Sunscreen school policy I need advice I'm pissed

you reply, hello school, it is fundamentally against my religion to apply sunscreen so therefore my child will be wearing a vegetable strainer on his or her head for protection. thank you have a nice day..

sincerely...

You are smart!!!

How didn't I think of that?

lung cancer is cause by burning diesel/kerosene (esp. from planes)

When dealing with any school, first thing to do is retain a lawyer...

$1200-$1500 for a lawyer and the school will give you anything you want.

Glad I could help.

They can use their own sunscreen.
I already emailed them, but they are dicks (no offence to dicks, I love dicks!)

That's what I emailed the yesterday.
"Ms Manetta,

Yesterday ..... told me that he was not allowed to play during recess in the sun.

Please do not restrict his movements during recess as he needs to be active, after all he is sitting for hours in the morning.

As I said I'm perfectly OK with him in the sun for 30min at a time without sunscreen for a few days.

As you know he has a skin condition that prevents me from using anything on him right now.

I'm going to test him with some aloe vera + avocado oil gel, hopefully he'll not react to it as this is a gentle and soothing gel, but with hives you never know.

Both the aloe vera and the avocado oil have sun protective properties.

If I provide you with the gel would it be accepted as an alternative to the sunscreen? "

and the reply:

"
Yes, you may send your own sunscreen. It needs to have a manufacturer's label showing the SPF. Our licensing policy prohibits us from allowing kids to play in the sun without sunscreen. If you have any further questions, please contact "

You're sending him to a private school, send him to an urban school and allow him to be thugged out and taught lower mentality educational courses.

Then he can play in the sun w/no sun screen all day... Least the school is acutally looking our for his health. I do agree, if they have a condition that disallows this, that sucks. ANND at least they are letting him go out in the shade, and not making him stay inside.


/off the rant of my poor privileged child syndrome.

Whether one uses sunscreen or not, going outside during the daytime - especially if one is white skinned - will shorten one's life considerably. You people know exactly what is happening on this planet. You all can see clearly that EVERY species on the planet is experiencing massive die offs and going down - including humans. Sunscreen is not the cause of low vitamin d levels nor is is causing skin cancer other than by giving people a false sense of security to stay in the sun for long periods of time.

To continue to push the meme of 'no sunscreen protection - go natural' is a sign of psychological dissociation. How about telling people to stay out of the sun? Oh wait, the official advice is basically to do just that - but that's just a conspiracy to the disturbed.

ASKL FOR A fucking copy of the "licensing policy" as there is no such thing in WA state and then take it to a lawyer.
it works, I had a teacher in my kids 8th grade class tell them if their parents don't sign the school "conduct regs" she was going to mark them down a grade which is also bullshit and I told her so and told her if she does this again I will hire a lawyer. they never asked again.
p.s. I live in WA state.

They never used to have any policy like that when i was a kid, never once ever used sunscreen at recess nobody ever did./ Besides you're hardly out long enough to get burnt in the first place, what is this, death valley california or something?

But the stupid thing is, how would they treat my son there after that ordeal?
I do want him to be in a good environment and respected as an individual. That is why I wanted a private school.

But the teacher is a moron and the director of the school is a ""I speak 5 languages and have 50 degrees and I know everything" kind of lady.

BULLSHIT THIS IS NOT LEGAL IN WA AND ITS HER CHILDREN NOT YOURS SO GO SHILL ANOTHER THREAD ASSHOLE

Your fact are all over the place, I'm confused!

If you look into it, you will see that lung cancer was flat-lining until exactly 1945/46, at which point it took off.

Diesel/kerosene did not have anything significant happening in that era.

For whatever reason and no matter what you believe the cause is, UBA and UVB radiation at the planets surface is much greater than they were when we were kids. UV radiation causes DNA damage and DNA damage leads to cancer. Most cases of skin cancer are not particularly dangerous, but melanoma is usually fatal. UV exposure can also cause painful burns that don't ever heal right.

So how do we protect ourselves and our children from this damaging radiation? With chemicals applied to the skin? I think that's one solution and probably the only solution if you want kids that are active out of doors doing things like swimming, where it is nearly impossible to cover the skin. Kids should wear at least tight fitting short sleeved shirts and knee length shorts to avoid having to use a lot of chemicals. The fact is though, the damages can be minimized by clothing choices, and kids should be wearing brimmed hats, UV blocking sunglasses, long sleeved wicking type shirts that reflect and block sunlight but do not insulate in the heat, and long pants as opposed to shorts.It might not be stylin', but it's a lot more comfortable than dying of melanoma or having gross skin discolorations. One of the most often overlooked items for kids is sunglasses, and I am certain that in the next ten years or so we are going to start seeing the results of that negligence with eye damage in young adults. The sun is much more intense and bright now than it was 20 years ago, and the human eye is not adapted to this intense brightness, now the elevated UV. UV radiation is particularly dangerous to people who wear sunglasses that do not specifically filter it, because the pupil will dilate allowing for more UV to reach the corneal, lens and retina. Get good high quality polarized sunglasses that specifically state they block UV

agree...just wait it out and try and find another school or home school if you can. Its so hard for you young parents these days.

Take an empty sunscreen bottle, wash it thoroughly and fill it with organic, cold-pressed coconut oil. Have him use that, it is 100% effective at blocking UV and doesn't have Benzoil, which when exposed to UV rays breaks down into Benzene - A KNOWN CARCINOGEN. That's right, sunscreen causes skin cancer!

Good luck OP - Fight the power!

Also tell them your kid must stay inside on the days they are spraying chemtrails -let's see them deny that one.

The increases in lung cancer correlate perfectly with the testing of nuclear weapons int he atmosphere. before the testing smoking did not cause lung cancer. A lot of people like myself believe the only reason there WERE more cases of lung cancer in smokers than non smokers for a few decades is because 1)smokers tend to work and play outdoors more than non smokers, and 2) fallout from the tests in the desert fell onto the tobacco plants in the east, plants which are known to be efficient in concentrating and uptaking radioactive isotopes.

I grew up in Bulgaria, still under the communist regime.
We were led like a cattle to the dentist (every school had a dentists cabinet, they ruined my teeth!

The nurses would show up in class, without warning and will vaccinate all kids at the spot, no parents permission was needed.

etc. etc.

Thanks, but no thanks, it is not the school's role to care for the health of my kids!

I'm sorry that my son is in a private school, but every penny here we earned with work, work like most Americans haven't seen!

Anyway, thanks for your input.

There is actually more magnetic field and atmospheric protection in the tropical-equatorial areas at present.



The Earth's magnetic field, which protects us from radiation from space, is getting weaker. We don't yet know why this is, but new evidence confirms it is happening unevenly across the planet with some areas getting more protection

The field averages a strength of around 40,000nT, so even the loss of 80nT over North America (see above) is small. However, this is in a period of just six months – should the trend continue for long enough the effects could eventually become serious. A weaker magnetic field would expose the planet to increased radiation, both from distant supernovae and from the solar events,

[link to www.iflscience.com]

It takes 8-10 minutes in the sun to get all the vitamin D you need for the day. Its very had to be vitamin D deficient during the summer.

Check out these links. the first is to a specific thread about the changes in the Sun, the second is a search result of GLP for "Yellow Sun"

Notice the percentage of people who observe a change in the Sun as oppose to those who claim it is unchanged, also take note that the "unchanged" demographic are all known shills known as pathological liars.

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

I will absoFUCKINGlutly do that!

good idea, I would roll with this one..

wtf?

Well, you're getting the OS. the magnetosphere is only part of the problem and does not block UVA, UVB or visible light at all. And it is important to understand that at times it almost completely fails , there are dangerous voids from time to time.

The main problem involved is a change in the Sun and the resulting effect it had on the protective layer of the atmosphere.

No it is not.
Some 30-40% of all 14 years old girls are Vit-d deficient at end of summer.