What's The Reddish Looking Star Over Orion? | |
Mr Brian Moran
User ID: 1407727 United Kingdom 03/11/2012 10:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ZETA FREAK
User ID: 11273955 United States 03/11/2012 10:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12018334 United States 03/11/2012 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've seen Orion thousands of times. I just noticed last week that over Orion is a Red looking star. Tonight off to the right is another red looking star which I assume is Venus. Anyone else notice this? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12358098 star ship betelgeuse we had a thread running on it a year ago now and people were watching IT MOVE AROUND and flash. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12302553 United States 03/11/2012 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We wouldn't see it anyway, right? Because we're looking at points of light from years ago. I hate light-years. I can't comprehend it or wrap my head around that principle. Let us know if you find out anything OP |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12018334 United States 03/11/2012 10:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to science, Betelgeuse is supposed to explode any day or, any millennium. So, did he go supernova?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12302553 We wouldn't see it anyway, right? Because we're looking at points of light from years ago. I hate light-years. I can't comprehend it or wrap my head around that principle. Let us know if you find out anything OP a star ship is hardly going to explode, see my post above. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9203729 United States 03/11/2012 10:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to science, Betelgeuse is supposed to explode any day or, any millennium. So, did he go supernova?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12302553 We wouldn't see it anyway, right? Because we're looking at points of light from years ago. I hate light-years. I can't comprehend it or wrap my head around that principle. Let us know if you find out anything OP a star ship is hardly going to explode, see my post above. Drugs. They do you. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 12358098 United States 03/11/2012 10:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Mr Brian Moran
User ID: 1407727 United Kingdom 03/11/2012 10:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12302553 United States 03/11/2012 10:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12302553 United States 03/11/2012 10:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to science, Betelgeuse is supposed to explode any day or, any millennium. So, did he go supernova?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12302553 We wouldn't see it anyway, right? Because we're looking at points of light from years ago. I hate light-years. I can't comprehend it or wrap my head around that principle. Let us know if you find out anything OP a star ship is hardly going to explode, see my post above. Hey, I don't doubt anything anymore. I'm almost convinced the Moon is artificial so who knows. I just wrote what science said. Whom...I don't believe either. If science tells us to look left, I instinctively look right! So if they (science) said Betelgeuse will implode, I say, they probably have colonized a few planets around it! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8635700 United States 03/11/2012 10:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11843512 Germany 03/11/2012 10:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1379944 United States 03/11/2012 10:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
xen
User ID: 1344279 Australia 03/11/2012 10:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 12358098 United States 03/11/2012 10:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to science, Betelgeuse is supposed to explode any day or, any millennium. So, did he go supernova?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12302553 We wouldn't see it anyway, right? Because we're looking at points of light from years ago. I hate light-years. I can't comprehend it or wrap my head around that principle. Let us know if you find out anything OP I agree. I remember a Yahoo headline about Betelgeuse going Supernova and we'd see what appeared to be 2 suns for a couple of weeks. But if it is light years away, how would we ever see that until way after it happened? Just a lot of odd coincidences. Ancient monuments, Orion, Red Star, Orion, 2012, etc. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1379944 United States 03/11/2012 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to science, Betelgeuse is supposed to explode any day or, any millennium. So, did he go supernova?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12302553 We wouldn't see it anyway, right? Because we're looking at points of light from years ago. I hate light-years. I can't comprehend it or wrap my head around that principle. Let us know if you find out anything OP if betelgeuse did explode... we wouldn't know about it for a long ass time... since it's 640 light years away... |
FatGoose
User ID: 1326813 United States 03/11/2012 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to science, Betelgeuse is supposed to explode any day or, any millennium. So, did he go supernova?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12302553 We wouldn't see it anyway, right? Because we're looking at points of light from years ago. I hate light-years. I can't comprehend it or wrap my head around that principle. Let us know if you find out anything OP ******** same concept as a delay in sound waves. Have you ever seen something happen and then the sound is delayed slightly? For instance - this is quite common when seeing someone hammer shingles on a roof from a distance. If you're far enough away it will seem that the "bang" of the hammer is happening when the roofer's hammer is on the upswing - rather than when it hits the roof. Another common example is watching someone fire a gun from a distance - the sound is delayed. Another is watching an airplane fly overhead - often it seems that the sound of the plane is "behind" or trailing the plane. This is because sound travels incredibly slow when compared to the speed of light. You see the action (because of the speed of light) and then hear the sound abit later when the slower sound waves finally get to your ear. Now... apply that same concept to light - these stars we observe in the sky are so incredibly far away that it takes years (sometimes thousands or millions of years) for the light to get to us. So what we are observing is something that actually already happened. Remember that light-years are a measure of distance - not time. It's simply the distance that light will travel in one year (an extremely long distance to us). So if we see a star go supernova tomorrow - and that star is 700 light years away from earth, then the supernova actually happened 700 years ago. We're just now seeing it. ************** (edit - corrected to 700) Last Edited by FatGoose on 03/11/2012 10:40 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1379944 United States 03/11/2012 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to science, Betelgeuse is supposed to explode any day or, any millennium. So, did he go supernova?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12302553 We wouldn't see it anyway, right? Because we're looking at points of light from years ago. I hate light-years. I can't comprehend it or wrap my head around that principle. Let us know if you find out anything OP ******** same concept as a delay in sound waves. Have you ever seen something happen and then the sound is delayed slightly? For instance - this is quite common when seeing someone hammer shingles on a roof from a distance. If you're far enough away it will seem that the "bang" of the hammer is happening when the roofer's hammer is on the upswing - rather than when it hits the roof. Another common example is watching someone fire a gun from a distance - the sound is delayed. Another is watching an airplane fly overhead - often it seems that the sound of the plane is "behind" or trailing the plane. This is because sound travels incredibly slow when compared to the speed of light. You see the action (because of the speed of light) and then hear the sound abit later when the slower sound waves finally get to your ear. Now... apply that same concept to light - these stars we observe in the sky are so incredibly far away that it takes years (sometimes thousands or millions of years) for the light to get to us. So what we are observing is something that actually already happened. Remember that light-years are a measure of distance - not time. It's simply the distance that light will travel in one year (an extremely long distance to us). So if we see a star go supernova tomorrow - and that star is 700 light years away from earth, then the supernova actually happened 700 years ago. We're just now seeing it. ************** (edit - corrected to 700) Yea.. I mean... the same deal with our Sun. The light we see is 8 minutes old.... so if our Sun shit itself... it'd be 8 minutes before we saw what was happening. |
FatGoose
User ID: 1326813 United States 03/11/2012 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to science, Betelgeuse is supposed to explode any day or, any millennium. So, did he go supernova?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12302553 We wouldn't see it anyway, right? Because we're looking at points of light from years ago. I hate light-years. I can't comprehend it or wrap my head around that principle. Let us know if you find out anything OP ******** same concept as a delay in sound waves. Have you ever seen something happen and then the sound is delayed slightly? For instance - this is quite common when seeing someone hammer shingles on a roof from a distance. If you're far enough away it will seem that the "bang" of the hammer is happening when the roofer's hammer is on the upswing - rather than when it hits the roof. Another common example is watching someone fire a gun from a distance - the sound is delayed. Another is watching an airplane fly overhead - often it seems that the sound of the plane is "behind" or trailing the plane. This is because sound travels incredibly slow when compared to the speed of light. You see the action (because of the speed of light) and then hear the sound abit later when the slower sound waves finally get to your ear. Now... apply that same concept to light - these stars we observe in the sky are so incredibly far away that it takes years (sometimes thousands or millions of years) for the light to get to us. So what we are observing is something that actually already happened. Remember that light-years are a measure of distance - not time. It's simply the distance that light will travel in one year (an extremely long distance to us). So if we see a star go supernova tomorrow - and that star is 700 light years away from earth, then the supernova actually happened 700 years ago. We're just now seeing it. ************** (edit - corrected to 700) ************** Also interesting is that our own sun is so far away from us that it actually takes apporx. 8 minutes for the light to get to us... So when you see the sun set - it actually happened 8 minutes earlier. :o) ************** |
FatGoose
User ID: 1326813 United States 03/11/2012 10:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to science, Betelgeuse is supposed to explode any day or, any millennium. So, did he go supernova?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12302553 We wouldn't see it anyway, right? Because we're looking at points of light from years ago. I hate light-years. I can't comprehend it or wrap my head around that principle. Let us know if you find out anything OP ******** same concept as a delay in sound waves. Have you ever seen something happen and then the sound is delayed slightly? For instance - this is quite common when seeing someone hammer shingles on a roof from a distance. If you're far enough away it will seem that the "bang" of the hammer is happening when the roofer's hammer is on the upswing - rather than when it hits the roof. Another common example is watching someone fire a gun from a distance - the sound is delayed. Another is watching an airplane fly overhead - often it seems that the sound of the plane is "behind" or trailing the plane. This is because sound travels incredibly slow when compared to the speed of light. You see the action (because of the speed of light) and then hear the sound abit later when the slower sound waves finally get to your ear. Now... apply that same concept to light - these stars we observe in the sky are so incredibly far away that it takes years (sometimes thousands or millions of years) for the light to get to us. So what we are observing is something that actually already happened. Remember that light-years are a measure of distance - not time. It's simply the distance that light will travel in one year (an extremely long distance to us). So if we see a star go supernova tomorrow - and that star is 700 light years away from earth, then the supernova actually happened 700 years ago. We're just now seeing it. ************** (edit - corrected to 700) Yea.. I mean... the same deal with our Sun. The light we see is 8 minutes old.... so if our Sun shit itself... it'd be 8 minutes before we saw what was happening. ************** lol... typing at the same time... you win :-) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1379944 United States 03/11/2012 10:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to science, Betelgeuse is supposed to explode any day or, any millennium. So, did he go supernova?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12302553 We wouldn't see it anyway, right? Because we're looking at points of light from years ago. I hate light-years. I can't comprehend it or wrap my head around that principle. Let us know if you find out anything OP ******** same concept as a delay in sound waves. Have you ever seen something happen and then the sound is delayed slightly? For instance - this is quite common when seeing someone hammer shingles on a roof from a distance. If you're far enough away it will seem that the "bang" of the hammer is happening when the roofer's hammer is on the upswing - rather than when it hits the roof. Another common example is watching someone fire a gun from a distance - the sound is delayed. Another is watching an airplane fly overhead - often it seems that the sound of the plane is "behind" or trailing the plane. This is because sound travels incredibly slow when compared to the speed of light. You see the action (because of the speed of light) and then hear the sound abit later when the slower sound waves finally get to your ear. Now... apply that same concept to light - these stars we observe in the sky are so incredibly far away that it takes years (sometimes thousands or millions of years) for the light to get to us. So what we are observing is something that actually already happened. Remember that light-years are a measure of distance - not time. It's simply the distance that light will travel in one year (an extremely long distance to us). So if we see a star go supernova tomorrow - and that star is 700 light years away from earth, then the supernova actually happened 700 years ago. We're just now seeing it. ************** (edit - corrected to 700) Yea.. I mean... the same deal with our Sun. The light we see is 8 minutes old.... so if our Sun shit itself... it'd be 8 minutes before we saw what was happening. ************** lol... typing at the same time... you win :-) lol |
FatGoose
User ID: 1326813 United States 03/11/2012 10:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to science, Betelgeuse is supposed to explode any day or, any millennium. So, did he go supernova?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12302553 We wouldn't see it anyway, right? Because we're looking at points of light from years ago. I hate light-years. I can't comprehend it or wrap my head around that principle. Let us know if you find out anything OP if betelgeuse did explode... we wouldn't know about it for a long ass time... since it's 640 light years away... ******* Of course it could have gone nova 640 years ago... and then we'd see it any minute. ******* |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1379944 United States 03/11/2012 10:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to science, Betelgeuse is supposed to explode any day or, any millennium. So, did he go supernova?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12302553 We wouldn't see it anyway, right? Because we're looking at points of light from years ago. I hate light-years. I can't comprehend it or wrap my head around that principle. Let us know if you find out anything OP if betelgeuse did explode... we wouldn't know about it for a long ass time... since it's 640 light years away... ******* Of course it could have gone nova 640 years ago... and then we'd see it any minute. ******* true... |