Physics: WHAT If I Told You The Mass Into Space Is Irrelevant Since It Have NO Weight

Here is another theory behind gravity. One of my very own. (I could write a book on this stuff)

Notice how water sticks strong to the edge of the glass. This happens within close proximity. Same force that bonds atoms together.

A micro gravity layer which is proportional to the size (diameter) of the parent object.


In other words, if you are within 0.01 of the diameter, you are in a fractal area of great pull.

Space has no bearing on size unless it is in relationship to each other.

A tennis ball will pull on an atom with the same force as will it's larger counterpart, a Sun to the Earth.



It is all proportional. Being as, anything that is within the 0.001% layer around the parent object is subjected to more gravity, exponentially.



Again, space knows no difference in actual size. it is all proportional to object and parent.

I think he was Goscinny:

"No more plays of words today. My word."

^^THIS would probably explain the relationship of the sacred geometry between earth, star and moon...the ratio's between one another...

That's the thing I like about your posts, you always post original material, in your own words...and you do it so effortlessly!

I know I have told you this many times, but I am so appreciative of you and the knowledge you share...every time you post something, as I'm reading it I'm like, "Yep, that is how X, Y and Z work"

You really help me put my personal wisdom in alignment with the science :)

Last Edited by Tampa Heather on 08/10/2014 01:33 PM

AND that's ALSO another point to look at.


----

Interesting point about mass in a vacuum environment


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 08/10/2014 04:49 PM

Does it have mass? Yes. Then it also has gravity, albeit not very much.

Are you suggesting that during an interstellar mission, all the obese Americans will weigh nothing.

Does consciousness have weight?

Better yet...does consciousness have atomic mass?

I like you OP.I thinking questioning the assumptions in physics is the way forward.

No, we do not!!!

KE=mv^2

Kinetic energy equals mass times velocity squared.

Your subatomic world is stupid...its has only two states, that which is assimilated or that which is seeking assimilation.

When do you graduate high school?

It seems to me, you confuse mass and weight.

Mass is the resultant of a sum of particles energetically bound together in a structure.

One could argue all things are bound together in an energetic structure, but let's not go there, some structures like a stone have more pronounced and similar energetic bondage than their surrounding, so that is usually what we define as an object.

If we take a glass of sugar water, it has a defined structure and mass, if we pour it into the ocean, it still has this same mass, but becomes part of another energetic structure

... anyway


Weight is the measured mass of a definable object on earth, the force we need to exercise for this object to cancel out the gravitational pull of planet earth, measured in Kilograms.

Whereas.

Mass is the resultant of a sum of particles energetically bound together in a structure.

Ukraine dude, you did not explain anything.

This is just a no proven equation.

A true vacuum is the absence of all matter. No mass, no nothing.
Gravity is a made up load of codswallop. Atmospheric pressure is your gravity.

I'd explain further but it requires real thinking and out of the box thoughts to mainstream science.

OP----->

but in order to move you need a force and the force = mass x accelleration

so your accelleration is inversly proportional to your mass.

Or stop it!

Weight has nothing to do with it. It has mass

OP, I think I get it.

But I want to know: by space, do you mean the 'universe'?

If so...

The universe is either infinite and unbounded, or perhaps a finite ball as the result of a "white hole" (look it up - cool notion)

In either case

BECAUSE Mass is defined as a sum effect of particle forces, all of the mass in the universe would essentially 'balance out' - thus the universe would have no weight.

However, the universe itself has a measurable mass, but we only have approximations because of dark matter, etc.

gravity is just consciousness of God, no silly materialistic explanation works. Telekinesis.

so are all electrostatic forces and such, just because you give it a name, or understand how the force works doesn't mean you know what the force actually is.

I'm fine with that. For some of us, until we know for sure, we use the language we can to understand our world.

why do balloons float? anti gravity?

so space is absolute nothingness?

then what is a singularity of infinite density and infinite gravity? No subatomic picometer diameter bubbles of vaccuum anywhere?

the singularity contains all matter in the galaxy in a single point, it contains all gravity of the galaxy.

so what makes the singularity expand? It cannot be gravity that makes it expand, it must be an opposite force.

trillions of years ago, objects with mass were repelled by eachother, instead of attracted to eachother. The oscillating universe.

Ducky what happened, did you get banned ?