I call bullshit on this person being a physicist. No actual scientist would jump to conclusions or fail to reach out to an expert in the field being discussed. There is no way this person understands geology or has even discussed levels of natural elements or reasons they could increase at ground level.
There are too many variables in or ecosystem to say that because we find something at ground level it must come from what we see when we look up.
Ridiculous
If this person is scientist, he/she wasn't there the day the taught the scientific method.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 63871965 I would like to see every part of the "scientific method"
disseminated according to my research. You do not refute
anything, yet attack my character about someone you know
nothing about. "Shill"....
There are not heavy metal particulates in the air in
high concentrations naturally. PLEASE find me any
study that can prove strontium and cadmium are in the
air at any natural levels, and then we will talk about WHO
disregards the "scientific process". Lol, bickles these days.
You dont even argue against anything, you just try and attack
people personally with no regard to content matter
whatsoever. Cant wait till hear that shill rebuttle.
Maybe youre not the physicist, so how would you know any
inkling of what happens in the scientific community?
This is a legitamate deal in universities and independant
air quality control companies. So keep shillin me out,
I dont care:) people who deserve the knowledge will
see it, others will and not do anything with it, so what
does it matter to me? Whats the real question is why do you
care so much about what people see in the sky in the
first place? Thats like the old Air Force shills trying to
be like, uh yeah we have seen ufos before but theyre not
alien. LOL!!
