Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,330 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,987,081
Pageviews Today: 2,756,746Threads Today: 670Posts Today: 13,011
09:00 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

"The Lost History of Atlantis" - Legitimate Historical Account? - poll

 
loveexists
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 66790266
United States
08/31/2016 12:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
"The Lost History of Atlantis" - Legitimate Historical Account? - poll
POLL: "The Lost History of Atlantis" - Legitimate Historical Account? - poll
 Legitimate Historical Account
 "Creative Fiction"
 The former, intended to appear as the latter
 False History put out as disinformation
 "Creative Fiction" used by tptb as disinformation
 An accurate translation of 'ancient documents' its translator discovered;documents tptb put out as disinfo millennia ago
 An accurate translation of 'ancient documents' containing both truth&falsehood,but believed2be factual by their authors
 Historical Truth mixed with Falsehood so as to 'muddy the waters'
 The History, if read 'literally', is false, however, 'encoded' in it is the 'Actual History of Atlantis' ...
 The 'History' is an accurate translation of documents from an alternate timeline 'shifted' in2 this one
 The "History' is an inaccurate translation of ancient documents which may or may not have been about 'atlantis'
 other
 Blank (View Results) 



Man claims to have discovered a 'lost history of atlantis' ...

You can read here the whole story of a hitherto unknown civilisation, and decide for yourself if it is the true story of a whole society forgotten for millennia, or simply a work of imagination.

I discovered this very detailed history of Atlantis and her empire - "Sayatal atlantisayu ed atlanan ceriehayu" in the original tongue - as a handwritten document in a package on my doorstep! That much I know to be fact. Yet the history itself appears to be the work of an author describing the archaeological and literary discoveries about Atlantis and neighbouring countries found beneath the Sahara Desert. Is this truth - and if so, how can it be, as we know of no such discoveries being made in our world? Is it a document I have somehow received from the future, or perhaps from an alternate timeline? Or is it all a long invention by the unknown writer?


[link to grahamjmabey.tripod.com]

The existence of Atlantis and indeed of all the peoples and civilisations which flourished for centuries so long ago on the Great Continent was completely unknown to modern Western man until the most recent times. This is because of the massive geological convulsions which shattered this whole continent some 15000 years ago, (after the year 900 in Atlantean chronology) and buried it beneath the present Sahara desert in Africa. All living creatures, as well as every artifact of the period thus perished and vanished as if they had never been, and our whole world itself was tipped over so that an area well north of the Equator thus ended up buried under a region now very close to it. Myths of a great civilisation called Atlantis did survive and were written about by the Ancient Greeks, and again from time to time up until the twentieth century. But no real facts survived, other than that it perished in a gigantic geological catastrophe. Even its location was unknown: it was generally believed to have sunk beneath the waves of the Atlantic Ocean.

Now it has been rediscovered under the African sands, and all the time more and more evidence of the mighty history of Atlantis is being brought to light. Archaeologically speaking, the only part of the Great Continent that can actually be unearthed is the north-western corner, including the areas of Atlantis and Helvris, most of Ycïel Atlantis and a small part of the Marossan coast. To this can be added the north of the Province of Thainen Thissaindix and the N.W. corner of Manralia. All the rest of the old Continent lies either beneath the Ahaggar or Atlas Mountains in North Africa, or is otherwise completely irrecoverable. One exception from this Ancient World is the so-called South Island ("Trayanaxo"), which should lie some 250 miles north of Timbuktu in Mali, and there appears to be some recent evidence that a part of this may now have been found.


[link to grahamjmabey.tripod.com]

... It was in 166 that the Atlantis finally succeeded in unifying various small states, each run by the local nobles. The resulting large state became a kingdom, but in the 190's it was plunged into civil war as some of the nobles sought to overthrow the king and regain their ancient rights. The noble who won the war and inherited the whole kingdom was Lir-Craonos ...

[link to grahamjmabey.tripod.com]

Is this "Lost History of Atlantis" a legitimate historical account? 'Creative fiction'? The former, designed to appear as the latter, so as to avoid 'provoking the wrath' of the 'academic establishment'? Misinformation? Fact mixed with half-truths and/or disinfo? Something else?
Because of the very nature OF duality, one must accept as factual duality's transient presence in order to truly comprehend its objective non-existence
loveexists  (OP)

User ID: 66790266
United States
09/01/2016 12:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "The Lost History of Atlantis" - Legitimate Historical Account? - poll
Some more excerpts ...

... As far back into the mists of time as we are able to penetrate, there seem always to have been empires dominating large tracts of the Great Continent. As we delve back into the pre-Atlantean centuries, our information on the movements and residents of the peoples of the Continent becomes increasingly fitful. Our sources for these periods number three : archaeological survivals, written remains in the languages of these peoples, and historical reminiscences of later times, above all of the Atlanteans.

Using Atlantean chronology, which dates the theoretical beginnings of an Atlantean state to the year 0, we can venture back certainly as far as -1400 with some security. About that time, and in fact also for some centuries earlier, a vast tract of the continent was dominated by the Marossan Empire. This extended at its greatest extent from almost the eastern edge of the later Atlantean Empire north to include the subsequent Keltish areas, west into later Ycïel Atlantis and Phonaria, and south to the Helvengïo. However the western part of Atlantis itself, from the R.Rollepp to the west of the Lillerunix, plus the Numidis area of Helvrïeh seems never to have been conquered by the Marossans. In Atlantean times there were still quite a number of impressive remains built by this people, especially in the NW. parts of the Continent, such as Marossan itself, and Phonaria. Quite a bit was also reconstructed of its language by the Atlanteans, mostly from inscriptions, names of places, and the study of Keltish, which was evidently a development of one particular dialect of Marossan. Thus we find in Atlantean times the mountain named Toill Caidhu in N.E. Marossan, where Toill is the Marossan word for Mountain , and Caidhu the Marossan for Old. The Keltish for these two words is Dol and Cadd, so the similarity is clear.

Some time just after -1400 the Marossan Empire disappeared, at least in part. Three new, smaller empires appear on the scene, all around the period -1400- -1300. These were the Dravedean Empire, which took over the later area of Chalcrïeh, and further S.E. across the R. Gestes; the North Numedean Empire, which occupied the whole of later Helvrïeh, Atlantidïeh and the area of the Jutes; and finally the South Numedean Empire, which took over most of the area later ruled by Atlantis to the south of the Helvengïo as far east as the R.Vulcan. This latter area was not in fact ever under the control of the Marossan Empire. The Dravideans, as well as the North and South Numedeans were evidently related, and the latter two languages were merely dialects of each other. Both later Jutish and Manralian were descendants respectively of North and South Numedean. As with Marossan, there remained into Atlantean times relics of these two empires, albeit less impressive than the Marossan ones - ruins, earthworks, and other archaeological features could be found in Numidis in the north, and Numedeas and other areas of the south. The original N.Numedean peoples later fled to Numidis and the N.W. parts of Atlantis when the Juralic invasions took place, while S. Numedean peoples became intermingled in the south with folk of Southern stock, and later on with Atlantean settlers. Many examples of the speech of the Numedeans can be found in place-names, for example Daigorunix in Numidis, where Daigor represents N.Numedean Doigos, old; and Numaipson, east of Numedeas in the south, where the first element is of course Numedean, and Ipson is Opson, the Numedean for Hill.
...

[link to grahamjmabey.tripod.com]

... After the execution of the Emperor Crehonerex in 591, the Republicans in power in Atlantis knew, and exulted in the fact that they had burnt their boats. There could be no going back now - it was all or nothing, the Republic or death. Pranonni, the Leader of the Council, now stretched every nerve to organise the Provinces under Republican control, and all their inhabitants to achieve victory over the Imperialists on the battlefield, and the establishment of a true Republican system of government.

Between 591 and 592, the Republican armies advanced steadily eastwards through Chalcrïeh I, conquering nearly all the Province. But in the end, the Imperialists regained their morale, and with superior numbers and larger, heavier forces pressed the Republicans back westwards later in 592 and 593. The Republicans found that the advantages that their lighter, more mobile, and more enthusiastic forces had over the demoralised Imperialists in the earlier years, was of less avail to them now, as the battles became more in the way of slugging matches, in which numbers, weight and experience told most. The Republicans fell back to some earthworks and small fortifications, which had been built years earlier to protect Cennatlantis from an attack from the east. The Imperialists were unable to progress any further, and in early 593 began to settle themselves in entrenched camps opposite their enemy, a mile or so to the east. ...


[link to grahamjmabey.tripod.com]

It's rather 'intriguing', whatever it is ...
Because of the very nature OF duality, one must accept as factual duality's transient presence in order to truly comprehend its objective non-existence
loveexists  (OP)

User ID: 66790266
United States
09/01/2016 12:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "The Lost History of Atlantis" - Legitimate Historical Account? - poll
bump 3
Because of the very nature OF duality, one must accept as factual duality's transient presence in order to truly comprehend its objective non-existence
KC_Goldshine

User ID: 1295383
United States
09/01/2016 12:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "The Lost History of Atlantis" - Legitimate Historical Account? - poll
spock
KC_Goldshine



"Know guns, no crime. No guns, know crime." - Ralph Lauretano

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms" - Thomas Jefferson

"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty." - Thomas Jefferson

"It's easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled." - Mark Twain

"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." - Thomas Jefferson

"Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one." - Benjamin Franklin

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." - Said to be Voltaire, but really - Unknown
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 71293830
United States
09/01/2016 01:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: "The Lost History of Atlantis" - Legitimate Historical Account? - poll
very interesting topic.

For the longest time I have believe the Atlanteans were. or are the "good" guys fighting the system today, and thought history. Fighting the archons, and parasite reptilians.

There is a reason why the main story out there is that the atlanteans were bad and destroyed themselves. They always flip everything.





GLP