Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,670 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 15,154
Pageviews Today: 23,171Threads Today: 17Posts Today: 132
12:11 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Why the "left" is afraid of Ted Cruz//Cruz touts radical court-stripping scheme (Ref: Homosexual “Marriage”)

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68829147
United States
04/08/2015 01:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Why the "left" is afraid of Ted Cruz//Cruz touts radical court-stripping scheme (Ref: Homosexual “Marriage”)
....they should be afraid...very afraid. ( ; )


Cruz touts radical court-stripping scheme (Ref: Homosexual “Marriage”)
MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Show ^ | April 7, 2015 | Steve Benen

Posted on 4/8/2015, 2:28:45 AM by 2ndDivisionVet

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) was in Iowa yesterday, where the presidential hopeful reflected on the possibility of a Supreme Court ruling endorsing marriage equality. The far-right senator told his audience, “The first thing and I think the most important thing every one of us can do, is pray. Lift up in prayer.”

But as the Dallas Morning News noted, that’s not all Cruz said.

He reiterated his vow to press for a constitutional amendment that would clarify the power of state legislatures to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. If the high court does legalize gay marriage nationwide, he added, he would prod Congress to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over the issue, a rarely invoked legislative tool.

The prospect of changing the U.S. Constitution to block marriages seems a little silly, especially since most Americans actually support equal marriage rights.

But it’s that other part that stood out for me.

“Court-stripping” – or “jurisdiction-stripping,” as some call it – is a fringe idea that doesn’t come up often, largely because it’s just too bizarre for most policymakers to even consider. The idea isn’t complicated: under this scheme, Congress would pass a federal law effectively telling the courts, “We’ve identified a part of the law that judges are no longer allowed to consider.”(continued)


(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...

[link to www.freerepublic.com]





GLP