Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,661 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 41,349
Pageviews Today: 57,416Threads Today: 35Posts Today: 286
12:27 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror

 
Islamic_Guy
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 148997
Canada
09/29/2006 12:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
President Bush suggested Thursday that Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror, battling back in the election-season clamor over administration intelligence showing terrorism spreading.

"Five years after 9/11, the worst attack on the American homeland in our history, Democrats offer nothing but criticism and obstruction and endless second-guessing," Bush said at a Republican fundraiser.

"The party of FDR and the party of Harry Truman has become the party of cut and run," Bush told a convention-center audience of over 2,000 people. The event put $2.5 million in the campaign accounts of Alabama Gov. Bob Riley and the state GOP.

Democrats immediately disputed the charge that they would hold back in the anti-terror battle.

"On his watch, five years after 9/11, he not only has failed to capture Osama bin Laden, but as the (National Intelligence Estimate) indicates, his failed policies have made America less safe and spawned terrorism, not decreased it," said Karen Finney, spokeswoman for the Democratic National Committee. "Democrats will be tough and smart, and will actually fight the terrorists, not leave them to plan future attacks."

Bush's no-holds-barred speech, one of his harshest yet on the campaign trail, came less than six weeks before midterm elections in which Democrats are seeking to strip Republicans of their control of one or both houses of Congress.

The war of words continued a nearly weeklong tussle by both parties over the implications of a newly revealed estimate, an analysis of terror trends put together by the nation's top intelligence analysts in 16 spy agencies.

The document concluded that Iraq has become a "cause celebre" for jihadists worldwide, whom it said have grown in number and geographic reach. The report said the factors, such as the Iraq war, that are fueling the jihadist movement's growth outweigh its vulnerabilities and that, if the current trend continues, risks to the U.S. interests at home and abroad will grow.

Portions of the five-month-old report were leaked over the weekend, and Bush ordered the key judgments - four of its 30 pages - declassified on Tuesday in hopes that wider availability of most conclusions would quell the criticism.

Democrats continued to point to the report to argue that the 2003 Iraq invasion, by fanning anti-U.S. sentiments and helping terrorists recruit, is one reason to change leadership in Congress.

On Thursday, Bush accused the opposition party of cherrypicking pieces of the report "for partisan political gain" and "to mislead the American people and justify their policy of withdrawal from Iraq."

"The greatest danger is not that America's presence in the war in Iraq is drawing new recruits to the terrorist cause," Bush said. "The greatest danger is that an American withdrawal from Iraq would embolden the terrorists and help them find new recruits to carry out even more destructive attacks."

Though not by name, he quoted Rep. Jane Harman of California, top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, as saying that because of the Iraq war "it may become more likely" that the U.S. will have to contend with terrorists on its own soil again, rather than less likely as the president argues. And he quoted Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, as saying the world would be better off without the Iraq war and if former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein were still in power.

"Some in Washington, some decent people, patriotic people, feel like we should not be on the offensive in this war on terror," the president said. "We will fight them wherever they make a stand."


The president also criticized House Democrats, including their leadership, who voted this week against a White House plan for interrogating, detaining and trying terrorists. "We must give our professionals the tools they need to protect the American people in this war on terror and those in the House of Representatives were wrong to vote against this bill," he said.

Democrats, joined by some Republicans, say the legislation would give the president too much latitude when deciding whether aggressive interrogations cross the line and violate international standards of prisoner treatment.

Bush headed from Alabama to Ohio to raise $600,000 for the Ohio GOP and Rep. Deborah Pryce, who is struggling to hold on to her seat in an evenly split district and stressing her independence from the president.

That fundraiser was held behind closed doors - like most that Bush does lately.

By Thursday's end, the president had headlined 68 political events - all fundraisers - benefiting 37 candidates, the national GOP, several state counterparts and the campaign arms of House and Senate Republicans. Half of them overall have been closed to media coverage, with the percentage going up to nearly two-thirds in recent months.

The only one of the president's six political events this week that was open was the fundraiser for Riley, who is favored for re-election over his challenger, Democratic Lt. Gov. Lucy Baxley.

[link to apnews.myway.com]
The imperialists see extremists everywhere. It's not that we are extremists. It's that the world is waking up. It's waking up all over. And people are standing up.

- Hugo Chavez.
pandora
User ID: 100233
Netherlands
09/29/2006 12:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
If this is the way to fight the war on terror we have already lost.
1
User ID: 1685
United States
09/29/2006 12:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
Most democrats are gay, this is why they don't let them in the military.
Get with the fucking program
User ID: 73687
United States
09/29/2006 12:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
Why should anybody fight a bogus war against a scapegoat enemy to bestow more wealth and control to a bunch of psychological cripples drunk on human blood and gold?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20933
United States
09/29/2006 12:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
more fearmongering and sad attempts to drudge up support for his failed and pointless war
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 148975
Switzerland
09/29/2006 12:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
That is the weakest retort from Little

Bush I've heard lately. Can't they come

up with somthing with more grit to it ?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 137402
United States
09/29/2006 03:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
He's right. And your point is?
9/11 is Nothing...
User ID: 149023
United States
09/29/2006 04:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
"Five years after 9/11, the worst attack on the American homeland in our history..."

That statement is wrong...

The worst attack on the American homeland in our history...has been the bush administration.


:bushhitler:
mathetes

User ID: 33914
United States
09/29/2006 04:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
President Bush suggested Thursday that Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror, battling back in the election-season clamor over administration intelligence showing terrorism spreading.

"Five years after 9/11, the worst attack on the American homeland in our history, Democrats offer nothing but criticism and obstruction and endless second-guessing," Bush said at a Republican fundraiser.

"The party of FDR and the party of Harry Truman has become the party of cut and run," Bush told a convention-center audience of over 2,000 people. The event put $2.5 million in the campaign accounts of Alabama Gov. Bob Riley and the state GOP.

Democrats immediately disputed the charge that they would hold back in the anti-terror battle.

"On his watch, five years after 9/11, he not only has failed to capture Osama bin Laden, but as the (National Intelligence Estimate) indicates, his failed policies have made America less safe and spawned terrorism, not decreased it," said Karen Finney, spokeswoman for the Democratic National Committee. "Democrats will be tough and smart, and will actually fight the terrorists, not leave them to plan future attacks."

Bush's no-holds-barred speech, one of his harshest yet on the campaign trail, came less than six weeks before midterm elections in which Democrats are seeking to strip Republicans of their control of one or both houses of Congress.

The war of words continued a nearly weeklong tussle by both parties over the implications of a newly revealed estimate, an analysis of terror trends put together by the nation's top intelligence analysts in 16 spy agencies.

The document concluded that Iraq has become a "cause celebre" for jihadists worldwide, whom it said have grown in number and geographic reach. The report said the factors, such as the Iraq war, that are fueling the jihadist movement's growth outweigh its vulnerabilities and that, if the current trend continues, risks to the U.S. interests at home and abroad will grow.

Portions of the five-month-old report were leaked over the weekend, and Bush ordered the key judgments - four of its 30 pages - declassified on Tuesday in hopes that wider availability of most conclusions would quell the criticism.

Democrats continued to point to the report to argue that the 2003 Iraq invasion, by fanning anti-U.S. sentiments and helping terrorists recruit, is one reason to change leadership in Congress.

On Thursday, Bush accused the opposition party of cherrypicking pieces of the report "for partisan political gain" and "to mislead the American people and justify their policy of withdrawal from Iraq."

"The greatest danger is not that America's presence in the war in Iraq is drawing new recruits to the terrorist cause," Bush said. "The greatest danger is that an American withdrawal from Iraq would embolden the terrorists and help them find new recruits to carry out even more destructive attacks."

Though not by name, he quoted Rep. Jane Harman of California, top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, as saying that because of the Iraq war "it may become more likely" that the U.S. will have to contend with terrorists on its own soil again, rather than less likely as the president argues. And he quoted Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, as saying the world would be better off without the Iraq war and if former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein were still in power.

"Some in Washington, some decent people, patriotic people, feel like we should not be on the offensive in this war on terror," the president said. "We will fight them wherever they make a stand."


The president also criticized House Democrats, including their leadership, who voted this week against a White House plan for interrogating, detaining and trying terrorists. "We must give our professionals the tools they need to protect the American people in this war on terror and those in the House of Representatives were wrong to vote against this bill," he said.

Democrats, joined by some Republicans, say the legislation would give the president too much latitude when deciding whether aggressive interrogations cross the line and violate international standards of prisoner treatment.

Bush headed from Alabama to Ohio to raise $600,000 for the Ohio GOP and Rep. Deborah Pryce, who is struggling to hold on to her seat in an evenly split district and stressing her independence from the president.

That fundraiser was held behind closed doors - like most that Bush does lately.

By Thursday's end, the president had headlined 68 political events - all fundraisers - benefiting 37 candidates, the national GOP, several state counterparts and the campaign arms of House and Senate Republicans. Half of them overall have been closed to media coverage, with the percentage going up to nearly two-thirds in recent months.

The only one of the president's six political events this week that was open was the fundraiser for Riley, who is favored for re-election over his challenger, Democratic Lt. Gov. Lucy Baxley.

[link to apnews.myway.com]
 Quoting: Islamic_Guy

I agree! Lets impeach Bush and let Cheney take over, LOL Then we'll take the gloves off and get serious! IG when does your flight leave?
For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
Matrix
User ID: 148610
Australia
09/29/2006 05:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
What a sad situation, where the success of how a government is doing is dependent not on how many lives are saved via sound domestic economic policy(the peace effort), but by how many people are killed via foreign political policy(the war effort). :history:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 149026
Australia
09/29/2006 05:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
there was no fucking war on terror till these jackasses started one..

what a joke..
 Quoting: ^TrInItY^

That's exactly right. I seem to remember it was pretty peaceful til Bush barged his way into office.
Only concern before that was Clinton getting a blowjob.
Yáll made a big fus about that though didn't ya? Got him impeached.
Now, Bush shits all over everyone and the constitution and all people do is beg for more.

Yes sir, yes sir, three bags full sir.
Are you men or mice? Whos country is it? Who pays the government through labor?

It's kindof ironic that people pay someone to shit on them. Rather disgusting really.
Callisto

User ID: 146587
United Kingdom
09/29/2006 05:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
The war on terror = you reap what you sow

The UK/US alliance has been sponsoring terrorism and dictatorships across the world for decades and now the world is waking up and its payback time.

Ironically, they have even sponsored terrorism against each other!! i.e. IRA etc.

I doubt if any of them have the stomach for whats coming as its coming big time.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 139767
United States
09/29/2006 05:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
NO SUCH THING AS TERRORISM
Callisto

User ID: 146587
United Kingdom
09/29/2006 05:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
there was no fucking war on terror till these jackasses started one..

what a joke..
 Quoting: ^TrInItY^



There was no war on terror overtly as most of the "terror" was taking place in other peoples countries so no no-one gave a toss. When the US got some payback on 9/11 the public got a dose of what many countries have suffered for years including the UK (also sponsored by the US) so now you have what you have, a war that cannot be won because no-one can see an enemy - only an idea. The people live in fear our gummints are making political capital by trading our freedoms for comfort and security, real or not.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 149046
New Zealand
09/29/2006 05:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
What he meant was the Democrats don't have the stupidity to fight the war on terror.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33914
United States
09/29/2006 05:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
there was no fucking war on terror till these jackasses started one..

what a joke..

That's exactly right. I seem to remember it was pretty peaceful til Bush barged his way into office.
Only concern before that was Clinton getting a blowjob.
Yáll made a big fus about that though didn't ya? Got him impeached.
Now, Bush shits all over everyone and the constitution and all people do is beg for more.

Yes sir, yes sir, three bags full sir.
Are you men or mice? Whos country is it? Who pays the government through labor?

It's kindof ironic that people pay someone to shit on them. Rather disgusting really.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 149026

The most ignorant post ever! Pretty peaceful? November 13 1995
Seven foreigners, including a number of US servicemen, are killed in bomb attack on National Guard training centre at Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Islamic radical terrorists opposed to the western military presence in the Gulf region, explode a truck bomb next to a USAF housing area at Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killing 19 American servicemen and 385 injuring more.
November 1 1996
US Embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar-es-Salem, Tanzania, heavily damaged by massive bomb attacks. US intelligence blames Islamic groups linked to Saudi dissident Osama Bin Laden.
November 15 1998
In Aden, Yemen, a small dingy carrying explosives rammed the destroyer U.S.S. Cole, killing 17 sailors and injuring 39 others. Supporters of Usama Bin Ladin were suspected.
December 30 2000
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 87692
United States
09/29/2006 08:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
Bush is a lame duck.
American BadAss

User ID: 143674
United States
09/29/2006 08:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
BUSH! YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT! I WISH HE WOULD GET A BJ SO WE COULD IMPEACH HIM!

Anyone see this shit on NBC's morning news today? An attack is happening once every 15 minutes on our guys over there. I think it's time for the whole fucking bunch to go, and lets' either bring our guys and gals home, or lets' start busting some serious ass over there, and show the world how damn mean we can really get.
I'd Rather Be A Shootin' Yankees!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 139474
United States
09/29/2006 08:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
Bush's comments are the equivalent of a bully on the playground goading someone into doing something they know is terribly wrong.

I sincerely hope the Democrats don't fall for Bush's dirty tricks.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 141289
United States
09/29/2006 08:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
He's right. They don't.

For if they did, they would have been screaming now the last four years that the Neocon-Zionists and Bushistas were the real terrorists and would have been leading the fight against them instead of being servile to the terrorist cause and supporting it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32062
United States
09/29/2006 09:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
That is the weakest retort from Little

Bush I've heard lately. Can't they come

up with somthing with more grit to it ?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 148975


I agree. Bush was sorta soft on the dems, bu he was being polite. What he meant to say was that democrats are gelded ladyboys who would let the entire country take it up the pooper before we offend the world with our freedoms and democracy.
starlight afar

User ID: 94505
United States
09/29/2006 09:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
Democrats are bibed and blackmailed to shut them up I believe. When a Leader goes against the Insiders "they are eliminated". Have you forgotten what happened to President John F. Kennedy, he was going to do away with the CIA so the CIA did away with him.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 127832
United States
09/29/2006 09:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
What war, we gave up yesterday.


Hey Osama its over man, you didn't like our freedoms so we gave them up. No need to fight anymore thanks to the great decider.
yanni
User ID: 148315
United States
09/29/2006 10:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
what does not seem to be recognized is that bush,etal., and his financial backers, the redsigns, do not want to win the war on terrorism. the longer it goes on with just the right commitment of forces to maintain it but not win it, the longer one bush or another stays in power and the more money and control for his backers.

they initiated the war and they will keep the fires going at just the right level. just enough to make money and bankrupt the usa, but not enough to get a conflagration. world control by the central banks may be the best option, considering the alternatives. that may even initiate the 1000 years of peace
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9679
United States
09/29/2006 10:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
That is the weakest retort from Little

Bush I've heard lately. Can't they come

up with somthing with more grit to it ?


I agree. Bush was sorta soft on the dems, bu he was being polite. What he meant to say was that democrats are gelded ladyboys who would let the entire country take it up the pooper before we offend the world with our freedoms and democracy.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32062

lol
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10315
United States
09/29/2006 10:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
gwdance dick You have to love tough talking chicken-hawk COWARDS that could not show up for duty!
Sinanju

User ID: 148047
United States
09/29/2006 12:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
Bush is wrong.

A few on the left DO have the balls to fight the War on Terror. People like Zell Miller and Joe Liebermann... but look at how they are treated by the traitorous democrats....

Just remember, if Gore or Kerry had won.. all these idiots flapping their pie holes right now would be screaming "GOOOO! USA!!!!" and "Kill the muslims!"

Remember when the Taliban was destroying the Buddha statues in Afghanistan? Remember the outcry from the California left?

They were ready to fight THEN, weren't they? Guess who was running things then.

But let them attack the WTC AGAIN... but this time with a rightie in office.. and the Democrats are ready to bend over and take it up the strata-chocolata.... at least until they can get one of their marxists in the Oval office...
rita the cat
User ID: 143924
United States
09/29/2006 12:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
i agree with the above poster--it's not dems who are the "Chickenhawks" The many brave democrats with genuine war records
who have run for public office--for example, Max Cleland, are always trashed by the republicans, while they are the chickenhawks! It's just pathetic that the american people, especially the red staters are so gullible...BTW, i think the dems in congress are cowards, most of them, for going along with almost everything this (p)resident proposes, but at least the majority of them in the House couldn't swallow the latest outrage--unfortunately my congressman, from a blue state yet, was one of the 34 TRAITORS. If he thinks we will forget this...
and someone made a comment that the democrats are gays. HA!! sure barney
whatever his name is, is openly gay, but just look at all the hidden gays in the
congress and white house starting at the top...most of them are republicans...
Sinanju

User ID: 148047
United States
09/29/2006 12:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
Think Vietnam... JFK's war somehow ended up being Nixon's fault. Sound familiar?
dude
User ID: 190
United States
09/29/2006 12:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
he is right you stupid towelhead

dumbocrats dont have the stomach to kick camelfu**ers in the ass

enough said
LTC Peachblossom

User ID: 89830
Sweden
09/29/2006 12:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bush - Democrats don't have the stomach to fight the war on terror
I wonder how much of this can be blamed on President Bush personally. There was an article about this... wait... yes: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

Here is an excerpt from the article:
"Every utterance from chief executive’s lips originated in a right-wing think tank and was poll-tested with numerous focus groups. Every thought has been reduced into a snappy marketing slogan to manipulate public opinion. All of Bush’s so-called "deeply held beliefs" first appeared on a teleprompter screen in a recording studio or were furtively whispered into the presidential earpiece. Bush’s religious convictions extend no further than the false pieties and self-righteous dribble that are inscribed on the presidential cue cards."

Love,
/LTC Peachblossom

PS. It has crossed my mind more than once that GLP could be one of these focus groups.
This space is not for rent.





GLP