The Future Genius - 235 IQ - If you can found out this information

You are aware that the highest IQ's cannot be calculated in real-time, and can only be estimated after they've made their effect(s) on common experience.. You are aware of that right?

Give an example of someone or a time when what you say has occurred

And what the IQ was estimated at

Being Smart can lead to other things than what you said

Normally I'd agree with you, about focusing on something else (science), but many have been warned spiritually to prepare or be ready for a dramatic world changing paradigm shift... So I think this doom focus would actually save a lot of lives. It inspires some to become more spiritual.

At some point in the future, Science will help define Spiritually in more precise terms and knowing Science will increase your Spiritually

Actually I believe it's the other way around.

Every historical example you provided.

Einstein.
Newton.
Whoever else you want to add to the list.
Notice that all of their IQ's are "estimated" by the impact that their innovations had -- not determined by some test.

You'll also notice that these IQ estimates tend to rise over time, as future generations increase and reinforce their notions of who intelligent the geniuses were compared to the people of their day -- what IQ is really trying to get at. As their impact increases, over time, so does their estimated IQ (sort of like an ever increasing disparity between their awesomeness and the un-awsomeness of their contemporary human beings).

-- the point being that intelligence that is so far beyond as to be utterly incomprehensible (say for a thousand years, or ever) may never -- in any meaningful measure of time -- manifest itself in some publicized IQ lauding.

Depends on how your brain is wired

Last Edited by Open Your Eyes OYE on 12/10/2014 02:12 AM

Good Point

How would you define the true measure of genius today?

OP, smart is a matter of perspective in relation to a persons place in time. Ultimately one must look at the qualities which define intelligence, and these are not always easily measured by conventional means. For example, creativity is useful and often critical in survival, but that doesn't mean it can then translate into something which our current level of civilization sees as valuable or intelligent. Yet if society were to collapse the natural order would once more revert to what is natures choice for intelligence. So these ideas of intelligence are ideas taken out of a context of time and which may or may not have value as definitions of intelligence. Does that make some sense?

As an example, on one of the very first Survival Series on TV the entire group of 30 people did not know how to start a fire without a book of matches or a lighter. Now, they all knew where they were going, and yet not one of these people bothered to read anything about basic survival skills which any Cub Scout would know. So were they all idiots? Probably not, but you see their idea of intelligence obviously hampered their logical reasoning. While another person who has any knowledge of the wilds would have considered these people unworthy of survival.

Ok

In this generation what would be the most accurate gauge of intelligence that includes creativity, logic, and other skills?

In terms of what you would like to see humans discover/evolve in this generation in the realm of knowledge, what you would like to see occur?

Hopefully, there will always be someone smarter.

Given that "intelligence" can only be quantified when it is "intelligible" to another -- which means that the highest attainable intelligence at even given point in history is simply the highest-level of information that is intelligible to a standard audience (for lack of a better term), which, in truth ascribes the intelligence to the interpreter/translator and not the source (which is essentially what you're getting at by saying "explain via pure mathematics, etc"), I wouldn't.

All math, all logic -- at their highest levels -- equal absolute one, which equals absolute zero, which requires a logical/mathematical break to emulate anything more than a single, indivisible reality. Sciene/Math/Logic is nearing this understanding via perception-experiments and multiple-potential "dimensions".

At this point, "measuring" (certainly "estimating") intelligence is passé. At this point, all there is left to do is continue to innovate in all directions, to any degree -- all are equally intelligent.

-- it seems like to me.

Yes I understand, but us humans like to measure things

It's the competitive nature that is instilled within our DNA

Tesla received his scientific breakthroughs in visions

Which aspect of science/mathematics or another form of knowledge would you like to see a dramatic breakthrough with a channeled vision from another realm (i.e. a huge paradigm shift in some particular aspect of specialized knowledge)

In the end.

None of the above.

The one that the op waits for is the same one Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad spoke about in his UN speech -
His imam Mahdi -"He will come and he will cut through ignorance, superstition, prejudice by opening the gates of science and knowledge

Be careful.

I've done a decent amount of IQ study, mainly wanting to know my own, but I've never seen Einstein's over 160. I am busy at the moment so I'll just post one link.

[link to www.cse.emory.edu]

Sears 235 store closures

In the early models of  nuclear hydrogen bombs, 
 the initial U-235 atomic bomb used to trigger the device was known as "The Swan". 

yes,

they should follow the truth.
the evidence.

infinity.

but they must continue to reach past God.

infinity.

fools.


---

(a) find the secret principle of the universe

By definition of such: Unity of The Word; which is the whole of morality and science, the inner and the outer.

Some interesting stuff.

I heard military research chips were giving the subject between 1000-2000 IQ off the charts . He's already here but he ain't gonna post it , like a flashing hotel light or bullseye target . Goodwill Hunting ain't stupid . ^ v

The quickest way to all knowledge is to ponder the nature of intelligence itself. What does it mean to know? Philosophy is the king science. Take some magic mushrooms, and increase your raw brain power. Shrooms and cannabis make it so easy to evolve super-brains, it's like cheating.

You are nothing, a void, but with a form. This form can know the emptiness of the void. When one is no longer just a person, but also the universe, they will know everything. To figure anything out, such as chemistry, biology, or astrophysics, you have to break everything down into the smallest parts.

My brain is failing me. It's been 2 years of a lackluster diet, poor mental state, and loads of other unhealthy things. I haven't taken shrooms since January 2013, but I know that they are the greatest evolutionary tool you could ask for.

Eventually, you no longer require equations and words. Shapes become your language, and you simply "know". It is pure knowing, and the best way to express the knowledge is to apply it to a creation of yours.

Anyone could be taught all of this, so does it reflect !Q?
[link to quoteinvestigator.com]

If u r so smart, keep working on your language skills.

IQ trail leads forward and backwards at the same time.

Who cares?

I figured out the connection between mathematics and this "reality".

Its kind of funny.

Exactly.

I've gotten so many "IQ" questions right by identifying relationships in presented materials that the presenters never conceived.

I selected the "right answer" but for reasons that were (after viewing the logic behind the question/answer) totally alien to the asker/presenter/test-giver.