VERIFIED - This interview is a HOAX!!!! Stanley Kubrick confesses to faking the moon landings! | |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 55240075 United States 12/10/2015 08:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm confused. Someone offer some cliff notes as to how this was determined a hoax? Thanks Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68782227 it is not a hoax It is a hoax. The dumbass who made it left up videos on another channel showing him coaching the actor who played Kubrick in his fake interview. The actor's name is apparently "Tom." The video has since been made private, but no worries, I saved it to my hard drive and will be using it to show that it's a hoax in a response video I will upload to my own channel. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38192441 United States 12/10/2015 08:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71007556 United States 12/10/2015 09:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | everything in this current world Age is a hoax and a monumental lie a ruse of the lowest order in fact and in truth there is but one source of truth herein and few they are with eyes to see and better yet understand |
Dace
User ID: 70360309 United States 12/10/2015 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I saved it too. What kind of Hoax-er uploads the video to debunk himself? Worst hoaxer EVER! I'll probably upload my copy later tonight and label it properly as a Hoax proof..almost out of daily data at the moment so I have to wait until later. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71005324 United States 12/11/2015 04:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70938146 United States 12/11/2015 05:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm confused. Someone offer some cliff notes as to how this was determined a hoax? Thanks Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68782227 [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Go to the 7 min mark and the interviewer begins to tell Kubrick what to say and then they talk about the real Kubrick and his death. Talk about using clever editing to distort the truth. People should watch the videos from beginning to end. |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
User ID: 68914848 Netherlands 12/11/2015 06:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not as if any of that matters. If Apollo was hoaxable at all it wasn't hoaxable in a damp studio somewhere in merry ol' England in the few months Kubrick wasn't working on other projects. Never mind that the visual documentation is only a tiny fragment from the evidence for Apollo. The mission is returning approximately 70–100 terabytes of image data. It is expected that this photography will boost public acknowledgement of the validity of the landings, and further discredit Apollo conspiracy theories.[10] Quoting: Slovenian Coward 18171524 Read at least the last 2 sentences. What the mission objective is and what was expected to be the result of of publishing certain imagery is not the same thing. The expectation was correct though. Hoax advocacy has declined considerably. These days it is pretty much the fringe of the fring, quite unfashionable. I don't know what your problem is. Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 12/11/2015 08:10 AM Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70998809 United States 12/11/2015 07:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Exactly. The yt channel or owner has been compromised by tptb. The creator of this film was too smart to have uploaded vids debunking what he just released. You guys believe in tr3b's but think big gov. can't pull off a fake vid? The fuck outta here. The interview is real, and they are scared shitless. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58106890 United States 12/11/2015 09:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70938146 United States 12/11/2015 09:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Exactly. The yt channel or owner has been compromised by tptb. The creator of this film was too smart to have uploaded vids debunking what he just released. You guys believe in tr3b's but think big gov. can't pull off a fake vid? The fuck outta here. The interview is real, and they are scared shitless. My assumption. The "system" is falling apart at the seams. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70857104 United States 12/11/2015 09:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The beard is wrong, the eyes are wrong, his glasses are wrong, his eyebrows are wrong, his wrinkles are wrong, and his forehead is wrong... [link to youtu.be (secure)] Kubrick's eyes are what define him and this actor doesn't have his eyes.. |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 12/11/2015 09:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tom doesn't even have the same facial features as Kubrick. Quoting: Masiro The beard is wrong, the eyes are wrong, his glasses are wrong, his eyebrows are wrong, his wrinkles are wrong, and his forehead is wrong... [link to youtu.be (secure)] Kubrick's eyes are what define him and this actor doesn't have his eyes.. Not to mention his accent and eloquence. Sorry Tom, you're no Kubrick. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43136614 United States 12/11/2015 11:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tom doesn't even have the same facial features as Kubrick. Quoting: Masiro The beard is wrong, the eyes are wrong, his glasses are wrong, his eyebrows are wrong, his wrinkles are wrong, and his forehead is wrong... [link to youtu.be (secure)] Kubrick's eyes are what define him and this actor doesn't have his eyes.. Not to mention his accent and eloquence. Sorry Tom, you're no Kubrick. I grew up in NY. I know that accent cold. I called it before the reveal just on the accent alone. Never mind the fact that Kubrick had dark hair right up until his death. |
drater
User ID: 21473338 Thailand 12/11/2015 06:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Made the mainstream: MOON LANDINGS 'FAKE': Shock video shows 'Stanley Kubrick' admit historic event was 'HOAX' [link to www.express.co.uk] [link to www.dailystar.co.uk] |
aHEMagain^2
User ID: 63817294 United States 12/12/2015 05:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I just know this will take on a life of its own as "that time someone posted an interview of Kubrick admitting the hoax." Of course they'll never bother to reference the original thread or they'd give away the hoax. There are two things that bother me "the most" about this. The initial reaction of many on this thread to this interview was a slightly panicked rush to authenticate that it really was Kubrick, and he really was saying what it seemed like he was saying. Based on a number of seemingly credible confirmations the thread consensus quickly became "Oh shit, it's real." Those who already believed the Moon Landing's WERE a hoax became elated at the confirmation of their beliefs. Those who had believed that the Moon Landing's were REAL fell into a state of cognitive dissonance as they tried to work the idea of the Moon Landing's being a HOAX into their belief system. Even if the interview HAD been real, what it was evidence FOR would be up to interpretation. It wouldn't have PROVEN anything, though. That's the first thing that bothers me "the most". The second thing that bothers me "the most" is that there are TRUE BELIEVERS who, even though they know this interview is a hoax, will continue to promote it as true. They may even "debunk the debunking" as a way of further promoting their beliefs thinking, "The interview might be a hoax, but it's telling the truth." The "most" thing I hate the worst about this interview is that it will be used by those who KNOW we went to the Moon, and who KNOW this interview is a hoax, but they will continue to promote both. They'll do so because promoting these lies serves agendas, such as providing the Dumbs ammo, and luring the unwarily curious to illogical but engaging beliefs. aHEMagain Last Edited by aHEMagain^2 on 12/12/2015 05:30 PM "And once again, Probability proves itself willing to sneak into a back alley and service Drama as would a copper piece harlot." -- Vaarsuvius, The Order of the Stick [link to tvtropes.org] "History doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme" -- Mark Twain "It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.-- William Clifford [link to myweb.lmu.edu] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70975244 United States 12/12/2015 05:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aHEMagain^2
User ID: 68377582 United States 12/12/2015 06:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | aHEMagain "And once again, Probability proves itself willing to sneak into a back alley and service Drama as would a copper piece harlot." -- Vaarsuvius, The Order of the Stick [link to tvtropes.org] "History doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme" -- Mark Twain "It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.-- William Clifford [link to myweb.lmu.edu] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68296233 United States 12/12/2015 06:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68296233 United States 12/12/2015 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68296233 United States 12/12/2015 06:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
drater
User ID: 21473338 Thailand 12/12/2015 09:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Coast To Coast AM - December 11, 2015 Kubrick & The Faked Moon Footage |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71022754 Bulgaria 12/13/2015 06:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm confused. Someone offer some cliff notes as to how this was determined a hoax? Thanks Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68782227 [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Go to the 7 min mark and the interviewer begins to tell Kubrick what to say and then they talk about the real Kubrick and his death. I went to 7 min mark and heard nothing that proves the interview is a hoax. Can you be more specific? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70700984 Denmark 12/13/2015 07:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm confused. Someone offer some cliff notes as to how this was determined a hoax? Thanks Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68782227 [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Go to the 7 min mark and the interviewer begins to tell Kubrick what to say and then they talk about the real Kubrick and his death. I went to 7 min mark and heard nothing that proves the interview is a hoax. Can you be more specific? at 13 min 'So was it just a one off, did you do them all or..?' 'I did 11 and 13 as well' 'you did 13, ok' 'not 12...' 'Why did, why was 13 a failure then, why did you..' 'Well, they brought me back after 12 failed' 'Eh, 12 failed how, what do you mean?How did 12 fail?' ' *raises eyebrow* 'you told me to tell 12 failed' 'How did it, I'm..asking YOUR CHARACTER Why did 12 fail!!!!!' '*puzzled look*Can we stop.. ' 'Nobody watched it, no one cared!!! 'Okay yea yea yea ok, I'm sorry' Then it goes back to the question and he does it 'right' that time. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71022754 Bulgaria 12/13/2015 07:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm confused. Someone offer some cliff notes as to how this was determined a hoax? Thanks Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68782227 [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Go to the 7 min mark and the interviewer begins to tell Kubrick what to say and then they talk about the real Kubrick and his death. I went to 7 min mark and heard nothing that proves the interview is a hoax. Can you be more specific? at 13 min 'So was it just a one off, did you do them all or..?' 'I did 11 and 13 as well' 'you did 13, ok' 'not 12...' 'Why did, why was 13 a failure then, why did you..' 'Well, they brought me back after 12 failed' 'Eh, 12 failed how, what do you mean?How did 12 fail?' ' *raises eyebrow* 'you told me to tell 12 failed' 'How did it, I'm..asking YOUR CHARACTER Why did 12 fail!!!!!' '*puzzled look*Can we stop.. ' 'Nobody watched it, no one cared!!! 'Okay yea yea yea ok, I'm sorry' Then it goes back to the question and he does it 'right' that time. So that only proves that Kubrick didn't know he must talk about 12 too. His confession is about Apollo 11. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70310504 Hong Kong 12/13/2015 10:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
soprettie1
User ID: 56698044 United States 12/13/2015 10:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's what I was thinking. Would they have a case? If his family and friends see that video I think they'll just have a good laugh. You would have to be terribly blind not see that it's not SK. SoPrettie1 "Creativity is wondering in wonder." *Me* "Synchronicity is the operating system of the universe." *Me* |
aHEMagain^2
User ID: 63817294 United States 12/14/2015 09:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Magnus74 [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Go to the 7 min mark and the interviewer begins to tell Kubrick what to say and then they talk about the real Kubrick and his death. I went to 7 min mark and heard nothing that proves the interview is a hoax. Can you be more specific? at 13 min 'So was it just a one off, did you do them all or..?' 'I did 11 and 13 as well' 'you did 13, ok' 'not 12...' 'Why did, why was 13 a failure then, why did you..' 'Well, they brought me back after 12 failed' 'Eh, 12 failed how, what do you mean?How did 12 fail?' ' *raises eyebrow* 'you told me to tell 12 failed' 'How did it, I'm..asking YOUR CHARACTER Why did 12 fail!!!!!' '*puzzled look*Can we stop.. ' 'Nobody watched it, no one cared!!! 'Okay yea yea yea ok, I'm sorry' Then it goes back to the question and he does it 'right' that time. So that only proves that Kubrick didn't know he must talk about 12 too. His confession is about Apollo 11. aHEMagain "And once again, Probability proves itself willing to sneak into a back alley and service Drama as would a copper piece harlot." -- Vaarsuvius, The Order of the Stick [link to tvtropes.org] "History doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme" -- Mark Twain "It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.-- William Clifford [link to myweb.lmu.edu] |
Quetzal785
User ID: 70633250 United States 12/16/2015 11:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71072425 United States 12/21/2015 09:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So after a crazy week where my MOCKUMENTARY film about Kubrick was believed to be real (that was terrific as that's the entire challenge of such a genre) and then it made international news (surprise and funny) and then it took a turn where people who have a great deal of time to spare apparently thought that they had exposed me as if I was not making a MOCKUMENTARY, which is kind of funny again, as I posted on YouTube my own raw footage of the shoot, so it didn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure that one out... The bizarre and sad thing (but it's also very telling) is the amount of venom expressed by so many- literally everyone hated the film at first because I edited it in a manner that did not reveal the interview in a stark manner- like the misdirection of a magician- so that's ok, it's a taste issue and most thought it truly was Kubrick- but then THE ACTUAL WIFE OF STANLEY KUBRICK issued a statement calling me a liar and the film fraudulent and that's LIBELOUS SLANDER, as it's pretty ironic ALL FICTION FILMMAKING is by definition a LIE yet when you structure it as a MOCKUMENTARY (Blair Witch, Paranornmal Activity, or DARK SIDE OF THE MOON which is about the same moon hoax theory and served as my influence) people don't call it fiction or (if initially fooled) effective or entertaining or clever or anything positive but actually try to portray this work of art that took a great deal of work to create a CRIMINAL ACT when I offered a preview of it for free, I am an award winning filmmaker with credits and regardless of anyone's taste about the film, I doubt anyone called the makers of Blair Witch liars when we thought the kids were dead and the footage real- that was the entire point. THEREFORE I am releasing this week the full feature film (which I withheld at first as I knew within 2 hours everyone would announce online the spoiler @ the end where I lost the credit for the actor playing Kubrick) and here's the point-even now the value of this film for anyone unaware of its history may really enjoy the experience of believing it's real for 2 hours only to @ the end experience the joy or frustration that they suspended disbelief... So please don't tell others it's a MOCKUMENTARY if they express interest as the ending will inform them quite clearly what it is and why I made it... And if you hated the film that's your right but I think many people missed a fun harmless thought provoking experience and focused only on deconstructing a film never intended to withstand investigative scrutiny- only cursory gut reaction in real time while viewed... In the end I am flattered so many people thought it was real and that for a few days it made international news- that's a harmless honor- but I will not tolerate being called a liar or fraud when fiction is MY PROFESSION and also the profession of the late Mr Kubrick... I will be sending his wife a polite demand for retraction of that statement as the film is not only fiction but in fact a labor of love towards the man, a genius who may indeed have pulled off the ultimate MOCKUMENTARY - the moon hoax. Regardless of that being true or not, I am here to state that I unapologetically made a work of comedic pseudo documentary fiction, that I will post a link this week got the full film and that I will pursue legal action against anyone calling me a liar or the film a fraud- a fraud is to artistic fiction as day is to night and this is fair warning so please say how much the film sucks and how much you hate it/ that's fine/ but do not defame me by insinuating that I was trying to actually execute a literal fraud as a fiction filmmaker- it's as ridiculous and absurd to say as it is very serious and damaging to be called such a lie- anyway, thanks for watching the preview and I doubt many or any will watch the feature but at least it will prove that it was and is a fictional work employing a WAR OF THE WORLDS or BLAIR WITCHIAN narrative infrastructure... Have a wonderful holiday and maybe one person will watch and enjoy my sincere work when released this week after such fanfare... Sincerely... T Patrick Murray, WRITER & DIRECTOR, SHOOTING STANLEY KUBRICK |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 49473140 United States 12/21/2015 02:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mayk did a superb job emulating Kubrick and this story line is light years more plausible than the 'official story' I would have sold it as SHOOTING STANLEY KUBRICK, staring TE Mayk Brilliant film, either way! |