Science says liberals, not conservatives, are psychotic

You stop, lying shill. Your comment is nonsense and non sequitur anyway. All you ever do here is introduce confusion (your job).

There is a single agenda and all presidents follow it. They all fill their cabinets with CFR shills.

They have different spiels for whatever side of the sheeple politic they are supposedly representing. But the NWO agenda never halts.

They are big gullible dummies. Their leaders are not big hearted fine Christians. They are secret society owned devil worshipers.

Conservatives allowed themselves to be lied to by the 911 false flag. They allowed themselves to be led into Iraq and to kill hundreds of thousands of civilians who had nothing to do with the 911 false flag.

Conservatives have no problem with the 3rd world being their slaves just so long as they never have to see the misery and the cheap goods and oil keeps flowing...and when it doesn't they tacitly support their government killing whomever stopped the flow.

They are fat and complacent. And they are culpable for what is about to happen.

And they refuse to open their eyes to their sin. Instead they hard on about how good and generous they are.

Aggression, like felonious behavior, is not a perfect predictor of psychopathy, but it's a very good indicator. If someone is willing to use aggression against his neighbor, I would say, generally speaking, that person lacks empathy, though. Agree? Lack of empathy is the only thing that guarantees you're dealing with a psychopath, but we have to look for outward signs because there's no way to know what's in someone's heart, and a psychopath is sure not going to tell you.

I still take issue with the description of Islam as "conservative," though. Islam is, economically, as far left as it gets. Islamic countries are social welfare states, redistributing a small amount of oil revenue to the masses while amassing enormous wealth for the kings and dictators, with their governments either owning or controlling the means of production. They range from socialist to fascist, and neither of those are conservative, free enterprise, solutions. They also fuck goats and children, and often with the "straight" men, each other, even though, if one is determined to be gay, they'll kill him or imprison him, which are definitely not conservative values on the social side. In Iran, they'll cut off your penis and call you a tranny just to try to avoid the existence of gays in their culture. Their subjugation of women and infidels is so far beyond anything Christians ever did, I don't know how it can even be considered conservative. It's just insane.

Take this little quiz. It has a graph that shows a more accurate portrayal of political belief than the old left-right spectrum where people who believe in freedom in all aspects of life are near the top, the traditional left and right are represented, and at the bottom are the statists. Islam is statist, not conservative.

[link to www.theadvocates.org (secure)]

The sick liberals switched the data around. Makes sense...

in psychology terms, yes, aggressive is a symptom in passive aggressive and manic depressive personality disorders. lack of empathy is indeed another symptom.
Christian laws are based upon lack of those, what the Founders were escaping as Europe fell into the Inquisition.

if we can use history as an indicator of direction. the Inquisition was also a period when the Muslims were being driven out. because of their aggressive nature. whereas, Europe was in a state between Explorers and Conservative Reformists. very similar to what we are living today.

however, the differences are important to note to see the end game. it took 200 years for the New World to be independent from feudalism. if we go by modern timeframe, taking into account we've been in conflict since 1970 (oil) then things are moving much more quickly.

now I'll check out the chart. thanks.

that's the dumbest quiz ever.
hahahahah.

who picked those questions?
so narrow. so unimportant.
jezus.
lol

their tone of voice almost always turns violent.

doesn't matter how friendly or reasonable you try to present dry factual information, they will shout it down and use emotions and name calling to "refute" the truth.. and unfortunately about 90% of people use/resonate the same way of "communicating".. so they will side with the charlatans and mob up together like a BLM protest, start yelling and name calling until the truth is completely squashed. They even bring whistles now to shut down reasonable debate and sharing of factual knowledge.

And libtards only pretend to care about screwed-up, miserable countries and their people. But if those nations are like Venezuela and run by socialists (libtards), libs think the misery and poverty are excusable and can only be solved with even more libtardism.

Dear Liberal Hypocrites
[link to youtu.be (secure)]


Dear Liberal Hypocrites #2
[link to youtu.be (secure)]

And the few libertarians standing in the corner wondering why the fuck is everyone else so screwed up,can you leave us alone?

^ Liberal education is proof that government schooling is rotten ^

It was straight to the point, no kidding.

Says I'm libertarian with the slightest tilt to the left.
The left tilt because I said "maybe" about SS. Many out there have worked for many years and paid in, but weren't able to put aside enough to retire because of the cost of living. I hear it everyday. They have some, but not enough.
Some say they had significant savings, but had to dip in to get by.

Wanted to say "maybe" on the charity statement, but I really am for private charity as opposed to government handouts.
I don't see how the number of charitable people can keep up with the number of those in need these days because of the economy.
I'm not talking about welfare kings and queens. I mean your average individual or family who has fallen on hard times.

What about those who are simply unemployable? I wouldn't hire them, you wouldn't hire them, but they're here.
Isn't it psychopathic to say they should just die?

I suppose I can't "fit" anywhere because of the ifs, ands or buts.

Conservatives believe in personal responsibility while liberals believe in shared responsibility. You can't be a liberal and a conservative at the same time because You either own Your mistakes or You don't.

The liberals are the conservatives here. Close borders , stop muslims, keep gay marriage illegal liberals. They do better than poor old trump ever will.

My uncle (seriously) once told me, "Show me a young republican, and I'll show you a man with no heart; show me an old democrat, and I'll show you a man with no brain."

I agree. And the important thing to remember is that this is by design, a typical divide and conquer strategy.

It just so happens though, that almost all the braindead, deluded, and downright evil, ended up on the left (sinister) side of the Hegelian Dialectic equation. Not that the "right" doesn't have a few of these too; it doesn't matter to a psychopath, whatever suits their purposes...

To add to this, my father once told me that things are never black and white; the truth is always in the gray area. "Walk the middle path", said Buddha...

I have trouble with it. I can't honestly categorize myself.

Told my son once that black and white can't exist separately in a gray world.

The point is that people are lazy. Nobody wants to think for themselves, do their own searching, find their own truth. It's fucking hard work, true, but it's what being human means. Rest is for the dead.

The ones who simply adopt the thoughts and opinions fed to them by the TV god are already dead.

The spectrum of human behavior can easily be displayed using the axis of individualism <-----> authoritarianism. This is far more important, IMHO, than the idiotic right vs left.

...which could also be said as "free will vs slavery."

The problem is that nobody wants free will. They've actually given it away to the slave masters.

The people of Earth allowed the present situation to unfold or actively helped it along.

For example, why does Monsanto exist, and why is it so powerful? Because farmers buy the product. Why do farmers buy the product? To make a living within the political and economic constructs that they believe in. They make a living growing poison and killing the planet because kraft, nestle, and all the other garbage food corporations buy the crops. They buy the crops because the consumers just keep on shoving the toxic shite down their throats.

I can only conclude that the people of Earth are suicidal. We work to make money that we use to pay for our own destruction.

""
A political-science journal that published an oft-cited study claiming conservatives were more likely to show traits associated with “psychoticism” now says it got it wrong. Very wrong.

The American Journal of Political Science published a correction this year saying that the 2012 paper has “an error” — and that liberal political beliefs, not conservative ones, are actually linked to psychoticism.
""

Typical Mongrel-Thiest, Jew-Ploy, Psy-Op...

They know that no-one ever remembers a retraction, or a correction...

They only remember the "Headlines"...

Mind-Pattern-Programming...
.

?