They faked it ! The Moon Landing !!

good lord, my ass. you believe that armstrong could talk over the 10,000 pound thruster? and you think that thruster didn't leave a mark? and you think it left a bunch of lose dirt? all kinds of logic.

This poor fellow has never heard of motion picture film. You see it works this way. You photograph images onto it and it stays preserved over a long period of time. That would mean that the shooting of the landing probably took place many years before Nixon became President. This is the most stupid comment of all.

No, it seems the poster was referring to "photoshop" technology, to manipulate images. Not technology to go to the moon. That is why I would not trust images even if they supposedly "exist" either.

My writing does not necessarily mean that we now have the technology. I did use the word "perhaps".

Don't be so retarded.
Lunar quakes if they occur would not compact the surface but would assure it stayed silted and churned up.

The film was shot between 1964 and 1966 during the making f 2001. You are a seriously stupid person.

Yup, probably even before that...say around 1860? They've been lying to us FOREVER and people just keep believing the codswallop because it's easier and it makes them feel "patriotic" - something that actual intelligent, thinking people don't engage in. It's one thing to have love and pride in your country and people, but NO ONE SHOULD EVER LOVE OR TRUST THEIR GOVERNMENT. EVER. Government should always be distrusted as those in it have massive motivation to lie, cheat and steal, and little motivation towards honesty. There's no profit in it.

I am a pilot and engineer who was in the Air Force. I have studied every detail of aviation and space travel since I was 5 years old. I have a stack of books about the Apollo and Gemini programs going back 30 years.

I have been to the Smithsonian several times to see all the exhibits and I have been to the "non-public" space exhibits as well because my grandfather was a Captain in the navy and a Naval astrophysicist.

AND, I knew one of the Astronauts (Col. Mike Anderson) killed in the shuttle re-entry breakup from the Air Force.

The only things I can say on this subject with 100% certainty are:

There were a HELL of a lot of jobs created in order to build all of that moon stuff so no engineer would question it.

We are actually able to put satellites and shuttles in orbit - I have seen the ISS in orbit with my own eyes.

There some pretty damning videos and pictures of the Apollo stuff - such as guys in the moon falling over and magically being pulled upright.


My advice is to keep an open mind and question anything you see on TV or anything claimed by the government.

The first order of business for all military and government personnel is the BRAINWASH THEM with the current party line.

It is very difficult IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE for some gov. employees to EVER deprogram themselves once they are out.

Combine that with millions of dollars in secret payoffs and legal immunity plus a threat that "if you talk, we'll give your wife and kids cancer" and you see how a hoax COULD persist forever.

same deal with 9/11 :P

Look dooshTard, the conspiracy states that Nixon hoaxed up the Moon walk film using Kubricks set to ensure that they had film of astronauts walking around.

Now numbskulls say we didn't even go because we didn't have the technology to make black trannies good enough to go to the Moon back then before iphones to watch honey boo beiber.

But you guys already knew this...on to the next one!

Oh shit here comes the Judy WoodTards

The shills are out but the truth will win. Kubrick directed the landing between 1964 and 1966 while using 2001 A Space Odyssey as a cover. See Kubrick's Odyssey.

The film was then edited and readied for the fake event. Nixon had nothing to do with it and might have even thought it was all real.

Not all the effects were front screen projection. Huge sets were built with large photographs in the background so they could move cameras on the lunar rover.

In the end it was all faked.

you are a

Yes they faked the moon landing, but have been going to the moon ever since 40+ years..

Now can anyone tell me what they are doing up there :) ?

watching us.

that's your response? I am sorry that you do not understand how film works.

That's my view also !

Yes and preparing.

It's interesting how the posters who don't think the moon landings were real all sound very intelligent and knowledgeable and literate enough to write in complete sentences, whereas the moon landing supporters sound, well.... retarded and quite illiterate. I wonder why this would be....are their responses being written by some poorly executed computer program? They certainly don't give me much confidence in the state of "science" these days.

Thank you for making us all look like dipshits. Buzz was right. YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT.

Excellent, excellent points, especially about the motivation of current or former govt employees involved in these scams. If they continue to play ball, they get all kinds of jobs and money and perks. If they DON'T play ball, or become "difficult" they could have their careers and lives destroyed, even be murdered, possibly along with their families, just as you say. Lot of dead whistle blowers out there. Not much motivation to tell the truth from the inside.

Some clown named Liar liar pants on fire is commenting about others? Puhleeeze.

Just admit that you are a MoonTard that even Richard C Hoaxland laughs at. Even a guy like him couldn't latch on to that idiocy and make a dime on it.

I take it then that Buzz "knows shit". I don't doubt that.

450,000 people worked on a project to go to the Moon but they all faked it and they all kept quite about it, mmmmm k

...an interesting angle you rarely hear mentioned from "either" side.

It reflects the generation and education level of most paid shills these days.

Prove it.

Seriously...you all sound like mouth-breathing, drooling, brass plated idiots. You really do. I presume your agenda is just plain ridicule as you have...no actual arguments to support your position other than....saying that the whores and bullies of the government media complex say so and how could we question the perceived reality of the 1960s... I'm sure you also believe that Oswald killed Kennedy, now dontcha?. Really, when you have to cite someone as pathetic as Richard Hoagland to support your cause, you really don't have much ammo in your BB gun. Try again.

ya think them mirrors would reflect bright spots back to earth when the shine shines on the moon