VERIFIED - This interview is a HOAX!!!! Stanley Kubrick confesses to faking the moon landings!

The version I linked is over an hour as well, so I believe it's the full version that isn't edited atrociously.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]


Great find brokenhalo!

It's like one of those "too good to be true" moments..

almost unbelievable

[link to history.nasa.gov]

This picture cracks me up, the shadow almost reaches the horizon.

Thanks! Someone should download this version and save it.

Yes, CHIP, and there is more of the interview,

yes, brokenhalo, someone should download it!

what the crap is this? the perspective lights his face on one side, and leaves one side dark, like the moon,

probably not intended, but, ya know

looks like the oldest of him i could find. was wondering howlong it would take to get his hair completely gray by aging(like in video)

What's with them?
Be the first hoaxie EVAH! to make a quantitate argument.


It would however fit in the MESA in the folded form it was SHOWN being put in and being extracted from the MESA.


I'm sure the were told not to put the cameras on the surface.


What's with it?
Where's your argument?


Quoted out of context.


DEMONSTRABLY not a fact.

They are call Primary Life Support System (PLSS), BTW.
Comparing it with an air-conditioning system that operates in an atmosphere is just plain stupid.


You can prove this by reproducing the sequence.

Meanwhile, back in reality, there's no cable work that would make that particular sequence possible.
Only low-grav does.
IOW it is yet more evidence for the Apollo record being genuine.


And there shouldn't be.

It's 2015 and people are still using an argument that was stupid in 1974?


And another unevidenced ASSertion.

So not a single verifiable relevant FACT?
Why am I not surprised.


We point and laugh at them.
Been doing that for decades.

Hoaxies being the biggest bullshitters of them all, pretending to know what they are talkin' about...




No, it is all you have seen.
And you don't believe because you want to, not because you have looked at the evidence.

(And it does have high detail, are you aware that the Descent Stage is only 6 metres across at its widest?)

BTW, the LRO's mission is to produce a high-resolution map of the Moon in a reasonable amount of time. Documenting the Apollo landing sites as they are now is just a bonus.


Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 12/11/2015 08:08 PM

what it is, is,

the interview mixed in with the film "a funny thing happened on the moon"

odd

I managed to save a copy of the video, it's low rez (240p) FLV, but I got it. This is probably the best cut we're going to see so I have it for future proofing.

I got it too, converted it to MP4 and saved it

I know, physics is a crack-up, isn't it!

That's the way light behaves when there's no air to diffuse it.


It isn't unbelievable to me, and it also isn't evidence.

I'm not even sure if Kubrick believes what he's saying, but even if he does, that doesn't mean it's true, or that he's right.

It seems just as likely to me that Kubrick intended THIS to be his masterpiece.

I don't know whether we went or not, but I know that I haven't read a credible reason why we couldn't have gone yet.

On the other hand, I also haven't read a credible reason for why it should take us so long to get back.

aHEMagain

Last Edited by aHEMagain^2 on 12/10/2015 12:42 PM

Here is another

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

This version is A LOT better than the two versions that were originally posted in this thread. Kubricks statements aren't interrupted as often & the vision of Kubrick is much cleaner.

here is a mockumentary, [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]



the newley found interview sort of follows this plot, ya know,

this is just odd, and as much as I believe Kubrick had his hand in the moon landing, I am still on the fence as to whether that is Kubrick in the newest interview we are watching here

He, Stanley, DIED, THREE DAYS after filming this interview.

Died: March 7, 1999, St Albans, United Kingdom
[link to www.google.nl (secure)]

Now, he did not look like he was about to die in that interview.

Last Edited by 2012Portal on 12/10/2015 12:52 PM

Just a random thought: what if it was really KUBRICK who was lying and that -in reality- his claims are the hoax?

eh

No, it is all you have seen.
And you don't believe because you want to, not because you have looked at the evidence.

(And it does have high detail, are you aware that the Descent Stage is only 6 metres across at its widest?)

BTW, the LRO's mission is to produce a high-resolution map of the Moon in a reasonable amount of time. Documenting the Apollo landing sites as they are now is just a bonus.



LROC
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera addresses the measurement requirements of landing site certification and polar illumination.[29] LROC comprises a pair of narrow-angle push-broom imaging cameras[30][31] (NAC) and a single wide-angle camera (WAC). LROC has flown several times over the historic Apollo lunar landing sites at 50 km (31 mi) altitude; with the camera's high resolution, the lunar rovers and Lunar Module descent stages and their respective shadows are clearly visible, along with other equipment previously left on the Moon. The mission is returning approximately 70–100 terabytes of image data. It is expected that this photography will boost public acknowledgement of the validity of the landings, and further discredit Apollo conspiracy theories.[10]


Read at least the last 2 sentences. And no I still don't know what to think of it.

why has this been released on something called the "playstation channel" if it is real, so profound, it's release into the world is a bit weird for sure....

I believe Kubrick. I never could believe the moon landings were real even as a kid. It just seemed too immpossible for a number of reasons. Reading this thread is like watching the kids find out that santa doesnt really come down the chimney and leave toys. Some just can't accept the truth I suppose.

Sorry guys



Last Edited by drater on 12/10/2015 01:12 PM

HaHaHa!!!
GLP got rick-rolled!

Still think it's him, CHIP?

Wow. Thanks, saving that for future reference in case this hoax comes up again. I don't know who that "director" is (the guy shouting at the old guy, not the old guy pretending to be Kubrick) but his voice sounds awfully, awfully familiar...

lool it was fun...

Feel a bit guilty now, I was rick rolled too...

O.T:

Kubrick was such a recluse that...

Alan Conway (1934 – 5 December 1998) was an English conman, best known for impersonating film director Stanley Kubrick.
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Conway's impersonations of director Stanley Kubrick occurred during the early 1990s, by which time Kubrick had been withdrawn from public view for about 15 years. Kubrick had also worn a beard since the late 1960s and Conway was clean-shaven, allowing his impersonation to appear more legitimate. He convinced several figures in the entertainment industry that he was the famed director, promising them both roles in films and exclusive interviews. On occasion, he conned others into paying for meals, claiming his studio would reimburse them.

Frank Rich, a famed Broadway critic for The New York Times, was taken in by Conway's act in Joe Allen's restaurant when he invited Conway and his friends to join him at his table. Rich was so convinced by Conway's act that he later said that he thought Stanley Kubrick was homosexual after meeting Conway. Rich and his journalist friends were excited at the prospect of an exclusive interview with "Stanley Kubrick", only later discovering that he was, in fact, an impostor after contacting executives at Warner Brothers who were aware of the scam but had been unable to identify the imposter.

Kubrick's lawyer was apprised of the scam and, when he informed Kubrick of the impostor, Kubrick was said to be fascinated by the idea. Kubrick's wife, Christiane, was less impressed with it. As she later reflected: "It was an absolute nightmare. This strange doppelgänger who was pretending to be Stanley. Can you imagine the horror?"[2]

Conway was tracked down in part through the efforts of Kubrick's personal assistant Anthony Frewin,[3] who went on to write the screenplay for the 2006 film Colour Me Kubrick based on these incidents, with John Malkovich starring as Conway.

Conway died in December 1998 of a heart attack shortly before Kubrick's death, also from a heart attack, in March 1999



Last Edited by drater on 12/10/2015 01:52 PM