Here Is The Text Of The Iran Deal -- Importnat Info

They are importing nats?

Thanks for posting this. Reading..........

^ That ^

LOL!! Yep, even Mods make title spelling errors!

Looking forward to reading GLP insights on this one!

thank you for sharing.. 5 stars and some greenery!

Saved to read later!

anyone have a summary?

importnat like the spitznat!

Saved and filed. Thanks, OP.

just pages one crossing into two they repeat "peaceful" in the same sentence... I'm no grammar major nor give two shits but this is a forced pill to see "peaceful" in the same sentence page 1 regarding Iran's nuclear deal... FFS!

Bump for later

Thank you, Lady Jane.

340 rabbis urge Congress to support Iran nuclear deal

By wmw_admin on August 17, 2015

Kristina Wong — The Hill August 18, 2015

More than three hundred rabbis sent a letter to Congress on Monday declaring their support for the Iran nuclear deal and urging lawmakers to endorse it.

“We encourage the members of the Senate and the House of Representatives to endorse this agreement,” read the Aug. 17 letter signed by 340 rabbis.

The letter was distributed by Ameinu, which describes itself as a “national, multi-generational community of progressive Jews in North America.”

The group in a statement described the signatories as rabbis “from all streams of Judaism.” The letter also sought to dispel the idea that all Jewish American community leaders oppose the deal.

“Most especially, we are deeply concerned with the impression that the leadership of the American Jewish community is united in opposition to the agreement. We, along with many other Jewish leaders, fully support this historic nuclear accord,” it said.

Eyes have turned to Jewish lawmakers and their constituents, as Congress prepares to vote on the controversial deal with Iran in September and as the White House seeks to shore up Democratic support.

Read more here:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

Does this show everything, or is the hidden shit still missing?

Also anyone got a highlight on the real shitty stuff so we don't have to read everything?

Last Edited by Daggo on 08/18/2015 02:53 PM

Like it makes any damn difference. Its all a dog and pony show.

Nope.

Just have to plow through the high quality government writing.

I count around 20 mentions of "peace" or "peaceful" regarding Iran's nuclear program within the 1st 25 pages.

Only 1 mention from 26-159

As far as I know, there is nothing hidden (that's not to say something "classified" isn't held in somebody's back pocket somewhere). I think a lot of the shitty stuff has already been discussed. Posted this so people could read for themselves.

Probably because they know most of the public, who even try to read this, will only trudge through about 25 pages.

This is a public text

The original text is top secret

I have a question regarding this:


IMAGE ( [link to s15.postimg.org] )


What happens when they build one anyways. Perhaps Iran already has the device!











Got proof? Where's a link.

Last Edited by Ludikrus on 08/18/2015 03:06 PM

Thank you Lady Jane. It will help my insomnia!

Making a 'deal' with one of the nations the US vowed to take out long ago?
Making a deal with the 'Islamic Republic of Iran' when we do nothing but bomb the shit out of Muslims?

Good old, sound US foreign policy, yessiree.....

My thoughts, exactly.

That is why one should read from back to front... :)

Pretty dry reading.

That is one of the main points that I always tried to make when discussing a nation who wants to 'develop' nuclear technology. It should be obvious to all that one need only BUY or be GIVEN the goods by an ally. Or outright steal it. Nuclear tech is there already. Doesn't need to be 'developed' over and over. I find it hard to believe Iran does not have working weapons at their disposal, and has had them for years.
This 'deal' stuff may just be theatre for the masses, IMO.

Sometime in September, I think.