Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,374 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 288,156
Pageviews Today: 457,282Threads Today: 163Posts Today: 2,870
04:59 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject MOST ACCURATE EARTHQUAKE PREDICTOR ON THE PLANET once again HITS the EXACT DATE of M7.8 to M8.5 QUAKE IN JAPAN!!! Also connected to JADE HELM???
Poster Handle Zuzu
Post Content
...


^THIS^
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69377015


Just the HANDLE I go by…

God Code Matrix of 188

which was born out of new research on the 188 Cycle that led to a discovery of a new EARTH GRID known as the 188 LEY LINES.

here's the video I release in 2012 that started everything.


however, there's 4 other sequels to it that show the progression of the GRID
from a FLAT MAP that many initially ridiculed and didn't
think could be TRANSLATED to a CURVED SURFACE, but conveniently DISAPPEARED when they ended up having to chow down on a BIG CROW smorgasbord since the 188 GRID Ley Lines actually form a STAR TETRAHEDRON aka MERKABA that correlates with HOAGLAND and NASSIM HARAMEIN'S discovery as it pertains to HYPER-DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRY of the VECTOR EQUILIBRIUM.
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


Please forgive me, I've never read any of your threads. As such I'm a bit ignorant as to your claims.

So you are this GCM that you are praising as if he is an entirely different person?

You wrote, "How SWEET is it that this ONE QUAKE validates both GCM's warning, as well as the GCM TIME (WAVE) THEORY, while at the SAME time, EXPOSES both JOKERS Ditrianum and even the ASTRONOMER's claims"

Or is GCM not a personal name but an organization or alter ego? I know this is off subject in regards to the point of this thread but frankly although I'm not sure why, it's bothering me. I can't help but to think that if this is a disassociated personality that you see as separated from yourself whom you praise and hold in such esteem that this alone would call your theories into question.

I'm not writing this to discredit or ridicule you, I'm am genuinely curious.
 Quoting: Zuzu


First of all, Gcm is not a personal name.
And so it's not always necessary to speak in the 1st person, nor is it really necessary.
Not to mention it's a LONG STORY... however, since you're asking, it would only make sense if you knew about the CONTEXT of the issue since it was a quick summary of someone that went on a rampage attacking GCM in a public forum with vile abuse posting lies and even made a 1 hour video attempting to debunk GCM's work which failed but then later took and plagiarized Gcm's original quake forecast date and created a video spreading FEAR all over the internet about a 9.8 quake that was going to hit California causing it to fall into the ocean which all failed. Fortunately several big discoveries were made which prompted the Gcm forecast to be changed to reflect the data. In the meantime, the guy who forecasted the 9.8 was attacked by an amateur astronomer and though was mostly correct about his criticism that agreed with Gcm's statements on the matter, the astronomer made extremely ignorant comments that ridiculed those who support the EUT (Electric Universe Theory), so when the latest quake in Japan struck the EXACT DATE Gcm had forecasted which disproved the Astronomers claims and didn't occur on the dates of the guy who plagiarized Gcm's original date that had attacked Gcm, the above statement was made as a reminder for those that were around or new to the page.

But with all due respect, I'm curious why that portion might matter at all or have any bearing on the FACTS or EVIDENCE???

And if you were really interested in the FACTS, why wouldn't you click some of the links to acquire some CONTEXT and do a little research??? Isn't that the logical step in TRUTH SEEKING??? A TRUE INVESTIGATOR, RESEARCHER and TRUTH SEEKER, is someone that has an OPEN MIND and CAN PUT THEIR EGO ASIDE to CONSIDER the FACTS or EVIDENCE even if it contradicts their own personal biases, beliefs or world view.

And let's say EVERYONE was calling someone CRAZY or MENTALLY ILL etc because they were making EXTRAORDINARY CLAIMS that didn't CONFORM to others BELIEFS or maybe EXPOSED something that those people were either trying to hide, or IGNORANT OF, would you follow that crowd of naysayers, or THINK FOR YOURSELF and do your own RESEARCH first???

Are you aware that some of the greatest minds in history, were called CRAZY and mentally ill by their PEERS because the ideas and knowledge they were revealing were TOO ADVANCED for those of that generation???

So all these haters, trolls and ignorant fools can call Gcm all the names they want and DENY there's any evidence or facts to back up the claims being made, but anyone with a BRAIN and one ounce of intelligence or common sense, can do simple research and ask simple questions that will VERIFY EVERYTHING stated and claimed to validate Gcm's work.

In fact, I've put out countless challenges here over the past several years to all those naysayers and deniers and pseudo skeptics who LIE about Gcm and post unsupported claims attacking Gcm's with AD HOMS, VILE ABUSE and everything but intelligent arguments backed up by evidence and facts.

I'll even put out the challenge again to all the TROLLS and DISINFO AGENTS here posting the SAME predictable lies that try to distract truth seekers from doing research which will ALWAYS validates Gcm's work in the end, that I'm willing to WAGER ANY AMOUNT OF MONEY one wants to put on the table
that says EVERYTHING claimed by GCM, is 100% TRUE.

Watch how QUIET the trolls get here and totally ignore this challenge while they continue posting their psychotic rants making the same false claims, followed by personal attacks that Gcm is "mentally ill" yadda yadda yadda which is all to hide the fact THEY KNOW THEY CAN'T DISPROVE GCM's work.

It's like CLOCKWORK mate.

Ready… SET…. GO!
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


Thank you for your informative and passionate response. I appreciate that you are willing to engage in a dialog to inform rather than becoming combative as some would.

To begin with, I actually did bookmark this thread so that I could come back this evening to do exactly as you have suggested. Research and draw my own conclusions from the evidence presented. I intend to do some reading after I finish this post.

It sounds as if you have waged quite the battle in furthering your theories and defending your work. As I've stated, I am somewhat ignorant of your work and therefor am not qualified to make assumptions regarding it's validity or deficiencies. That said, whether I in the end agree or disagree I do respect your dedication in developing a theory that can save lives. It is a shame that another would claim your efforts as their own. It seems that integrity is lacking more and more each day in this world.

I am aware that many of the most brilliant minds of history were in their own times thought to be mentally... off. I also recognize that if you want to discredit an individual's theories questioning their mental state is an efficient way to do so. I've seen it happen on this site more than once. This is why I questioned you as opposed to simply discounting your what you have presented. Yes, the way you had written your post struck me as odd so I sought more information. I thank you for your explanation although you owed me none.

I look forward to investigating the links you have provided and enhancing my education.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP