|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
It's Not About a Piece of Fruit! It's About The Twins!
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Sobriquet™ |
|
Post Content
|
It's like taking genesis 4 in Torah
4 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.
2 And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.
& twisting it into
Adam and Eve fornicating with the adversary.
Not a translation OP your logic fails.
Quoting: M1.618 We'll have to agree to disagree. That's all I can tell you. 50% rule: Aramaic translation of Nevi'imA Targum (plural: targumim) is an Aramaic translation of the Hebrew Bible written or compiled in the land of Israel, or in Babylonia, from the Second Temple period until the early Middle Ages (late first millennium). According to the Talmud, the Targum on Nevi'im was composed by Jonathan ben Uzziel. Like Targum Onkelos on the Torah, Targum Jonathan is an eastern (Babylonian) Targum with early origins in the west (Land of Israel). Like the Targum to the Torah, Targum Jonathan to Nevi'im served a formal liturgical purpose: it was read alternately, verse by verse, in the public reading of the Haftarah and in the study of Nevi'im. Yemenite Jews continue the above tradition to this day, and have thus preserved a living tradition of the Babylonian vocalization for the Targum to Nevi'im. [ link to www.newworldencyclopedia.org] Clearly you are stubborn and are justifying yourself listening to 'rabbis' explanations of what verses mean. In other words, you are content to believe them, not God. Catholicism - it's priests tell the whole church that verse x means y. All become united under y, not x. Targum - it's rabbis tell the whole congregation that verse x means y. All become united under y, not x. Etc etc etc. The entire Targums are explanations and interpretations of scripture. The people listening to them become united under those explanations and interpretations, not under what God actually says and means. But here you are saying 'it's ok to disagree' CLEARLY NOT. NOT WHEM THEY'VE MADE YOU THEIR CONVERT ALREADY. I'm saying that I'd rather not argue with someone who does not believe that Jesus, Yeshua, is the Son of God and the savior of the world. So yeah. There's that.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
