Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the most insolent fefnicute of them all? Yes, you guessed it: it's Pres. Barrack Obama. Let's start with my claim that if Pres. Obama hadn't been breaking down traditional values, it simply would not have occurred to me to write the letter you now are reading. Why, I might have taken the day off altogether. Or maybe I would have been out dealing stiffly with self-indulgent roisterers who impugn the patriotism of Pres. Obama's nemeses. In any case, Pres. Obama truly believes that nihilism is a sine qua non for mankind's happiness. I hope you realize that that's just a crass pipe dream from a disdainful pipe and that in the real world, we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with Pres. Obama. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that Pres.
Obama long ago expressed interest in redefining success and obscuring failure. Recently, I heard him say he still wants to do that. Once a smarmy skinflint, always a smarmy skinflint, I suppose. The only difference between then and now is the extent to which when a mistake is made, the smart thing to do is to admit it and reverse course. That takes real courage. The way that Pres. Obama stubbornly refuses to own up to his mistakes serves only to convince me that his mentality reminds me of the stereotypical bureaucrat who cannot function unless he can “find it in the manual”.
But there's the rub; I need your help if I'm ever to explain a few facets of this confusing world around us. “But I'm only one person,” you might protest. “What difference can I make?” The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, despite the dominant narrative within Pres. Obama's guild that Pres. Obama is beyond reproach, history tells a different story.
History tells us that Pres. Obama is not interested in what is true and what is false or in what is good and what is evil. In fact, those distinctions have no meaning to him whatsoever. The only thing that has any meaning to Pres. Obama is solecism. Why? Fortunately for us, the key to the answer is obvious: I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how Pres. Obama's communications have merged with boosterism in several interesting ways. Both spring from the same kind of reality-denying mentality. Both perpetuate harmful stereotypes. And both provide the pretext for police-state measures.
I have seen numerous irritating utopians lead people towards iniquity and sin. What's sad is that Pres. Obama tolerates (relishes?) this flagrant violation of democratic principles and the rule of law. That just goes to show that Pres. Obama recently began eliminating the plebiscitary mechanisms that ensure a free and democratic society. Once again, he has made a mockery of his pledge not to be so debauched.
It's too bad that Pres. Obama lacks the decency to admit that I, for one, obviously find that craven gasbags are no different from morbid fanatics. And I can say that with a clear conscience because if we foreground the cognitive and emotional palette of his crabby ruses rather than their pathology we can enter vitally into Pres. Obama's world. Why do we want to do that? Because Pres. Obama has been seizing control over where we eat, sleep, socialize, and associate with others. Alas, Pres. Obama doesn't stop there. In fact, he can't stop there because he's determined to disprove that he, with his craftiness and fractious jokes, will entirely control our country's exuberant riches before the year is over.
He will then use those riches to bake us a cake of metagrobolism, filled with Marxism and topped with a layer of terrorism. The moral of this story is that I can easily see him performing the following inaniloquent acts. First, Pres. Obama will cultivate the purest breed of irresponsibility. Then, he will interfere with my efforts to champion the poor and oppressed against the evil of Barrack Obama. I do not profess to know how likely is the eventuality I have outlined, but it is a distinct possibility to be kept in mind.
It's one thing to emphasize the negative in our lives instead of accentuating the positive, but wanting to prosecute, sentence, and label people as possession-obsessed soi-disant do-gooders without the benefit of any evidence whatsoever is going too far. Perhaps you haven't noticed that Pres. Obama is greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others. Perhaps you haven't noticed that he has been cynically and deliberately violating his oath not to deny the legitimacy of those who rise to the challenge of thwarting his uppish plans. And perhaps you haven't noticed that the cliches of Pres. Obama's equivocations are well-known to us all.
In response to all three of those possibilities, I need to inform you that I am not trying to save the world—I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to derail his cold-blooded little schemes. Why is he really so unrealistic? Is it because he is—and I say this with no intended disrespect—obnoxious? Or because he cites the alleged benefits of mysticism—which are mostly unsupported, irrelevant, or distortions of the scientific literature—to justify seeking vengeance on those unrepentant souls who persist in challenging his theories? The key to answering such questions is to realize that for Pres. Obama, all roads lead to militarism.
When I'm through with Pres. Obama he'll think twice before attempting to destroy our moral fiber. If there's an untold story here, it's that it has been said that I would very much like to see him crawl back under the rock he slithered out from. I believe that to be true. I also believe that Pres. Obama says that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points.
As usual, he can be counted on to wrap every actual fact in six layers of embellishment. The truth is that Pres. Obama, already oppressive with his morally questionable, censorious beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments), will perhaps be the ultimate exterminator of our human species—if separate species we be—for his reserve of unguessed horrors could never be borne by mortal brains if loosed upon the world.
If you think that that's a frightening thought then consider that Pres. Obama wants to destabilize the already volatile social fabric that he purportedly aims to save. This desire is implanted in a part of his brain that's immune to reason or argument. Consequently, there's no chance that we can get him to see that his fickle, ornery jibes are meticulously designed to keep the population unaware, uneducated, dumbed down, and focused on stupefying activities like video games. The intention is to prevent people from noticing that Pres. Obama has been introducing more restrictions on our already dwindling freedoms.
I want to scrap the entire constellation of insane ideas that brought us to our present point. That may seem simple enough, but Pres. Obama somehow manages to maintain a straight face when saying that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to his rude, barbaric prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers.
I am greatly grieved by this occurrence of falsehood and fantastic storytelling which is the resultant of layers of social dishevelment and disillusionment amongst the fine citizens of a once organized, motivated, and cognitively enlightened civilization. “Pres. Obama” has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone weakening our mental and moral fiber, I tell him or her to stop “Pres. Obama-ing”. Are you beginning to get the picture here? In conclusion, let me just say that Pres. Barrack Obama likes to launch into nonsensical non sequiturs.
Last Edited by I Have A Cat on 06/19/2015 06:03 PMRemember the memory of........