|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Breaking 9/11 congressman says World Trade Center and Pentagon Bombed!
|
|
Poster Handle
|
TruthNow88 |
|
Post Content
|
They were bombed. The planes were the bombs.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70284508 No planes hit any buildings that day! None! You've been duped along with many others. Please wake the fuck up and do some research. Jeesh I through the same as you at one point but realised over time that it was more complex then that... North Tower = Something hit the first tower (but it wasn't flight 11, more then likely a 767T/T, a prototype for the yet to be named KC-767). South Tower = Nothing hit the second tower (wasn't flight 175, live video was Akamai technology real-time augmented reality (using the first impact as the template/framework), while videos released days/weeks/months/years after the fact were CGI).Pentagon = Something hit the pentagon (but it wasn't flight 77 or any commercial aircraft, but instead was more then likely a A3-Skywarrior) Shanksville = I don't care... honestly I see shanksville as a pure distraction (hero angle) and honestly don't spend any time/effort on this bullshit aspect (PS fuck you MITRE and your bullshit lets role psy-op). Why not simply crash another plane into the south tower? Why risk some science fiction solution to knocking it down when there was a real life way as demonstrated with the north tower. The word of the day is obfuscation. Try again. Simple, because you can't fly a 767 1000 feet above sea level at 500+MPH like the official story states happened, and 2nd "airplane impact videos" appear to show... Understand the first plane impact was going much slower then the official speed stated but due to lack of video evidence this is very hard to prove either way so they can get away with saying anything they want in regards to this one, and add to the fact that hardly any eye-witnesses actually saw this ones impact (most people weren't focused on the towers randomly prior to the 1st attack). The 2nd impact needed to be faked in order to create the illusion that the plane was traveling close to 600MPH (which isn't possible with a real 767), as that massive speed was needed to help convince the public that the impact damage was far greater then it would of been and the building may collapse due to this extensive damage (if the plane hit the building for real it would of been traveling much slower and selling the "it ripped through the core columns" would of been impossible to sell with thousands of eye-witnesses focused on the towers at this point with most of the aircraft not even penetrating the exterior walls...). As for the 2nd impact eye-witnesses, as I stated before the ones saying they saw a plane work for main street media in practically every single case, while the real eye-witnesses that didn't mention a plane mostly assumed the "plane" impacted from the opposite side of the building that they couldn't see (so they see an explosion, the MSM tells them a plane hit, and therefore they think a plane must of hit but from the opposite side that they couldn't see). Whatever, think what you want, but the short answer to your question "Why risk some science fiction solution to knocking it down when there was a real life way as demonstrated with the north tower?" is simple, because they can and a perfect example is you think the 2nd plane is real when it isn't... so it really isn't risky for them to pull off when they know that 99% of the public will buy the lie without question, just like you did...
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
