Constitution and Bill of Rights and the Religious Freedom Act | |
Anonymous Cowherder
Stop the inanity! User ID: 64083145 United States 04/03/2015 02:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | correct, and that's brings up one of the very few things that Obama has ever said that I agree with. that being when he was talking about the Supreme Court, with Earl Warren as the Chief Justice, not being radical enough and he said that "generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, ..." {the rest of the shit he spews during that statement is not worth copying/pasting. quote came from here [link to michellemalkin.com] by the way.} yes, it (the Constitution) is a charter of negative liberties when looked at through the eyes of a statist/globalist/big-government progressive. Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929! Thread: First steps down the road to a return to the Constitutional Republic that we were intended to be. Restore the Republic. Thread: The Bill of Rights does NOT include age requirements! It's a flower, not something to be feared. - Moo! |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 52105664 United States 04/03/2015 07:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | correct, and that's brings up one of the very few things that Obama has ever said that I agree with. that being when he was talking about the Supreme Court, with Earl Warren as the Chief Justice, not being radical enough and he said that "generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, ..." {the rest of the shit he spews during that statement is not worth copying/pasting. quote came from here [link to michellemalkin.com] by the way.} Quoting: Anonymous Cowherder yes, it (the Constitution) is a charter of negative liberties when looked at through the eyes of a statist/globalist/big-government progressive. That's because the fedgov only has 2 real missions, protect us from other countries and make the states play nice with each other. Most of the rest is made up. |