Chaol Speaks:Reality, consciousness, time-space, mind, matter, and more

I forgot to mention.. if you have any questions on the material please feel free to let me know. I'd be more than happy to try to discuss it with you :)

Last Edited by The Builder on 10/24/2016 02:23 PM

HI, I'm reading the website right now, will download & read the PDF as well. It sounds very interesting.
I have a couple of questions; it appears that this QuMe theory is based on a fundamentally accepted truth about the inherent limitation of something called 'perspective'... Is that an accurate assessment?

I have a metaphysical skill that I have spent several years developing; I can employ it at will. This skill allows me to absorb, experience, understand, and also Modify, the perspective of any object: person, thing, etc. by using a form of focused concentration in a trance state.
I use this skill in my day to day life as an energy healer... People come to me with a problem, I can see the changes of perspective needed to make the problem disappear. I apply the perspective changes, the problem disappears.
Does the QuMe theory then preclude the possibility of existence of the skill I have described?

Thanks for reading and clarifying!

I'm reading further - some things resonate, others I'm not sure about. Very very interested though! Anything that expands my perspective enables me to better help my clients. A theory of everything is very appealing!

Thx OP. I'll check it out~=

Hi. Thanks for your message. I suppose you could say the theory was developed from scratch using only reasoning, not really based on assumptions about reality (including that perception of something is real, or even limited).

If we cannot 'see beyond our own perspective' for example then for me it doesn't highlight a limitation of perspective but more of its unlimited, endless nature. This points to an algorithm of sorts, which I suppose is how the 'God Equation' developed.


Curious. Wouldn't your awareness of 'another' perspective still be your own perspective?


In QuMe, things do not have an independent reality but are entirely based on other things. Hot defines cold and cold defines hot, for example.

The existence of a "skill" would be defined by other skills and also the languages we use to illustrate, define, and practice the skill.

In that way, anything is "possible" as long as it can relate to something else and extract meaning from that relationship.


Certainly. I hope I've clarified it a little. If not, please let me know :)

Not if you are egoless? Unless you assume you cant change your perspectives or that it is limited to your human mind, then it will. Beliefs create reality, like placebo effect or psychosomatic reactions.

You can change of perspective even to the point of having the same one as the Universe itself. But you must be able to let go of everything, identity, expectations, bias, false beliefs, memories..

Switching to another perspective especially wider to infinite like Truth requires total acceptance of the new global vision and understanding its gonna cast upon you. If you reject it, your subconscious will hinder and deform Truth into something untrue and limiting...

Yes, I understand what you're saying, that does clear it up.

May I ask, what profession are you in?

Thanks.. let me know what you think

Last Edited by The Builder on 05/11/2016 10:33 AM

I posted earlier that I'm a healer.

My own experience tells me that because everything is relative, The existence of Ego (the sense of "I", of "self") is predicated on the existence of "Not I" ("neti" in Sanskrit). "Not I" could also be taken to mean "other" or "external reality" depending on the context.

Therefore, if one removes the Ego, then everything else also ceases. And Vice Versa: remove the external world and the Ego ceases. This has been my experience, and it appears to be supported by the QuMe.

Apologies. But question.. do you see your clients as part of your own perspective?

Are you aware of something that has no ego?

I wonder if we have a different definition of perspective? I don't use the term perspective often, perspective relies on another idea, called ego (self). I use the term awareness more often, it is different.

I'm my practice I regard clients as individual beings in the physical reality (I have lots of ego) but in order to effectively heal them I have to also have a different truth- one that is based on the experiential understanding of the illusion of reality.
In short, I've experienced the illusory nature of reality to an extent that it enables me to analyze and imprint within others' "being" (however you want to define that), a set of programs, beliefs, & feelings that change the individual's perspective/awareness of reality.

Everyone has the potential to be able to do this.. It's simply a matter of the programs feelings and beliefs that make up your individual reality on where the individual limitations are set.

For example, some of my clients have chronic injuries like fibromyalgia and arthritis. These can be overcome by imprinting into the client a reality in which those injuries and all events leading up to the creation of the injury, are either removed or "recompleted" in a way where the injury never occurred and never "had to" occur.
I've healed breast cancer simply by removing one client's expectation of developing breast cancer. cancer runs in her family so she just expected she'd get it. She did, but for no other reason than her expectations. She's very healthy and cancer free now.
To be able to do this, I have to have a level of awareness that allows me to understand all of these things. I am not a smart or educated man- this level of awareness comes from the trance state I employ, not from any higher education or learning.

I am not.

LOL, I am laughing about the wording tho - being "aware" of "ego"- as ego lessens, awareness increases, and vice versa. Being more aware of less ego, however, is simply more ego and less awareness. Hehe, an interesting little mindfuck.

Why are people so goofy ?

The real question is whether or not goofy is a person or just a dog trying to pass as human.

Do you think Mickey thinks about his mouseness and loses sleep over the nature of reality?

Wow !

This is where language gets a bit limited, I think. We don't really have proper definitions for some of these concepts.

Do you mean general awareness?

Or do you mean awareness of things specifically?


Yes, forgetting about the 'greater reality' in order to function in a more specific reality seems to be what we do. That would certainly explain our current (perhaps limited) awareness of the world around us.

QuMe says that we know of one thing only in relation to another. And you seem to extend that in your practice for your clients to know of a reality where they don't have x-ailment by relating more to a more healthy experience. (Meaning, their health improves because they're getting to know their bodies in relation to a more healthy body.)


I think formal education actually works against someone when trying to understand these things. Myself, I completed only 7th grade but of course continued a different kind of education.

It sounds like you're putting your wisdom into good practice. Wonderful!

:)

Over 200 downloads so far, plus some additional downloads on Issuu. Thanks, everyone!

For those who have already finished reading it please be sure to rate it on Amazon. (Amazon allows you to rate any book, just login. My goal is 15 reviews, whereby the book would show up much higher in search results so others can find it. Thank you!)

An except from the most read section so far (gleaned from Issuu), section 1.12

You Experience Your Interpretation of Reality, Not Reality Itself

Reality is representation. What we call reality is an interpretation of something else that we do not experience, nor need to experience. You may look around and think you are experiencing things as they are, but what you're actually experiencing are things that interface with a true reality that cannot be perceived directly.

You could say that your perspective creates reality and does so in the most efficient way imaginable (by cleverly leveraging illusions). But really, you don't create reality at all. You don't need to. Besides, experiencing reality directly – even for a nanosecond – would take far more energy than has ever been created since the beginning of time. You only need to represent something that you cannot really perceive and then interact with the representation. It would be as if someone described to you how something looked and you had to make a drawing of it based on a vague and unreliable description. You could have drawn a dancing squirrel and it wouldn't make any different because nobody had had any direct experience with it anyway, and all that mattered is how people relate to and interact with what you drew. In fact, your drawing would become the reality of the object because it would be the only real interface people had with that unseen and unknown thing.

To your mind, the representation (the illusion) becomes more important than the reality. If someone made a more accurate drawing somehow, it would likely be rejected and ignored because the value of the drawing is not in its accuracy but in how it relates to and interacts with others...

Nobody is God???

What's your definition of God?

(And I'm assuming here when you say "nobody" you also mean "nothing"? As in "Nothing is God?")

in order to understand the universe you must understand the demiurge and the aeons.

Would you agree that "the universe" doesn't know anything about those concepts (because we made them up, and our definition is unique to our civilization)?

So the first thing may be to understand what we mean when we say "the universe".

What does it mean to you?

Hmm its funny to see how humans tend to try to protect their ego by rationalizing its existence...

Everything that is not human is egoless. You dont understand that the current humanity is sick. What sickness? Well they are all parasited by an ego.

Is this normal? No its not but it has become for the current humans because well thats all they have known for a few millenias?

Ego or wetiko (read the book to get a grasp of the true situation) is a mental parasite that has been grown by who knows, tptb? archons? It has been used to control you, to close your mind, to emprison you and the worst is, you cant even see it unless you are totally into spirituality and freeing your mind.

Its really a complex yet simple subject but the problem remains, its an invisible parasite that encloses your consciousness, and as you feed it (negative emotions, the very ones this devil's reject society stimulate to no end) it grows and take over more and more of your divinity.

It is usually created not long after birth, thanks to the false ideas and beliefs countless generations have been teaching without ever putting them into question ("education" sigh). Its the very thing that make it hard to reconnect to your inner powers like healing, intuition, higher senses, esp...

It is complex because you cannot convey this information to people that dont share a similar perspective as yours. Yet simple because all you gotta do is to accept unconditionally this truth and stop feeding it consciously (mindfulness anyone?).

Whats going on globally isnt some coincidence, in fact something grand and terrifying is going on with humans, something hard to fathom. As there are parasite for the flesh body, there are also on the mental plane and other planes of existence.

As within so without.....

The ego gives the illusion of purpose but it is centered around materialism. Ultimately if you seek true awakening, you have to get rid of the ego.

Without an ego you are your true self. The very Higher self, pure consciousness shared by all beings, unhindered by the "noise" and veils put in place by the ego-parasite.

The void or egoless state or Enlightened state, is all but emptiness. On the contrary, when you start reaching your normal state again, you finally see how little you truly know, and how limiting your mind was under the ego influence.

When you die you lose it but as i said we are in an age where things have been calculated and enforced to make the world ignorant, deformed and separated from Nature (human matrix) as it is. So its highly speculative but my best bet atm is, strong egos can force you to reincarnate on earth even if you dont want to. As if they planted their seeds like the parasites they are into your very soul, making it impossible for you to have your say unless you took the time and effort to work on it while alive and aware of the problem. Its like a trap cast upon the whole human species.

Hard to convey uh? Ill stop now..

Why cant you understand animals? They are egoless naturally spiritual beings, and an ego that needs verbal language to thrive (yup another smart move from the archons) cannot understand beings that are naturally telepathic (the universal language between True beings). Why do you think animal communicators exist? You know these people that talk with animals by telepathy?

Your ego's perspective as well as the ignorance of this materialist civilization, make you unable to understand something that has no ego. Thus you find excuses like "they are dumb" "humans are the most intelligent" "we own them coz our false gods told us so, in books written by humans". What a ridiculous situation...

The arguments of QuMe go beyond ego to a more fundamental nature of awareness. In one sense we can wonder if other beings are self-aware or have ego. In another sense we can realize that all the things we wonder and know about are in our perspective.

I suppose, then, the limit of what we could claim is, "I am aware of you being self-aware".

Or we could say, "Your awareness is an aspect of my awareness"

But what are we really 'aware' of? If we say that we are aware of a cup, are we aware of it's complete nature? What do we really know when we are only aware of about 15 of its electromagnetic signature?

We can also apply this to ourselves and realize that our self-awareness is an illusion. Perhaps our true self-awareness is simply perspective itself.

This is an infinite loop, however. We do love the concept of ego.