Obama - Dreams of my "REAL" Father | |
Daniel's Seventieth Seven User ID: 8807706 United States 06/24/2012 09:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This bull... breathtaking news is around for years. Let me summarize all we "know" about Obama by now: - his fathers are Marshall Davis, Malcolm X, and his own grandfather; - regardless to above he’s NOT a natural born citizen; - regardless to above his highly pregnant mother went to some remote African village to give him a birth; - he is a communist, radical Muslim and homosexual at the same time; - is actually Osama bin Laden who actually died in ‘01; I can't see any contradictions at all!!!! Carry on perusing "the TRUTH", neo-cons! The reason one has to PURSUE the truth is because obama has hidden his background and forbade certain normally innocuous records to be released. He's only the (faux) POTUS - So why should we, Americans, have to know about his foreign background? Right? If only we knew the truth to carry on "perusing" it. That would be a good thing. Carry on! But will you pursue "the truth" and apply the same scrutiny for all presidential candidates? Why wouldn't we? ? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17433381 United States 06/24/2012 09:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Kenyan dad problem pinned here about 4 or 5 days ago: Thread: Obama is not yet the Democratic nominee for president |
CE1
***** User ID: 18513225 United States 06/24/2012 09:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18518601 United States 06/24/2012 09:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17433381 United States 06/24/2012 09:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is really just trying to stifle the need to have the natural born citizen clause. They are basically trying to say: "What does it matter who the dad is, beause look: dads can easily turn their children into bastards." All it is doing is influencing opinion. This is simply damage control. Nonetheless, the reality for them will set in once it is shown that Obama is not the democratic nominee, as his lawyers have had to concede. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18515681 Slovenia 06/24/2012 09:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18515681 This bull... breathtaking news is around for years. Let me summarize all we "know" about Obama by now: - his fathers are Marshall Davis, Malcolm X, and his own grandfather; - regardless to above he’s NOT a natural born citizen; - regardless to above his highly pregnant mother went to some remote African village to give him a birth; - he is a communist, radical Muslim and homosexual at the same time; - he is actually Osama bin Laden who actually died in ‘01; I can't see any contradictions at all!!!! Carry on pursuing "the TRUTH", neo-cons! The reason one has to PURSUE the truth is because obama has hidden his background and forbade certain normally innocuous records to be released. He's only the (faux) POTUS - So why should we, Americans, have to know about his foreign background? Right? If only we knew the truth to carry on "perusing" it. That would be a good thing. Carry on! But will you pursue "the truth" and apply the same scrutiny for all presidential candidates? Why wouldn't we? C'mon do it! Time is ripe right now, because... ... the credentials of the US president have to be verified before he takes the oath; any member of the Congress can call objections. Once sworn president can be lawfully removed from his office only by the elections or impeachment; read the Article 1 of the US Constitution. FYI, Obama's legibility has been contested on the US courts almost 200 times. Courts granted standing to plaintiffs at least 5 times (Berg v. Obama, Keyes v. Bowen, Hollister v. Soetoro, Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, Allen v. Arizona Democratic Party). Let me cite two recent rulings: Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana [link to www.in.gov] “… Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States [] natural-born citizens…” Allen v. Arizona Democratic Party [link to www.scribd.com] “Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent, and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. See United States v. Wong Kim Ark (addressing U. S. Const. amend. XIV) ; Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana(addressing the precise issue). Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett does not hold otherwise.” * |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18515681 Slovenia 06/24/2012 09:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: truthwillsetyoufreeagain The reason one has to PURSUE the truth is because obama has hidden his background and forbade certain normally innocuous records to be released. He's only the (faux) POTUS - So why should we, Americans, have to know about his foreign background? Right? If only we knew the truth to carry on "perusing" it. That would be a good thing. Carry on! But will you pursue "the truth" and apply the same scrutiny for all presidential candidates? Why wouldn't we? C'mon do it! Time is ripe right now, because... ... the credentials of the US president have to be verified before he takes the oath; any member of the Congress can call objections. Once sworn president can be lawfully removed from his office only by the elections or impeachment; read the Article 1 of the US Constitution. FYI, Obama's eligibility* has been contested on the US courts almost 200 times. Courts granted standing to plaintiffs at least 5 times (Berg v. Obama, Keyes v. Bowen, Hollister v. Soetoro, Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, Allen v. Arizona Democratic Party). Let me cite two recent rulings: Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana [link to www.in.gov] “… Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States [] natural-born citizens…” Allen v. Arizona Democratic Party [link to www.scribd.com] “Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent, and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. See United States v. Wong Kim Ark (addressing U. S. Const. amend. XIV) ; Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana(addressing the precise issue). Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett does not hold otherwise.” * edited |
Chrit
User ID: 15366081 United States 06/24/2012 09:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How can you remember that? Were you there? So Obama and Russia go back a long way. Don’t forget Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 during the soviet war against Afghanistan even though there was a travel ban at the time to Pakistan! Quoting: Chrit There never was any travel ban to Pakistan for US citizens; Pakistan was the key US ally in the mentioned war. 1) There definitely was a travel warning re Paaaaakistan. 2) While we are on the subject, do you have an explanation as to where he got the money to travel for two months at age 19? 1) Do you understand the difference between warning and travel ban??? 2) Since when is having money illegal? When at it, do you have an explanation as to where Romney got the money to travel for few years in France (a way more expensive venue than Pakistan)? What was he doing there during the Vietnam War's draft? * As far as I understand it was a ban. Unless you were Muslim the U.S. would not let you fly out of the country to Pakistan if you did not already have a visa, but you could only get a visa after entering Pakistan at the border or at the airport unless you were on a sponsored trip or official business. Pakistan loved Americans coming in the country; after all we were supplying the war effort. He went to Indonesia first to visit his mother. From there he went to Pakistan, he then went to India to return home. It was not illegal to go but you were not allowed to fly to Pakistan direct and to avoid questions you return through India. This circumventing is still done today; people go to Canada then fly to Cuba often. I'm only human, it's my biggest flaw. We must all realize a sink a chair and a pillow are all luxuries of home and a soldiers helmet takes the place of all three. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18524988 United States 06/24/2012 09:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This bull... breathtaking news is around for years. Let me summarize all we "know" about Obama by now: - his fathers are Marshall Davis, Malcolm X, and his own grandfather; - regardless to above he’s NOT a natural born citizen; - regardless to above his highly pregnant mother went to some remote African village to give him a birth; - he is a communist, radical Muslim and homosexual at the same time; - is actually Osama bin Laden who actually died in ‘01; I can't see any contradictions at all!!!! Carry on perusing "the TRUTH", neo-cons! How does Obama's dick taste? Or do you bend over and spread your cheeks for him? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11391214 United States 06/24/2012 09:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18515681 Carry on! But will you pursue "the truth" and apply the same scrutiny for all presidential candidates? Why wouldn't we? C'mon do it! Time is ripe right now, because... ... the credentials of the US president have to be verified before he takes the oath; any member of the Congress can call objections. Once sworn president can be lawfully removed from his office only by the elections or impeachment; read the Article 1 of the US Constitution. FYI, Obama's eligibility* has been contested on the US courts almost 200 times. Courts granted standing to plaintiffs at least 5 times (Berg v. Obama, Keyes v. Bowen, Hollister v. Soetoro, Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, Allen v. Arizona Democratic Party). Let me cite two recent rulings: Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana [link to www.in.gov] “… Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States [] natural-born citizens…” Allen v. Arizona Democratic Party [link to www.scribd.com] “Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent, and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. See United States v. Wong Kim Ark (addressing U. S. Const. amend. XIV) ; Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana(addressing the precise issue). Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett does not hold otherwise.” * edited |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11391214 United States 06/24/2012 09:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This bull... breathtaking news is around for years. Let me summarize all we "know" about Obama by now: - his fathers are Marshall Davis, Malcolm X, and his own grandfather; - regardless to above he’s NOT a natural born citizen; - regardless to above his highly pregnant mother went to some remote African village to give him a birth; - he is a communist, radical Muslim and homosexual at the same time; - is actually Osama bin Laden who actually died in ‘01; I can't see any contradictions at all!!!! Carry on perusing "the TRUTH", neo-cons! go to bed it is like 3:45 A.M. in slovena. sure you live there. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17433381 United States 06/24/2012 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: truthwillsetyoufreeagain The reason one has to PURSUE the truth is because obama has hidden his background and forbade certain normally innocuous records to be released. He's only the (faux) POTUS - So why should we, Americans, have to know about his foreign background? Right? If only we knew the truth to carry on "perusing" it. That would be a good thing. Carry on! But will you pursue "the truth" and apply the same scrutiny for all presidential candidates? Why wouldn't we? C'mon do it! Time is ripe right now, because... ... the credentials of the US president have to be verified before he takes the oath; any member of the Congress can call objections. Once sworn president can be lawfully removed from his office only by the elections or impeachment; read the Article 1 of the US Constitution. FYI, Obama's legibility has been contested on the US courts almost 200 times. Courts granted standing to plaintiffs at least 5 times (Berg v. Obama, Keyes v. Bowen, Hollister v. Soetoro, Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, Allen v. Arizona Democratic Party). Let me cite two recent rulings: Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana [link to www.in.gov] “… Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States [] natural-born citizens…” Allen v. Arizona Democratic Party [link to www.scribd.com] “Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent, and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. See United States v. Wong Kim Ark (addressing U. S. Const. amend. XIV) ; Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana(addressing the precise issue). Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett does not hold otherwise.” * |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18531531 Netherlands 06/24/2012 09:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18515681 Slovenia 06/24/2012 09:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18515681 How can you remember that? Were you there? ... There never was any travel ban to Pakistan for US citizens; Pakistan was the key US ally in the mentioned war. 1) There definitely was a travel warning re Paaaaakistan. 2) While we are on the subject, do you have an explanation as to where he got the money to travel for two months at age 19? 1) Do you understand the difference between warning and travel ban??? 2) Since when is having money illegal? When at it, do you have an explanation as to where Romney got the money to travel for few years in France (a way more expensive venue than Pakistan)? What was he doing there during the Vietnam War's draft? * As far as I understand it was a ban. Unless you were Muslim the U.S. would not let you fly out of the country to Pakistan if you did not already have a visa, but you could only get a visa after entering Pakistan at the border or at the airport unless you were on a sponsored trip or official business. ... /snip/ Pure, unadulterated bullshit. .... unless you can prove it with a link to the alleged travel ban. Records on travel bans must been kept, right? Do it. Again, Pakistan was the key US ally in the mentioned war. How old are you anyway? * |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18515681 Slovenia 06/24/2012 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This bull... breathtaking news is around for years. Let me summarize all we "know" about Obama by now: - his fathers are Marshall Davis, Malcolm X, and his own grandfather; - regardless to above he’s NOT a natural born citizen; - regardless to above his highly pregnant mother went to some remote African village to give him a birth; - he is a communist, radical Muslim and homosexual at the same time; - is actually Osama bin Laden who actually died in ‘01; I can't see any contradictions at all!!!! Carry on perusing "the TRUTH", neo-cons! go to bed it is like 3:45 A.M. in slovena. sure you live there. Accessing the data mining sites (like ...) without using a proxy equals idiocy. * |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11391214 United States 06/24/2012 09:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This bull... breathtaking news is around for years. Let me summarize all we "know" about Obama by now: - his fathers are Marshall Davis, Malcolm X, and his own grandfather; - regardless to above he’s NOT a natural born citizen; - regardless to above his highly pregnant mother went to some remote African village to give him a birth; - he is a communist, radical Muslim and homosexual at the same time; - is actually Osama bin Laden who actually died in ‘01; I can't see any contradictions at all!!!! Carry on perusing "the TRUTH", neo-cons! go to bed it is like 3:45 A.M. in slovena. sure you live there. Accessing the data mining sites (like ...) without using a proxy equals idiocy. * cool story bro |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18531531 Netherlands 06/24/2012 09:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18515681 Slovenia 06/24/2012 09:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18515681 Carry on! But will you pursue "the truth" and apply the same scrutiny for all presidential candidates? Why wouldn't we? C'mon do it! Time is ripe right now, because... ... the credentials of the US president have to be verified before he takes the oath; any member of the Congress can call objections. Once sworn president can be lawfully removed from his office only by the elections or impeachment; read the Article 1 of the US Constitution. FYI, Obama's legibility has been contested on the US courts almost 200 times. Courts granted standing to plaintiffs at least 5 times (Berg v. Obama, Keyes v. Bowen, Hollister v. Soetoro, Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, Allen v. Arizona Democratic Party). Let me cite two recent rulings: Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana [link to www.in.gov] “… Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States [] natural-born citizens…” Allen v. Arizona Democratic Party [link to www.scribd.com] “Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent, and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. See United States v. Wong Kim Ark (addressing U. S. Const. amend. XIV) ; Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana(addressing the precise issue). Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett does not hold otherwise.” * the ruling was made incorrectly. The United Kingdom was an Empire, and thus it had many foreign subjects. A British "subject" was not the same as British "citizen". Being a British subject certainly has no comparison to what it is to be an American citizen. Suuuuure, all court rulings were false. Birthers, either you follow the law - including the case law (= court rulings) or not. Make up your choice. * |
Eggcellent
Re-Instate Smith-Mundt! User ID: 13043121 United States 06/24/2012 09:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | disinfo. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17433381 Judge Terry Lewis is finding Obama inelligible under the natural born clause (his father is Kenyan), and Obama's lawyers are having to claim he is not the democratic noinee: [link to www.wnd.com] [link to www.youtube.com] Actually, judging from the numerous documents and interviews which I have read, she was WORSE than a whore. A whore has sex for money, to pay bills and survive. Apparently SHE never saw a black Communist dick she didn't like. Or take up any available orifice. If she actually WAS Obama's mother (which is questionable) she probably, honestly, DIDN'T know who his father was. Oh, and about that "American" thing? She was 6 months short of being 19 (the age at which citizenship can be passed) when he was born. So, Obama can't even claim to be "American" from his "mother's" side. And since he waved around that phony photoshopped BC in front of the TV cameras and claimed it was official, then his claimed "father", the Kenyan/BRITISH subject, nullifies any claim on THAT side. So, unless Obama has a sudden "revelation" and admits that Frank Marshall Davis, or Malcolm X (2 among many who are reputed to be his father) is his father, he has no more claim to be American than the Man In The Moon. You know, the Muslims believe that their Mahdi will climb out of a deep, dark well. For all we actually KNOW about Obama, he may as well have climbed out from a well too. "I have come to the conclusion that all news should be treated like 9/11, assume it is a psyop with actors participating in a staged event complete with props, until proven otherwise, in which case assume whatever is being recorded, reported, televised, is distortions/lying by omission/outright lies, until proven otherwise." - Anonymous, 4-13-12 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18515681 Slovenia 06/24/2012 10:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18515681 This bull... breathtaking news is around for years. Let me summarize all we "know" about Obama by now: - his fathers are Marshall Davis, Malcolm X, and his own grandfather; - regardless to above he’s NOT a natural born citizen; - regardless to above his highly pregnant mother went to some remote African village to give him a birth; - he is a communist, radical Muslim and homosexual at the same time; - he is actually Osama bin Laden who actually died in ‘01; I can't see any contradictions at all!!!! Carry on pursuing "the TRUTH", neo-cons! go to bed it is like 3:45 A.M. in slovena. sure you live there. Accessing the data mining sites (like ...) without using a proxy equals idiocy. cool story bro Never mind; in which way my IP location negates my statements and arguments? * |
Aria User ID: 16175271 United States 06/24/2012 10:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Chrit
User ID: 15366081 United States 06/24/2012 10:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: truthwillsetyoufreeagain 1) There definitely was a travel warning re Paaaaakistan. 2) While we are on the subject, do you have an explanation as to where he got the money to travel for two months at age 19? 1) Do you understand the difference between warning and travel ban??? 2) Since when is having money illegal? When at it, do you have an explanation as to where Romney got the money to travel for few years in France (a way more expensive venue than Pakistan)? What was he doing there during the Vietnam War's draft? * As far as I understand it was a ban. Unless you were Muslim the U.S. would not let you fly out of the country to Pakistan if you did not already have a visa, but you could only get a visa after entering Pakistan at the border or at the airport unless you were on a sponsored trip or official business. ... /snip/ Pure, unadulterated bullshit. .... unless you can prove it with a link to the alleged travel ban. Records on travel bans must been kept, right? Do it. Again, Pakistan was the key US ally in the mentioned war. How old are you anyway? * Retired. I should not have to give you a link when it is so easy to find after you look past the dem/repub BS links. Snip: Any non-official American who is in Pakistan for more than 30 days must register with the Government's Foreigner Registration Office. Exit permits are required for those who have stayed longer than 30 days before they are allowed to leave the country. All Americans traveling to Pakistan on official business or private employment are required to have a visa before arrival, and as the Government of Pakistan's clearance process is often lengthy, we would urge those coming to apply at the nearest Pakistani Embassy or Consulate as far in advance of their scheduled arrival as possible 50% [link to www.scribd.com] I'm only human, it's my biggest flaw. We must all realize a sink a chair and a pillow are all luxuries of home and a soldiers helmet takes the place of all three. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14962676 United States 06/24/2012 10:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9117667 United States 06/24/2012 10:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Korean campaign ground to a halt and our troops were freezing to death because of the successful strikes by the communist backed unions in Hawaii holding up vital supplies on the docks, including Mr. Davis. And North Korea still is a festering wound today, thanks to them. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14962676 United States 06/24/2012 10:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11391214 United States 06/24/2012 10:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Chrit
User ID: 15366081 United States 06/24/2012 10:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | . Quoting: Borat Sagdiyev Nearly everything in Obama's so-called autobiographies are fucking lies. Nobody knows who the fuck this guy really is ... they know who he is... Remember when Obama was held in Russia for being a British spy. Obama's father was Kenyan and that Kenya was a British colony giving him duel citizenship automatically . [link to www.foxnews.com] A plane carrying two U.S. senators was detained for several hours Sunday while trying to leave Russia, before being permitted to leave the country for Ukraine, according to spokesmen for the lawmakers. Sens. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Barack Obama, D-Ill., who had both been visiting storage sites for weapons of mass destruction, were held at an airport in the Ural Mountain city of Perm for several hours, but were allowed to leave after talks between U.S. and Russian officials. [link to www.examiner.com] On Obama’s own website, called “Fight the Smears”, it’s admitted that he was a British citizen at birth since his father was a British citizen. It is stated: “As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama, Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children. Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.” In addition, British legal experts agree that Obama may well be a British citizen So Obama and Russia go back a long way. Don’t forget Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 during the soviet war against Afghanistan even though there was a travel ban at the time to Pakistan! Here again I stand by my original post people try to cut apart words and distort for obvious reasons. Anytime someone will not post an entire quote you should know something is wrong. Last Edited by Chrit on 06/24/2012 10:10 PM I'm only human, it's my biggest flaw. We must all realize a sink a chair and a pillow are all luxuries of home and a soldiers helmet takes the place of all three. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17433381 United States 06/24/2012 10:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | C'mon do it! Time is ripe right now, because... ... the credentials of the US president have to be verified before he takes the oath; any member of the Congress can call objections. Once sworn president can be lawfully removed from his office only by the elections or impeachment; read the Article 1 of the US Constitution. FYI, Obama's legibility has been contested on the US courts almost 200 times. Courts granted standing to plaintiffs at least 5 times (Berg v. Obama, Keyes v. Bowen, Hollister v. Soetoro, Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, Allen v. Arizona Democratic Party). Let me cite two recent rulings: Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana [link to www.in.gov] “… Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States [] natural-born citizens…” Allen v. Arizona Democratic Party [link to www.scribd.com] “Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent, and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. See United States v. Wong Kim Ark (addressing U. S. Const. amend. XIV) ; Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana(addressing the precise issue). Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett does not hold otherwise.” * the ruling was made incorrectly. The United Kingdom was an Empire, and thus it had many foreign subjects. A British "subject" was not the same as British "citizen". Being a British subject certainly has no comparison to what it is to be an American citizen. Suuuuure, all court rulings were false. Birthers, either you follow the law - including the case law (= court rulings) or not. Make up your choice. * "Klayman told WND that during a hearing last month on discovery issues in the case, Lewis noted that the plaintiff’s brief cited U.S. Supreme Court case Minor v. Happersett from 1875 defining “natural born citizen” as the offspring of two citizens of the nation, while the Obama campaign’s arguments provided no citations. Defining the term is critical. Such a step has not been reached in any of the more than 100 legal cases that have been brought over Obama’s eligibility." [link to www.wnd.com] |
oahf User ID: 18531531 Netherlands 06/24/2012 10:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18515681 Slovenia 06/24/2012 10:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | disinfo. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17433381 Judge Terry Lewis is finding Obama inelligible under the natural born clause (his father is Kenyan), and Obama's lawyers are having to claim he is not the democratic noinee: [link to www.wnd.com] [link to www.youtube.com] Actually, judging from the numerous documents and interviews which I have read, she was WORSE than a whore. A whore has sex for money, to pay bills and survive. Apparently SHE never saw a black Communist dick she didn't like. Or take up any available orifice.... /snip/ Kudos, to your "conservative values"! Arguably, neo-cons are winning on the how-low-can-you-go contest. Smearing someone's deceased mother is the lowest form of existence. You’re the scum of the Earth. * |