Ancient Europeans: dark skinned, blue eyed?

Anti-nationalist, anti-White and multiculturalist are breaking down the nation-state, which is the NWO agenda....

So it you that serves the NWO, not me.


,

Sorry, for being off topic.

How is that logical 90% of the population weren't farmers? But blacksmiths, musicians, etc etc.

This devolution of humanity was accomplished in no small part by the Arab Muslim working together with the European Royals and the Vatican as they are today to destabilize Syria and Iran.

Greedy self interest is breaking down the Nation state. Corporatism.

National pride is not racial its National.

It's not a flip coin. Blond/blue genes are recessive, and dark gens are dominant which means the dark ones are "stronger". It's a little more complicated than that (so rarely you can still have blue eyes) but generally, in a population of original 50:50% light-dark, the light genes go extinct over several generations.

Btw, did you know that the name Baltic Sea, and the Baltic ethnic groups living there, means 'WHITE PEOPLE', 'WHITE SEA', 'THE WHITES' in their Baltic languages (Lithuanian and Latvian). Baltas = White

I didn't know that. Interesting.

This is pretty foolish, Fox is a bunch of amateurs ....

Blue eyes appeared because of a mutation of OCA2 gene around 10,000 years ago NW of Black Sea....

And people in that area had light skin for even tens of thousand of years before that... and there are proofs for this statement ...

Generalizing a finding from Spain to the entire European continent is not science work, it's just amateurs making TV @ Fox ...

Well if this is true it makes the theory of evolution false. According to evolution Europeans had/have light skin since they are far from the equator.

cant ever kill the Great White Spirit. No matter how many fuktards around the globe try and achieve that.

i dont think there were many musicians and blacksmiths 40,000 to 7,000 years ago

you sound like an idiot

Last Edited by Oyster on 01/27/2014 12:42 PM

The Great White spirit is here to set all souls and animals free, with the technology they bring.

I think you are the idiot.

Indeed, if you take African American people out of their natural environment (around the Ecuator) and you bring them into northern territories, they will start accumulating all kind of issues - because their skin will produce ~ 15% of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) they will start getting cancer and other nice diseases like crazy.
The colour of skin is a very important feature and doesn't change in a few hundred generations ... Each sub-species evolved in its natural habitat for millions of years, displacing them will always produce collective dramas, they can't blame us for changing the environment...

White skin has nothing to do with being up north. Snow reflects UV and most white people burn bad when they go snowboarding or skiing. A lot of Northern Asians like Inuits are dark skinned. White people also fare worse when they go to mountainous regions like Tibet.


As well white people aren't unique in depigmentation - a lot of East Asians can be light skinned, albeit dark eyed and dark haired.

so what is occurring today, occurred thousands of years ago.


"White Flight"

White folks were unhappy in the hoods. So they packed up and headed north to explore new, lighter and colder territory.

But the moment white people settle down and create a prosperous community it gets over run and they have to pack up and go once again.

But seriously...

I had a grade 9 teacher nearly 25 years ago tell us that..

1. People near the equator had darker skin due to the vitamin D/ultra violet rays from exposure to the sun.

2. People in the north who lived in igloos, were not exposed to near the amount of sunlight, but instead had a diet of nearly 100% fish which provided comparable amounts of vitamin D causing their skin and hair to darken as well.

3. The lot in-between were variable degrees of skin pigment dependant on where they were. Some, like in Scandinavia were very pale and washed out from the lack of Vitamin D.

4. Curly hair developed to trap sweat and keep it from touching the shoulders/neck etc. to prevent over heating. While in the north, hair was straighter so it would grow long and cover the neck and shoulders to trap heat.

5. Asian (also Eskimo's) had formed additional skin around the eyes to help provide cover from blowing sand and snow.

I don't know if the science is there, but it all sounds nice

looks like me with a tan ?

I think this has more to do with the Rhesus negative blood type that first appeared some 35000 years ago in the Atlas Mountains and that are prevalent in the basque parts of Spain. That is where you have to search for the roots of this man.

How does that rationalize white supremacy?

Lost White Tribes of Asia

I've always been perplexed about where we came from (White people). It doesn't seem logical that we would have developed naturally on this planet, seeing as our skin burns. I've never understood either how supposedly we went from cavemen to building civilizations.

I don't believe that we just somehow figured out how to make metal. Someone taught us, left us with the foundation necessary to build and create.

I've read in various articles that we were originally on Mars. Mars is an additional 50mil miles from the Sun. Perhaps our skin would be much more suited to that distance. There's also the glaring difference in higher mental ability and ingenuity to the other races.

:shitdrip:

There's some evidence that a lot of white people are dark and vice versa.

You're making the case that science can mean anything we want it to. In science, black is not brown.
So you decided on your own that, in a careful analysis, we can just say that black is brown. So, at square one, you're already not making logical sense. Now, if you started with something that makes logical sense, and then you proceeded carefully step by step, using only careful and completely assembled information, it might be worth considering what you have to say, as a serious proposition. Until then, you're just like all the other crazies with good spelling and punctuation.

Yet the blue eye gene is only found under Europeans and some people that have European ancestry.

Tanned white men with blue eyes.

Looks like me.

Cool.