Planet X now seen in constellation of Capricornus

Yes they have found them in our solar system but are "too hard to track."

I certainly hope you're getting paid well for making the rest of us look like fucking maniacs...

As another AC already pointed out: The paper is about Pioneer not Voyager.

Second: The Pioneer anomaly is a constant miniscule acceleration of (8.74 ± 1.33) x 10^–10 m/s^2 experienced by both spacecraft.
An additional object of the size you claim (regardless of the orbital characteristics, almost circular or highly excentric) would induce a non-constant acceleration because of varying distance between the object and the spacecrafts.

You just debunked yourself.

Sometimes it's of advantage to read the complete article you link to.

.

We are talking about astronomy not astrology.
Because of the precession of the equinoxes the astrological sign are one off.

Ophiuchus is partly located on the ecliptic (between Scorpio and Sagittarius) and not part of the astrological zodiac sign (though it's sometimes referred as the 13th zodiac sign)
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

.

Ever heard of camera resolution and Field Of View?

Btw: count the pixels - almost same size.

.

If you run out of arguments, throw in some lessons from the University of YouTube.

And still, after 30 years, the objects discovered by IRAS can be found in the same places.

.

:catint:

.

Why is it you uneducated Fucktards call someone who actually KNOWS what they're talking about a "shill"?

You might as well stick your fingers in your ear and yell "Nuh-uh, Mr. Poo-Poo head!"

Astro shill in 3..2..1...

wake me up when it's 80 days away

get lost IMBECILE

Lol I'm not saying what the op is saying, is Planet X. But yeah, a planet at 80 light-years away shouldn't be visible. If it's indeed a planet, and not a star.

our solar system extends out to about 150-400 AU not 63,000 AU

Last Edited by highwic on 10/23/2013 09:00 PM

[link to www.nepanewsletter.com]

The shilling on these nibiru threads are crazy.As soon as someone puts up anything remotely related to NIBIRU,THE DESTROYER,etcc.it gets attacked and shilled to death,which would make one suspect,that maybe their is a lot of truth in the ancient cultural tablets,as well as religious texts.The point is a lot of cultures and religions speak of this Nibiru,some who never ever came in contact with each other.So to me Nibiru will come through in our life time,before 2030,and that can change because time is speeding up or coming to a end,and that's been scientifically explained.So OP you could be correct..

:crazypills:

Not in the visible light spectrum - but in IR and far IR.

Btw: A free-floating planet is much easier to spot than a planet orbiting a star because it's not outshined by the glare of its star.

.

Thus you just confirmed that this free-floating planet is not part of our solar system - thanks.

.

And your point is?

.

WOW - a "basement amateur astronomer" (you know the difference to a backyard amateur astronomer?) finds Planet X in the 30+ year old IRAS data used by Microsofts WWT.

And still, after 30+ years, the Planet X from your video (aka CW Leonis) is in the same place.

.

Or maybe Nibiru threads get attacked because Nibiru is bs!
But, then again, if I disagree with Nibiru, obviously I'm a shill... Or I'm just stupid...
Thank goodness fthat every Nibiru believer seems to be a scholar or expert on ancient texts, literature, religion, world cultures, archaeology, anthropology, history, geology, biology, chemistry, physics, astronomy, astrology, astrophysics, and numerous other subjects. Otherwise, who would explain this all to the stupid nonbelievers like myself?

The HOAX Kolbrin is not a reliable source.
It is claimed to be heretical Christian or Judaeo-Christian document, and claims a history for the book up to 1184, when suppressed by Edward I (reigned 1272-1307)-- even a Nibirutards can see that doesn't add up. It was allegedly preserved by 'religious druids', but Druidism was a pre-Roman religion in Britain. Any pagan religion had been extinct in Britain for centuries by 1184. It was preserved 'on bronze tablets', not a usual medium for literary documents in Britain - parchment was the usual one. The parent website for the Kolbrin refers to the destruction of Glastonbury Abbey as an arson attack, another lie. That website refers to this as 'the time of history when there was a great suppression of monasterys'. The greater monasteries (such as Glastonbury) were dissolved in 1539 and lesser ones a few years earlier, nearly 400 years after the claimed time period. It is claimed that the book is in 'Biblical English', but what is that? There are virtually no English texts of the 12th and 13th centuries, indeed little between the Old English of the Anglo-Saxons and Middle English of Chaucer, but the language used is neither. It is not even the English of Shakespeare and the King James Bible, since the first person singular is 'you' not 'thou'. The orthography of the text is modern, from the period after Samuel Johnson's dictionary modernised English spelling (or at least I think that was when spelling changed). Everything about this subject says HOAX.