VERIFIED - This interview is a HOAX!!!! Stanley Kubrick confesses to faking the moon landings!

This T Patrick Murray fuck has been accused of fraud already. What a load of shit this is. For one he had 15 years to get this ready and he still needs 48 hours to edit it?

What a fucking clown.

Meanwhile in other news: John Wayne confesses to assassinating Adolf Hitler.




Why do you lie? He did do no such thing.

New edit of film uploaded and amazing

Fucking brilliant

[link to vimeo.com (secure)]

So good

It seems quite possible that Stanley himself dictated how the film was to be edited.

It also is quite possible that Stanley was directed by TPTB to make the film.

IF, we do not receive the FULL, UN-CUT, interview in the near future, then I would tend to agree that TPTB directed Stanley. In this way TPTB maintain their MO, which is giving us a 'form of truth', that can be questioned.

A filmmaker, T. Patrick Murray, interviewed Kubrick three days before his death in March 1999. He signed an 88-page NDA not to divulge the contents of the interview until 15 years after his death.

"Shooting Stanley Kubrick" first 30 minutes preview was uploaded to youtube today.





This is a transcript of the interview with Stanley Kubrick and T. Patrick Murray for the movie "Shooting Stanley Kubrick."


K: I'm so preoccupied. With my work, innovation, risk-taking, regrets...
T: Why are you giving this interview?
K: Because, it started to get to me after awhile. Well, this is difficult, because it is the first time I've talked about it. (sighs)
T: Sure, take all the time you need.
K: I've always been conflicted by it, but not consciously until years later. I was just blown away by the chance, the opportunity, the challenge of making this, this production, and I went into this like it was a regular film, like another regular film of mine, not thinking too much about uh the long term effects of what it would mean to society if it was ever discovered.
T: What are you talking about? I'm dying to know what you're talking about.
K: Well, a confession of sorts. A movie I made, that nobody is aware of - even though they've seen it.
T: A movie you made, no one knows you made? Is that what you said?
K: That's right. Is that intriguing? Do I have you intrigued?
K: I perpetrated a huge fraud on the American public, which I am now about to detail, involving the United States government and NASA, that the moon landings were faked, that the moon landings ALL were faked , and that I was the person who filmed it.
T: Ok. (laughs) What are you talking...You're serious. Ok.
K: I'm serious. Dead serious.
K: Yes, it was fake.
T: Ok. Wait. Wait...
T: I don't want this to be an R-rated film, but seriously, what the blank, but seriously...
T: I, I, I worked almost eight months to secure this once in a lifetime interview that almost no else could ever get, and instead of talking about his sixteen films that I've endured since I was a child...That we didn't land on the moon, you're saying?
K: No, we didn't.
K: It was not real.
T: The moon landings were fake?
K: A, a, a.. fictional moon landing. A fantasy. It was not real.
K: Don't you think it's important for people to know the truth?
T: The moon landing in '69, which was two years before my birth...
K: Is total fiction.
T: Total fiction.
T: Is that?...So, that's the 15 year thing. So that's makes sense now. That's why I can't release it for 15 years now, that makes total sense now.
T: Did we...we didn't land on the moon you're saying?
K: No, we didn't.
T: Why are you telling me?
K: A, a, a, a massive fraud. An unparalleled fraud perpetrated against them. They SHOULD know.
K: Nixon want to uh, they were planning, yeah, he want to fake this, this moon landing...
T: Are you contending that people DON'T want to know the truth about the world, reality, the moon landings...?
K: The government, knowing this, takes advantage of it by perpetrating fraud after fraud after fraud.
T: How did you end up giving in? Being complicit with this fraud?
K: I didn't want to do it.
T: This is NOT where I thought this interview was going!
K: With my help, with my, with my aid, and it is, it is bothering me.
T: I only have this certain amount of time with you. And I'll talk about whatever you want, but...
T: You're not...This isn't some type of joke, or...
K: No. No, it's not.
T: Or a film within a film thing...
K: Not joking. NOPE.
T: Okay.
K: The conspiracy theorists were right, on this occasion.
T: I don't know what to ask you first.
K: I thought it was wrong, I just...I didn't believe in perpetrating a fraud like that.
T: But you did.
K: It also undermined my artistic integrity to do that.
T: Ok, but you ended up saying yes. Why?
K: Well, yes, but because basically I was bribed. To put it bluntly, that's what it was. It was just a plain fucking bribe.
T: Why are you telling me?
K:A, a, a, massive fraud. An unparalleled fraud perpetrated against them. They SHOULD know! Don't you think it's important for people to know the truth?
T: Why did they have to fake it? Why? Why would they ever need to do something like that? Why would the government ever want or need to do...
K: It's no secret that NASA always wanted to fulfill this Kennedy prophecy.
T: Take it from the beginning...
T: I gotta be honest, this is where he (Kubrick) got me. I mean, when I actually put myself in his position, when I actually imagine that he was telling the truth, and that he was presented with this opportunity and if in the one in a billion chance that I lived his life and I was presented with the same opportunity, what would I do?
T: Yeah, he wanted his approval points up and he thought nothing could do it better than this.
T: What a conflict. I mean, gosh, I can't imagine being presented with that opportunity. On one hand, I'd really would want to do it, but then I'd probably say I'm committing a crime, and lying...
T: It depends, but my guess would be...no, if you're good, but you would do it.
K: Spielberg, (inaudible) Scorsese, even Woody Allen. There isn't one of them who wouldn't do this.
T: I gotta admit: I'd do it. I'd do it too.
T: But they dangled all this power and all this flattery on you, essentially?
K: Yeah, it got to me after awhile. You can listen to so much of that stuff before you start to believe it.
T: They just said you were the greatest and stuff?
K: Yeah, yeah - and I agreed with them.
K: Why are you telling the world? Why does the world need to know that the moon landings aren't real and you faked them?
K: Which I consider to be my masterpiece.
T: And you can't take credit, or even talk about...
K: Well, I am now..
T: Right, so you'll be dead. In ten years, or 15...
K: Right, ten or 15 something like that.
T: So, you can't talk to Roger Ebert about it. Does that frustrate you?
T: Why did they have to fake it? Why would they have to do that?
K: Because it is impossible to get there.
T: Ok, back up, back up, back up....

So let me get this straight. In the digital ear they had an interview without actually recording the interview?

I call bullshit, because it is easy to make up shit about people when they are no longer around to call bullshit.

You have to wonder what Stanley was doing with NASA cameras.

Something doesn't ad up.

Van Allen belts alone.

Never did make sense to me.

Why do you debunkertards have to be sooooooo consdescending and patronizing.

Give me a fucking break.

But, yeah, the radiation on the daylight side should have been way too much for the astronauts.

There's no way you could put adequate shielding on that thing.

No way we could get to the moon on transistors.

Anyone with half a brian knows the "moon landing" was fake.

NASA claims to have landed men on the moon 6 times, and successfully returned them home.

NASA needs to PROVE, beyond any shadow of doubt, the claim they are making.

Halcyon Days .... Reporting to work at 09:00, lol! This interview MUST be real!!

THIS

And apart from all that I'm wondering, why the hell I can see my bike in front of my house on google earth but NASA can't post one single pic of material that's been left on the moon.

I think I don't need to mention that the camera and the scope on the sattelite, which is watching us, is like a toy compared to all the mega telescopes on the earth. Why the hell can't wee see some traces on the moon? We have also some nice scopes in the space like hubble. Is it really that hard to take some real(legit) pics and show them?

And we know it's not "impossible" to get to the moon, so Kubrick was not in on all the details of the secret space program. He assumes we never went to the moon, but we likely did decades before then.

Van Allen belts alone.

Never did make sense to me.

And, I've seen the capsule at the Smithsonian.

Basically, no way.

He didn't have NASA cameras.

That's just one of the many confabulations/lies hoaxies keep repeating to each other without ever checking if it is true.

[link to www.dpreview.com]
NASA contracted the Carl Zeiss company to develop and build an extreme aperture lens to be used for low-light photography.
Kubrick BOUGHT two of these lenses.


That would be hoax believers research and reasoning skills.




How is "I don't understand how it works" proof of anything?




Considering that hoax believers keep blatantly demonstrating their deficient knowledge and reasoning why would that come as a surprise?


This is a meaningless statement.

Without quantifying both A and B the claim "A is larger than B" is just so much hot air.
What we want from you are numbers and the prove for those numbers.
HOW MUCH radiation was there, HOW MUCH shielding was there, and HOW MUCH shielding would have been needed.




Unevidenced ASSertion.
Why not? And what's your proof?

Also the AGCs did use integrated circuits.




Yeah, we're stupid because we don't believe your claptrap.
Such a convincing argument...

The solution here is rather simple: provide EVIDENCE for your accusations.
NOT lies, NOT logical fallacies, but hard verifiable EVIDENCE.

In over half a century hoaxies have failed to do so, even though there is a €50,000 award for such evidence.




No. They only need to prove it beyond REASONABLE doubt.
Which they have, many times over.

After all: can you prove, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that you are a human being?

You being ignorant of the extant evidence, or having irrational standards of proof tells us nothing about the historicity of the manned moonlandings.

Hoaxies claim that the evidence was faked.
This is a affirmative claim, as well as a criminal accusation, and as such caries its own burden of proof.
But again and again we see that hoaxies are actually ignorant of 99+% of the evidence, and aren't even trying to fix that deficiency.
IOW they have no hope in hell of ever proving anything.




Such a nice example of hoaxie "logic."
The Shill Gambit is the first resort for those who do know that have no evidence.
IOW it is used by losers who know they are losers.
Why not just paint a big L on your forehead?

Also, are time zones yet another subject you are oblivious about?
That post was made 15:07 CET.

It is Kubrick, but he is NOT saying what you are hearing. It's over dubbed...just watch the lips carefully. He even recycles the same footage.

Could it be that the google van hasn't landed on the moon yet...