Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,498 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 272,376
Pageviews Today: 433,634Threads Today: 136Posts Today: 2,219
05:31 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Who Wants To Bet Me On A Hypothesis Regarding Chemtrails?
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
I call bullshit on this person being a physicist. No actual scientist would jump to conclusions or fail to reach out to an expert in the field being discussed. There is no way this person understands geology or has even discussed levels of natural elements or reasons they could increase at ground level.

There are too many variables in or ecosystem to say that because we find something at ground level it must come from what we see when we look up.

Ridiculous

If this person is scientist, he/she wasn't there the day the taught the scientific method.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 63871965


I would like to see every part of the "scientific method"
disseminated according to my research. You do not refute
anything, yet attack my character about someone you know
nothing about. "Shill"....

There are not heavy metal particulates in the air in
high concentrations naturally. PLEASE find me any
study that can prove strontium and cadmium are in the
air at any natural levels, and then we will talk about WHO
disregards the "scientific process". Lol, bickles these days.
You dont even argue against anything, you just try and attack
people personally with no regard to content matter
whatsoever. Cant wait till hear that shill rebuttle.
Maybe youre not the physicist, so how would you know any
inkling of what happens in the scientific community?
This is a legitamate deal in universities and independant
air quality control companies. So keep shillin me out,
I dont care:) people who deserve the knowledge will
see it, others will and not do anything with it, so what
does it matter to me? Whats the real question is why do you
care so much about what people see in the sky in the
first place? Thats like the old Air Force shills trying to
be like, uh yeah we have seen ufos before but theyre not
alien. LOL!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70539575


Look at you attacking the character of someone you call a "shill" for pointing out that you jump to conclusions.

"high concentrations"

Show HOW HIGH, and show what they used to be before the trails came around. And then show there are no other sources of contamination.

And I find it hard to believe a "physicist" would have such horrid spelling and not use a spellcheck.

Some people actually care about the truth. You're not one of them.

We don't care about what you believe you see in the sky, we care about conjecture and assumption being presented as truth.

YOU are the "shill". You and the other imbeciles keep Michael Murphy and Dane Wigington swimming in money they REFUSE to use to get actual samples from the trails themselves.

And what's wrong with anyone from the Air Force saying that an unidentified object in the sky isn't alien?

Just because people don't know what an object is, doesn't mean it came from another planet!

Again, more evidence that you are NOT a person of science.

By the way, please provide the data from the independent air quality control companies and Universities who claim that the levels of ANYTHING have risen because of the trails in the sky.

I'll wait.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP