!ALERT! MANUAL SCRAM @ Ind. Point #2 w/10 CONTROL RODS fall loose! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70815046 United States 12/07/2015 07:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is evidenced by the fact they've had to use the aux. feedwater system to provide additional heat sink. Quoting: aHEMagain^2 I am stretching my knowledge here given the differences between a nuclear boiler and a conventional boiler, but I am thinking the aux feedwater system would be used ANY time the unit is not online and producing electricity. Normally the heat from the reactor is carried away by steam that is sent to the turbine generator... when you are only dealing with decay heat you can't make enough steam to send to the turbine, so another cooling system must be used. You can't send half assed steam to the turbine, the entrained water droplets would erode the blades. Depending on how the plant is designed, low pressure steam can sometimes be vented directly to the condensor, but this could be radioactive steam and so this may not be an option. Another explanation would be that the damaged MCC also powered the main feedwater pumps, rendering them inoperable. |
aHEMagain^2
(OP) User ID: 63817294 United States 12/07/2015 07:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I initially thought they'd dropped loose of their housing, but that doesn't seem likely as the smolder/fire was in an adjacent building to the control rod mechanism. I think a lot depends on what "dropped" means. It sounds less controlled than "lowered" but more controlled than "OH MY GOD WHAT HAPPENED IN THERE!" The thing about the timing of problems was something I was just studying. Neutron poisons build up in reactors to a steady state, but disruptions like this can cause instabilities. ======= 135Xe effects on restart Main article: Iodine pit In a typical nuclear reactor fueled with uranium-235, the presence of 135Xe as a fission product presents designers and operators with problems due to its large neutron cross section for absorption. Because absorbing neutrons can detrimentally affect a nuclear reactor's ability to increase power, reactors are designed to mitigate this effect; operators are trained to properly anticipate and react to these transients. During periods of steady state operation at a constant neutron flux level, the 135Xe concentration builds up to its equilibrium value for that reactor power in about 40 to 50 hours. When the reactor power is increased, 135Xe concentration initially decreases because the burn up is increased at the new higher power level. Because 95% of the 135Xe production is from decay of iodine-135, which has a 6.57 hour half-life, the production of 135Xe remains constant; at this point, the 135Xe concentration reaches a minimum. The concentration then increases to the new equilibrium level for the new power level in roughly 40 to 50 hours. During the initial 4 to 6 hours following the power change, the magnitude and the rate of change of concentration is dependent upon the initial power level and on the amount of change in power level; the 135Xe concentration change is greater for a larger change in power level. When reactor power is decreased, the process is reversed. Iodine-135 is a fission product of uranium with a yield of about 6% (counting also the iodine-135 produced almost immediately from decay of fission-produced tellurium-135).[3] This 135I decays with a 6.57 hour half-life to 135Xe. Thus, in an operating nuclear reactor, 135Xe is being continuously produced. 135Xe has a very large neutron absorption cross-section, so in the high neutron flux environment of a nuclear reactor core, the 135Xe soon absorbs a neutron and becomes stable 136Xe. Thus, in about 50 hours, the 135Xe concentration reaches equilibrium where its creation by 135I decay is balanced with its destruction by neutron absorption. When reactor power is decreased or shut down by inserting neutron absorbing control rods, the reactor neutron flux is reduced and the equilibrium shifts initially towards higher 135Xe concentration. The 135Xe concentration peaks about 11.1 hours after reactor power is decreased. Since 135Xe has a 9.2 hour half-life, the 135Xe concentration gradually decays back to low levels over 72 hours. The temporarily high level of 135Xe with its high neutron absorption cross-section makes it difficult to restart the reactor for several hours. The neutron absorbing 135Xe acts like a control rod, reducing reactivity. The inability of a reactor to be started due to the effects of 135Xe is sometimes referred to as xenon precluded start-up, and the reactor is said to be "poisoned out". The period of time where the reactor is unable to override the effects of 135Xe is called the xenon dead time. If sufficient reactivity control authority is available, the reactor can be restarted, but a xenon burn-out transient must be carefully managed. As the control rods are extracted and criticality is reached, neutron flux increases many orders of magnitude and the 135Xe begins to absorb neutrons and be transmuted to 136Xe. The reactor burns off the nuclear poison. As this happens, the reactivity and neutron flux increases, and the control rods must be gradually reinserted to counter the loss of neutron absorption by the 135Xe. Otherwise, the reactor neutron flux will continue to increase, burning off even more xenon poison, on a path to runaway criticality. The time constant for this burn-off transient depends on the reactor design, power level history of the reactor for the past several days, and the new power setting. For a typical step up from 50% power to 100% power, 135Xe concentration falls for about 3 hours. Failing to anticipate and manage xenon poisoning and compensate for the subsequent burn-off properly was a contributing factor to the Chernobyl disaster; during a run-down to a lower power, a combination of operator error and xenon nuclear poisoning caused the reactor thermal power to fall to near-shutdown levels. The crew's resulting efforts to restore power, including the manual withdrawal of control rods not under the SKALA computer's automated control, placed the reactor in a highly unsafe configuration. A failed SCRAM procedure, resulting in the control rods being jammed at a level that actually increased reactivity, caused a thermal transient and a steam explosion that tore the reactor apart. ---------- [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] ========== aHEMagain Last Edited by aHEMagain^2 on 12/07/2015 07:22 PM "And once again, Probability proves itself willing to sneak into a back alley and service Drama as would a copper piece harlot." -- Vaarsuvius, The Order of the Stick [link to tvtropes.org] "History doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme" -- Mark Twain "It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.-- William Clifford [link to myweb.lmu.edu] |
amicrazy78
User ID: 63738199 United States 12/07/2015 07:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70815046 United States 12/07/2015 08:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47008581 United States 12/07/2015 08:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Useless Cookie Eater
User ID: 29696048 United States 12/07/2015 08:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "People are just clueless as to what the danger is here." Quoting: Gelatinous Mass I am a physicist by education and I do not see what the panic is, except for the fact that this is GLP and so fear mongers get to go full retard. The system is stable, cooling is still operational, and the entire reactor can be slowly moved to a cold shutdown if necessary. So, doom off. That was my first thought too. These are dropped CONTROL RODS....if anything that should SLOW DOWN any reactions at the core, not make it go BOOM. |
Stonewall Jackson
Senior Forum Moderator 12/07/2015 08:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70815046 United States 12/07/2015 08:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | AC 70815046 has confirmed to me details that tells me in fact he is an employee at Indian point. Quoting: R. Wordsworth huh.... you saying you work there? No but I have worked at a power plant about a half a mile from there, and AC confirmed facts that only someone in the power generation industry in that area would know. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41649328 United States 12/07/2015 08:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41649328 United States 12/07/2015 08:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Doesn't look like both are shut down. Power Reactor Event Number: 51586 Facility: INDIAN POINT Region: 1 State: NY Unit: [2] [ ] [ ] RX Type: [2] W-4-LP,[3] W-4-LP NRC Notified By: CHEE YUN HQ OPS Officer: JOHN SHOEMAKER Notification Date: 12/05/2015 Notification Time: 18:48 [ET] Event Date: 12/05/2015 Event Time: 17:31 [EST] Last Update Date: 12/05/2015 Emergency Class: NON EMERGENCY 10 CFR Section: 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B) - RPS ACTUATION - CRITICAL 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A) - VALID SPECIF SYS ACTUATION Person (Organization): WILLIAM COOK (R1DO) SCOTT MORRIS (NRR) BERNARD STAPLETON (IRD) Unit SCRAM Code RX CRIT Initial PWR Initial RX Mode Current PWR Current RX Mode 2 M/R Y 100 Power Operation 0 Hot Standby Event Text MANUAL REACTOR TRIP INITIATED DUE TO MULTIPLE DROPPED CONTROL RODS "At 1731 [EST] on December 5, 2015, Indian Point Unit 2 Control Room operators initiated a Manual Reactor Trip due to indications of multiple dropped Control Rods. The initiating event was a smoldering Motor Control Center (MCC) cubicle in the Turbine Building that supplies power to the Rod Control System. The unit is stable in Mode 3 with heat sink provided by Auxiliary Feedwater and decay heat removal is via the steam dumps to the condenser. Offsite Power remains in service. "The smoldering MCC cubicle had power removed from it when 24 MCC breaker tripped on overcurrent. The affected cubicle has ceased smoldering and is being monitored by on-site Fire Brigade trained personnel. The trip of 24 MCC removed power to 22 Battery Charger, 22 DC Bus remained powered from the 22 Battery without interruption, and 22 Battery Charger was subsequently repowered." The cause of the smoldering MCC is being investigated and a post reactor trip evaluation is being conducted by the licensee. There was no impact on Unit 3, which continues to operate at 100% power. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector and appropriate State and Local authorities. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47008581 United States 12/07/2015 08:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41649328 United States 12/07/2015 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70815046 United States 12/07/2015 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It wouldn't make sense to shut down the other unit, that would be bad for the gird in general, making a blackout more likely, and if that were to happen they would be relying on diesel generators for feedwater pump power, and those things are not that reliable. The other unit surely has it's own control cabinet for it's control rods, so this failure would not affect it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47008581 United States 12/07/2015 08:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It wouldn't make sense to shut down the other unit, that would be bad for the gird in general, making a blackout more likely, and if that were to happen they would be relying on diesel generators for feedwater pump power, and those things are not that reliable. The other unit surely has it's own control cabinet for it's control rods, so this failure would not affect it. you nailed it |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70815046 United States 12/07/2015 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It wouldn't make sense to shut down the other unit, that would be bad for the gird in general, making a blackout more likely, and if that were to happen they would be relying on diesel generators for feedwater pump power, and those things are not that reliable. The other unit surely has it's own control cabinet for it's control rods, so this failure would not affect it. you nailed it On a side note, being winter time the grid would not be in much trouble at all if Indian Point went down, we are in a good time of year for low power demand, not too cold, not too hot. There are shit tons of gas turbine plants that are idle right now, their main turbines could be online in 10 minutes and their steam turbines online about an hour later. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34783230 United States 12/07/2015 09:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The only real data any of us have to go on is this: Quoting: aHEMagain^2 MANUAL REACTOR TRIP INITIATED DUE TO MULTIPLE DROPPED CONTROL RODS "At 1731 [EST] on December 5, 2015, Indian Point Unit 2 Control Room operators initiated a Manual Reactor Trip due to indications of multiple dropped Control Rods. The initiating event was a smoldering Motor Control Center (MCC) cubicle in the Turbine Building that supplies power to the Rod Control System. The unit is stable in Mode 3 with heat sink provided by Auxiliary Feedwater and decay heat removal is via the steam dumps to the condenser. Offsite Power remains in service. "The smoldering MCC cubicle had power removed from it when 24 MCC breaker tripped on overcurrent. The affected cubicle has ceased smoldering and is being monitored by on-site Fire Brigade trained personnel. The trip of 24 MCC removed power to 22 Battery Charger, 22 DC Bus remained powered from the 22 Battery without interruption, and 22 Battery Charger was subsequently repowered." So we don't know if just a couple dropped because they lost power to the rod control system, or if more damage occurred. The key thing is, contrary to assurances, there is no indication from the alert that they have regained control of the rods. This is evidenced by the fact they've had to use the aux. feedwater system to provide additional heat sink. aHEMagain That isn't the way I read it. There are more than 10 control rods. They say 10 DROPPED into the reactor. This means to me that ten rods fell loose into the reactor. It's an open question whether their uncontrolled drop ended well or not. Quoting: aHEMagain^2 From what I understand, upon failure of the controlling system the rods are designed to safely drop down in a controlled manner to stop the nuclear reaction. Now perhaps an uncontrolled drop could fracture them, and that would certainly be doom, but that's not what was reported to be the failure. The failure was in the motor controller, not the motors or actuators themselves. In which case that system would go into fail safe mode and the rods would drop, stopping the reaction. For what it's worth, I've worked in the power generation industry for over 10 years and have actually been in a nuclear plant before as well as hundreds of other conventional plants... I wasn't working on the nuclear equipment but still, I am pretty familiar with how a lot of these control systems work. The only real data any of us have to go on is this: MANUAL REACTOR TRIP INITIATED DUE TO MULTIPLE DROPPED CONTROL RODS "At 1731 [EST] on December 5, 2015, Indian Point Unit 2 Control Room operators initiated a Manual Reactor Trip due to indications of multiple dropped Control Rods. The initiating event was a smoldering Motor Control Center (MCC) cubicle in the Turbine Building that supplies power to the Rod Control System. The unit is stable in Mode 3 with heat sink provided by Auxiliary Feedwater and decay heat removal is via the steam dumps to the condenser. Offsite Power remains in service. "The smoldering MCC cubicle had power removed from it when 24 MCC breaker tripped on overcurrent. The affected cubicle has ceased smoldering and is being monitored by on-site Fire Brigade trained personnel. The trip of 24 MCC removed power to 22 Battery Charger, 22 DC Bus remained powered from the 22 Battery without interruption, and 22 Battery Charger was subsequently repowered." So we don't know if just a couple dropped because they lost power to the rod control system, or if more damage occurred. The key thing is, contrary to assurances, there is no indication from the alert that they have regained control of the rods. This is evidenced by the fact they've had to use the aux. feedwater system to provide additional heat sink. aHEMagain That is the information we have. When the rods accidentally dropped, operators initiated a Manual Reactor Trip. This means the rest of the control rods were inserted into the reactor core, shutting down the reaction before the situation became more serious. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46066815 United States 12/07/2015 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70815046 United States 12/07/2015 09:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68760602 United States 12/07/2015 10:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Bodiless
Forum Administrator User ID: 70503725 United States 12/07/2015 10:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is not a deadly situation-at this time--according to reports. It COULD have been--but the time frame for that happening is now past thank GOD. Vigilance is to be advised considering the dearth of information and transparency that has resulted from Fukushima. Most of the general public has no conception of what and how these energy sources work. Education is key. Knowledge is power. Information is vital. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] “We have assembled the most extensive and inclusive Voter Fraud Organization in the history of America”—Joe “SippyCup” Biden Joe Biden will never be the man Michelle Obama is The worst thing about dying is that you become a democratic voter for eternity |
Simple27
User ID: 69659907 United States 12/15/2015 01:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Mr. D User ID: 4603964 United States 12/15/2015 02:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Milo824
User ID: 69170964 United States 12/15/2015 05:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let's try to remember what happened at our advanced nuclear plants in Japan. After losing power, then NOT leaving the site as they were instructed the technical people were keeping the pile cool by using their car batteries to operate the 24 volt DC control systems. As the car batteries died they passed the need onto their superior staff. Helecopters dropped batteries on site. They were of the wrong voltage and so large that they could not be moved to the control panels in the building. Result, after many hours of valiant effort the plant was lost. Car batteries Just car batteries Simple Easy Total screw up Let's keep this in our minds. Milo824 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71032695 United States 12/15/2015 06:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That isn't the way I read it. There are more than 10 control rods. They say 10 DROPPED into the reactor. This means to me that ten rods fell loose into the reactor. It's an open question whether their uncontrolled drop ended well or not. Quoting: aHEMagain^2 From what I understand, upon failure of the controlling system the rods are designed to safely drop down in a controlled manner to stop the nuclear reaction. Now perhaps an uncontrolled drop could fracture them, and that would certainly be doom, but that's not what was reported to be the failure. The failure was in the motor controller, not the motors or actuators themselves. In which case that system would go into fail safe mode and the rods would drop, stopping the reaction. For what it's worth, I've worked in the power generation industry for over 10 years and have actually been in a nuclear plant before as well as hundreds of other conventional plants... I wasn't working on the nuclear equipment but still, I am pretty familiar with how a lot of these control systems work. That isn't the way I read it. There are more than 10 control rods. They say 10 DROPPED into the reactor. This means to me that ten rods fell loose into the reactor. It's an open question whether their uncontrolled drop ended well or not. Quoting: aHEMagain^2 From what I understand, upon failure of the controlling system the rods are designed to safely drop down in a controlled manner to stop the nuclear reaction. Now perhaps an uncontrolled drop could fracture them, and that would certainly be doom, but that's not what was reported to be the failure. The failure was in the motor controller, not the motors or actuators themselves. In which case that system would go into fail safe mode and the rods would drop, stopping the reaction. For what it's worth, I've worked in the power generation industry for over 10 years and have actually been in a nuclear plant before as well as hundreds of other conventional plants... I wasn't working on the nuclear equipment but still, I am pretty familiar with how a lot of these control systems work. We have had cores with damaged rod because of bad fme practices with no doom. Our systems are robust. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71032695 United States 12/15/2015 06:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71032695 United States 12/15/2015 06:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71032695 United States 12/15/2015 07:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |