Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,510 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 157,347
Pageviews Today: 329,268Threads Today: 130Posts Today: 2,747
06:11 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!

 
Uisce
User ID: 13515254
Ireland
07/24/2013 05:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Made a point of watching none of media circus but still unwillingly saw them at one point come out with baby and thought how incredibly the same Kate looked - absolutely the same as before, or rather as if she'd been on a cruise and was well rested, fresh as a daisy !!! Even allowing for every possible luxury inside the hospital its still a birth, its a life changing experience, but no sign at all in eyes, face nothing. No emotion I think is what I mean, even a hint of triumph would have done it but no ! Must of made an impression on me because I ended up thinking about Diana when she appeared in the same situation, got a really good memory for visuals, seem to remember she still wore a maternity type dress, and she DID look different in the face, sort of changed and shell shocked - just what you might expect for someone giving birth for the first time and then having to face the world's press !!! Not our Kate though ! Bomb proof this one ! I'm obliged to the OP and others for making me focus ! And yes, some ladies stay big, and some go back small, but boy that's a bump !
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 42511934
United States
07/24/2013 06:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
shills shilling so hard it's funny

cruise
Ohwell

User ID: 43895297
United Kingdom
07/24/2013 06:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Hi OP. I checked your post and despite attempts by many to portray you as crazy, you are not. Dont worry too much about them. You are only pointing out the odd things you see in this scenario and we have learned enough to realsie that we cant trust the MSM.

Just more proof you are not crazy and that this was a staged and symbolic event, look at the ticker below......

[link to now.msn.com]

In a live broadcast, there is a 5 to 10 second delay between what happens live in the studios and what we see on TV. They have many directors and enough time to cut the feed and avoid this mistake, yet they didn't and now telling us this is a mistake? Absolutely not.

The ticker and the timing of it just shows that are playing a prank on us and even putting it in our faces. Even at that people do not see. Just shows the level of stupidity they believe mankind has descended into.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37819089
United States
07/24/2013 06:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Men can't have baby's...problem solved was there a baby....No way! But if there was a baby ...it has 2 Daddy
'
I'm like, WTF?

User ID: 26756823
United States
07/24/2013 06:12 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Then I am a superwoman ...
After giving birth to my daughter I did NOT have a round belly like that anymore.
I was still chubby but was not so swollen like when pregnant.

Even my girlfriends did not had such a tummy/belly after labor.
 Quoting: Krispy71


Me neither, after all 4 of mine, mine was puffy and sticking out, but not like that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24946868


I had twins - and although was flabby afterwords - was flatter than that. Given that her baby bump was smal during her pregnancy? And it is her first (snap back faster) Really - something just isn't right.

That said - royals and celebs have historically used doubles to duck the media, crowds etc - could be that this is what all this is about. I know I wouldn't want the general public all over the birth of my first child either.
I'm like, WTF?

User ID: 26756823
United States
07/24/2013 06:14 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Hi OP. I checked your post and despite attempts by many to portray you as crazy, you are not. Dont worry too much about them. You are only pointing out the odd things you see in this scenario and we have learned enough to realsie that we cant trust the MSM.

Just more proof you are not crazy and that this was a staged and symbolic event, look at the ticker below......

[link to now.msn.com]

In a live broadcast, there is a 5 to 10 second delay between what happens live in the studios and what we see on TV. They have many directors and enough time to cut the feed and avoid this mistake, yet they didn't and now telling us this is a mistake? Absolutely not.

The ticker and the timing of it just shows that are playing a prank on us and even putting it in our faces. Even at that people do not see. Just shows the level of stupidity they believe mankind has descended into.
 Quoting: Ohwell


Being called crazy when one is being observant happens ALOT around here - not only that, the little bastards are quite nasty about it as well.
lmao
User ID: 34173127
United Kingdom
07/24/2013 06:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
i think the OP does have a point, YES it take time to loss the bump (if your not obese, eating shit all day wont loose it! and if people are asking when its due and your not pregnant get on a fucking diet!), but water retention and baby weight leaves a different shape after birth (ask any midwife), i have four boys, and YES now im suspicious as she clearly does still look pregnant. when your slim the bump goes from very rounded like a balloon to a umm hill slope kinda shape and takes about 4 months to go back to near normal shape with strict dieting and exercise. if your fat folks sorry to say this butally, but its true, YOU have to tell people your pregnant and all the time your endangering your unborn and rarely endure a natural birth without consultants interfering.prove me wrong, i doubt it, im a midwife!.

truth hurts, but honesty pays.
Krispy71  (OP)

User ID: 39765605
Netherlands
07/24/2013 06:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
shills shilling so hard it's funny

cruise
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42511934


wave
Krispy71  (OP)

User ID: 39765605
Netherlands
07/24/2013 06:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Hi OP. I checked your post and despite attempts by many to portray you as crazy, you are not. Dont worry too much about them. You are only pointing out the odd things you see in this scenario and we have learned enough to realsie that we cant trust the MSM.

Just more proof you are not crazy and that this was a staged and symbolic event, look at the ticker below......

[link to now.msn.com]

In a live broadcast, there is a 5 to 10 second delay between what happens live in the studios and what we see on TV. They have many directors and enough time to cut the feed and avoid this mistake, yet they didn't and now telling us this is a mistake? Absolutely not.

The ticker and the timing of it just shows that are playing a prank on us and even putting it in our faces. Even at that people do not see. Just shows the level of stupidity they believe mankind has descended into.
 Quoting: Ohwell


Tnx hf


Your work and research on your thread confirmed what I saw and felt and knew.
I know I am not crazy,
but I dont mind if others think I am, they are entitled to have their own vision and opinion ;)

I am glad though to see that more people have their eyes and senses open and DO understand the signs or feel something is just not right.



Respect to you Ohwell flower



xxxK
Krispy71  (OP)

User ID: 39765605
Netherlands
07/24/2013 06:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Hi OP. I checked your post and despite attempts by many to portray you as crazy, you are not. Dont worry too much about them. You are only pointing out the odd things you see in this scenario and we have learned enough to realsie that we cant trust the MSM.

Just more proof you are not crazy and that this was a staged and symbolic event, look at the ticker below......

[link to now.msn.com]

In a live broadcast, there is a 5 to 10 second delay between what happens live in the studios and what we see on TV. They have many directors and enough time to cut the feed and avoid this mistake, yet they didn't and now telling us this is a mistake? Absolutely not.

The ticker and the timing of it just shows that are playing a prank on us and even putting it in our faces. Even at that people do not see. Just shows the level of stupidity they believe mankind has descended into.
 Quoting: Ohwell


Being called crazy when one is being observant happens ALOT around here - not only that, the little bastards are quite nasty about it as well.
 Quoting: I'm like, WTF?


hf

TNX
Ohwell

User ID: 43895297
United Kingdom
07/24/2013 06:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Hi OP. I checked your post and despite attempts by many to portray you as crazy, you are not. Dont worry too much about them. You are only pointing out the odd things you see in this scenario and we have learned enough to realsie that we cant trust the MSM.

Just more proof you are not crazy and that this was a staged and symbolic event, look at the ticker below......

[link to now.msn.com]

In a live broadcast, there is a 5 to 10 second delay between what happens live in the studios and what we see on TV. They have many directors and enough time to cut the feed and avoid this mistake, yet they didn't and now telling us this is a mistake? Absolutely not.

The ticker and the timing of it just shows that are playing a prank on us and even putting it in our faces. Even at that people do not see. Just shows the level of stupidity they believe mankind has descended into.
 Quoting: Ohwell


Being called crazy when one is being observant happens ALOT around here - not only that, the little bastards are quite nasty about it as well.
 Quoting: I'm like, WTF?


LOL!!! So true!
Ohwell

User ID: 43895297
United Kingdom
07/24/2013 06:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Hi OP. I checked your post and despite attempts by many to portray you as crazy, you are not. Dont worry too much about them. You are only pointing out the odd things you see in this scenario and we have learned enough to realsie that we cant trust the MSM.

Just more proof you are not crazy and that this was a staged and symbolic event, look at the ticker below......

[link to now.msn.com]

In a live broadcast, there is a 5 to 10 second delay between what happens live in the studios and what we see on TV. They have many directors and enough time to cut the feed and avoid this mistake, yet they didn't and now telling us this is a mistake? Absolutely not.

The ticker and the timing of it just shows that are playing a prank on us and even putting it in our faces. Even at that people do not see. Just shows the level of stupidity they believe mankind has descended into.
 Quoting: Ohwell


Tnx hf


Your work and research on your thread confirmed what I saw and felt and knew.
I know I am not crazy,
but I dont mind if others think I am, they are entitled to have their own vision and opinion ;)

I am glad though to see that more people have their eyes and senses open and DO understand the signs or feel something is just not right.



Respect to you Ohwell flower



xxxK
 Quoting: Krispy71


Thanks so much. Glad to be of service!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31128946
United States
07/24/2013 06:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Hello all,

I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw this photo :
[link to images.starpulse.com]

Kate with her presumable baby in her arms ...
BUT LOOK AT THAT BELLY !!!
ITS STILL ROUND AND FULL
as if still pregnant !!!!!!




I delivered a baby myself
and believe me after giving birth your belly is wayyyyyy flatter and slimmer !!!



This might tie into the hexagonal planetary alignment of the 29th !!!
Or also called : The 13th Star of David alignment !!! {an other will not occur within 100 years! ]

There are many threads about that right now,
with 1 of myself:
Thread: The Grant Hexagram alignment, July 29th 2013


One post from my thread where I spoke about Kate and this 29th-date:

What does it all mean? Will the antichrist be born? Jesus coming back? Rapture? Public disclosure? Earthquakes? Tsunamis?
 Quoting: Face Palmer


Hello Face Palmer,

The only thing I know for certain is that TPTB and the Illuminati [and other cults] will use this date in their rituals becoz of the position of the planets: a six-pointed star, like that of the Star of David.

I cant say anything about the Antichrist, dont know if he is already born and mature or has to be born ...
I do know that Kate is about to deliver the next Royal Baby this weekend.
If she would hold the baby till the 29th that would be to coincidental.


Positions of planets are linked with electro-magnetical forces and force-fields. The position influences Earths EM-field also, and thus us -people- to, our hormones and emotions and our chemical signals/make-up.
The more planets are involved in a specific GEOMETRIC FORM or alignment, the stronger the influence of the total Event.

This could indeed influence political steps, impulsive actions like disclosure or bombings/shootings or many other impulsive actions people can make.

Electro-magnetic changes from OUTSIDE [from space] are always influencing geo-magnetic forces on Earth, and thus could it be that EQ's or tsunami's or other geophysical events take place.

The above mentioned is all previous acknowledged by science.
(Except that of the Illuminati/TPTB but there are many sources that write about that in detail.)


I hope this helped to understand.

xxxK
 Quoting: Krispy71


It is clear that the Illuminati are USING this date, this alignment, and the 3 or 4 days before it and after it [coz then the energy-field builds up and weakens].

Luis Vega talks about Wars that have begun with this alignment-configuration in the past ...
Luis Vega : [link to www.nightghost.ws]






What could be playing is next :

To avoid all rumors and conspiracy they could have faked the birth-date of the baby to be the 22th,
and Kate will hold the baby [artificial controled] untill the 28-29th ...
NO ONE WILL NOTICE THE DIFFERENCE WITH THE BABY SWITCH !!!

Baby's change a lot the first weeks and months.


AFTER LABOR : [link to news.bbcimg.co.uk]

BEFORE LABOR : [link to www.dispatch.com]

THE SAME SIZE BELLY !!!!!!!





I tell you KATE DID NOT GAVE BIRTH YET !!!!
 Quoting: Krispy71


You idiot! It takes nine months to gain all that weight. Do you REALLY think that you lose it the MINUTE you have the baby??? Even dieting and working out, it took me over a year to lose all my baby weight. Not only is this thread stupid, but it's disrespectful to women everywhere. It's like the second we have the baby our stomach should magically poof back! It doesn't work that way!
Lamplite

User ID: 945308
New Zealand
07/24/2013 06:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Here retards a photo of Kate after birth besides Dianna after birth ... both have large tummies still, so shut the fuck up!

[link to www.ibtimes.com]
Krispy71  (OP)

User ID: 39765605
Netherlands
07/24/2013 06:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
@ lmao

I was pregnant of a daughter and was round all-around,
women who are pregnant of boys most of the time are not fully round but wear their child on the front pointing explicit forward.
When women give birth indeed the water-volume and the weight of the baby is reduced from the size of the belly and that SHOWS indeed ... specially with Kate's posture and the fact she was/is carrying a boy.

{ This is for normal/average size women, its true that for women with more weight or even obese things are different.
This is no attack or discrimination or any other negative way. }


Kate should have been slimmer then during pregnancy indeed.


xxxK
geminilion

User ID: 43579070
United States
07/24/2013 06:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
I am just bewildered that they would actually take a newborn out into a screaming crowd like that. I also noticed that unlike most new mom's she did not touch the baby's head or attempt to cover it as it is the natural thing that I always did with all 5 of mine. I don't know what to think but something does seem off.
 Quoting: Flnative


Tnx !!!

Indeed, I didnt see that special spark in her eyes, or the mom-way to look at HER child,
she did not TOUCH it like that
BUT SHE TOUCHED HER BELLY LIKE THAT !!!

hf
 Quoting: Krispy71


There were tons of people, cameras flashing, etc. She's probably exhausted. No special spark in her eyes? Ugh.
..."The soul is dyed the color of its thoughts. Think only on those things that are in line with your principles and can bear the light of day. The content of your character is your choice. Day by day, what you choose, what you think, and what you do is who you become. Your integrity is your destiny ... it is the light that guides your way."
Heraclitus
geminilion

User ID: 43579070
United States
07/24/2013 06:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
shills shilling so hard it's funny

cruise
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42511934


Easy to debunk using any search engine, don't have to take the word of all of the mothers on here who've had multiple children.
..."The soul is dyed the color of its thoughts. Think only on those things that are in line with your principles and can bear the light of day. The content of your character is your choice. Day by day, what you choose, what you think, and what you do is who you become. Your integrity is your destiny ... it is the light that guides your way."
Heraclitus
Ohwell

User ID: 43895297
United Kingdom
07/24/2013 06:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Here retards a photo of Kate after birth besides Dianna after birth ... both have large tummies still, so shut the fuck up!

[link to www.ibtimes.com]
 Quoting: Lamplite


Doesn't prove anything other than the fact that they both could have been staged events.
Krispy71  (OP)

User ID: 39765605
Netherlands
07/24/2013 06:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
You idiot! It takes nine months to gain all that weight. Do you REALLY think that you lose it the MINUTE you have the baby??? Even dieting and working out, it took me over a year to lose all my baby weight. Not only is this thread stupid, but it's disrespectful to women everywhere. It's like the second we have the baby our stomach should magically poof back! It doesn't work that way!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31128946



Its clear that you feel hurt, but its not by anything I have said if you read my posts right.

I dont say that Kate should have magically gone back to size 6 4 hours after supposedly giving birth for 24 hours ...

I have looked up pictures from a few days before her labor and the pictures from that "parade" outside the hospital.
It just dont matches up, she is as round and bellyed-up as 2 days before.

I gave birth myself to a daughter, as you can read in other posts and replies.
Even a midwife here on the thread admids that you should see the difference between the lost birth-water and the volume of the baby !!!

Its okay to still have a chubby tummy/belly,
but its unlogical and unreal that you dont see ANY DIFFERENCE.

THAT is my point.
NOT what YOU are hurt about.

Further I have watched that video and noticed many things that made me go scratching



I hope you feel relieved by calling me an idiot.
Your welcome.


xxxK
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30546946
United States
07/24/2013 07:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Then I am a superwoman ...
After giving birth to my daughter I did NOT have a round belly like that anymore.
I was still chubby but was not so swollen like when pregnant.

Even my girlfriends did not had such a tummy/belly after labor.
 Quoting: Krispy71


My wife said the same, she is still pregnant, her belly was huge, my mrs had a flat tummy after both the kids, I never seen a woman hold such a huge belly after birth, the way she held it also seemed strange, like she was holding her baby, like all pregnant mothers do.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37615774


She gave birth to an 8 pounder. Of course she's still all stretched out. This thread is dumber than the one yesterday.
 Quoting: Meggarea


I gave birth to 5 children the last 3 weighed 8.3lbs, 9.5 lbs, 10 lbs.

But my belly was not 40 weeks large and rounded it went down to about 4 months look. That women looks like she is about to explode.
Lamplite

User ID: 945308
New Zealand
07/24/2013 07:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Here retards a photo of Kate after birth besides Dianna after birth ... both have large tummies still, so shut the fuck up!

[link to www.ibtimes.com]
 Quoting: Lamplite


Doesn't prove anything other than the fact that they both could have been staged events.
 Quoting: Ohwell


Oh for shits sake, not everything is a fucking conspiracy.

She had a fucking baby for shits sake.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 41936247
Sweden
07/24/2013 07:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
The before and after


IMAGE ( [link to i43.tinypic.com] )


Sure looks very fishy
0fice

User ID: 43694949
United States
07/24/2013 07:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
oh jeez its been nothing but the royal baby...
Ohwell

User ID: 43895297
United Kingdom
07/24/2013 07:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Here retards a photo of Kate after birth besides Dianna after birth ... both have large tummies still, so shut the fuck up!

[link to www.ibtimes.com]
 Quoting: Lamplite


Doesn't prove anything other than the fact that they both could have been staged events.
 Quoting: Ohwell


Oh for shits sake, not everything is a fucking conspiracy.

She had a fucking baby for shits sake.
 Quoting: Lamplite


No hard feelings but what does it matter to you if she did or didn't. Would it put food on your table?
Lamplite

User ID: 945308
New Zealand
07/24/2013 07:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
I gave birth to 5 children the last 3 weighed 8.3lbs, 9.5 lbs, 10 lbs.

But my belly was not 40 weeks large and rounded it went down to about 4 months look. That women looks like she is about to explode.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30546946


Oh for fucks sake, that is hardly a big bump and she is making it look bigger because she is holding the baby.

Some people carry large and some don't, she is way smaller than her pre-birth photos.

Fuck some people are too retarded for words.
.
Lamplite

User ID: 945308
New Zealand
07/24/2013 07:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Here retards a photo of Kate after birth besides Dianna after birth ... both have large tummies still, so shut the fuck up!

[link to www.ibtimes.com]
 Quoting: Lamplite


Doesn't prove anything other than the fact that they both could have been staged events.
 Quoting: Ohwell


Oh for shits sake, not everything is a fucking conspiracy.

She had a fucking baby for shits sake.
 Quoting: Lamplite


No hard feelings but what does it matter to you if she did or didn't. Would it put food on your table?
 Quoting: Ohwell


Your making GLP look like the stupidest site on the planet.

I'm embarrassed now to even be viewing the site.
.
Krispy71  (OP)

User ID: 39765605
Netherlands
07/24/2013 07:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
The before and after


IMAGE ( [link to i43.tinypic.com] )


Sure looks very fishy
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41936247


hf

THATS what I noticed too !!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 43638424
United States
07/24/2013 07:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Perhaps the baby they are showing the world is not theirs, and Kate is still to give birth. The child she eventually gives birth to will be brought up out of the public eye, only to come onto the scene 30 years later.. As a savior figure - having learnt dark secrets and adept at the dark arts. Maybe the child she is still carrying is King Arthur II and the elite know it. So to fulfill their dark agenda, they must push the general populous onto the brink of starvation, increase the suffering - more wars, tax hikes, job cuts and debase the minds of men through satanic media manipulation. At the current rate , mankind would be so docile in 30 years time, they will beg the charismatic magician Arthur to rule their sorry asses..

Or The baby she is still carrying will be sacrificed at a later date - to complete the character change William needs to go through (like Hitler) - the gentleman you see now, may soon, become an angry hate filled being - wanting revenge for his mother and son, and total control of the plebs who idolize him - And these very beings will, through sympathy allow laws to be passed to give the grieving man power 'he deserves'. As his soul becomes saturated with more and more darkness - Satan will take hold of him.. He will be turned..


When his transformation is complete.. Flee to the mountains!

As Anakin became Darth / William will become Arth!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 43953497
Germany
07/24/2013 07:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
Here retards a photo of Kate after birth besides Dianna after birth ... both have large tummies still, so shut the fuck up!

[link to www.ibtimes.com]
 Quoting: Lamplite


Nice

Diana:

You can see the dress is much more wide. And the belly seems fluffy and a little bit loose like it should be on a woman like Diana and Kate.

Kate

Kate has a tense round belly, this is not normal in any circumstances.

They put her in some XS outfit so everyone can see she still bread anything inside of her, nice gig.

At least a great show.
Ohwell

User ID: 43895297
United Kingdom
07/24/2013 07:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OMG! Royal British baby birth = hoax -- photo proof ! KATE STILL PREGNANT !!!
...


Doesn't prove anything other than the fact that they both could have been staged events.
 Quoting: Ohwell


Oh for shits sake, not everything is a fucking conspiracy.

She had a fucking baby for shits sake.
 Quoting: Lamplite


No hard feelings but what does it matter to you if she did or didn't. Would it put food on your table?
 Quoting: Ohwell


Your making GLP look like the stupidest site on the planet.

I'm embarrassed now to even be viewing the site.
.
 Quoting: Lamplite


Is it so hard to answer that simple question? Anyway, can you explain this too? Look at the ticker below....

[link to now.msn.com]





GLP