REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
Message Subject
|
New York City Lets You Choose From 31 Different Gender Identities, Businesses MUST Respect/Accommodate Otherwise Face 6 Figure Fines!!!
|
Poster Handle
|
GGAllin |
Post Content
|
I could make a longer thread of my own on this, been thinking how everything is backwards from what I was brought up with.
In the old school feminism of the 1970s, I thought the whole point was that it didn't matter whether you were male and female, you were a person first, an individual, not a member of some assigned group.
Now all of a sudden the thing that matters most is whether you are or aren't male or female?
Also I have been aware for some time, that women have had more freedom to dress the way they want to. A hundred or so years ago wearing bifurcated garments wasn't an everyday option for most women in the Western world. Now a woman can dress like a man and really, no one thinks anything of it, either it's not even noticed or maybe it's amusing.
So is a lot of this about clothing, and personal expression through dress? If a guy wants to wear a skirt or dress, does that mean he should be treated as a woman? Why? A woman wearing pants is still a woman. It doesn't change her to wear the clothing that used to be considered men's clothing.
It's just so bizarre that this stuff is such a big deal. I thought we went through a whole sexual revolution to make it NO BIG DEAL one way or the other. I thought people were people first, before it mattered about their sex.
Quoting: Vision Thing Same way with the racial thing. It's all been polarized. Turned inside out. Backwards. The last thing these people are is truly progressive. They are regressives.
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|