Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,187 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,296,133
Pageviews Today: 2,163,997Threads Today: 871Posts Today: 15,422
08:31 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject ACA cap on out-of-pocket maximums delayed to 2015
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
My plan from blue cross blue shield of TN (none ACA) always had out of pocket max. It is $3000 for each member or $6000 for the family.

I have personal coverage from my work. It's $1020, a month, to add my wife and kid on through work. ACA plan (same eveything) was $367 a month. However this had an "E" network and i could not find one doctor to accept this insurance. The same plan in the "S" network was $417 a month. The same plan under the "P" network was $468 a month. All of our doctors take the S and P plans. So explain to me how our company has to pay over double the amount for my family. This does not make any since.

I went with the "s" network. No reason to pay any more than i have to for the same coverage.

No mine is a real plan too

35/50 co pay for doctor visits*
3/35/50 for drug*
20% co-insurance/co-pay (does not apply to doct visits or drugs)
2000/4000 deductable

29 year old female
<1 male


* - the things the crap plans do not have.

Now the insurance company wants to hurry and lock in there new rate Dec 31st. I think they are ripping use off. But what can you do when the insurance underwrite is our CEO's neibor. Some how he has to pay for that big house on the mountain.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10630957


Are the above ACA quotes with a subsidy?
 Quoting: Renegade ()


Yeah, how much money do I get to steal from strangers via the point of a gun (proxied through gov't agencies) in order to pay for my pregnancy coverage when I'm a male?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4466048


You don't, however if you get cancer in your balls i bet your be glad some female that cant get cancer in the balls is helping you out.

or how about when your older and can't afford it. Should i complain about have to pay for older people.

I see it as an investment. Pay a little more while i can and save alot later in live. You might call me a socialist for this but im far from it. I just can see a worth while investment that we can all benefit from. Would you pay a $500 a year more now to save $3000 a year later?
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP