and so on

Words cannot describe what it means that there are people like you. It means everything.

im pretty that is the reason for all those facilities that handle fetal body parts stem cell research have been going up in smoke....
CLINTON's run baby parts too...

they destroying more evidence

Wiki disclosed possible health problems with HC

[link to donaldtrumpnews.co]

Bump ya bump ya bump

Truth is a lie and I'm a lier and that's the truth