Can ISON hit the Earth? WARNING math inside | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47581945 United States 12/01/2013 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47581945 United States 12/01/2013 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47581945 United States 12/01/2013 09:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ozark Granny
User ID: 31027866 United States 12/01/2013 09:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How about some interaction with space debris ... [link to www.nasa.gov] Thread: ARE THEY GOING TO CRASH THE INTERNET? Thread: They have taken over our Constitution via UCC and here is how they did it! "God sleeps in the rocks, stirs in the plants, dreams in the animals, and finally awakens in man." -Famous Vedic Quote- [link to youtu.be] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50721961 United States 12/01/2013 09:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50897554 United States 12/01/2013 09:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, when it was closer to the sun, or right at the sun, the smallest possible vector change would bring it to Earth. As it moves away from the sun, greater and greater angles of redirection are necessary to bring it to Earth. And the greater the angle of redirection necessary, the greater the amount of energy. But when it was the closest to the sun, it required the least amount of energy because it requird the least amount of redirection - but it had the most amount of energy input, since the sun was blasting it up close. Think of driving down a street. If you change the angle of a car slightly, then by the time you get to the end of the block, you could be on the other side of the street. That takes just a small twitch of the steering wheel. But the farther you move down the street, the more you have to move the steering wheel, until, if you wait to the end of the street, you have to crank it all the way over to get to the other side of the street before you run out of street. So the question is, could ISON's vector have been affected by the blasting of the sun at perihelion enough to redirect its angle so that it hits Earth? Answer, of course, since what hit it actually broke it into pieces. BUT - Earth is only one of a million places it could be redirected to. So if you add up all the OTHER places it could have been smacked into going, the Earth is an extremely tiny possibility. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41581129 United States 12/01/2013 09:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ison is currently composed of multiple debris. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34482807 So how does one redirect, not a merely a singular comet, but a mass of countless fragments. well, lets say it broke into 3 parts, one half the original size and the other two a quarter. the kinetic energy in the larger rock will supply the energy needed to move thee smaller rock if itbumped it. kind of like an ocean liiner pushing a dingy. think also about breaking a set of pool balls up... |
indigowiz
User ID: 34972892 Australia 12/01/2013 10:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Would you like to try the math on a bigger object that is now a debris field! [link to i791.photobucket.com] The sizes based on the above Frank Whitmer photograph are 72,000 kilometres for the Head Coma (H) and 10,800 kilometres for the Core ©. The Earth has a diameter of 12,742 kilometres. So the Coma in this image is 5.6 Earth diameters and the Core is 85% of the Earth's diameter between Venus and Mercury in size. [link to i791.photobucket.com] Here is the close up of the Find edges and Contrast adjustment image so you can see the bad boy up close and personal. Mass is based on a diameter of 10,800 kilometres and a density the same as an Iron Core object like Mercury of 5.427 g/cm3 is 2.84E+12 kg. I guestimate 1/3 of the debris field is now heading our way. Iam Alpha and Omega |
isonTards User ID: 16784466 United States 12/01/2013 10:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A few/several days ago the magnetic field of Venus was detected at Earth. A planets magnetic field has a big reach and can be contorted. As for ison, it takes less energy to effect a small object than it does a large object. Any pieces set in motion from ison exploding would remain in motion, perhaps moving faster than than ison originally. Any pieces put in motion toward where Earth will be when the pieces reach Earth orbit will encounter Earth. Small pieces would be meteors and spark up the sky. Larger pieces could meteorites. Really large pieces could be trouble. |
Mr. D User ID: 4603964 United States 12/01/2013 10:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Because whenever there is a cme the magnetic field lines of objects facing the cme get affected Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47581945 If comet ison is electric, wouldn't it become attracted to a magnetic field line near it? Like a tractor beam? I'd tend to say yes. Earth's magnetic field would attract any oppositely charged object. If the comets and fragments are of the opposite polarity they should attract like a magnet to the Earth. Considering that the comet did not plunge into the sun it probably has the same polarity (or close enough to it) so that it was flung out into space because of the like charges which overcame the intense gravitational pull of the sun. So now you have this mass of electromagnetically charged debris that is expanding headed our way. The question is whether it has an opposite or same charge as the Earth. [link to history.nasa.gov] [link to en.wikipedia.org] We also have to take Earth's gravitational pull into account which according to China travels at the speed of light! [link to en.wikipedia.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50903481 United States 12/01/2013 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am not an astronomer but have basic knowledge of Newton physics. My goal here is to estimate how much energy we need in order to change the course of Ison so it will hit the Earth. Quoting: Sergman So let's start. t: it takes 28 days for ISON to reach the Earth from Sun (2.4 x 10e6 sec) Se: closest approach to the Earth 63,000,000 km (6.3 x 10e10 m) Ss: distance from Earth to Sun: 149,600,000 km (1.5 x 10e11 m) Vi: speed of Ison 86000 m/s = 8.6 x 10e4 m/s m: estimated mass 7,000,000,000 kg (7 x 10e12 g) to 7,000,000,000,000 kg (7 x 10e16 g) from [link to www.nasa.gov] , for our calculation we take lower number. angle between Earth - Sun - Projected Ison path atan(Se/Ss) = atan(6.3 x 10e10 / 1.5 x 10e11) = atan(0.2625) = 14.7 degrees This is how much the course of Ison or one of its debrees must be changed in order to hit the Earth. The speed we need to push Ison in perpendicular vector towards the Earth V = Se/T = 6.3 x 10e10 / 2.4 x 10e11 = 2.6 x 10e4 = 26000 m/s This is how much energy needed to do that: E = mVxV/2 = 7 x 10e12 x 6.76 x 10e8 / 2 = 2.4 x 10e21 Joels (1 kiloton of TNT equals to 5 x 10e12 Joels so we need 2.4 x 10e21 / 5 x 10e12 of kilotons = 4.8 x 10e8 kilotons = 30,000,000 Hiroshima bombs) It looks a lot but considering total Kinetic energy of Ison: 8.6x8.6x 10e8 x 7 x 10e12 / 2 = 259 x 10e20 = 2.6 x 10e22 Joels = 5.2 x 10e9 kilotons = 325,000,000 Hiroshima bombs we need only 9% of the total Ison energy to be redirected in order to change the course towards the Earth. It does not look a lot. Let's take only small chunk of Ison (we don't need the full comet for the disaster. For example for one Million of Hiroshima bomb we need 1/325 of Ison's mass thus it is enough to redirect 9%/325 = 0.028% of the total Ison energy to change the course of this chunk. Remember we used lowest mass estimation. So the number can be even less. Astromut and other experts! Am I wrong? If yes show where. The Sun is perfectly capable of providing the necessary resistance in order to change ISON's trajectory by just the right amount. And that is what I fear we might just have witnessed occurring on the LASCO C3 feed. |
Hesthelamb User ID: 35305795 Canada 12/01/2013 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is interesting, bur for the one who think 9% of total energy to be impossible,you are wrong ! In fact, it as already happened and it is now playing Russian Roulette ! Why ? Because ISON exploded into many pieces and when it happened, all these debris took and were propelled into different orbits (with high strenght and here comes our 9% + trust needed to creates a «window of danger») which spreading has the shape of a cone. Now, for the one who have seen some pictures of ISON after its perihelion, you have noticed this «Delta-like» shape ? So now, let's imagine the side view of a cone, what will you see ? Answer : A Delta-like shape So my point is when ISON exploded, it broke into many pieces that spreaded into the shape of a cone. This thing (ISON) represents a real danger. I would be surprised if nothing BIG hits us and I would suggest to everyone to keep their cars full in fuel, keep a good reserve of water and have a plan. Some will laugh at my message, some will take it seriously. God bless everyone |
Paggs
User ID: 41770098 United States 12/01/2013 10:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am not an astronomer but have basic knowledge of Newton physics. My goal here is to estimate how much energy we need in order to change the course of Ison so it will hit the Earth. Quoting: Sergman So let's start. t: it takes 28 days for ISON to reach the Earth from Sun (2.4 x 10e6 sec) Se: closest approach to the Earth 63,000,000 km (6.3 x 10e10 m) Ss: distance from Earth to Sun: 149,600,000 km (1.5 x 10e11 m) Vi: speed of Ison 86000 m/s = 8.6 x 10e4 m/s m: estimated mass 7,000,000,000 kg (7 x 10e12 g) to 7,000,000,000,000 kg (7 x 10e16 g) from [link to www.nasa.gov] , for our calculation we take lower number. angle between Earth - Sun - Projected Ison path atan(Se/Ss) = atan(6.3 x 10e10 / 1.5 x 10e11) = atan(0.2625) = 14.7 degrees This is how much the course of Ison or one of its debrees must be changed in order to hit the Earth. The speed we need to push Ison in perpendicular vector towards the Earth V = Se/T = 6.3 x 10e10 / 2.4 x 10e11 = 2.6 x 10e4 = 26000 m/s This is how much energy needed to do that: E = mVxV/2 = 7 x 10e12 x 6.76 x 10e8 / 2 = 2.4 x 10e21 Joels (1 kiloton of TNT equals to 5 x 10e12 Joels so we need 2.4 x 10e21 / 5 x 10e12 of kilotons = 4.8 x 10e8 kilotons = 30,000,000 Hiroshima bombs) It looks a lot but considering total Kinetic energy of Ison: 8.6x8.6x 10e8 x 7 x 10e12 / 2 = 259 x 10e20 = 2.6 x 10e22 Joels = 5.2 x 10e9 kilotons = 325,000,000 Hiroshima bombs we need only 9% of the total Ison energy to be redirected in order to change the course towards the Earth. It does not look a lot. Let's take only small chunk of Ison (we don't need the full comet for the disaster. For example for one Million of Hiroshima bomb we need 1/325 of Ison's mass thus it is enough to redirect 9%/325 = 0.028% of the total Ison energy to change the course of this chunk. Remember we used lowest mass estimation. So the number can be even less. Astromut and other experts! Am I wrong? If yes show where. Do we even know ISONS mass when it turned to a puff of dust? Last Edited by Paggs on 12/01/2013 10:26 PM |
isonTards User ID: 16784466 United States 12/01/2013 10:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28373307 United States 12/01/2013 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am not an astronomer but have basic knowledge of Newton physics. My goal here is to estimate how much energy we need in order to change the course of Ison so it will hit the Earth. Quoting: Sergman So let's start. t: it takes 28 days for ISON to reach the Earth from Sun (2.4 x 10e6 sec) Se: closest approach to the Earth 63,000,000 km (6.3 x 10e10 m) Ss: distance from Earth to Sun: 149,600,000 km (1.5 x 10e11 m) Vi: speed of Ison 86000 m/s = 8.6 x 10e4 m/s m: estimated mass 7,000,000,000 kg (7 x 10e12 g) to 7,000,000,000,000 kg (7 x 10e16 g) from [link to www.nasa.gov] , for our calculation we take lower number. angle between Earth - Sun - Projected Ison path atan(Se/Ss) = atan(6.3 x 10e10 / 1.5 x 10e11) = atan(0.2625) = 14.7 degrees This is how much the course of Ison or one of its debrees must be changed in order to hit the Earth. The speed we need to push Ison in perpendicular vector towards the Earth V = Se/T = 6.3 x 10e10 / 2.4 x 10e11 = 2.6 x 10e4 = 26000 m/s This is how much energy needed to do that: E = mVxV/2 = 7 x 10e12 x 6.76 x 10e8 / 2 = 2.4 x 10e21 Joels (1 kiloton of TNT equals to 5 x 10e12 Joels so we need 2.4 x 10e21 / 5 x 10e12 of kilotons = 4.8 x 10e8 kilotons = 30,000,000 Hiroshima bombs) It looks a lot but considering total Kinetic energy of Ison: 8.6x8.6x 10e8 x 7 x 10e12 / 2 = 259 x 10e20 = 2.6 x 10e22 Joels = 5.2 x 10e9 kilotons = 325,000,000 Hiroshima bombs we need only 9% of the total Ison energy to be redirected in order to change the course towards the Earth. It does not look a lot. Let's take only small chunk of Ison (we don't need the full comet for the disaster. For example for one Million of Hiroshima bomb we need 1/325 of Ison's mass thus it is enough to redirect 9%/325 = 0.028% of the total Ison energy to change the course of this chunk. Remember we used lowest mass estimation. So the number can be even less. Astromut and other experts! Am I wrong? If yes show where. ok good math but theres something abit weird about saying 'we need it move' .....no WE dont need or want it to move it will WIPE US OUT!! No, we DO need it to wipe us out. Humans are a cancer on this planet. We need civilisatoin to start over, this one is completely f*cked. start with yourself, worm. you pieces of dung that wish for the conscious human, the jewel of reality, to be gone are the real drones produced by the machine. The human isn't evil, the machine is. |
Mr. D User ID: 4603964 United States 12/01/2013 10:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If the comet does contain an "electric" charge, where is it picking up that charge? Considering the extended orbit of travel I tend to think that the charge could incorporate an Electrostatic component in lieu of, or in addition to an electromagnetic charge. |
Mr. D User ID: 4603964 United States 12/01/2013 10:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am not an astronomer but have basic knowledge of Newton physics. My goal here is to estimate how much energy we need in order to change the course of Ison so it will hit the Earth. Quoting: Sergman So let's start. t: it takes 28 days for ISON to reach the Earth from Sun (2.4 x 10e6 sec) Se: closest approach to the Earth 63,000,000 km (6.3 x 10e10 m) Ss: distance from Earth to Sun: 149,600,000 km (1.5 x 10e11 m) Vi: speed of Ison 86000 m/s = 8.6 x 10e4 m/s m: estimated mass 7,000,000,000 kg (7 x 10e12 g) to 7,000,000,000,000 kg (7 x 10e16 g) from [link to www.nasa.gov] , for our calculation we take lower number. angle between Earth - Sun - Projected Ison path atan(Se/Ss) = atan(6.3 x 10e10 / 1.5 x 10e11) = atan(0.2625) = 14.7 degrees This is how much the course of Ison or one of its debrees must be changed in order to hit the Earth. The speed we need to push Ison in perpendicular vector towards the Earth V = Se/T = 6.3 x 10e10 / 2.4 x 10e11 = 2.6 x 10e4 = 26000 m/s This is how much energy needed to do that: E = mVxV/2 = 7 x 10e12 x 6.76 x 10e8 / 2 = 2.4 x 10e21 Joels (1 kiloton of TNT equals to 5 x 10e12 Joels so we need 2.4 x 10e21 / 5 x 10e12 of kilotons = 4.8 x 10e8 kilotons = 30,000,000 Hiroshima bombs) It looks a lot but considering total Kinetic energy of Ison: 8.6x8.6x 10e8 x 7 x 10e12 / 2 = 259 x 10e20 = 2.6 x 10e22 Joels = 5.2 x 10e9 kilotons = 325,000,000 Hiroshima bombs we need only 9% of the total Ison energy to be redirected in order to change the course towards the Earth. It does not look a lot. Let's take only small chunk of Ison (we don't need the full comet for the disaster. For example for one Million of Hiroshima bomb we need 1/325 of Ison's mass thus it is enough to redirect 9%/325 = 0.028% of the total Ison energy to change the course of this chunk. Remember we used lowest mass estimation. So the number can be even less. Astromut and other experts! Am I wrong? If yes show where. ok good math but theres something abit weird about saying 'we need it move' .....no WE dont need or want it to move it will WIPE US OUT!! No, we DO need it to wipe us out. Humans are a cancer on this planet. We need civilisatoin to start over, this one is completely f*cked. start with yourself, worm. you pieces of dung that wish for the conscious human, the jewel of reality, to be gone are the real drones produced by the machine. The human isn't evil, the machine is. And who pray tell do you think is controlling that machine? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50432294 Canada 12/01/2013 10:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50815627 United States 12/01/2013 10:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The universe is 99% plasma that is, when a comet such as ISON is in deep space for so long away from our positively charged Sun (a Cathode of sorts) it begins to pick up a negative charge. The longer in deep space the more negatively charged it gets. [link to www.thunderbolts.info] |
Mr. Toppit
User ID: 50328366 United States 12/01/2013 10:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Krystle|Ann
User ID: 49621846 United States 12/01/2013 10:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Would you like to try the math on a bigger object that is now a debris field! Quoting: indigowiz [link to i791.photobucket.com] The sizes based on the above Frank Whitmer photograph are 72,000 kilometres for the Head Coma (H) and 10,800 kilometres for the Core ©. The Earth has a diameter of 12,742 kilometres. So the Coma in this image is 5.6 Earth diameters and the Core is 85% of the Earth's diameter between Venus and Mercury in size. [link to i791.photobucket.com] Here is the close up of the Find edges and Contrast adjustment image so you can see the bad boy up close and personal. Mass is based on a diameter of 10,800 kilometres and a density the same as an Iron Core object like Mercury of 5.427 g/cm3 is 2.84E+12 kg. I guestimate 1/3 of the debris field is now heading our way. ^^^this! :cpl3: :rose:Power, Corruption and Lies.. Much more than just the title of an album. The year was 2081, and everyone was finally equal.KV :rose: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22849365 United States 12/01/2013 11:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP, you forgot something - the energy required to change ISON's direction is a function of how much of a directional change needs to be made. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 50897554 So, when it was closer to the sun, or right at the sun, the smallest possible vector change would bring it to Earth. As it moves away from the sun, greater and greater angles of redirection are necessary to bring it to Earth. And the greater the angle of redirection necessary, the greater the amount of energy. But when it was the closest to the sun, it required the least amount of energy because it requird the least amount of redirection - but it had the most amount of energy input, since the sun was blasting it up close. Think of driving down a street. If you change the angle of a car slightly, then by the time you get to the end of the block, you could be on the other side of the street. That takes just a small twitch of the steering wheel. But the farther you move down the street, the more you have to move the steering wheel, until, if you wait to the end of the street, you have to crank it all the way over to get to the other side of the street before you run out of street. So the question is, could ISON's vector have been affected by the blasting of the sun at perihelion enough to redirect its angle so that it hits Earth? Answer, of course, since what hit it actually broke it into pieces. BUT - Earth is only one of a million places it could be redirected to. So if you add up all the OTHER places it could have been smacked into going, the Earth is an extremely tiny possibility. You made perfect sense until the end. IF the sun's "blasting at perihelion" affected ison at all, the effect would have been to push the new trajectory FURTHER AWAY from earth. Unless you think the Sun's gravity grew exponentially at the exact point in time that the comet was near - without similarly affecting it's pull on the earth. Naw, that isn't going to fly… Momentarily increasing gravity on only one side of the sun and not the other isn't a very good theory. I bet you can do better…. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48727943 United States 12/01/2013 11:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am not an astronomer but have basic knowledge of Newton physics. My goal here is to estimate how much energy we need in order to change the course of Ison so it will hit the Earth. Quoting: Sergman So let's start. t: it takes 28 days for ISON to reach the Earth from Sun (2.4 x 10e6 sec) Se: closest approach to the Earth 63,000,000 km (6.3 x 10e10 m) Ss: distance from Earth to Sun: 149,600,000 km (1.5 x 10e11 m) Vi: speed of Ison 86000 m/s = 8.6 x 10e4 m/s m: estimated mass 7,000,000,000 kg (7 x 10e12 g) to 7,000,000,000,000 kg (7 x 10e16 g) from [link to www.nasa.gov] , for our calculation we take lower number. angle between Earth - Sun - Projected Ison path atan(Se/Ss) = atan(6.3 x 10e10 / 1.5 x 10e11) = atan(0.2625) = 14.7 degrees This is how much the course of Ison or one of its debrees must be changed in order to hit the Earth. The speed we need to push Ison in perpendicular vector towards the Earth V = Se/T = 6.3 x 10e10 / 2.4 x 10e11 = 2.6 x 10e4 = 26000 m/s This is how much energy needed to do that: E = mVxV/2 = 7 x 10e12 x 6.76 x 10e8 / 2 = 2.4 x 10e21 Joels (1 kiloton of TNT equals to 5 x 10e12 Joels so we need 2.4 x 10e21 / 5 x 10e12 of kilotons = 4.8 x 10e8 kilotons = 30,000,000 Hiroshima bombs) It looks a lot but considering total Kinetic energy of Ison: 8.6x8.6x 10e8 x 7 x 10e12 / 2 = 259 x 10e20 = 2.6 x 10e22 Joels = 5.2 x 10e9 kilotons = 325,000,000 Hiroshima bombs we need only 9% of the total Ison energy to be redirected in order to change the course towards the Earth. It does not look a lot. Let's take only small chunk of Ison (we don't need the full comet for the disaster. For example for one Million of Hiroshima bomb we need 1/325 of Ison's mass thus it is enough to redirect 9%/325 = 0.028% of the total Ison energy to change the course of this chunk. Remember we used lowest mass estimation. So the number can be even less. Astromut and other experts! Am I wrong? If yes show where. I should have heeded the warning of the math... :glp111: |
Reinvigorated Being
User ID: 2782120 United States 12/01/2013 11:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 50892049 That's a bullshit estimate anyway. Ison was much bigger than that. And if so ops calcs go out the window. It would take much more force to pull ison off its orbit. That's not my estimate but NASA's. And it can be from 7,000,000,000 kg to 7,000,000,000,000 kg. Anyway the math does not change if only a small chunk with a fixed mass will be directed to us. The bigger the mass of the comet the smaller the portion of the total comet energy needed to push the chunk towards the Earth. Where is this force or energy going to come from? that will magically make it to be directed at us? It's going to pass by 40,000,000 miles above us... Above us, huh? Made me think of this... [link to youtu.be] Embed please? That video needs its own thread & to be super pinned for months for everyone to see. I've been sending it to Friends & Family since the day I first saw it. I'm a proud Texan & American, posting from Central Texas & have no clue why my flag shows friggin Canada(no offense to my Canadian friends). "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." Diderot "Immigration without assimilation is invasion!" - Anonymous Coward Gird your lions, shave your Family & panic sex the 'maters! "When your so-called religion is purely a political theory of conquest, and deception is one of it's core principles then it strikes me as perfectly sane and reasonable to assume literally everyone who is of such a "religion" to be exactly the same POS who deserves to be treated as the enemy non-stop." Darkwolf007 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22849365 United States 12/01/2013 11:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | YES IT CAN!! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 50432294 Listen to scientist from MIT explain how Ison threatens the Earth: That can't be a scientist from MIT. I've picked up more than one item that would never have been mentioned by such an individual, and I quit a few minutes into the video. Besides, what valid scientist uses a fake voice to make a scientific presentation. This was done by a 5th grader... |
MagTog
User ID: 39292843 United States 12/01/2013 11:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am not an astronomer but have basic knowledge of Newton physics. My goal here is to estimate how much energy we need in order to change the course of Ison so it will hit the Earth. Quoting: Sergman So let's start. t: it takes 28 days for ISON to reach the Earth from Sun (2.4 x 10e6 sec) Se: closest approach to the Earth 63,000,000 km (6.3 x 10e10 m) Ss: distance from Earth to Sun: 149,600,000 km (1.5 x 10e11 m) Vi: speed of Ison 86000 m/s = 8.6 x 10e4 m/s m: estimated mass 7,000,000,000 kg (7 x 10e12 g) to 7,000,000,000,000 kg (7 x 10e16 g) from [link to www.nasa.gov] , for our calculation we take lower number. angle between Earth - Sun - Projected Ison path atan(Se/Ss) = atan(6.3 x 10e10 / 1.5 x 10e11) = atan(0.2625) = 14.7 degrees This is how much the course of Ison or one of its debrees must be changed in order to hit the Earth. The speed we need to push Ison in perpendicular vector towards the Earth V = Se/T = 6.3 x 10e10 / 2.4 x 10e11 = 2.6 x 10e4 = 26000 m/s This is how much energy needed to do that: E = mVxV/2 = 7 x 10e12 x 6.76 x 10e8 / 2 = 2.4 x 10e21 Joels (1 kiloton of TNT equals to 5 x 10e12 Joels so we need 2.4 x 10e21 / 5 x 10e12 of kilotons = 4.8 x 10e8 kilotons = 30,000,000 Hiroshima bombs) It looks a lot but considering total Kinetic energy of Ison: 8.6x8.6x 10e8 x 7 x 10e12 / 2 = 259 x 10e20 = 2.6 x 10e22 Joels = 5.2 x 10e9 kilotons = 325,000,000 Hiroshima bombs we need only 9% of the total Ison energy to be redirected in order to change the course towards the Earth. It does not look a lot. Let's take only small chunk of Ison (we don't need the full comet for the disaster. For example for one Million of Hiroshima bomb we need 1/325 of Ison's mass thus it is enough to redirect 9%/325 = 0.028% of the total Ison energy to change the course of this chunk. Remember we used lowest mass estimation. So the number can be even less. Astromut and other experts! Am I wrong? If yes show where. Op I checked the math and it looks all good to me. It still won't hit earth though, because there is nothing that could redirect 9% of ison's energy. What are you thinking? OP, the AC is correct. I rode on top of ISON as it went around the sun. Although I couldn't see the whole comet all at once, as it's massive, I am pretty sure that nothing hit it, fracturing it and causing a redirection of portions of it. I also do not think the sun did anything funny with the comet, like heat it up and cause any kind of fragmentation from that, nor did the sun behave in a way it never has before. Because we know everything about the sun, and how it has always behaved and will continue to behave, uniformally, throughout time...and judging by my knowledge about the sun, which is nothing short of everything, I can tell that it behaved as it does every second of every day. Truly, OP...What ARE you thinking? |
Sergman
(OP) User ID: 43941380 Canada 12/01/2013 11:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP, you forgot something - the energy required to change ISON's direction is a function of how much of a directional change needs to be made. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 50897554 So, when it was closer to the sun, or right at the sun, the smallest possible vector change would bring it to Earth. As it moves away from the sun, greater and greater angles of redirection are necessary to bring it to Earth. And the greater the angle of redirection necessary, the greater the amount of energy. But when it was the closest to the sun, it required the least amount of energy because it requird the least amount of redirection - but it had the most amount of energy input, since the sun was blasting it up close. Think of driving down a street. If you change the angle of a car slightly, then by the time you get to the end of the block, you could be on the other side of the street. That takes just a small twitch of the steering wheel. But the farther you move down the street, the more you have to move the steering wheel, until, if you wait to the end of the street, you have to crank it all the way over to get to the other side of the street before you run out of street. So the question is, could ISON's vector have been affected by the blasting of the sun at perihelion enough to redirect its angle so that it hits Earth? Answer, of course, since what hit it actually broke it into pieces. BUT - Earth is only one of a million places it could be redirected to. So if you add up all the OTHER places it could have been smacked into going, the Earth is an extremely tiny possibility. In my calculation I assumed that the course change happened at perihelion. I also calculated the angle: 14.7 degrees. Now think of huge bomb that exploded to million pieces. There is a very good chance that some of them will hit the Earth. Also consider gravitation force of the Earth that will attract the flyby chunks. :bdance: |
SkinnyChic
User ID: 45388520 United States 12/01/2013 11:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 5 stars OP! I can't do the math...but I truly appreciate a thread with people discussing the info. and trying to figure it out. (Verses shills and a lot of bitching). I am learning so please everyone continue the discussion...cause we are not going to find the answers outside of here, that's for sure! |
Sergman
(OP) User ID: 43941380 Canada 12/01/2013 11:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am not an astronomer but have basic knowledge of Newton physics. My goal here is to estimate how much energy we need in order to change the course of Ison so it will hit the Earth. Quoting: Sergman So let's start. t: it takes 28 days for ISON to reach the Earth from Sun (2.4 x 10e6 sec) Se: closest approach to the Earth 63,000,000 km (6.3 x 10e10 m) Ss: distance from Earth to Sun: 149,600,000 km (1.5 x 10e11 m) Vi: speed of Ison 86000 m/s = 8.6 x 10e4 m/s m: estimated mass 7,000,000,000 kg (7 x 10e12 g) to 7,000,000,000,000 kg (7 x 10e16 g) from [link to www.nasa.gov] , for our calculation we take lower number. angle between Earth - Sun - Projected Ison path atan(Se/Ss) = atan(6.3 x 10e10 / 1.5 x 10e11) = atan(0.2625) = 14.7 degrees This is how much the course of Ison or one of its debrees must be changed in order to hit the Earth. The speed we need to push Ison in perpendicular vector towards the Earth V = Se/T = 6.3 x 10e10 / 2.4 x 10e11 = 2.6 x 10e4 = 26000 m/s This is how much energy needed to do that: E = mVxV/2 = 7 x 10e12 x 6.76 x 10e8 / 2 = 2.4 x 10e21 Joels (1 kiloton of TNT equals to 5 x 10e12 Joels so we need 2.4 x 10e21 / 5 x 10e12 of kilotons = 4.8 x 10e8 kilotons = 30,000,000 Hiroshima bombs) It looks a lot but considering total Kinetic energy of Ison: 8.6x8.6x 10e8 x 7 x 10e12 / 2 = 259 x 10e20 = 2.6 x 10e22 Joels = 5.2 x 10e9 kilotons = 325,000,000 Hiroshima bombs we need only 9% of the total Ison energy to be redirected in order to change the course towards the Earth. It does not look a lot. Let's take only small chunk of Ison (we don't need the full comet for the disaster. For example for one Million of Hiroshima bomb we need 1/325 of Ison's mass thus it is enough to redirect 9%/325 = 0.028% of the total Ison energy to change the course of this chunk. Remember we used lowest mass estimation. So the number can be even less. Astromut and other experts! Am I wrong? If yes show where. Op I checked the math and it looks all good to me. It still won't hit earth though, because there is nothing that could redirect 9% of ison's energy. What are you thinking? OP, the AC is correct. I rode on top of ISON as it went around the sun. Although I couldn't see the whole comet all at once, as it's massive, I am pretty sure that nothing hit it, fracturing it and causing a redirection of portions of it. I also do not think the sun did anything funny with the comet, like heat it up and cause any kind of fragmentation from that, nor did the sun behave in a way it never has before. Because we know everything about the sun, and how it has always behaved and will continue to behave, uniformally, throughout time...and judging by my knowledge about the sun, which is nothing short of everything, I can tell that it behaved as it does every second of every day. Truly, OP...What ARE you thinking? The sun overheat the comet's core. It caused the explosion and broke the comet into pieces. I am sure that it is possible that some pieces can change the course by 15 degrees. This is only how much needed to hit the Earth. Otherwise it is not explosion but more like cracking. So in other words the Sun provided thermal energy to the comet which in place caused to explosion and some of that energy was converted into kinetic energy by changing the comet course. It is not about astronomy but just pure physics. Try to microwave an egg. It did not have any energy but will explode after few minutes. So the heat energy of microwaves were converted into kinetic energy of the egg. :bdance: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40493944 Canada 12/01/2013 11:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Forget about how much energy it takes to change a trajectory, the comet seems to have spread into a cone of material maybe 30 degrees or more in some cross sections of that (unevenly distributed) cone. Extrapolate where that cone will be by the time it gets here, where would it intersect earth's orbit (if at all) and where will we be at that time. |